Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-08-2023, 11:03 AM   #5981
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

If the flames do trade Lindholm before the season, what teams would still be in on him?

The most obvious one IMO is Boston but most people think their picks and prospects are too underwhelming to get the deal done. And I agree for the most part. However, if the bruins had to make the pick a 2025 or 2026 first round pick, it does not make that a less valuable pick. If anything, I would think those years would see the bruins in the decline and would lead to a better pick for the flames.

Other teams I could see in on Lindholm are Dallas, Minnesota, Carolina, Detroit and possibly Pittsburgh.

Pittsburgh is in real tough in terms of picks/prospects. They would absolutely have to include Yager and, similar to Boston, the first round pick they could offer is not until 2025. But if the flames could somehow get Yager + 2025 first round pick (lottery protected) from Pittsburgh… that would be a good return IMO considering the market.

Dallas has picks and good young players and they seem motivated to make change to get their team to another level. Doubt they would trade Wyatt Johnson but if he was included, it would be a huge win for the flames if he was the centrepiece in the return.

Minnesota definitely needs some help at centre and they could use what Lindholm brings. Rossi + 2024 first round pick would be a great return I think.

Carolina has been rumoured to be in on Lindholm since before the TDL. They have some good prospects but I would just ask for Seth Jarvis 1-for-1. Carolina likely says no though.

I think Detroit is getting desperate to become a playoff team again and they still don’t have much in terms of centres on their team that are ready for a top #1/2 spot. I could see them making a push for Lindholm. They have lots of great prospects in their system to choose from as a centrepiece to a trade for Lindholm.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stemit14 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to stemit14 For This Useful Post:
Old 08-08-2023, 11:11 AM   #5982
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

I'd see if NYR is interested. Chytil is OK but Lindholm would be ideal behind Mika Z. And then they can put Chytil on wing, where he might actually be better.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Old 08-08-2023, 11:13 AM   #5983
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Rangers still haven't signed RFA Laf. Something to mull over
Toonage is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2023, 11:23 AM   #5984
Major Major
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Backlund for Goodrow and a 1st.
Major Major is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Major Major For This Useful Post:
Old 08-08-2023, 11:23 AM   #5985
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
I'd see if NYR is interested. Chytil is OK but Lindholm would be ideal behind Mika Z. And then they can put Chytil on wing, where he might actually be better.

Good point. I could see the rangers being interested as well. Laf + 2024 first round pick would be a solid return IMO.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stemit14 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2023, 11:34 AM   #5986
calf
broke the first rule
 
calf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Major View Post
Backlund for Goodrow and a 1st.
Give him #13
calf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2023, 11:38 AM   #5987
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

The other thing is Chytil is LHS so you could play either guy on draws depending on the side of the ice you’re on, like with Monahan.

One wonders how the Laf negotiations are going and if they just want to trade rights.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2023, 11:41 AM   #5988
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

I'd do Backlund and Tanev at 50% for Goodrow, Lafreniere, and Schneider.

Taking on the Goodrow contract and getting two very young players to retool with would be a great trade to make. Goodrow, Coleman, and Pelletier would be a good third line to roll with.

New York rolling with Panarin - Zib - X, Kreider - Trochek - X, and Chytil - Backlund - X (fill in the X's with Wheeler, Vesey, and Kakko), and you've got some solid depth. Additionally, Miller - Fox, Lindgren - Trouba, and Gustafsson - Tanev would be a solid top 6 D.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2023, 11:48 AM   #5989
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
I'd do Backlund and Tanev at 50% for Goodrow, Lafreniere, and Schneider.

Taking on the Goodrow contract and getting two very young players to retool with would be a great trade to make. Goodrow, Coleman, and Pelletier would be a good third line to roll with.

New York rolling with Panarin - Zib - X, Kreider - Trochek - X, and Chytil - Backlund - X (fill in the X's with Wheeler, Vesey, and Kakko), and you've got some solid depth. Additionally, Miller - Fox, Lindgren - Trouba, and Gustafsson - Tanev would be a solid top 6 D.
Well yeah that’s an amazing deal for Calgary
Doubt New York trades two young guys like that for two pending free agents
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2023, 11:55 AM   #5990
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
If the flames do trade Lindholm before the season, what teams would still be in on him?

The most obvious one IMO is Boston but most people think their picks and prospects are too underwhelming to get the deal done. And I agree for the most part. However, if the bruins had to make the pick a 2025 or 2026 first round pick, it does not make that a less valuable pick. If anything, I would think those years would see the bruins in the decline and would lead to a better pick for the flames.

Other teams I could see in on Lindholm are Dallas, Minnesota, Carolina, Detroit and possibly Pittsburgh.

Pittsburgh is in real tough in terms of picks/prospects. They would absolutely have to include Yager and, similar to Boston, the first round pick they could offer is not until 2025. But if the flames could somehow get Yager + 2025 first round pick (lottery protected) from Pittsburgh… that would be a good return IMO considering the market.

Dallas has picks and good young players and they seem motivated to make change to get their team to another level. Doubt they would trade Wyatt Johnson but if he was included, it would be a huge win for the flames if he was the centrepiece in the return.

Minnesota definitely needs some help at centre and they could use what Lindholm brings. Rossi + 2024 first round pick would be a great return I think.

Carolina has been rumoured to be in on Lindholm since before the TDL. They have some good prospects but I would just ask for Seth Jarvis 1-for-1. Carolina likely says no though.

I think Detroit is getting desperate to become a playoff team again and they still don’t have much in terms of centres on their team that are ready for a top #1/2 spot. I could see them making a push for Lindholm. They have lots of great prospects in their system to choose from as a centrepiece to a trade for Lindholm.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dallas has negative cap space. I'm not sure their way of helping solve that problem that is to trade a great player on his ELC for a more expensive player who will need a huge 8 year extension.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
Old 08-08-2023, 12:04 PM   #5991
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
Well yeah that’s an amazing deal for Calgary
Doubt New York trades two young guys like that for two pending free agents
I think Backlund wanting to win a cup would sign for a lot less the following season, and Schneider behind Fox and Trouba doesn’t make sense at all for him to wait until Trouba regresses to the point that he’s a bottom pairing D. I doubt that happens anytime soon.

The Goodrow contract is not good. But if it got us to stay on the line if we took it on I think they’d consider it. Even if it meant us adding a 2nd/3rd or maybe one of our decent prospects not in the top 5 range.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2023, 12:06 PM   #5992
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stemit14 View Post
If the flames do trade Lindholm before the season, what teams would still be in on him?

The most obvious one IMO is Boston but most people think their picks and prospects are too underwhelming to get the deal done. And I agree for the most part. However, if the bruins had to make the pick a 2025 or 2026 first round pick, it does not make that a less valuable pick. If anything, I would think those years would see the bruins in the decline and would lead to a better pick for the flames.

Other teams I could see in on Lindholm are Dallas, Minnesota, Carolina, Detroit and possibly Pittsburgh.

Pittsburgh is in real tough in terms of picks/prospects. They would absolutely have to include Yager and, similar to Boston, the first round pick they could offer is not until 2025. But if the flames could somehow get Yager + 2025 first round pick (lottery protected) from Pittsburgh… that would be a good return IMO considering the market.

Dallas has picks and good young players and they seem motivated to make change to get their team to another level. Doubt they would trade Wyatt Johnson but if he was included, it would be a huge win for the flames if he was the centrepiece in the return.

Minnesota definitely needs some help at centre and they could use what Lindholm brings. Rossi + 2024 first round pick would be a great return I think.

Carolina has been rumoured to be in on Lindholm since before the TDL. They have some good prospects but I would just ask for Seth Jarvis 1-for-1. Carolina likely says no though.

I think Detroit is getting desperate to become a playoff team again and they still don’t have much in terms of centres on their team that are ready for a top #1/2 spot. I could see them making a push for Lindholm. They have lots of great prospects in their system to choose from as a centrepiece to a trade for Lindholm.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You are absolutely thinking about this the wrong way. You are thinking like the Flames are rebuilding, they are not. If the Flames deal Lindholm they are going to want a top 6 C back or a young player that will develop into one. Yes, with Hanifin they would absolutely trade him for futures because they can plug Kylington into his spot but if they can't sign Lindholm they are going to make a hockey trade with him, not a futures trade.
dissentowner is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 08-08-2023, 12:15 PM   #5993
InternationalVillager
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Exp:
Default

i fully expect the flames to not make any major trades and go into the season with the current roster and see how it plays out.

this hasnt changed since i last posted the same thing.

conroy believe this team can compete and is going to give them a chance under a new coach. the only real significant change is sharangovich in place of toffoli and Sutter's favourites along with Sutter have also been removed from the team.
InternationalVillager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2023, 12:22 PM   #5994
howard_the_duck
#1 Goaltender
 
howard_the_duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
You are absolutely thinking about this the wrong way. You are thinking like the Flames are rebuilding, they are not. If the Flames deal Lindholm they are going to want a top 6 C back or a young player that will develop into one. Yes, with Hanifin they would absolutely trade him for futures because they can plug Kylington into his spot but if they can't sign Lindholm they are going to make a hockey trade with him, not a futures trade.
I sure hope they're not prescribing that for the return. Talk about limiting yourself. No wonder we haven't seen a deal.
howard_the_duck is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to howard_the_duck For This Useful Post:
Old 08-08-2023, 12:33 PM   #5995
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
I think Backlund wanting to win a cup would sign for a lot less the following season, and Schneider behind Fox and Trouba doesn’t make sense at all for him to wait until Trouba regresses to the point that he’s a bottom pairing D. I doubt that happens anytime soon.

The Goodrow contract is not good. But if it got us to stay on the line if we took it on I think they’d consider it. Even if it meant us adding a 2nd/3rd or maybe one of our decent prospects not in the top 5 range.
It is a massive win for Calgary and not a chance the Rangers trade a guy they picked 1st overall 3 years ago and a guy they picked in the first round for 2 pending UFA’s who will be 35 even if they dump a bad deal in the process. I am not sure they make that deal if you change Backlund with Lindholm?
Vinny01 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2023, 12:34 PM   #5996
DionTheDman
First Line Centre
 
DionTheDman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by InternationalVillager View Post
i fully expect the flames to not make any major trades and go into the season with the current roster and see how it plays out.

this hasnt changed since i last posted the same thing.

conroy believe this team can compete and is going to give them a chance under a new coach. the only real significant change is sharangovich in place of toffoli and Sutter's favourites along with Sutter have also been removed from the team.
Which would be fair in different circumstances. We were told that having X number of pending UFAs was an unacceptable situation yet we're still in the same boat.
DionTheDman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2023, 12:38 PM   #5997
Paulie Walnuts
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Sep 2022
Exp:
Default

I don't see any deals being made at this point in the summer either.

Not sure what is happening with Lindholm but I wonder if he wants to get to Calgary and get into the new culture and see what its like before committing long term blindly without a chance to be in this environment.

The offers are probably not great either.

It would be nice to have a group of players we know will be here going forward without their futures in lingo seems like it would be a wasted start to a fresh start.
Paulie Walnuts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2023, 12:53 PM   #5998
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

It’s extremely difficult to make a major deal in this cap environment. Outside of the short window of the draft and the trade deadline, most teams are capped out. That means any significant deal involves interlocking cap management manoeuvres.

Look at the Karlsson deal. The only asset of that trade moved for on-ice value was Karlsson. The other pieces were an extraordinarily complicated exercise in cap management for the three teams involved.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2023, 12:57 PM   #5999
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
It is a massive win for Calgary and not a chance the Rangers trade a guy they picked 1st overall 3 years ago and a guy they picked in the first round for 2 pending UFA’s who will be 35 even if they dump a bad deal in the process. I am not sure they make that deal if you change Backlund with Lindholm?
Perhaps I was shooting for the stars with Schneider and Tanev involved, but Laf is getting buried, and Backlund makes a lot more sense for their window. 1st OA or not he hasn’t lived up to that hype. Either he or Kakko imo are going to be dealt.

As for Lindholm they don’t have the necessary space to hold onto him longer than this year.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-08-2023, 01:01 PM   #6000
InternationalVillager
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DionTheDman View Post
Which would be fair in different circumstances. We were told that having X number of pending UFAs was an unacceptable situation yet we're still in the same boat.
I think Conroy painted himself into a corner and will have to talk that line back a bit which I'm sure he will once September/training camp rolls around. I expect a line of "we're not going to firesale our assets, not going to trade for the sake of trading etc...".

If we are in a playoff position come the deadline, I further do not anticipate any moves to trade away Hanifin, Lindholm.

Backlund (as per my understanding) has earned the goodwill to walk away as he will be 35 next March and will have given 16 years of service to the organization.

I will say though ... if Flames are in a playoff spot and they bounce back....I expect Lindholm to sign long term. The only wildcard is Hanifin at that point.

Last edited by InternationalVillager; 08-08-2023 at 01:03 PM.
InternationalVillager is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy