Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-14-2022, 03:58 PM   #81
HighLifeMan
First Line Centre
 
HighLifeMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree View Post
Which means we’ve scored 3 or more goals in 12 of our last 23 games. Pretty good actually.
No, that's not good at all when the league average is 3.18 this season. We need more goals, and we need them more consistently.
HighLifeMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2022, 04:01 PM   #82
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
Looks like it is already happening if we look at attendance

https://www.hockey-reference.com/friv/attendance.cgi

Down to 92% capacity this year, bottom third of the league

This isn't completely because of the style of play, but I know anecdotally people I talk to (Including myself) have less and less interest in going to games this year as the season has progressed and use the term 'boring' a lot.
% capacity, sure. Pure numbers what are they, 14th league-wide? Flames have the ~6th largest capacity building in the league.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CalgaryFan1988 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-15-2022, 01:59 PM   #83
CSharp
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
I don’t understand what you are saying about Montreal
They don’t get the 2023 1st under any scenario
I believe the 1st round pick from the Flames is only protected if they fall down to 10th position or lower (9 thru 1). So, if it's protected from Montreal, the Habs will get the Flames 2024 1st round pick. Heck anything from 1-10 in 2023 would be great considering Tre has basically traded away the futures to Montreal for 2023 or 2024 (2023 1st for Tiffoli) and 2025 (1st to have Montreal take on Monahan's contract). It's a deep draft as well. So, if they fall anywhere outside of that 10th spot, the Habs gets the Flames pick, which'll suck if it turns out to be a good prospect.

So, I won't be disappointed if the Flames don't make the playoffs this year and drop to being the 10th or worse worst team for 2023 Entry Level Draft. Just hope they do it right when that happens. Don't get me wrong, we lost two great players and restocked with good talent back. It just takes time to get the chemistry back. It's no better time to go one step further and restock in 2023 if that talent pool is there for the pickings.
CSharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2022, 02:09 PM   #84
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Flames can't lose their 2023 1st...not sure what you are on about
__________________
GFG
dino7c is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2022, 02:09 PM   #85
CSharp
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
Wrong. Oilers below Flames always and forever.
Sure, Draisaitl here in Calgary would've been better than up in Edmonton.
CSharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2022, 02:10 PM   #86
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSharp View Post
I believe the 1st round pick from the Flames is only protected if they fall down to 10th position or lower (9 thru 1). So, if it's protected from Montreal, the Habs will get the Flames 2024 1st round pick. Heck anything from 1-10 in 2023 would be great considering Tre has basically traded away the futures to Montreal for 2023 or 2024 (2023 1st for Tiffoli) and 2025 (1st to have Montreal take on Monahan's contract). It's a deep draft as well. So, if they fall anywhere outside of that 10th spot, the Habs gets the Flames pick, which'll suck if it turns out to be a good prospect.

So, I won't be disappointed if the Flames don't make the playoffs this year and drop to being the 10th or worse worst team for 2023 Entry Level Draft. Just hope they do it right when that happens. Don't get me wrong, we lost two great players and restocked with good talent back. It just takes time to get the chemistry back. It's no better time to go one step further and restock in 2023 if that talent pool is there for the pickings.
It’s not a 2023 pick, it’s a 2025 pick with a condition that could make it a 2024 pick.
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2022, 02:23 PM   #87
saillias
Franchise Player
 
saillias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
Looks like it is already happening if we look at attendance

https://www.hockey-reference.com/friv/attendance.cgi

Down to 92% capacity this year, bottom third of the league

This isn't completely because of the style of play, but I know anecdotally people I talk to (Including myself) have less and less interest in going to games this year as the season has progressed and use the term 'boring' a lot.
been that way since the hot start and the oilers attendance has been right there with us. Calgary home attendance to date speaks to economic situation of the province mostly
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by JobHopper View Post
The thing is, my posts, thoughts and insights may be my opinions but they're also quite factual.
saillias is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2022, 02:29 PM   #88
Yeah_Baby
Franchise Player
 
Yeah_Baby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: still in edmonton
Exp:
Default

I honestly don't think it's the system that's the issue but frankly the players ability to execute offensively. Which we knew was going to be tough this year, it's just proven to been even tougher than imagined. The way people talk sometimes you'd think Sutter was asking them trap all game, and I really don't see that. It's smart two way play. Because it's (usually) as Darryl said a 3-2 league
Yeah_Baby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2022, 02:36 PM   #89
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

A letter to Mr. Sutter and Flames management.

"W"

That is all were asking for.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2022, 03:07 PM   #90
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSharp View Post
Sure, Draisaitl here in Calgary would've been better than up in Edmonton.
Flames still would have picked Bennett, so it's a moot point.

The point is, don't cheer for your team to be losers.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2022, 03:10 PM   #91
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_McDonald View Post
A letter to Mr. Sutter and Flames management.

"W"

That is all were asking for.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2022, 03:35 PM   #92
CSharp
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Flames can't lose their 2023 1st...not sure what you are on about
Nevermind - I've got too many got too many dates mixed up. I guess Tre can still trade the Flames 2023 draft pick away. These kind of things only happens with the Flames in a good draft year.

Last edited by CSharp; 12-15-2022 at 03:48 PM.
CSharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2022, 03:42 PM   #93
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CSharp View Post
enlighten me - I'm not sure what you're talking about or I'm missing something.
The 1st for Toffoli was used in 2022. The 1st with Monahan will be 2024 or 25
PepsiFree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2022, 03:54 PM   #94
CSharp
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
Flames still would have picked Bennett, so it's a moot point.

The point is, don't cheer for your team to be losers.
LOL, I might agree with you on the pick for Bennett but I think the Flames were in on Drai all the way. I mean the stupid Oilers got Pool Party when Tkachuk was there for the taking.

I'd still cheer for the Flames even if they're on the losing side but it'll be good if they're on the winning side of the draft pick for once in their whole franchise here in Calgary. Hell, McDavid and Drai back to back picks for Calgary would've be champions with the Flames by now.
CSharp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2022, 04:01 PM   #95
CalgaryFan1988
Franchise Player
 
CalgaryFan1988's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Problem with being mediocre, the first round picks take elite scouting and the Flames have a habit of trading down in the 1st round instead of up.
CalgaryFan1988 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:16 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy