Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-17-2023, 03:26 PM   #10941
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Selling high is fine, I just think that COL proposal isn't reflective of the Flames selling high on Kadri.

That's what you'd expect it to look like if they were dealing Kadri while he was still struggling.

I think futures need to be tacked on if we're eating two of their disposable contracts in return.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TrentCrimmIndependent For This Useful Post:
Old 11-17-2023, 04:43 PM   #10942
Classic_Sniper
#1 Goaltender
 
Classic_Sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shutout View Post
Everything is based on right now?

Two weeks ago people were thinking Kadri was untradeable unless multiple picks went with him and pitchforks were out to find a solution to dump him.

Now after a few good games he is an essential savior for the youth movement and we need to keep him.

For how long? Until this hot streak stops and his desire is questioned?


Also have to wonder if the report that he might not want to stay for a rebuild was from his agent and has a high degree of truth and that the Flames may need to look for ways to trade him.
Is it just a streak though? Outside of a few weeks to end last season and a handful of games this season, I feel like Kadri has played up to expectations.

I didn't think he was ever going to be a ppg center here, but I did expect a play driving second line center with edge and I feel like that's exactly what we're getting. He earned that All Star nod last season with his great first half too.

I'm as critical as anyone on Brad Treliving, but Kadri was not a bad target. Trading the 1st to move Monahan's contract without a doubt sucks, but Kadri's been more good then bad and I think GMs would be happy to add him to their team with some retention. If the Flames can nab a 1st back + some extra pieces, the acquisition could be relatively salvageable.
Classic_Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2023, 05:06 PM   #10943
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMike View Post
If we have to give Markstrom to someone, let it be to make the division tougher on Edmonton and Vancouver.
Markstrom to the Kings? Oilers say “bring it on”.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2023, 05:13 PM   #10944
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Hell no, Kadri was a terrible gamble by the wizard
One last all in move on a bad hand before he jumped ship

Dude is a bad fit on a rebuilding team. He is 33 and still have contract for 5 more years?
On top of that we gave up a good pick
There is nothing good about Kadri moving forward.
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flamesfan05 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-17-2023, 05:40 PM   #10945
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 868904 View Post
Markstrom to the Kings? Oilers say “bring it on”.
Oilers are more like Bring it on 2.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CalgaryFan1988 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-17-2023, 05:40 PM   #10946
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

I dunno, he seems to be bringing the kids along very nicely for us.

Just because we're bitter about the 1st with Monahan doesn't mean we should discount the current positives he's bringing..

I feel fine about Kadri for the next 2 years, maybe 3. Beyond that? Yeah it doesn't look good. If he can't keep up his cap hit will be a hindrance.

But it may not matter since he doesn't want to be part of an official rebuild/retool.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to TrentCrimmIndependent For This Useful Post:
Old 11-17-2023, 05:45 PM   #10947
memphusk
Franchise Player
 
memphusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Current positives is what, 5 or 6 games? What happens when #### goes south again?
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
memphusk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2023, 05:47 PM   #10948
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

If a team wants Kadri, and will actually give up value for him, make it happen! Sure he's playing well now, but he won't forever and he won't want to be around for a rebuild.

Trade everyone at this point.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-17-2023, 05:47 PM   #10949
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

As long as he's surrounded with youthful enthusiasm I don't see him sinking back into his apathetic play of late last year/early this year.

He looks like he wants to help keep this team from the teardown he doesn't want to be a part of.

If you can swing a trade that's a positive asset management move, sure do it.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TrentCrimmIndependent For This Useful Post:
Old 11-17-2023, 05:55 PM   #10950
traptor
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Girard would be a decent value piece back.

He's only 25 and has been a top 4 D on a cup winner and consistent contender.
traptor is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to traptor For This Useful Post:
Old 11-17-2023, 05:55 PM   #10951
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

It is pretty crazy how hockey fans are swayed by such small sample sizes. It works both ways. The Kadri signing thread was pinned at the top of the page for how much of a disaster it was less than 3 weeks ago. A nice streak and now we forget he is 33 signed for 5 more years at $7M?

Similar I saw some absolute brutal takes on twitter how Lindholm was worth a 2nd because he was going through a 10 game slump. Obviously he is still worth a 1st+ and 10 down games not erase the last 5 years of top line production.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-17-2023, 05:58 PM   #10952
MrMike
Franchise Player
 
MrMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor View Post
Girard would be a decent value piece back.

He's only 25 and has been a top 4 D on a cup winner and consistent contender.
It’s actually a decent trade if looking to retool/rebuild and get rid of the last years of Kadris contract. It looks like we will be losing 3 key Dmen this year and will need some form of replacement.
MrMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2023, 06:07 PM   #10953
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

I'm starting to wonder whether the Flames might look to eventually dangle Duehr as a potential Barclay Goodrow-like add for a team. Cheap cap hit, UFA after next year, and doesn't seem to have a place under Huska. Regular healthy scratch and barely playing when he's in.

He'll be 26 this month and he isn't a long-term piece. Definitely isn't as established as Goodrow was but I could see him having a bit of value. (I'm not convinced he's an NHLer, but I'm sure he has his defenders around the league).
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2023, 06:27 PM   #10954
Harry Lime
Franchise Player
 
Harry Lime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Exp:
Default

It will be interesting to see what the fallout from trading the pending ufas is going to be. I could see the result being a surplus of forwards, and having to move someone like duehr or even mangiapane to make room.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
Harry Lime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2023, 06:38 PM   #10955
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
Hell no, Kadri was a terrible gamble by the wizard
One last all in move on a bad hand before he jumped ship

Dude is a bad fit on a rebuilding team. He is 33 and still have contract for 5 more years?
On top of that we gave up a good pick
There is nothing good about Kadri moving forward.
What does the pick have to do with anything now?
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2023, 06:45 PM   #10956
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMike View Post
It’s actually a decent trade if looking to retool/rebuild and get rid of the last years of Kadris contract. It looks like we will be losing 3 key Dmen this year and will need some form of replacement.
I’d do that swap in a second.
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2023, 06:53 PM   #10957
howard_the_duck
#1 Goaltender
 
howard_the_duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TrentCrimmIndependent View Post
Selling high is fine, I just think that COL proposal isn't reflective of the Flames selling high on Kadri.

That's what you'd expect it to look like if they were dealing Kadri while he was still struggling.

I think futures need to be tacked on if we're eating two of their disposable contracts in return.
Getting anything in return that doesn’t require retaining money is selling high.

If there’s a market, you gotta explore it.
howard_the_duck is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to howard_the_duck For This Useful Post:
Old 11-17-2023, 07:16 PM   #10958
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

That proposed deal by Duha makes a ton of sense if the Flames plan a rebuild/retool. They are poised to move Hanifin, Tanev, Zadorov so getting Girard would fill a need for a longer term second pair D. Johansen would be another guy who could have a look with Huberdeau and maybe if they both got some strong offensive minutes they could gel. The commitment to him is short so the Flames will have a chance to flip him next year as a rental.

The best thing for the Flames though would be getting rid of the next 5 years of the Kadri contract. Not being locked into that deal will be helpful when they hopefully have some high end youngsters coming off ELC that need long term big money extensions
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-17-2023, 08:48 PM   #10959
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
That proposed deal by Duha makes a ton of sense if the Flames plan a rebuild/retool. They are poised to move Hanifin, Tanev, Zadorov so getting Girard would fill a need for a longer term second pair D. Johansen would be another guy who could have a look with Huberdeau and maybe if they both got some strong offensive minutes they could gel. The commitment to him is short so the Flames will have a chance to flip him next year as a rental.

The best thing for the Flames though would be getting rid of the next 5 years of the Kadri contract. Not being locked into that deal will be helpful when they hopefully have some high end youngsters coming off ELC that need long term big money extensions
Johansen is a spent force, one good year in the last 4 and it does not look like this year will be any different. That being said I would still probably do the deal given what Kadri will likely be in the final 2-3 years of that deal when hopefully the Flames are starting to compete again.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2023, 09:15 PM   #10960
Badgers Nose
Franchise Player
 
Badgers Nose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor View Post
Girard would be a decent value piece back.

He's only 25 and has been a top 4 D on a cup winner and consistent contender.
He'll basically take Hanifin's spot on the roster on lower term and avg.

He's a downgrade, but if we trade all our UFAs it won't matter much.
Badgers Nose is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:38 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy