Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-13-2023, 10:02 AM   #11841
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan View Post
Let it play out!

I think Newsome has some red flags for a lot of Americans because of COVID restrictions in California, but other than that, he's done the closest job to being president as possible: Governing 39 million people in a diverse state with an even more diverse and enormous economy.

Tell me who is more qualified on the current political landscape. I'll listen to any arguments.
Strike against him is he might not be able to win the midwest, which is the key to the election. Whitmer from Michigan is high profile and Buttitieg has run before to name a couple. American politics is playing like Quebec Midwest = Quebec. Need to have it.
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline  
Old 09-13-2023, 10:33 AM   #11842
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

If we had effective term limits and restrictions as to when your last term in congress could start it would make a huge difference. I say that no serving member of congress can start a new term AFTER their 60th birthday. That means for those in the house the maximum age would be 62 and in the senate age 66. Still allows for some career politicians but gets everyone out before cognitive decline really becomes a problem. Also gets the out of touch set into retirement where they belong. What would that impact look like?

In the senate the following would be out on their ears:

Charles E. Grassley (R) IA - 90
Dianne Feinstein (D) CA - 90
Bernie Sanders (I) VT - 82
Mitch McConnell (R) KY - 81
Benjamin L. Cardin (D) MD - 79
Jim Risch (R) ID - 80
Richard J. Durbin (D) IL - 79
Angus King (I) ME - 79
Edward J. Markey (D) MA - 77
Richard Blumenthal (D) CT - 77
Mitt Romney (R) UT - 76
Peter Welch (D) VT - 76
Mazie K. Hirono (D) HI - 75
Joe Manchin III (D, but really R) WV - 76
Jeanne Shaheen (D) NH - 76
Thomas R. Carper (D) DE - 76
Jack Reed (D) RI - 74
Ron Wyden (D) OR - 74
Elizabeth Warren (D) MA - 73
John Boozman (R) RI - 73
Debbie Stabenow (D) MI - 73
Charles E. Schumer (D) NY - 73
Patty Murray (D) WA - 72
Roger Wicker (R) MS - 72
Michael D. Crapo (R) ID - 71
John Kennedy (R) LA - 71
Deb Fischer (R) NE - 71
John Hickenlooper (D) CO - 71
Rick Scott (R) FL - 71
John Cornyn (R) TX - 71
John Barrasso (R) WY - 71
Susan Collins (R) ME - 71
Sherrod Brown (D) OH - 71
Marsha Blackburn (R) TN - 71
Shelley Moore Capito (R) WV - 69
Bob Menendez (D) NJ - 69
Mark Warner (D) VA - 68
Tommy Tuberville (R) AL - 68
Jerry Moran (R) KS - 69
Mike Braun (R) IA - 69
Mike Rounds (R) SD - 69
Cynthia Lummis (R) WY - 69
Lindsey Graham (R) SC - 68
Ron Johnson (R) WI - 68
Sheldon Whitehouse (D) RI - 67
Jeff Merkley (D) OR - 66
Jon Tester (D) MT - 67
Lisa Murkowski (R) AK - 66
Bill Cassidy (R) LA - 65
John Hoeven (R) ND - 66
Jacky Rosen (D) NV - 66
Tina Smith (D) MN - 65
Tim Kaine (D) VA - 65
Maria Cantwell (D) WA - 65
Gary Peters (D) MI - 64
Maggie Hassan (D) NH - 64
Chris Van Hollen (D) MD - 64
Cindy Hyde-Smith (R) MS - 64
Bill Hagerty (R) TN - 64
Thom Tillis (R) NC - 63
Amy Klobuchar (D) MN - 63
Roger Marshall (R) KS - 63
Bob Casey (D) PA - 63
Kevin Cramer (R) ND - 62
John Thune (R) SD - 62

65% of the senate would be sent packing! In the house the unemployed would include 177 of 435 members, or almost 41 percent of representatives. To say this would drain the swamp is the understatement of understatements.
Lanny_McDonald is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 09-13-2023, 10:36 AM   #11843
DownInFlames
Craig McTavish' Merkin
 
DownInFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

I'm guessing that would be unconstitutional. A cognition test would be a good start though.
DownInFlames is offline  
Old 09-13-2023, 10:50 AM   #11844
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DownInFlames View Post
I'm guessing that would be unconstitutional. A cognition test would be a good start though.
A restriction based on age (already in the constitution for serving as president) but a cognitive function test would be okay?
Lanny_McDonald is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
Old 09-13-2023, 10:51 AM   #11845
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Setting the bar at 60 seems extreme. This would be a major problem on both sides of the isle.
The Fonz is offline  
Old 09-13-2023, 10:52 AM   #11846
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

I mean, Sheldon Whitehouse, for example, is a terrific Senator, sharp as anyone I can imagine and has no sign of decline. Even if you up it to 70, same could be said about Sherrod Brown.

I'm all for cognititive tests, but even those must have to have a line. I'd like to see how Boebert does on one.

EDIT: I'm 60. I don't know if I'm at the top of my game, but I'm sure better than I was at 30. And my skill set is different.
GioforPM is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 09-13-2023, 10:56 AM   #11847
nfotiu
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Exp:
Default

How are you going to get all these old politicians to vote for getting rid of old politicians?
nfotiu is offline  
Old 09-13-2023, 11:02 AM   #11848
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz View Post
Setting the bar at 60 seems extreme. This would be a major problem on both sides of the isle.
yeah, 60 is way to young. It's prime time for many academics. I would argue that 80 is more reasonable. I've worked with lots of seniors and 78 is when they start to get a little wonky. By 80 they are normally in their own little world.
TheIronMaiden is offline  
Old 09-13-2023, 11:04 AM   #11849
GirlySports
NOT breaking news
 
GirlySports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Retire when you hit 75, like the Canadian Senate
__________________
Watching the Oilers defend is like watching fire engines frantically rushing to the wrong fire

GirlySports is offline  
Old 09-13-2023, 11:07 AM   #11850
DownInFlames
Craig McTavish' Merkin
 
DownInFlames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
A restriction based on age (already in the constitution for serving as president) but a cognitive function test would be okay?
Yes. There is no top-ended age limit but there is the 25th amendment to remove a president.

I'm also on the side of those saying 60 is too young.
DownInFlames is offline  
Old 09-13-2023, 11:10 AM   #11851
The Fonz
Our Jessica Fletcher
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden View Post
yeah, 60 is way to young. It's prime time for many academics. I would argue that 80 is more reasonable. I've worked with lots of seniors and 78 is when they start to get a little wonky. By 80 they are normally in their own little world.
Agreed, mostly. Heck Obama is already 62.

If the wonky period for most seniors is 78-80 years old though, I don't think you'd want to let them run up until they're 80. Cutting them off once they're 75 would ensure the oldest members would be retiring at 78.
The Fonz is offline  
Old 09-13-2023, 11:11 AM   #11852
MissTeeks
Franchise Player
 
MissTeeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
I mean, Sheldon Whitehouse, for example, is a terrific Senator, sharp as anyone I can imagine and has no sign of decline. Even if you up it to 70, same could be said about Sherrod Brown.

I'm all for cognititive tests, but even those must have to have a line. I'd like to see how Boebert does on one.

EDIT: I'm 60. I don't know if I'm at the top of my game, but I'm sure better than I was at 30. And my skill set is different.

I’m guessing not well?

https://twitter.com/user/status/1701729919493960078

Classy.
__________________
The Quest stands upon the edge of a knife. Stray but a little, and it will fail, to the ruin of all. Yet hope remains while the Company is true. Go Flames Go!

Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.
MissTeeks is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MissTeeks For This Useful Post:
Old 09-13-2023, 11:11 AM   #11853
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu View Post
How are you going to get all these old politicians to vote for getting rid of old politicians?
Setup a Bingo tournament in another room at the time of the vote.
Fuzz is offline  
Old 09-13-2023, 11:49 AM   #11854
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fonz View Post
Setting the bar at 60 seems extreme. This would be a major problem on both sides of the isle.
Sure, but there are currently 90 year olds. That's ridiculous, imo.
bizaro86 is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bizaro86 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-13-2023, 11:54 AM   #11855
Cube Inmate
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Boxed-in
Exp:
Default

Seeing that list of aged senators is an eye opener. I knew it was an old folks home, but scrolling past the actual list makes it more real.

Age limits may be a hard sell in the face of anti-discrimination trends...but term limits alone would weed out the vast majority of the 70+.
Cube Inmate is offline  
Old 09-13-2023, 11:59 AM   #11856
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

The line for starting a new term in congress was put at 60 because of longitudinal studies in cognitive decline. The great drop off begins at 60 and accelerates at 70. So the intent is to get representatives out of office sometime during this period of moderate decline and before the rapid decline begins. Those in the house could possibly serve until 62. Those in the senate until 66. For such an important function it is best that we have representatives that both highly functioning but also in touch with the realities that the average Americans are facing. As someone in the range in question I see it as fair and equitable. There are other ways to serve your community than being in congress and the people who really care about service should be able to provide service elsewhere.
Lanny_McDonald is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
GGG
Old 09-13-2023, 12:09 PM   #11857
MissTeeks
Franchise Player
 
MissTeeks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Romney not seeking a second senate term.

https://twitter.com/user/status/1702014991535120395
__________________
The Quest stands upon the edge of a knife. Stray but a little, and it will fail, to the ruin of all. Yet hope remains while the Company is true. Go Flames Go!

Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory... lasts forever.
MissTeeks is offline  
Old 09-13-2023, 01:06 PM   #11858
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

An age limit is better than term limits.. the shorter the term limits the more powerful lobbyists and non-elected people the elected officials become as they get depended on more since they're the ones who understand how things work.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to photon For This Useful Post:
Old 09-13-2023, 01:35 PM   #11859
SutterBrother
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2021
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu View Post
How are you going to get all these old politicians to vote for getting rid of old politicians?
Is the answer Covid 2.0?
SutterBrother is offline  
Old 09-13-2023, 01:41 PM   #11860
ResAlien
Lifetime In Suspension
 
ResAlien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Curious since this is apparently only an American problem: does any country that elects officials to public office have an upper age limit?
ResAlien is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:29 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy