08-22-2023, 05:07 PM
|
#61
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Macho0978
You can also make a case than Coleman was better than Mangiapane last year for about $900k less. Mangiapane was an RFA too.
Lucic, Magiapane, Kadri, Vladar and Markstrom all had worse season and are probably more over paid than Coleman is.
I don't like expensive 3rd liners either, but Backlund and Coleman weren't the problem and are only slightly overpaid for 3rd liners. They probably were considered one of the best 3rd line combos in the league too.
|
Man, this really shows how bad the team's cap structure is and how they need to stop handing out retirement contracts to everyone. It's a bad contract but not even among the worst on the team.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Redrum For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-22-2023, 06:07 PM
|
#62
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Here is a really great article from 2022 explaining that in Huby's best season, the following happened:
https://theathletic.com/3174467/2022...consideration/
1) Huberdeau did not drive play
2) Huberdeau was not good at winning puck battles and board battles
3) Huberdeau was bad a defensive recoveries
4) Huberdeau was bad at retrieving pucks in offensive zone
5) Huberdeau was often the first man out and last man in
Summary of article:
"Without Barkov ahead of him in the lineup eating crucial tough minutes, it’s difficult to imagine Huberdeau having a similarly strong offensive season. He’s at his best when playing defense isn’t a high priority, a luxury he’s afforded on the second line. Combine that with his style of play — one where he does cheat for offense — and his totals start looking a little inflated."
"The Panthers get a lot more good than bad out of Huberdeau’s affinity for a rush-based game, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t come with some drawbacks.
Combine that with Huberdeau’s below-average defensive game in general and there are real issues here worth discussing that do lower his total value. For all the offensive vision he has, he doesn’t always make the right defensive reads. He either looks out of place while attempting to defend, is straight up out of position defending no one, or he overcommits and ends up behind the play."
Pretty obvious why he didn't mesh with Sutter. Huby is not capable of playing the 200ft game. Super excited to watch this guy for the next 8 years. It sounds like a winner style for the playoffs /sarcasm
Sure sounds like when it came to playoff hockey, Panthers did some addition by subtraction.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GullFoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-22-2023, 06:20 PM
|
#63
|
Franchise Player
|
Playing "behind" Barkov...scoring 27 more points and playing a lot with him out of the lineup
Pathers also had other worldly goaltending or they would have been done in the playoffs in 5 games...the second it came back to earth they were absolutely pounded
__________________
GFG
Last edited by dino7c; 08-22-2023 at 06:33 PM.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-22-2023, 07:13 PM
|
#64
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
|
I think there's a happy medium in there somewhere- Huby showed last season that he can play sound defensive hockey. If he can combine a little of that with a point-per-game or more, we're laughing. If everyone pulls the same direction, we don't necessarily need him to score 115 points.
|
|
|
08-22-2023, 07:17 PM
|
#65
|
Franchise Player
|
Honestly I would prefer he plays no D and puts up 115 points
Flames always have this obsession with trying to make players who suck at D play a better defensive game . Lean into your players strengths . We have plenty of guys who can play defensive hockey in the forwards ranks
|
|
|
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to Jason14h For This Useful Post:
|
blankall,
ComixZone,
Enoch Root,
Flames_F.T.W,
FormerPresJamesTaylor,
gvitaly,
jayswin,
Jiri Hrdina,
Lanny_McDonald,
logan_izer10,
Scroopy Noopers,
The Hendog
|
08-22-2023, 07:32 PM
|
#66
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h
Honestly I would prefer he plays no D and puts up 115 points
Flames always have this obsession with trying to make players who suck at D play a better defensive game . Lean into your players strengths . We have plenty of guys who can play defensive hockey in the forwards ranks
|
I prefer he plays within a team system and we win games. We won't be playing the kind of pond hockey that Florida was playing when he put up those numbers.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Sandman For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-22-2023, 07:43 PM
|
#67
|
Scoring Winger
|
This thread sucks. Negativity is brutal.
|
|
|
08-22-2023, 08:18 PM
|
#68
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman
I prefer he plays within a team system and we win games. We won't be playing the kind of pond hockey that Florida was playing when he put up those numbers.
|
He played a team game and we didn’t win games and he was useless
So the plan is try more of the same ?
|
|
|
08-22-2023, 08:21 PM
|
#69
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h
He played a team game and we didn’t win games and he was useless
So the plan is try more of the same ?
|
Read my initial "happy medium" post.
|
|
|
08-22-2023, 08:27 PM
|
#70
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman
Read my initial "happy medium" post.
|
But why do you think there is a happy medium ?
He’s never shown he can play D and put up points and he is in his 30s
He has shown he can play elite offence
Maybe we just let our skilled players be skilled and our defensive players be defensive for once instead of always worrying so much about the 100 ft game
It hasn’t worked for this team for the last 20 years
|
|
|
08-22-2023, 08:35 PM
|
#71
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Holland
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h
Honestly I would prefer he plays no D and puts up 115 points
Flames always have this obsession with trying to make players who suck at D play a better defensive game . Lean into your players strengths . We have plenty of guys who can play defensive hockey in the forwards ranks
|
I concur, but there is definitely a line to walk. Flames always just have a habit of pushing that to the extreme. If little Johnny can become a pretty damn good defensive player, albeit for one season, then anyone can do better.
__________________
Crypto/AI Developer.
|
|
|
08-22-2023, 09:00 PM
|
#72
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h
But why do you think there is a happy medium ?
He’s never shown he can play D and put up points and he is in his 30s
He has shown he can play elite offence
Maybe we just let our skilled players be skilled and our defensive players be defensive for once instead of always worrying so much about the 100 ft game
It hasn’t worked for this team for the last 20 years
|
The post was in response to GullFoss' post, and I was making the point that Huby can afford to clean up his game defensively while putting up reasonable numbers. Most top-line players on WINNING teams play some kind of passable defense-it's just a fact in today's game, whether you like it or not.
Sutter wanted to turn Huby into a checker- I'm not talking about that, I want him to be better.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Sandman For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-23-2023, 02:03 AM
|
#73
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sandman
The post was in response to GullFoss' post, and I was making the point that Huby can afford to clean up his game defensively while putting up reasonable numbers. Most top-line players on WINNING teams play some kind of passable defense-it's just a fact in today's game, whether you like it or not.
Sutter wanted to turn Huby into a checker- I'm not talking about that, I want him to be better.
|
I like this version of Huberdeau
__________________

|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Sec214 For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-23-2023, 10:44 AM
|
#74
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss
Here is a really great article from 2022 explaining that in Huby's best season, the following happened:
https://theathletic.com/3174467/2022...consideration/
1) Huberdeau did not drive play
2) Huberdeau was not good at winning puck battles and board battles
3) Huberdeau was bad a defensive recoveries
4) Huberdeau was bad at retrieving pucks in offensive zone
5) Huberdeau was often the first man out and last man in
Summary of article:
"Without Barkov ahead of him in the lineup eating crucial tough minutes, it’s difficult to imagine Huberdeau having a similarly strong offensive season. He’s at his best when playing defense isn’t a high priority, a luxury he’s afforded on the second line. Combine that with his style of play — one where he does cheat for offense — and his totals start looking a little inflated."
"The Panthers get a lot more good than bad out of Huberdeau’s affinity for a rush-based game, but that doesn’t mean it doesn’t come with some drawbacks.
Combine that with Huberdeau’s below-average defensive game in general and there are real issues here worth discussing that do lower his total value. For all the offensive vision he has, he doesn’t always make the right defensive reads. He either looks out of place while attempting to defend, is straight up out of position defending no one, or he overcommits and ends up behind the play."
Pretty obvious why he didn't mesh with Sutter. Huby is not capable of playing the 200ft game. Super excited to watch this guy for the next 8 years. It sounds like a winner style for the playoffs /sarcasm
Sure sounds like when it came to playoff hockey, Panthers did some addition by subtraction.
|
You are fooling yourself if you don't think those criticism's aren't commonly shared by nearly all of the top end offensive wingers in the game. Kucherov, Pastrnak, Ovechkin, Kane, Draisaitl, etc.. all cheat on the defensive side of the puck and receive favorable offensive deployments in order to create offense.
Do you know what the difference is however? They have/had coaches who understood their strengths and weaknesses as players instead of one that diminished their creativity and confidence by attempting to change them into player's they are not.
When you have a player with elite level offensive ability - it is actually a good idea to manage the matchups they receive and to allow them to exchange chances with the more exploitable talent(s) on the opposition side.
The need to always have to look for faults in a players game is ridiculous. That article comes off as a hit piece digging into a players season whom finished second in the league in scoring.. Is it at all necessary?
Huberdeau routinely win his matchups and has not had a negative goal differential at five on five since his second year in the NHL. We paid the man 80+ million dollars for a reason. Let him play his game.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to HighLifeMan For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-24-2023, 09:42 AM
|
#75
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
|
I think that people are too heavily invested in the idea that the coach was the problem.
No doubt Sutter was not the solution, but the problems with the team run deeper than that.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to TheIronMaiden For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-24-2023, 10:05 AM
|
#76
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden
I think that people are too heavily invested in the idea that the coach was the problem.
No doubt Sutter was not the solution, but the problems with the team run deeper than that.
|
Personally, I think it's incredibly accurate. The mental component of sports is just as important as the physical. The stories that have come out only prove what we all thought was wrong. We've all worked for a boss who just absolutely kills the experience and makes life so much harder. You lose all your enthusiasm and love for what you do.
|
|
|
08-24-2023, 11:58 AM
|
#78
|
Ate 100 Treadmills
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h
Honestly I would prefer he plays no D and puts up 115 points
Flames always have this obsession with trying to make players who suck at D play a better defensive game . Lean into your players strengths . We have plenty of guys who can play defensive hockey in the forwards ranks
|
Seriously.
If Huberdeau is excelling at offence, give him 70% O-Zone starts. Let him do his thing and have the multiple Selke vote receiving players on the team play the defensive role. Play players to their strengths instead of trying to put square pegs into round holes. The Flames have two of the top defensive centers in the league on the team. For whatever baffling reason, we also need Huberdeau to be a defensive forward?
We do not need a happy medium. We need players to consistently put up points.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to blankall For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-24-2023, 12:04 PM
|
#79
|
Ate 100 Treadmills
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheIronMaiden
I think that people are too heavily invested in the idea that the coach was the problem.
No doubt Sutter was not the solution, but the problems with the team run deeper than that.
|
Sutter exacerbated all problems on the team. He prevented the team from forming any kind chemistry. He played favorites. He didn't let players play their own game. He was inexplicably hard on young players and guys who didn't fit his outdated ideal of what an NHL player should be.
The other major problem on the team was coming from management, who were consistently giving out retirement contracts to vets. Both Sutter and the management were creating systems that naturally turned players against each other.
The Flames have had fantastic players, who have all been largely team players, with the only major recent exception being James Neal. There's no way to get players to gel, when they are living under draconian and non-sensical coaching and financial systems.
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to blankall For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-24-2023, 02:40 PM
|
#80
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blankall
Sutter exacerbated all problems on the team. He prevented the team from forming any kind chemistry. He played favorites. He didn't let players play their own game. He was inexplicably hard on young players and guys who didn't fit his outdated ideal of what an NHL player should be.
The other major problem on the team was coming from management, who were consistently giving out retirement contracts to vets. Both Sutter and the management were creating systems that naturally turned players against each other.
The Flames have had fantastic players, who have all been largely team players, with the only major recent exception being James Neal. There's no way to get players to gel, when they are living under draconian and non-sensical coaching and financial systems.
|
Well said.
It doesn’t take much bleach to whiten an entire load and thats what sutter did is suck everything unique about every player.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:22 AM.
|
|