Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-22-2023, 01:20 AM   #1521
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post
Sorry, don't know how to resize

Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
Old 04-22-2023, 01:35 AM   #1522
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1649644498257948672

Nurse is an incredibly expensive pylon. Impressive really.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
Old 04-22-2023, 01:43 AM   #1523
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague View Post
I dunno, the toe of the stick moves right at the right time for the puck to have hit it... if it didn't that's one hell of an optical illusion.

I mean I'm glad, obviously. Hopefully it happens to them again next game.
From other angles, you can see that Valardi is waving his stick around, the stick movement is almost certainly from that.

There’s a slow mo zoom in replay going around, but I think it’s pretty clear that that video is being slowed down and then being sped up slightly. The change in video speed makes it look like the puck changes direction.

But even from that video, it still looks inconclusive at best. Watching it more and more, it becomes clearer to me that it doesn’t hit the stick.
__________________
My LinkedIn Profile.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to You Need a Thneed For This Useful Post:
Old 04-22-2023, 01:48 AM   #1524
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

From HF Oilers

__________________
Dion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2023, 01:52 AM   #1525
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
Sorry, don't know how to resize

TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TrentCrimmIndependent For This Useful Post:
Old 04-22-2023, 01:58 AM   #1526
RoadGame
Powerplay Quarterback
 
RoadGame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: N/A
Exp:
Default

The puck also appears to be at the apex of its flight at the point where the orientation of the axis of rotation changes. That seems reasonable as the apex is where the puck's kinetic energy is lowest (having turned a bunch into potential energy) and you've got someone waving at it with a stick, even the air current from a near miss could start it tumbling.

I mean if we had a physicist with lots of time to parse the video frame by frame you might even be able to solve this fairly conclusively with math, but it wouldn't convince the Oiler fans anyway nor would it change the fact they lost.



Still a bit of a fun thought experiment though to consider.
RoadGame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to RoadGame For This Useful Post:
Old 04-22-2023, 01:59 AM   #1527
TrentCrimmIndependent
Franchise Player
 
TrentCrimmIndependent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RoadGame View Post
The puck also appears to be at the apex of its flight at the point where the orientation of the axis of rotation changes. That seems reasonable as the apex is where the puck's kinetic energy is lowest (having turned a bunch into potential energy) and you've got someone waving at it with a stick, even the air current from a near miss could start it tumbling.

I mean if we had a physicist with lots of time to parse the video frame by frame you might even be able to solve this fairly conclusively with math, but it wouldn't convince the Oiler fans anyway nor would it change the fact they lost.

[IMAGE]https://media.tenor.com/nhK95Ys7Mk0AAAAC/laughing-seinfeld.gif[/IMAGE]

Still a bit of a fun thought experiment though to consider.
Sounds like we need another SN visual science segment guest featuring Bill Nye.
TrentCrimmIndependent is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TrentCrimmIndependent For This Useful Post:
Old 04-22-2023, 02:07 AM   #1528
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by You Need a Thneed View Post
From other angles, you can see that Valardi is waving his stick around, the stick movement is almost certainly from that.

There’s a slow mo zoom in replay going around, but I think it’s pretty clear that that video is being slowed down and then being sped up slightly. The change in video speed makes it look like the puck changes direction.

But even from that video, it still looks inconclusive at best. Watching it more and more, it becomes clearer to me that it doesn’t hit the stick.
That was my thought. The slowmo back and forth is making it look like momentum that isn't there. I am more than 50% sure that it didn't hit his stick. Either way, inconclusive is the right call. When you start needing physicists and forensic analysis for a replay, it's inconclusive. Did the Oilers expect to be able to call specialists in and cross-examine all the witnesses?
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2023, 02:26 AM   #1529
Camronius
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thefoss1957 View Post
I didn't see the game. But, looking at that replay, I must ask, who touched the puck next? If the puck came down and hit Ekholm in the ass, as looks possible, because the clip is incomplete, then play continues.

As far as "not getting the calls", I would remind Oil fans that, in my 60 years of watching hockey, it seems that the referees often let everything short of mass-murder go in the 3rd period and OT of playoff games. You are just not going to get the same friendly calls...in the playoffs...on the road...game on the line. Living by homer regular season calls is a losing tactic.
That's not how the rule works. The opposing team would have to be in control of the puck, hitting his a$$ doesn't count as control.

Regardless, haha Edmonton!!

Last edited by Camronius; 04-22-2023 at 08:32 AM.
Camronius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2023, 02:29 AM   #1530
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

I thought it was funny that they took 5 minutes to review and he referred to the ‘missed call’
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
Old 04-22-2023, 03:48 AM   #1531
Hockey_Ninja
 
Hockey_Ninja's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja View Post
It’s my 29th birthday today. Last year on this day Tkachuk scored #40 and got his 100th point. I’m manifesting an Oilers loss as a birthday gift
Thank you LA
__________________
Just trying to do my best
Hockey_Ninja is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2023, 05:25 AM   #1532
Rick M.
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
I thought it was funny that they took 5 minutes to review and he referred to the ‘missed call’
They’re just whining in hopes of getting reffing in their favour in future games.
Rick M. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2023, 05:42 AM   #1533
Barnet Flame
Franchise Player
 
Barnet Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Barnet - North London
Exp:
Default

What stands out for me is, the almost complete inability amongst the NHL and its fans to understand what the word ‘conclusive’ means.

A passing understanding of the meaning of the word and its place in the rule book makes this an extremely easy and uncontentious call to make.

By any measure, the call on the ice has to stand.

We have a good goal.
Barnet Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Barnet Flame For This Useful Post:
Old 04-22-2023, 06:34 AM   #1534
PaperBagger'14
Franchise Player
 
PaperBagger'14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Cowtown
Exp:
Default

As much as I hate to say it, I actually changed my mind and i think it should have been called a high stick. It really looks like the puck hits the blade of the stick. See the link below.

What's most important now is that we all find a way to laugh at the Oilers as much as possible, whether you think there was contact or not. Them losing the series on a blown call would just be the best.


https://www.reddit.com/r/hockey/comm...puck_rotation/
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by puckhog View Post
Everyone who disagrees with you is stupid

Last edited by PaperBagger'14; 04-22-2023 at 06:37 AM.
PaperBagger'14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2023, 06:42 AM   #1535
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaperBagger'14 View Post
As much as I hate to say it, I actually changed my mind and i think it should have been called a high stick. It really looks like the puck hits the blade of the stick. See the link below.

What's most important now is that we all find a way to laugh at the Oilers as much as possible, whether you think there was contact or not. Them losing the series on a blown call would just be the best.


https://www.reddit.com/r/hockey/comm...puck_rotation/
You are correct. The fact it changed direction makes it pretty obvious that it hit the stick. Who knows if that was available to the replay judges though.

Edit: looking at the full reply, I am not so sure the puck changed direction because it hit the stick, or simply that it appears to change direction because the stick moves in the opposite direction. The video simply showing the stick and puck has no context of anything else.

If you look at the bar in the glass behind it, the puck does not really change direction, it goes virtually straight down. The movement of the stick gives the illusion of the puck changing direction.

So I still have some doubt, which makes it not conclusive to me.

Last edited by The Cobra; 04-22-2023 at 06:52 AM.
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2023, 06:46 AM   #1536
red sky
#1 Goaltender
 
red sky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

I see a gold dress?
red sky is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to red sky For This Useful Post:
Old 04-22-2023, 06:58 AM   #1537
Hockey-and_stuff
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The Oilers org and media are the only ones who claim their players have some special authority that the league should honor becuase they're good players.

Stauffer whining that 2019 MVP Draisaital should have got that unsportsmanlike call.

Woodcroft stating multiple times that McDavid is the best player in the world therefore his interpretation is the correct one.

Fools, all of them. No good.

Sent from my SM-G998W using Tapatalk
Hockey-and_stuff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2023, 07:13 AM   #1538
Sofa GM
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CedarMeter View Post
Man that Stauffer is embarrassing. He’s going to give himself a heart attack.
You have to consider the time of day this is happening, he’s probably 3/4 of a jar in already.
Sofa GM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2023, 07:16 AM   #1539
Sainters7
Franchise Player
 
Sainters7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: back in the 403
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dieHARDflameZ View Post
Now just wait for the Oiler apologists to complain about this for the next two days.
To be fair, they do that after literally every L. Such a whiny fanbase..
Sainters7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2023, 07:16 AM   #1540
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

The biggest thing to me with that all too is even if it was a high stick it really has no impact on the goal being scored, the puck hits Ekholm in the back and then he attempts to play it, and he gives it away.

They are acting like it was high sticked directly into the net.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2023 , kings , oilers , playoffs


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:26 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy