Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-15-2023, 06:57 PM   #13581
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pickle Juice View Post
What would Cgy want in a return from Colorado for Lindholm? I’ve looked at their top prospects and I’m not sure where to begin?

Sandman or anyone for that matter have any insight?
No insight but here's what I would be looking at:

Johansen(cap dump) + Calum Ritchie + Sam Malinski would be my starting point. Maybe another pick on top of that like a 26' 2nd.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to gvitaly For This Useful Post:
Old 12-15-2023, 09:00 PM   #13582
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Honestly there isn't a ton to love from the Avs (Byram off the table obviously).

Any package would start with their 2024 1st. Ritchie would be good too.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-15-2023, 09:13 PM   #13583
Spurs
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Apr 2023
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords View Post
Some of you guys have low doorway headers or something? Stop suggesting Markstrom or Vladar to the Oilers, and get your head checked.
I gladly trade them Vladar, he isn’t any good and it likely means they can’t actually get someone good.

Markstrom I would think longer but really they aren’t s Markstrom away from winning anything so if the price is right sure.

The biggest problem is the Oilers have very little value to trade.
Spurs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2023, 10:06 PM   #13584
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spurs View Post
I gladly trade them Vladar, he isn’t any good and it likely means they can’t actually get someone good.

Markstrom I would think longer but really they aren’t s Markstrom away from winning anything so if the price is right sure.

The biggest problem is the Oilers have very little value to trade.
Markstrom has a NMC. He’d be nuts to waive to go there.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 12-15-2023, 11:19 PM   #13585
Sandman
Franchise Player
 
Sandman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Sandman want Ritchie.
Sandman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sandman For This Useful Post:
Old 12-15-2023, 11:51 PM   #13586
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Honestly there isn't a ton to love from the Avs (Byram off the table obviously).

Any package would start with their 2024 1st. Ritchie would be good too.
Ritchie and a 2024 1st round pick would be a solid return IMO. What should work in the flames favour is there are a lot of teams that are making a push to make the playoffs/go on a run that need a two-way center with a low cap hit. Lindholm is the best one of those players available even though he is not having a great season.

I wish Pittsburgh was doing a little better than they are right now as I think they would be in the market for Lindholm… but they are a ways out of a playoff spot right now. Would love it if they went on a run in the next month or so and Conroy could pry their 2025 first round pick from Dubas in exchange for Lindholm.. Even if it had a top 10 protection on it… that trade would be a potentially big return in the long run as I think they will inevitably be on the downswing in 2025 and 2026… if the penguins picked top 10 in 2025 and it got deferred to 2026, there would be no protection on it and I think the penguins could be really bad by then and it could be a potential lottery pick.

Would be willing to take back some bad contracts too if it could also bring back Yager in the trade… but I highly doubt Pittsburgh would trade him. He’s the highest draft pick they have made in a long time and his asset value will likely rise even higher after the world juniors are over (as will most players on team Canada).

To Pittsburgh:
Lindholm (50% retained)

To Calgary:
2025 1st round pick (top ten protected)
Brayden Yager
Rickard Rackell (salary dump - he’s signed at $5 million AAV till 2028).

Who says no? That Rackell contract is a bad one so I figure taking it on is worth a lot. The pens would end up gaining almost $3 million in cap space this year if they wanted to make another move. Pittsburgh is all in no matter what it seems… so I figure they might as well give Crosby/Malkin/Letang their best shot. Yager likely won’t be an impact player for them while they are still around so might as well use him to make them better right now. I’ve been so far off though in any trade estimate this year so I really don’t know.

Last edited by stemit14; 12-16-2023 at 12:14 AM.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 12:00 AM   #13587
AFireInside
First Line Centre
 
AFireInside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
Ritchie and a 2024 1st round pick would be a solid return IMO. What should work in the flames favour is there are a lot of teams that are making a push to make the playoffs/go on a run that need a two-way center with a low cap hit. Lindholm is the best one of those players available even though he is not having a great season.

I wish Pittsburgh was doing a little better than they are right now as I think they would be in the market for Lindholm… but they are a ways out of a playoff spot right now. Would love it if they went on a run in the next month or so and Conroy could pry their 2025 first round pick from Dubas in exchange for Lindholm.. Even if it had a top 10 protection on it… that trade would be a potentially big return in the long run as I think they will inevitably be on the downswing in 2025 and 2026… if the penguins picked top 10 in 2025 and it got deferred to 2026, there would be no protection on it and I think the penguins could be really bad by then and it could be a potential lottery pick.

Would be willing to take back some bad contracts too if it could also bring back Yager in the trade… but I highly doubt Pittsburgh would trade him. He’s the highest draft pick they have made in a long time and his asset value will likely rise even higher after the world juniors are over (as will most players on team Canada).

To Pittsburgh:
Lindholm (50% retained)

To Calgary:
2025 1st round pick (top ten protected)
Brayden Yager
Rickard Rackell (salary dump - he’s signed at $5 million AAV till 2028).

Who says no? That Rackell contract is a bad one so I figure taking it on is worth a lot. The pens would end up gaining almost $3 million in cap space this year if they wanted to make another move. Pittsburgh is all in no matter what it seems… so I figure they might well give Crosby/Malkin/Letang their best shot. Yager likely won’t be an impact player for them while they are still around so might as well use him to make them better right now. I’ve been so far off though in any trade estimate this year so I really don’t know.
This seems like a bad deal for the Flames no?
AFireInside is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AFireInside For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2023, 12:12 AM   #13588
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AFireInside View Post
This seems like a bad deal for the Flames no?
Maybe. I thought we would get much more for Toffoli (though that one is looking good lately) and Zadorov so my predictions are not that great. In this trade, the flames are getting basically all the Penguins have left in terms of top picks and top prospects in exchange for 4 months of Lindholm. Yager just went 14th overall in a very deep draft… and that 2025/2026 pick could be a very good pick if the penguins continue their decline.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stemit14 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2023, 12:21 AM   #13589
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

People keep adding a camp dump as a must in a Lindholm trade but if the Flames retain 50% the other team really doesn't need to, especially the closer we get to the trade deadline
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2023, 12:34 AM   #13590
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
People keep adding a camp dump as a must in a Lindholm trade but if the Flames retain 50% the other team really doesn't need to, especially the closer we get to the trade deadline
Yeah. For me, I add a cap dump to increase the return even more… which probably makes the trade more unlikely to happen. I just don’t think Lindholm at 50% retention gets you a first round pick + an A-level prospect (like Yager). But throwing in a salary dump of a bad contract like Rackell and it makes it more likely for the flames to get a high-end prospect along with a first round pick.

My goal is to try and make the return as high as possible in terms of 1st round picks and A-level prospects… rather than a single first round pick + B-level prospect.

Like I said… my trade projections are always way off so you’re probably right… the flames would probably be very reluctant to take on a contract like Rackell’s and the Penguins would be very reluctant to trade Yager so any trade with Pittsburgh would likely be a lot smaller… probably limited to the first round pick as being the most impressive asset in the return.
stemit14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to stemit14 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2023, 01:52 AM   #13591
SemicolonD
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
Ritchie and a 2024 1st round pick would be a solid return IMO. What should work in the flames favour is there are a lot of teams that are making a push to make the playoffs/go on a run that need a two-way center with a low cap hit. Lindholm is the best one of those players available even though he is not having a great season.

I wish Pittsburgh was doing a little better than they are right now as I think they would be in the market for Lindholm… but they are a ways out of a playoff spot right now. Would love it if they went on a run in the next month or so and Conroy could pry their 2025 first round pick from Dubas in exchange for Lindholm.. Even if it had a top 10 protection on it… that trade would be a potentially big return in the long run as I think they will inevitably be on the downswing in 2025 and 2026… if the penguins picked top 10 in 2025 and it got deferred to 2026, there would be no protection on it and I think the penguins could be really bad by then and it could be a potential lottery pick.

Would be willing to take back some bad contracts too if it could also bring back Yager in the trade… but I highly doubt Pittsburgh would trade him. He’s the highest draft pick they have made in a long time and his asset value will likely rise even higher after the world juniors are over (as will most players on team Canada).

To Pittsburgh:
Lindholm (50% retained)

To Calgary:
2025 1st round pick (top ten protected)
Brayden Yager
Rickard Rackell (salary dump - he’s signed at $5 million AAV till 2028).

Who says no? That Rackell contract is a bad one so I figure taking it on is worth a lot. The pens would end up gaining almost $3 million in cap space this year if they wanted to make another move. Pittsburgh is all in no matter what it seems… so I figure they might as well give Crosby/Malkin/Letang their best shot. Yager likely won’t be an impact player for them while they are still around so might as well use him to make them better right now. I’ve been so far off though in any trade estimate this year so I really don’t know.
Ya I don't see the need for cap dumps on a Lindholm deadline deal, and if it happens it should be paid for with additional assets for sure. To be fair I'm not sure how blue chip Yager is but he better be damn good. It should cost more than just a 1st to dump Rackell's contract.
SemicolonD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 06:24 AM   #13592
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AFireInside View Post
This seems like a bad deal for the Flames no?
No, this would be a great deal. A first and a top prospect.
The Cobra is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 06:26 AM   #13593
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SemicolonD View Post
Ya I don't see the need for cap dumps on a Lindholm deadline deal, and if it happens it should be paid for with additional assets for sure. To be fair I'm not sure how blue chip Yager is but he better be damn good. It should cost more than just a 1st to dump Rackell's contract.
Yeager is considered an A level prospect. He’d be the flames #1 prospect.

I doubt the Penguins move him.
The Cobra is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2023, 07:16 AM   #13594
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AFireInside View Post
This seems like a bad deal for the Flames no?
That’s an awesome deal for the flames. 2 first for a 50pts UFA wanting 9M
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 07:38 AM   #13595
The Original FFIV
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Markstrom has a NMC. He’d be nuts to waive to go there.
Iirc it was down to Edm and when he was ufa. And that’s when we had Johnny and Chuckie. I think he’d waive in a heartbeat given the changes the team has undergone since then.
The Original FFIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 07:40 AM   #13596
Ped
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

The Pens are in win-now mode as long as Crosby plays, and they have a history of trading prospects and picks to go all in.
Ped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 08:12 AM   #13597
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ped View Post
The Pens are in win-now mode as long as Crosby plays, and they have a history of trading prospects and picks to go all in.
They traded their 2024 1st for Karlsson
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 08:21 AM   #13598
Ped
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja View Post
They traded their 2024 1st for Karlsson

They did, although it is top-10 protected.
Ped is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-16-2023, 08:43 AM   #13599
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
People keep adding a camp dump as a must in a Lindholm trade but if the Flames retain 50% the other team really doesn't need to, especially the closer we get to the trade deadline
Yeah, his salary right now is super atttactive for a contender. With retention at the TDL he’s almost free. He just has to start playing better to up his value.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 12-16-2023, 08:53 AM   #13600
Monahammer
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

I'd want Yager and Pickering from the pens in a deal and that's probably too much for them.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Monahammer For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:48 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy