Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-27-2023, 09:32 PM   #641
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Ignoring age in that equation.

Sharangovich is 25 with a career high 46 points in 76 games.

Toffoli is 31 with a career high of 73 points in 82 games.

I never try to look at things as just one season but if this trade was made in the 2022 offseason we probably wouldn't have hated it.

Sharangovich was coming off 24 goals and 46 points in 76 games .
Toffoli was coming off 20 goals and 49 points in 74 games.

Over the last three seasons at 5v5:

Toffoli: GP - 208, G-40, P- 84
Sharangovich: GP-205, G-35, P-76


Starting to look a lot closer... and he's 6 years younger.
I'll predict right now that Sharangovich puts up more 5 on 5 points than Toffoli, over the next 3 years (Toffoli will get his PP points, playing with Hughes).
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 09:33 PM   #642
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Guy has played over 200 NHL games...he is already better than a lot of late firsts

Like the ones in the Iginla and Jaybo deals
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2023, 09:34 PM   #643
MrMike
Franchise Player
 
MrMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor View Post
It does make me wonder if management is even allowed to trade guys like toffoli with retained salary for pure futures.

I have a hard time believing no one would give a 1st (2023 or 2024)for toffoli 50% retained.

Conroy got younger and got a a pick but it's still essentially a hockey trade. Maybe it's him retooling within his allowed bounds.

Retaining and trading purely for futures may not even be an option from ownership.
I think they want the cap space for this year to try and sneak into the playoffs.
MrMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 09:36 PM   #644
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

There is no sneaking into the playoffs...it takes 96-100 points

You have to have a good season
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 09:37 PM   #645
KipperFaNaTic
Scoring Winger
 
KipperFaNaTic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
Even if this is a "hockey trade" - we just traded a 73 point player for a 30 point player.

This is a brutally bad hockey trade. Wow.
I like this trade.

The 73 points this year was an anomaly for Toffoli. Just look at his previous stats.

Also, we are trading for the potential of Sharangovich to continue improving for the next 3+ years.
KipperFaNaTic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 09:41 PM   #646
camm13
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
There is no sneaking into the playoffs...it takes 96-100 points

You have to have a good season

florida did being the 17th team in the league by points....one behind the flames
camm13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 09:41 PM   #647
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by traptor View Post
It does make me wonder if management is even allowed to trade guys like toffoli with retained salary for pure futures.

I have a hard time believing no one would give a 1st (2023 or 2024)for toffoli 50% retained.

Conroy got younger and got a a pick but it's still essentially a hockey trade. Maybe it's him retooling within his allowed bounds.

Retaining and trading purely for futures may not even be an option from ownership.
Yeah, but Conroy has been abundantly clear that he believes this group can compete. He is not retaining salary under these circumstances even if he has total freedom to do so.

Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 09:42 PM   #648
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Agree the market is the market- but very, very, very curious how much negotiation went into this. I have my doubts they scrubbed super hard on it for the sake of preserving a new GM relationship. Total guessing here, but if I’m right I don’t think that’s acceptable.
I don’t think a little more scrubbing moves the needle much. That’s an extra 6th type of material for a trade like this, or a similar level player swapped for the one we got.

There were likely multiple teams in on this. They didn’t have to preserve relationships, they just needed to beat the next guy’s offer. I have no doubt this was floated and wasn’t beaten by anybody. And working the negotiation a little harder doesn’t turn this into a 1st or whatever.
PepsiFree is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 09:44 PM   #649
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Doubt it. My suspicion is a 2nd could have been had, but obviously just a hunch.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 09:45 PM   #650
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMike View Post
I think they want the cap space for this year to try and sneak into the playoffs.
I don't think the focus is on "sneaking in." Conroy believes this team can win.

Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 09:46 PM   #651
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05 View Post
They can probably get the same package or more at the TDL

But Conroy needs to do something and this was probably his best option
Unless he gets injured
Or his production falls
Or the market is flooded with other better forwards.

that's the risk you take if you hang on to him that has to be factored in.
So you weigh how much of a better deal you could get then v. now and those risks. And you have to factor in the value of the cap you create now.

Of course if they had held on to him you probably would be criticizing them for doing that too.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2023, 09:46 PM   #652
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
I don't think the focus is on "sneaking in." Conroy believes this team can win.

Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk
Which is a mistake, because they can’t, and won’t.
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 09:47 PM   #653
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
Not really because the 2 years makes a big difference and Milano has a bigger body of work that shows he's probably not much more than that.

Sharangovich has much better per 82 game numbers in his only 3 NHL seasons.

20-21: 46 points, 24 goals per 82 games
21-22: 49 points, 26 goals per 82 games
22-23: 33 points, 14 goals per 82 games

So to me that is actually buying low on a player that had good NHL seasons at 22 and 23 years old, and maybe a down year in 22-23 in his 24 year old season.

At first glance sure the 73 points vs the 33 points looks bad for the Flames. But a 3 year view shows a young player that had a pretty good start to his career prior to this last season.
I guess I'm not very good at conveying my point. I'm not saying Sharangovich is going to be Milano. I'm saying that we're trying to zoom in on a stat to show that our 40pt player will be just as good as the 70pt player we just lost. If only we gave him PP time and more ice time he'd be just as good as Toffoli offensively, or not much of a downgrade. That's the narrative.

I'm just saying that if we chose to zoom in on those stats 5 on 5 Sharangovich can just as easily be compared to Milano. A player that didn't show much of anything while he was here. A similar narrative was spun when we got a player like Leivo or Czarnik. Anyways, an increased role and a change of scenery won't necessarily lead to an increased production, and expecting it is setting the fan base for disappointment.

Last edited by gvitaly; 06-27-2023 at 09:50 PM.
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 09:47 PM   #654
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Which is a mistake, because they can’t, and won’t.
I guess we will see what happens.

Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 09:47 PM   #655
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by camm13 View Post
florida did being the 17th team in the league by points....one behind the flames
It's rare and that was the east

The Flames would have needed 96 and that was with the Jets choking big time

Seattle needed 100 for a wild card
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 09:48 PM   #656
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperMatt18 View Post
But looking at those stats and you can see that Yegor is also more than you're giving him credit for.

Last three seasons:

5v5

Toffoli: GP-208, G-40 , P-84, TOI-2571
Sharangovich: GP-205, G-35, P-76, TOI-2633

Power Play

Toffoli: GP-208, G - 25, P-51, TOI-501
Sharangovich: GP-205, G-4, P- 6, TOI-152

So pretty much all the difference in their production is PP. So then the question that I ask is Toffoli a much better PP player, or did he just get more opportunity.
Over the past three seasons

Even Strength
Coleman GP - 218, G - 43, P - 96

PP - Goals 1, Assists 0, Points - 1

Do we also think that maybe Coleman could perform the same as Toffoli if he got PP time?
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 09:50 PM   #657
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

I think the reality is that Sharangovich is a guy who is a top 6 forward but not a great one. So NJ went out an upgraded that position which made him redundant because he doesn't do the things they want in their bottom 6.

But for a team like the Flames that will try to retool he's a way of moving out an asset that is a pending UFA and resetting the clock while also filling a roster spot.

I think it's that simple.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2023, 09:51 PM   #658
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly View Post
I guess I'm not very good at conveying my point. I'm not saying Sharangovich is going to be Milano. I'm saying that we're trying to zoom in on a stat to show that our 40pt player will be just as good as the 70pt player we just lost. If only we gave him PP time and more ice time he'd be just as good as Toffoli offensively, or not much of a downgrade. That's the narrative.

I'm just saying that if we chose to zoom in on those stats 5 on 5 Sharangovich can just as easily be compared to Milano. A player that didn't show much of anything while he was here. A similar narrative was spun when we got a player like Leivo or Czarnik. Anyways an increased role and a change of scenery won't necessarily lead to increased production and expecting it is setting the fan base for disappointment.
Toffoli is not a 70 point player year in and year out. But the fact is he got way more PP time and attention here than anywhere else and it boosted his numbers. It may or may not for this kid but who’s to say it won’t? An increased role did wonders for Lindholm. It did wonders for Bennett in Fla. Look at what happened when Chandler Stephenson had to assume a bigger role in Vegas.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 09:51 PM   #659
Mr.Coffee
damn onions
 
Mr.Coffee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
I guess we will see what happens.

Sent from my SM-G986W using Tapatalk
Uh yeah, guess so.

What is your actual opinion on all of this? You haven’t really gotten into detail. Do you think this group can win a cup? What do you think the Flames should do?
Mr.Coffee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2023, 09:52 PM   #660
IamNotKenKing
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
Doubt it. My suspicion is a 2nd could have been had, but obviously just a hunch.
You’re probably right. Conroy took less than you suspect he could have received just ‘cause…
IamNotKenKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:35 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy