Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-02-2023, 01:05 PM   #141
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Oesterle
ha! bingo.
__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
dustygoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2023, 01:06 PM   #142
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David View Post
In that case, absolutely no complaining allowed on the return.
1st + prospect is the baseline for me. Anything more and I'd happy and anything less I'd be disappointed. I am hoping Vancouver overpays for Tanev as well haha
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2023, 01:07 PM   #143
Johnny Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Johnny Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
1st + prospect is the baseline for me. Anything more and I'd happy and anything less I'd be disappointed. I am hoping Vancouver overpays for Tanev as well haha
Lets send him to the Krack to play with his brother.. Better yet, lets trade him for his brother!
__________________
Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
Johnny Makarov is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2023, 01:07 PM   #144
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
I would add Mangiapane to the list, but Weegar and Andersson are the guys you keep. You have to ice a team, and they are the guys you want to be teaching the young additions how to play defense in the NHL.
Those are the only two NHLers you have signed on the backend next year. We are not icing an AHL team or a team entirely made up of waiver pickups.

They are lock solid to be on the team next year.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2023, 01:08 PM   #145
D as in David
Franchise Player
 
D as in David's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Yeah that's not really how this works. If they trade both for a second round pick, I will be disappointed.

I don't think that will be the case though.

If the Flames can't get good value at 50% retained while taking on another $2.5M in salary to make it work for the acquiring team, criticism is deserved.
Because you're risk averse, you're suggesting they should trade when trade values are low but expect to get good value anyway?

"If the Flames can't get good value at 50% retained while taking on another $2.5M in salary to make it work for the acquiring team, c̶r̶i̶t̶i̶c̶i̶s̶m̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶d̶e̶s̶e̶r̶v̶e̶d̶ ..." wait until there is a good value trade to be made.
D as in David is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2023, 01:11 PM   #146
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Classic_Sniper View Post

The only ones more happy to see Hanifin sign for $60M would be Oiler fans because Draisaitl and McDavid would own him for close to another decade.
Are Oiler fans still going to be cheering for McDrai after they bail when their contracts are up?
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2023, 01:17 PM   #147
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post

But man Conroy is going to have some work to do just to ice an NHL calibre back end next year. We think the team is bad right now, Subtract Hanifin, Tanev and Zadorov and yikes. IMO no real NHL ready players in the system, but a couple of intriguing prospects. He will have to overpay a couple of vets on short term deals IMO just to ice a team that doesn't get run over every night.
Yeah, the D depth-chart looks grim in 2024/25

Weegar/Anderson
??? / ???
Solovyov / ???

They’ll have to go to the UFA market for a 2nd pairing guy, and probably a 3rd pairing guy too. Welcome Matthew Dumba and Jani Hakanpaa.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2023, 01:21 PM   #148
Rick M.
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
I wonder which player the flames were/are debating putting on waivers?

I also noticed in that article how Kent Johnson has hired a new agency firm which was the same group that represented both PLD and Seth Jones. Johnson has been scratched twice this year and I wonder if perhaps he is the target for the Flames on a Lindholm swap?


At 8 years over $7.5M per no wonder Noah was leaning towards staying. This start has been a blessing. Management can’t be fooled like they were after Johnny and Chucky left that there was a contending core left. Time to retool.


I even noticed Francis article on last nights game references a looming rebuild which 2 days ago he said they wouldn’t do
Can you link the Francis article?
Rick M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2023, 01:49 PM   #149
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David View Post
Because you're risk averse, you're suggesting they should trade when trade values are low but expect to get good value anyway?

"If the Flames can't get good value at 50% retained while taking on another $2.5M in salary to make it work for the acquiring team, c̶r̶i̶t̶i̶c̶i̶s̶m̶ ̶i̶s̶ ̶d̶e̶s̶e̶r̶v̶e̶d̶ ..." wait until there is a good value trade to be made.
Yes, again, Lindholm and Hanifin are great value on their current contracts, and if the Flames are willing to retain salary (as they should), there is no excuse for a poor return. I won't accept "poor market" as an excuse for the value these players provide on these contracts.

It's not like moving these players is coming out of left field. We aren't rushing out and trading them at this point.

Making excuses for poor returns reminds me of the Feaster days.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2023, 01:50 PM   #150
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

these players are terrible! don't sign them trade them for massive returns or else!
__________________
GFG
dino7c is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2023, 01:52 PM   #151
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
these players are terrible! don't sign them trade them for massive returns or else!
who thinks these players are terrible? Who are you mocking?
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2023, 01:53 PM   #152
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
who thinks these players are terrible? Who are you mocking?
many on CP

Hanifin especially often takes a lot of harsh criticism for his play. Posters have suggested putting him in the pressbox on the 31st place team in the league.
__________________
GFG

Last edited by dino7c; 11-02-2023 at 01:55 PM.
dino7c is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2023, 01:55 PM   #153
Johnny Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Johnny Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
many on CP

Hanifin especially often takes a lot of harsh criticism for his play
Yeah because he sucks no matter how many times Timbit defends him. ZERO offensive upside, butter soft, oh but he eats up minutes!! lol
__________________
Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
Johnny Makarov is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Johnny Makarov For This Useful Post:
Old 11-02-2023, 01:58 PM   #154
BrownDrake
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: May 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss View Post
Would Carey Price + Gallagher for Huby work for Montreal? Huby in Montreal seems right. Isn't that where Tanguay ended up as well?

I don't understand the cap/LTIR implications enough but man does this sound like a good idea.
We gotta suck for at least 2 years so the dead money on Price isnt an issue but probably is an issue for Montreal as they take steps over the next few years.


Interesting, anyone have an actual idea if this is feasible and attractive from Montreals standpoint???
BrownDrake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2023, 02:05 PM   #155
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Montreal is rolling in actual money; it's one of the most profitable teams in the league. Dead money doesn't bother them, as long as they can stash the contracts on LTIR. That's why the Habs were willing to take on Monahan, and could name their terms to do so. They were already planning to use LTIR money, and expected Monahan to end up there too, so from their point of view they were just buying a first-round pick for cash.

In those circumstances, I don't imagine they care all that much about unloading Price.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2023, 02:05 PM   #156
UKflames
Powerplay Quarterback
 
UKflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: England
Exp:
Default

If you are offering a player like Lindholm, who is going to drop onto most teams as a 2c, maybe even a 1a/1b, with 50% retained, you can bet your bottom dollar that teams will find a way to make it work, regardless of where they sit with or without cap space.
UKflames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to UKflames For This Useful Post:
Old 11-02-2023, 02:11 PM   #157
BrownDrake
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: May 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
Montreal is rolling in actual money; it's one of the most profitable teams in the league. Dead money doesn't bother them, as long as they can stash the contracts on LTIR. That's why the Habs were willing to take on Monahan, and could name their terms to do so. They were already planning to use LTIR money, and expected Monahan to end up there too, so from their point of view they were just buying a first-round pick for cash.

In those circumstances, I don't imagine they care all that much about unloading Price.

But don't you have to be cap compliant before the start of the season where you can move that dead money to LTIR. What I am wondering is in future years as they have these younger stars to sign and maybe the Monahans they will not be able to carry so much dead money, easy last few years to do but will create issues later on right?
BrownDrake is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2023, 02:18 PM   #158
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrownDrake View Post
But don't you have to be cap compliant before the start of the season where you can move that dead money to LTIR.
Apparently they have modified that rule and now have a provision for opening-day LTIR. This year, several teams started off with players on LTIR and did not paper any of their players down to the AHL before doing so.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 11-02-2023, 02:20 PM   #159
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick M. View Post
Can you link the Francis article?
https://www.sportsnet.ca/nhl/article...ming-rebuild/?
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 11-02-2023, 02:21 PM   #160
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Makarov View Post
Yeah because he sucks no matter how many times Timbit defends him. ZERO offensive upside, butter soft, oh but he eats up minutes!! lol
proving my point

"but trade him for a massive haul or else!"
__________________
GFG
dino7c is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:30 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy