Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-04-2023, 08:23 AM   #5841
flambers
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ped View Post
I thought Formenton was issued a QO but then they just never signed him.
He is still shown on the reserve list with Senators via CapFriendly, I believe he was issued an QO

Just not signed,
flambers is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to flambers For This Useful Post:
Old 08-04-2023, 08:28 AM   #5842
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

I wonder if in a standard NHL players contract, the involvement in an incident like this is grounds to terminate the contract. I'm going to assume so since it is pretty customary to have non-compliance with 'Applicable Laws' as a satisfactory condition to terminate.

And if the above is correct and Dube is involved, personally I would want the Flames to just terminate and move on. There are thousands of other, more well deserving people, that have played and worked hard their entire lives that can play in the NHL than keeping sexual offenders because they may outpace scoring by a few points.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2023, 08:57 AM   #5843
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
I wonder if in a standard NHL players contract, the involvement in an incident like this is grounds to terminate the contract. I'm going to assume so since it is pretty customary to have non-compliance with 'Applicable Laws' as a satisfactory condition to terminate.

And if the above is correct and Dube is involved, personally I would want the Flames to just terminate and move on. There are thousands of other, more well deserving people, that have played and worked hard their entire lives that can play in the NHL than keeping sexual offenders because they may outpace scoring by a few points.
Depends on the extent of his involvement as to whether termination could occur.

I expect that if he was simply there and didn’t actively participate would still be enough these days. The days of turning a blind eye are largely over.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2023, 09:09 AM   #5844
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Original FFIV View Post
Why not both?
... because they don't have the cap space or the assets to acquire both. Hell I'm not sure they will have the cap space or the assets to acquire just one.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2023, 10:22 AM   #5845
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
Depends on the extent of his involvement as to whether termination could occur.

I expect that if he was simply there and didn’t actively participate would still be enough these days. The days of turning a blind eye are largely over.
....and should be... these are crimes FFS and these are people that are extremely lucky to be in the position they are. If we're going to idolize hockey players in this country than we need to hold them to an extremely high standard for a lot of good reasons.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2023, 10:31 AM   #5846
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Found it interesting that recently Conroy discussed starting contract extension talks with Dube. To me, that sounds like a GM not too concerned with any forthcoming suspension.
Toonage is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
Old 08-04-2023, 10:47 AM   #5847
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
Found it interesting that recently Conroy discussed starting contract extension talks with Dube. To me, that sounds like a GM not too concerned with any forthcoming suspension.
Yeah, that's how I took it as well. I think it's safe to say that although the involved players aren't publicly known, I'm sure all the teams know who was and wasn't involved.

I wouldn't read too much into anyone's individual statement because it makes sense for them to all put out the same statement. If 15 players put out a statement where 10 said they absolutely weren't involved and 5 went with the "cleared of any wrongdoing" statement, it would be pretty easy to pinpoint who was involved.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 08-04-2023, 11:05 AM   #5848
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja View Post
I wonder if Hanifin or Karlsson gets traded first. Leaning towards Karlsson
Looks like I might be right:

https://twitter.com/user/status/1687471784348528641
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2023, 11:19 AM   #5849
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

^ which then likely makes Hanifin the prime D target for anyone else looking for one. I think only a few teams were able to fit in Karlsson, so maybe the trade market gets back on heat.

As for forwards, I think nothing has happened with Lindholm yet because of Scheifele also on the move.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
Old 08-04-2023, 11:31 AM   #5850
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Andy Strickland mentioned that San Jose offered Tarasenko $6mm. What the heck are they doing? Is this a rebuild?

I can't see this Karlsson trade netting much and probably leads to retention.

For the first time ever I'm getting emails from the Sharks advertising luxury boxes for this coming season. Starting to think Sharks can't do a rebuild else season tickets plummet further.
__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
dustygoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2023, 11:34 AM   #5851
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dustygoon View Post
Andy Strickland mentioned that San Jose offered Tarasenko $6mm. What the heck are they doing? Is this a rebuild?

I can't see this Karlsson trade netting much and probably leads to retention.

For the first time ever I'm getting emails from the Sharks advertising luxury boxes for this coming season. Starting to think Sharks can't do a rebuild else season tickets plummet further.

It sounds like Tarasenko had a pretty limited market. I bet it was just just a one year deal where they would be able to retain and flip him at the deadline for a few additional assets.
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2023, 11:34 AM   #5852
memphusk
Franchise Player
 
memphusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

San Jose probably planned on buying assets.
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
memphusk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2023, 11:35 AM   #5853
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dustygoon View Post
Andy Strickland mentioned that San Jose offered Tarasenko $6mm. What the heck are they doing? Is this a rebuild?

I can't see this Karlsson trade netting much and probably leads to retention.

For the first time ever I'm getting emails from the Sharks advertising luxury boxes for this coming season. Starting to think Sharks can't do a rebuild else season tickets plummet further.
They kind of need to though. They finally stocked up on some solid prospects from the most recent draft and need to do that for another 2/3 years while also figuring out who will take Karlsson, Couture, and whoever else they need to get rid of.

Rebuild is the right route, at least for now. You've got LA, Edmonton, Vegas who imo are for-sure playoff starters, and then you've got WC teams with Seattle, Calgary, and Vancouver. Assuming they are worse than Anaheim next season, they are worst i the division. They're going to need to rebuild whether they like it or not.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2023, 11:49 AM   #5854
dustygoon
Franchise Player
 
dustygoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
They kind of need to though. They finally stocked up on some solid prospects from the most recent draft and need to do that for another 2/3 years while also figuring out who will take Karlsson, Couture, and whoever else they need to get rid of.

Rebuild is the right route, at least for now. You've got LA, Edmonton, Vegas who imo are for-sure playoff starters, and then you've got WC teams with Seattle, Calgary, and Vancouver. Assuming they are worse than Anaheim next season, they are worst i the division. They're going to need to rebuild whether they like it or not.
They should rebuild. But I'm starting to think they worry about lost ticket sales. My bet.....they plan on having Will Smith on the team (mistake) and wanted Tarasenko for him to then flip for something at the deadline. Then they advertise the #### out of that. Losing Karlsson is going to hurt more.
__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
dustygoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2023, 11:50 AM   #5855
shutout
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nelson View Post
Who reported that?
Think that it was Duhatchek musing that Lindholm will want to see what the new GM and coach are like for the organization and how the dressing room is this year.
Thoughts are that the Flames want to keep him and the contract dollars won't be hard to agree to its whether or not Lindholm wants to spend 8 more years in Calgary.
Flames want him and will give him that time. Most likely until after Christmas. Sometime in January Lindholm will need to decide or will be traded if he does not want to sign.
Only way it happens before then is if a team offers the Flames a great deal and they go to Lindholm and say you have to decide now.
__________________
'Skank' Marden: I play hockey and I fornicate, 'cause those are the two most fun things to do in cold weather. - Mystery Alaska
shutout is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to shutout For This Useful Post:
Old 08-04-2023, 11:55 AM   #5856
blankall
Ate 100 Treadmills
 
blankall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goriders View Post
Our UFAs sure like to string along the organization. Don’t think they are really gaining much leverage by doing it. Pretty selfish in my mind. If you’ve been here as long as they have you know if you want to stay or not. You can look at the cap situation and figure out whether you’re going to get paid or not.

I’d bet their agents are trying to see what Conroy’s made of. Whether he will panic.
The team was a mess last year. I don't blame Lindholm for wanting to see what it's actually like on the team this year before committing long term.
blankall is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2023, 11:56 AM   #5857
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

That doesn't fly with me. He knows the GM. He knows the coach. I'd prefer if he just came out and said I want to see if we're a winning team. But even then he might just wait it out until the playoffs to see how they do, and the Flames history suggests they'd roll the dice with that.

If he isn't signed come camp, you have to move him.
Toonage is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2023, 12:01 PM   #5858
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage View Post
That doesn't fly with me. He knows the GM. He knows the coach. I'd prefer if he just came out and said I want to see if we're a winning team. But even then he might just wait it out until the playoffs to see how they do, and the Flames history suggests they'd roll the dice with that.

If he isn't signed come camp, you have to move him.
I think originally he was waiting on the Hanifin return (maybe the Backlund decision as well) as he didn't want to sign long term with a team taking a step back.

Market grinds to a standstill and now those decision points are hanging in the balance.

With that he holds the cards ... just don't sign, and it puts it back in the Flames corner.

The Flames with a GM that said he doesn't want to walk players to free agency (and two ex GMs with experience) has to have had that internal discussion ....

1) How long can we sit on this with the player not making a decision?
2) What happens if we go into the season and get into a playoff spot? Can we still move him?

I'm pretty sure one of the two gets moved before camp, the other before the season starts.

Lindholm won't love the Hanifin return from a win now mode, and nothing else will have changed.
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 08-04-2023, 01:07 PM   #5859
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
^ which then likely makes Hanifin the prime D target for anyone else looking for one. I think only a few teams were able to fit in Karlsson, so maybe the trade market gets back on heat. .
Who’s left looking for a #3-4 dman?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2023, 01:13 PM   #5860
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Who’s left looking for a #3-4 dman?
With the right partner Hanifin can play top pairing. But you're right, 2nd pairing is his most natural fit.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:49 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy