09-19-2022, 08:43 AM
|
#6221
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
First it wasn't a proposal I was saying what it would take to move him for me. Basically I wouldn't unless it's a high end winger.
Second Hanifin wouldn't be 5/6
Brodie, Muzzin, you can't be serious
Hanifin would easily be in the top 4 in Toronto
|
The point is they are set at top 4. You might like Hanifin over Brodie or Muzzin but they aren’t bottom pairing D either.
Flames need a RW but they also need a solid top 4 D. You’d create a hole to fill a different one.
|
|
|
09-19-2022, 08:45 AM
|
#6222
|
Pent-up
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Top 4 D > top 6 RW
|
Yup. I agree.
|
|
|
09-19-2022, 10:19 AM
|
#6223
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers
Yup. I agree.
|
Which is why basically I think you’d have to be blown away on a RW offer for Hanifin. It’s gotta be top line RW, which I doubt many teams are offering.
At the end of the day I think Treliving and Sutter put a lot of work into solidifying the D. Hanifin, Tanev and Weegar acquired for the top 4, to complement Andersson who is more or less home grown, Zadorov for the bottom, with Kylington. I don’t think it should be messed with for a guy to play wing with the second line. I just think that role’s easier to plug in.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-19-2022, 10:21 AM
|
#6224
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
I still don’t like our top line… really was hoping to replace Tkachuk.
|
|
|
09-19-2022, 10:26 AM
|
#6225
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
The point is they are set at top 4. You might like Hanifin over Brodie or Muzzin but they aren’t bottom pairing D either.
Flames need a RW but they also need a solid top 4 D. You’d create a hole to fill a different one.
|
Well I disagree...their top 4 isn't very strong IMO
Murray is gonna get lit up, they will be looking to make a move
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
09-19-2022, 10:26 AM
|
#6226
|
Franchise Player
|
If you trade Hanifin and Dube for Nylander, you have zero cap space, with only a 20-man roster. You can't run 82 games with a 20-man roster.
It doesn't work.
|
|
|
09-19-2022, 10:27 AM
|
#6227
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PuckSlap
I still don’t like our top line… really was hoping to replace Tkachuk.
|
We all want a team with all elite talent at every position, especially top line, but very few teams have it.
TB has 2 elite Cs and an elite RW. After that - good but not elite. Toronto plays two elite or near elite pairs on the top 6 and fills in the other winger position. Avs have an entire elite top line depending on deployment. But Landeskog often moves down a line.
|
|
|
09-19-2022, 10:27 AM
|
#6228
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Which is why basically I think you’d have to be blown away on a RW offer for Hanifin. It’s gotta be top line RW, which I doubt many teams are offering.
At the end of the day I think Treliving and Sutter put a lot of work into solidifying the D. Hanifin, Tanev and Weegar acquired for the top 4, to complement Andersson who is more or less home grown, Zadorov for the bottom, with Kylington. I don’t think it should be messed with for a guy to play wing with the second line. I just think that role’s easier to plug in.
|
AND, that top line RW has to come cheaper than Hanifin, or you blow the cap.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-19-2022, 10:27 AM
|
#6229
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
If you trade Hanifin and Dube for Nylander, you have zero cap space, with only a 20-man roster. You can't run 82 games with a 20-man roster.
It doesn't work.
|
There would need to be more moves involved...it was just an example of the kind of player it would take...for me
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
09-19-2022, 10:31 AM
|
#6230
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
AND, that top line RW has to come cheaper than Hanifin, or you blow the cap.
|
Yeah, that’s why I think there are almost no deals to be made that are worth it. A team with (a) an elite or near elite RW who is $5M or so, and that (b) also needs D help so much that they will part with valuable commodity (a).
|
|
|
09-19-2022, 10:41 AM
|
#6231
|
Pent-up
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Which is why basically I think you’d have to be blown away on a RW offer for Hanifin. It’s gotta be top line RW, which I doubt many teams are offering.
At the end of the day I think Treliving and Sutter put a lot of work into solidifying the D. Hanifin, Tanev and Weegar acquired for the top 4, to complement Andersson who is more or less home grown, Zadorov for the bottom, with Kylington. I don’t think it should be messed with for a guy to play wing with the second line. I just think that role’s easier to plug in.
|
To the bolded, yes. Of course.
And yeah, lots of arguments for reasons why a trade like that wouldn’t happen. But the idea behind it isn’t stemmed in hating Hanifin, or under appreciating him at all.
|
|
|
09-19-2022, 10:59 AM
|
#6232
|
Franchise Player
|
You really sound butt-hurt about this.
No one said YOU were under appreciating Hanifin, simply that many fans are.
|
|
|
09-19-2022, 11:14 AM
|
#6233
|
Pent-up
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
You really sound butt-hurt about this.
No one said YOU were under appreciating Hanifin, simply that many fans are.
|
Another weird one…I’m really not. My first post was saying that I don’t see anyone under appreciating Hanifin. Are you okay?
|
|
|
09-19-2022, 04:48 PM
|
#6234
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Hell
|
what happened to the rumor that the flames aren't done and are getting another top 6 player? really hoping brad does some more magic !
|
|
|
09-19-2022, 04:54 PM
|
#6235
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Can any of our extra dmen play RW?
|
|
|
09-19-2022, 04:56 PM
|
#6236
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
AND, that top line RW has to come cheaper than Hanifin, or you blow the cap.
|
You also have to replace Hanifin. Not many guys ready to step into a top pairing role put up 45 plus points and play against the other teams best players.
No way they trade any of the top 6. Sutter even said at the end of the season press conference that we needed a more experienced back end.
I don't think anyone saw a 300 goal team last season, some even said we might score 200. This team is much better and deeper on paper, and the high shot volume Sutter employs along with better transition from the back end should keep our scoring in the top 10 I think.
|
|
|
09-19-2022, 04:56 PM
|
#6237
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames_Gimp
what happened to the rumor that the flames aren't done and are getting another top 6 player? really hoping brad does some more magic !
|
Salim from TSN said he still thinks a forward for Dman trade happens but I also think with the Milano, Eakin PTO’s and the Ritchie signing I have doubts a trade happens
|
|
|
09-19-2022, 05:01 PM
|
#6238
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames_Gimp
what happened to the rumor that the flames aren't done and are getting another top 6 player? really hoping brad does some more magic !
|
I think they need to figure out if Weegar is signing or not.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bonded For This Useful Post:
|
|
09-19-2022, 05:10 PM
|
#6239
|
Franchise Player
|
We went into the offseason looking to add to the back end, why would we trade from it now?
If we trade someone now Michael Stone is in your lineup every night. The team was pretty fortunate in terms of injuries last year, so we are now an injury away from Valamaki or Mackey in lineup along with Stone.
|
|
|
09-19-2022, 06:47 PM
|
#6240
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulie Walnuts
We went into the offseason looking to add to the back end, why would we trade from it now?
If we trade someone now Michael Stone is in your lineup every night. The team was pretty fortunate in terms of injuries last year, so we are now an injury away from Valamaki or Mackey in lineup along with Stone.
|
Maybe it's just me but Mackey - Stone sounds like a decent/average 3rd pairing around the league.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to gvitaly For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:07 AM.
|
|