05-02-2023, 08:03 AM
|
#9501
|
Monster Storm
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame
Why does she do this with her face

|
That’s her tell, she is lying when she does that. Also when she doesn’t do that, she is lying.
__________________
Shameless self promotion
|
|
|
The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to surferguy For This Useful Post:
|
aaronck,
BeltlineFan,
BlackArcher101,
calgarybornnraised,
cral12,
D as in David,
direwolf,
Duruss,
FlameOn,
FLAMESRULE,
flizzenflozz,
Fuzz,
greyshep,
HitterD,
Johnny Makarov,
Major Major,
Ozy_Flame,
powderjunkie,
redflamesfan08,
redforever,
rotten42
|
05-02-2023, 08:08 AM
|
#9502
|
Franchise Player
|
I won't be getting an NDP sign. I don't want any of these unhinged UCP supporters coming and trying to talk "politics" with me.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgaryblood
Looks like you'll need one long before I will. May I suggest deflection king?
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hockeyguy15 For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-02-2023, 08:19 AM
|
#9503
|
wins 10 internets
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: slightly to the left
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
Smith must think voters are absolute utter morons. She's promising to get rid of the carbon tax. Remember how Kenney tried that, went to the Supreme Court and lost? WTF is she planning om doing, taking it to the Really Supreme Court?
Presumably this falls in line with our own pension, police force, tax collection, and ultimately thinking they have the ability to #### off form Canada. Which they do, I just wish they'd do it right now and leave the rest of the province alone. How can Conservatives support this? But oh, hey, Notley is scary.
|
Given the polls, why wouldn't she?
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hemi-Cuda For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-02-2023, 08:24 AM
|
#9504
|
Scoring Winger
|
A vote for the NDP is a vote for Jagmeet/Trudeau, do you think Alberta would prosper with Trudeau in control of it? The fact that the provincial and federal ndp are the same party makes the NDP not even an option.
|
|
|
05-02-2023, 08:26 AM
|
#9505
|
 Posted the 6 millionth post!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StickMan
A vote for the NDP is a vote for Jagmeet/Trudeau, do you think Alberta would prosper with Trudeau in control of it? The fact that the provincial and federal ndp are the same party makes the NDP not even an option.
|
Actually sir, a vote for the NDP is a vote for Rachel Notley and the Alberta NDP. It is a provincial election!
|
|
|
The Following 16 Users Say Thank You to Ozy_Flame For This Useful Post:
|
Art Vandelay,
calgarybornnraised,
cral12,
FlameOn,
Flames0910,
FLAMESRULE,
MarchHare,
mikephoen,
Muta,
para transit fellow,
powderjunkie,
redflamesfan08,
Sliver,
Spurs,
topfiverecords,
You Need a Thneed
|
05-02-2023, 08:26 AM
|
#9506
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StickMan
A vote for the NDP is a vote for Jagmeet/Trudeau, do you think Alberta would prosper with Trudeau in control of it? The fact that the provincial and federal ndp are the same party makes the NDP not even an option.
|
Falling for the propaganda again, eh? I often wonder why people like you enjoy being swindled so much? Does it make you feel like you are on the "in team"? I'd be embarrassed if I was so regularly made a fool of by endless lies. Isn't it embarrassing? Do you admit this stuff in public?
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-02-2023, 08:27 AM
|
#9507
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame
Actually sir, a vote for the NDP is a vote for Rachel Notley and the Alberta NDP.

|
Rachel Notley has no say, she just takes orders from Jagmeet and Trudeau.
|
|
|
05-02-2023, 08:28 AM
|
#9508
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: St. Albert
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StickMan
Rachel Notley has no say, she just takes orders from Jagmeet and Trudeau.
|
You mind backing that up with something?
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DFO For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-02-2023, 08:29 AM
|
#9509
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
Falling for the propaganda again, eh? I often wonder why people like you enjoy being swindled so much? Does it make you feel like you are on the "in team"? I'd be embarrassed if I was so regularly made a fool of by endless lies. Isn't it embarrassing? Do you admit this stuff in public?
|
"Holding membership of a provincial or territorial section of the NDP includes automatic membership in the federal party, and this precludes a person from being a member of different parties at the federal and provincial levels.
Unlike most other Canadian federal parties, the NDP is integrated with its provincial and territorial parties."
Look it up.
|
|
|
05-02-2023, 08:40 AM
|
#9510
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: On your last nerve...:D
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StickMan
A vote for the NDP is a vote for Jagmeet/Trudeau, do you think Alberta would prosper with Trudeau in control of it? The fact that the provincial and federal ndp are the same party makes the NDP not even an option.
|
You're supposed to smoke the devil's lettuce, man, not your living room curtains.
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Minnie For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-02-2023, 08:44 AM
|
#9513
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geraldsh
Is there any evidence that the signs sway voters one way or the other? Those signs can’t be that cheap.
|
I doubt if signs on public property do much beyond brand awareness but in an effectively 2 party election presumably everyone knows who the parties are. Signs on private property are a stronger indicator of support for a party, not sure how much they move the needle in this election, if there were multiple credible parties it might tell undecideds which parties have a shot at winning.
|
|
|
05-02-2023, 08:46 AM
|
#9514
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StickMan
"Holding membership of a provincial or territorial section of the NDP includes automatic membership in the federal party, and this precludes a person from being a member of different parties at the federal and provincial levels.
Unlike most other Canadian federal parties, the NDP is integrated with its provincial and territorial parties."
Look it up.
|
That's a fantastic connection to the Liberals. Oh, wait...
It's also a load of fearmongering that you fell for. Notley wasn't at the end of anyone's leash the last time she was in office, so the thesis is easily disprove. But go on, keep eating the feces being fed to you. Meanwhile you'll support someone who thought she could just declare everyone abroad diplomats to get around covid rules, and that she had the pardoning powers of US governors. She doesn't even understand how our government works, and what there powers are, yet you are fooled enoguh to suppose she can be premier?
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-02-2023, 08:48 AM
|
#9515
|
Scoring Winger
|
I see a lot of blue signs on private land and orange on public side in my area this morning. I am in the west if you were curious.
|
|
|
05-02-2023, 08:48 AM
|
#9516
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StickMan
"Holding membership of a provincial or territorial section of the NDP includes automatic membership in the federal party, and this precludes a person from being a member of different parties at the federal and provincial levels.
Unlike most other Canadian federal parties, the NDP is integrated with its provincial and territorial parties."
Look it up.
|
That doesn’t at all support your thesis that a vote for Notley is a vote for Jagmeet/Trudeau and somehow Trudeau would control Alberta.
What you state is a fact, however that fact does not support your argument.
|
|
|
05-02-2023, 08:59 AM
|
#9517
|
Scoring Winger
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
That's a fantastic connection to the Liberals. Oh, wait...
It's also a load of fearmongering that you fell for. Notley wasn't at the end of anyone's leash the last time she was in office, so the thesis is easily disprove. But go on, keep eating the feces being fed to you. Meanwhile you'll support someone who thought she could just declare everyone abroad diplomats to get around covid rules, and that she had the pardoning powers of US governors. She doesn't even understand how our government works, and what there powers are, yet you are fooled enoguh to suppose she can be premier?
|
Last time Rachel was voted in she turned out to be the devil. How quickly people forget.
|
|
|
05-02-2023, 09:02 AM
|
#9518
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Pickle Jar Lake
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by StickMan
Last time Rachel was voted in she turned out to be the devil. How quickly people forget.
|
Is this satire?
Be specific. What devil-adjacent policies did she implement?
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Fuzz For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-02-2023, 09:08 AM
|
#9519
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz
Is this satire?
Be specific. What devil-adjacent policies did she implement?
|
Come on, it was pretty obvious.
The devil has a well known penchant for LED light bulbs and smart thermostats.
I'm actually starting to wonder if Stickman is actually a green party voter.
I mean, the only thing I can think of is that he is anti oil and gas and that's why he doesn't want to vote for someone who:
1) Worked with Trudeau to actually get an oil pipeline built (as compared to the UCP who spent $1.6 Billion to not build a pipeline)
2) Signed a deal to put oil on rail to get oil out of the province (that was then cancelled by the UCP at the cost of a couple hundred million, and further restricted oil egress out of the province.
If you're anti oil and gas, I can totally see why you would think Rachel Notley is the devil.
I mean, why would anyone who is pro oil industry vote for someone like Rachel Notley who has spent her own political capital to try to get our oil to market, when you could vote for the UCP who spent actual real capital to every effectively reduce our access to market?
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
 <-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
Last edited by Bring_Back_Shantz; 05-02-2023 at 09:11 AM.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bring_Back_Shantz For This Useful Post:
|
|
05-02-2023, 09:10 AM
|
#9520
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
|
I hope she puts a hex on you.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:25 PM.
|
|