Alberta Politics & Government Thread 3.0

[PepsiFree]

Originally Posted by Yoho

Sorry what part of my posts are anti senetic? Because I posted a WEF saying they had members in Canada elected officials.

It’s so funny “Yoho doesn’t engage he a troll”

Any time I reply I get baseless “homophobic” “antiemetic” that one poster or another had dreamed up in his head.

I get the game to try and get me and my voice banned just please don’t be so obvious.

The question was “show some affiliation to WEF” I provided it out of the head of the organizations mouth.

It’s not because people want you banned, it’s because you regularly do share mindless, hate-based conspiracy theories, bad-faith editorials, and misinformation while having a completely unfounded sense of intellectual confidence about the way the world works. Not to mention the laughable “try not to attack other posters” while you do it in the regular. Your posts are a sideshow, which is why most people just have you on ignore.

But yeah, I’m sure it’s actually because people want to silence your brave, bold voice of reason and truth. Whatever you need to tell yourself.

Regarding the WEF video, even the national post (your favourite editorial source) mocks WEF conspiracy theorists: https://nationalpost.com/news/canada...ian-government

Despite being a spooky German, there’s nothing nefarious about the video that would lead a normal person to 14Romans conclusions. 50% of cabinet having attended/been a part of Young Global Leaders doesn’t not equal “infiltrating” 50% of cabinet. We can use our brains even a little bit, here.

WEF conspiracies are almost as dumb as conspiracies about COVID being designed by governments to control the population and vaccines being mass-murder initiatives and… oh wait… look who believed in that nonsense too!

[14Roman14]

Originally Posted by Roughneck

I think we shouldn't judge the head of the WEF on the things he's said and done, and instead give him a change and wait for policy.

There is a difference between an unelected elite globalist being held to account and an elected Alberta Premier being held to account. He can say and do what he wants. It’s up to our elected officials in both federal and provincial politics to do only what is best for Canadians and Albertans without any outside influence.
I don’t support everything our premier has said and done but she has denounced the WEF and anyone involved with them in a position to make decisions or help make decisions.

Has Trudeau, Singh, Notley, Gondek, Sohi denounced them? I haven’t seen it if they have. They just deflect and label it as misinformation, or conspiracy theories.

It’s actually an organization that is real and quite public about its intentions. With them being unelected elites, they should have zero influence in our country’s and provinces day to day decisions. If the names above have denounced the WEF or stated that they are not at all involved with them please let me know as I would gladly give them credit where credit is due.

[Cappy]

Why do those politicians have to denounce the WEF?

Have you read Michelle Rempel-Garner's thoughts on WEF? or is has she been co-opted by this secret (yet public?) society...

https://theline.substack.com/p/miche...rner-i-went-to

[Roughneck]

Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame

I also don't get the paranoia around them.

When ‘globalists’ replaced ‘the Jews’ in the lexicon of new world order conspiracies it will make more sense of where the paranoia comes from. Anti-semitism with plausible deniability.

[belsarius]

Originally Posted by 14Roman14

There is a difference between an unelected elite globalist being held to account and an elected Alberta Premier being held to account. He can say and do what he wants. It’s up to our elected officials in both federal and provincial politics to do only what is best for Canadians and Albertans without any outside influence.
I don’t support everything our premier has said and done but she has denounced the WEF and anyone involved with them in a position to make decisions or help make decisions.

Has Trudeau, Singh, Notley, Gondek, Sohi denounced them? I haven’t seen it if they have. They just deflect and label it as misinformation, or conspiracy theories.

It’s actually an organization that is real and quite public about its intentions. With them being unelected elites, they should have zero influence in our country’s and provinces day to day decisions. If the names above have denounced the WEF or stated that they are not at all involved with them please let me know as I would gladly give them credit where credit is due.

Has Harper? Has Remple Garner?

Seriously, this is nothing but uninformed conspiracy bull####. The WEF is basically a giant TED talk for policy makers and economic leaders of the world. They exchange ideas, some of which countries will try, some they won't.

Denouncing the WEF is just a dog whistle for the conspiracy theory morons who have no actual clue what it is.

[powderjunkie]

Originally Posted by 14Roman14

There is a difference between an unelected elite globalist being held to account and an elected Alberta Premier being held to account. He can say and do what he wants. It’s up to our elected officials in both federal and provincial politics to do only what is best for Canadians and Albertans without any outside influence.
I don’t support everything our premier has said and done but she has denounced the WEF and anyone involved with them in a position to make decisions or help make decisions.

Has Trudeau, Singh, Notley, Gondek, Sohi denounced them? I haven’t seen it if they have. They just deflect and label it as misinformation, or conspiracy theories.

It’s actually an organization that is real and quite public about its intentions. With them being unelected elites, they should have zero influence in our country’s and provinces day to day decisions. If the names above have denounced the WEF or stated that they are not at all involved with them please let me know as I would gladly give them credit where credit is due.

Ummm...wanna give a little critical thought to the bolded?

[Fuzz]

Originally Posted by Cappy

Why do those politicians have to denounce the WEF?

Have you read Michelle Rempel-Garner's thoughts on WEF? or is has she been co-opted by this secret (yet public?) society...

https://theline.substack.com/p/miche...rner-i-went-to

Rempe-Garner is basically a Liberal compared to this new Conservative movement that has "infiltrated" our existing Conservative parties. I wouldn't be surprised if they turn on her soonish.

[edslunch]

Originally Posted by 14Roman14

There is a difference between an unelected elite globalist being held to account and an elected Alberta Premier being held to account. He can say and do what he wants. It’s up to our elected officials in both federal and provincial politics to do only what is best for Canadians and Albertans without any outside influence.
I don’t support everything our premier has said and done but she has denounced the WEF and anyone involved with them in a position to make decisions or help make decisions.

Has Trudeau, Singh, Notley, Gondek, Sohi denounced them? I haven’t seen it if they have. They just deflect and label it as misinformation, or conspiracy theories.

It’s actually an organization that is real and quite public about its intentions. With them being unelected elites, they should have zero influence in our country’s and provinces day to day decisions. If the names above have denounced the WEF or stated that they are not at all involved with them please let me know as I would gladly give them credit where credit is due.

What should they be denouncing exactly?

[14Roman14]

Originally Posted by PepsiFree

It’s not because people want you banned, it’s because you regularly do share mindless, hate-based conspiracy theories, bad-faith editorials, and misinformation while having a completely unfounded sense of intellectual confidence about the way the world works. Not to mention the laughable “try not to attack other posters” while you do it in the regular. Your posts are a sideshow, which is why most people just have you on ignore.

But yeah, I’m sure it’s actually because people want to silence your brave, bold voice of reason and truth. Whatever you need to tell yourself.

Regarding the WEF video, even the national post (your favourite editorial source) mocks WEF conspiracy theorists: https://nationalpost.com/news/canada...ian-government

Despite being a spooky German, there’s nothing nefarious about the video that would lead a normal person to 14Romans conclusions. 50% of cabinet having attended/been a part of Young Global Leaders doesn’t not equal “infiltrating” 50% of cabinet. We can use our brains even a little bit, here.

WEF conspiracies are almost as dumb as conspiracies about COVID being designed by governments to control the population and vaccines being mass-murder initiatives and… oh wait… look who believed in that nonsense too!

You used a perfect word to describe the article. They “mock” the video.

If there was truth to it being a little more involvement than going to Davos to get connections and eating 50 buck burritos I’d want it downplayed too. If I was getting funding to be a “trusted source” I too would write an article saying how it doesn’t mean anything and that they were just there for a holiday and have no further involvement.

Again, I’m not saying it’s 100 percent guaranteed happening or not happening. If it is, some of the decisions being made like putting us into gargantuan amounts of debt, attacking the oil sands and the prosperity it brings, and multiple wealth transfers from tax payers to elites line up with ways they want more control.

A written article from the National Post with the mocking opinion that it is untrue does not make it untrue. No more than a written article of opinion from any other news source stating it is happening.

To me, politicians denouncing any influence is a good start, followed by decisions that would seem to not line up with any WEF philosophy and benefit all Canadians/Albertans.

I will not argue this to the death, but you again saying it is dumb does not make it untrue or unsaid or conspiracy.

I will ask you an honest question though. When people started floating the idea that governments would implement vax passes and 99 percent of the people said, “that will never happen, that’s conspiracy and misinformation”, were you part of the 1 percent?

[Doctorfever]

Originally Posted by iggy_oi

Is Pierre going to be able to stop the WEF?

I don’t follow any of this WEF stuff. Do they need to be stopped or where are you going with that question?

[Barnes]

Originally Posted by edslunch

What should they be denouncing exactly?

They should be denouncing the Secret Cabel WEF of Jews Global Elites.

After they first ensure that their names and photos have been taken off the WEF website of course.

[undercoverbrother]

Originally Posted by 14Roman14

I will not argue this to the death

[calgarygeologist]

Originally Posted by Fuzz

Rempe-Garner is basically a Liberal compared to this new Conservative movement that has "infiltrated" our existing Conservative parties. I wouldn't be surprised if they turn on her soonish.

They already have turned on her and she is largely irrelevant now every since O'Toole got the boot. She lost her critic role, was forced to be a backbencher and very rarely participates in the House now.

[iggy_oi]

Originally Posted by Doctorfever

I don’t follow any of this WEF stuff. Do they need to be stopped or where are you going with that question?

Pierre always rails against them and clearly has people identifying them as a problem so I’m just wondering if they think this guy who is supported and endorsed by people who in the past have been heavily involved in the WEF is going to stand up to them or if it’s just another example of people falling for his misleading tactics.

[belsarius]

Originally Posted by 14Roman14

You used a perfect word to describe the article. They “mock” the video.

If there was truth to it being a little more involvement than going to Davos to get connections and eating 50 buck burritos I’d want it downplayed too. If I was getting funding to be a “trusted source” I too would write an article saying how it doesn’t mean anything and that they were just there for a holiday and have no further involvement.

Again, I’m not saying it’s 100 percent guaranteed happening or not happening. If it is, some of the decisions being made like putting us into gargantuan amounts of debt, attacking the oil sands and the prosperity it brings, and multiple wealth transfers from tax payers to elites line up with ways they want more control.

A written article from the National Post with the mocking opinion that it is untrue does not make it untrue. No more than a written article of opinion from any other news source stating it is happening.

To me, politicians denouncing any influence is a good start, followed by decisions that would seem to not line up with any WEF philosophy and benefit all Canadians/Albertans.

I will not argue this to the death, but you again saying it is dumb does not make it untrue or unsaid or conspiracy.

I will ask you an honest question though. When people started floating the idea that governments would implement vax passes and 99 percent of the people said, “that will never happen, that’s conspiracy and misinformation”, were you part of the 1 percent?

Nice strawman. Any data or polls or anything to back this up? I remember there being a lot of support for some kind of registration not 99% saying it will never happen. It could be my own bubble and bias but some evidence to back this up is nice.

[undercoverbrother]

Originally Posted by calgarygeologist

They already have turned on her and she is largely irrelevant now every since O'Toole got the boot. She lost her critic role, was forced to be a backbencher and very rarely participates in the House now.

thank ####

[14Roman14]

Originally Posted by powderjunkie

Ummm...wanna give a little critical thought to the bolded?

Fair point.

Like it or not she was elected to be the leader of the party who was elected to govern the province.

Anyone could buy a UCP membership and vote in that leadership race.

[14Roman14]

Originally Posted by undercoverbrother

Thank you for the laugh. You may be right. Haha. Nonetheless, love Ron Burgandy and that extremely politically incorrect movie that would likely never be allowed to be made today as humor has become offensive.

[Harry Lime]

I have only the vaguest of ideas what the WEF is all about, and have just read the last two pages to get caught up on Alberta politics. So, if I understand what both sides here are saying, the WEF is an entirely Jewish led coalition, and that is why opposing them is anti-semetic?

[PsYcNeT]

Originally Posted by 14Roman14

Thank you for the laugh. You may be right. Haha. Nonetheless, love Ron Burgandy and that extremely politically incorrect movie that would likely never be allowed to be made today as humor has become offensive.

I'm trying to remember what in Anchorman is really all that "offensive" and I'm coming up dry.

I hear Conservatives repeat this line a lot in relation to Blazing Saddles however, which is also bafflingly dumb because Blazing Saddles is basically a masterclass in Punching Up