08-05-2022, 08:58 PM
|
#3061
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Power forwards combine size, toughness and soft hands. They hit hard and possess elite puck protection skills. There might be 5 true elite power forwards at any given time. Tkachuk is closer to Marchand or Burrows than a typical power forward but possesses high end hockey IQ that is almost peerless along with a remarkable 200 foot presence. He's also pretty slow, has a huge ego and is not a natural leader IMO. He's a unicorn in the sense that he's the only player with his combination of traits but that doesn't make him a superstar. He might be the worst skater in hockey and I think he might be more of a 25-30g 45a+ guy going forward than the fantasy of 100+ ever again. Don't get me wrong, I think he's a great player but he's not in the top tier with the Kucherovs just yet or probably ever. Even after 6 years, I still can't wrap my head around him completely, so I guess he is a unicorn lol
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to TheoFleury For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-05-2022, 09:02 PM
|
#3062
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FormerPresJamesTaylor
Matthew Tkachuk is not a 200ft player, he was the third best defensive player on a line of three players
|
Gaudreau without Sutter going forward will be interesting to watch. I bet he doesn't finish +60 combined over his 7 years there, much less one season. Tkachuk will have Barkov, it's going to be impossible to compare but you are right about Lindholm. He might be the best center to play in Calgary since 1995
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to TheoFleury For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-05-2022, 09:08 PM
|
#3063
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fort McMurray, AB
|
I can say it now. I'm glad Tkachuk is gone. I just never really warmed up to him. I found him hard to defend against other team's fan's pestering. He was a bit like Phaneuf to me; full of himself, over-hyped and always came across as kind of a dbag.
I'm not likening him to Kane but sometimes you get a player on your team that you just don't like and you feel the need to defend him anyway because he's "one of yours". I'm sure some Oiler fans are doing that now. Again, he's not the same, but I hated when the Flames signed Bertuzzi and Marchment. I get the "crest on the front, not the name on the back" stuff, but I still want to like the players, or my impression of the players, that I cheer for.
I already know that I'm going to like Huberdeau much more than I ever did Tkachuk.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to schteve_d For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-05-2022, 09:10 PM
|
#3064
|
#1 Goaltender
|
This thread is becoming embarrassing. There is no need to lessen Tkachuk’s impact now that he isn’t a Flame.
He is an absolute stud and his contract will be a bargain for Florida. He’s a special player.
With that being said the Flames did amazingly well given the circumstances. I still can’t believe it.
Both things can be true
|
|
|
The Following 28 Users Say Thank You to bax For This Useful Post:
|
activeStick,
anyonebutedmonton,
Ashasx,
Biff,
BloodFetish,
Burning Beard,
CKPThunder,
ComixZone,
CsInMyBlood,
FanIn80,
Fighting Banana Slug,
GreenHardHat,
HitterD,
Hockey_Ninja,
IamNotKenKing,
indes,
jayswin,
klikitiklik,
Major Major,
powderjunkie,
Psytic,
SnipeShow,
soulchoice,
Stampede2TheCup,
Textcritic,
TheScorpion,
transplant99,
Vox
|
08-05-2022, 09:16 PM
|
#3065
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Saskatoon
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bax
This thread is becoming embarrassing. There is no need to lessen Tkachuk’s impact now that he isn’t a Flame.
He is an absolute stud and his contract will be a bargain for Florida. He’s a special player.
With that being said the Flames did amazingly well given the circumstances. I still can’t believe it.
Both things can be true
|
I disagree, and it’s not because he’s gone. I told everyone in my circle the Flames should be selling high on him. Happy he’s gone.
|
|
|
08-05-2022, 09:18 PM
|
#3066
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bax
This thread is becoming embarrassing. There is no need to lessen Tkachuk’s impact now that he isn’t a Flame.
He is an absolute stud and his contract will be a bargain for Florida. He’s a special player.
With that being said the Flames did amazingly well given the circumstances. I still can’t believe it.
Both things can be true
|
How many 90+ point seasons do you think he will put up next 8 years? Just curious. I think he will end up with around 550-600 points or so over the term of the contract but if he doesn't figure out the playoffs, it won't really matter and Florida got weaker this year with that deal and the future could be tight with no picks. Bob and Hornqvists contracts are anchors and IMO their D looks worse than Edmonton if Ekblad gets hurt again or has a down year. They will probably have to deal Knight eventually because of Bob and they lack assets and cap to address the backend. Tkachuk is great but Bennett and Reinhart/Duclair aren't Johnny and Elias, and I feel most of the hockey world now sees him as a 100+ point guy. That was probably his career year and his new team is in tough to improve from last year for all the reasons I mentioned
|
|
|
08-05-2022, 09:21 PM
|
#3067
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bax
This thread is becoming embarrassing. There is no need to lessen Tkachuk’s impact now that he isn’t a Flame.
He is an absolute stud and his contract will be a bargain for Florida. He’s a special player.
With that being said the Flames did amazingly well given the circumstances. I still can’t believe it.
Both things can be true
|
time will tell, there was no shortage of posters cringing at the thought of paying him even 9M this upcoming season though. Many posters have had concerns about Tkachuk on a superstar contract this isn't just a recent thing.
Points per season
48
49
77
61
43
104
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-05-2022, 09:23 PM
|
#3068
|
Backup Goalie
Join Date: Jul 2022
Exp:  
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheoFleury
Power forwards combine size, toughness and soft hands. They hit hard and possess elite puck protection skills. There might be 5 true elite power forwards at any given time. Tkachuk is closer to Marchand or Burrows than a typical power forward but possesses high end hockey IQ that is almost peerless along with a remarkable 200 foot presence. He's also pretty slow, has a huge ego and is not a natural leader IMO. He's a unicorn in the sense that he's the only player with his combination of traits but that doesn't make him a superstar. He might be the worst skater in hockey and I think he might be more of a 25-30g 45a+ guy going forward than the fantasy of 100+ ever again. Don't get me wrong, I think he's a great player but he's not in the top tier with the Kucherovs just yet or probably ever. Even after 6 years, I still can't wrap my head around him completely, so I guess he is a unicorn lol
|
I totally agree...I think the loss of Huberdeau as a puck distributor significantly hampers their offense. I dont think Tkachuk approaches the season he had last year ever again without an elite passer him.
|
|
|
08-05-2022, 09:34 PM
|
#3069
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
time will tell, there was no shortage of posters cringing at the thought of paying him even 9M this upcoming season though. Many posters have had concerns about Tkachuk on a superstar contract this isn't just a recent thing.
Points per season
48
49
77
61
43
104
|
For him to be worth his contract, he probably only needs 80+ points a year with the other elements he brings. Thing is, the hype I'm seeing makes me think the expectation should be better than 'worth the contract. 80 points is not easy either. Tkachuk's only done it once, even Johnny only 3 times...
Predicting he'll get around 70+ points per year isn't insulting him, it's reasonable imo. However, I think tons of people are expecting 90+... kinda unrealistic for anyone except 4 or 5 dudes
Zito calling him generational is the kind of comment you hear in a fantasy keeper league from a buddy who has had too much to drink and he's trying to sell high or something lol. Hearing an NHL GM say that? Wow lol. Generational is a talent that appears every 15 years, Tkachuk is in the conversation for top 10 wingers for sure but it's the least valued position for a reason
|
|
|
08-05-2022, 09:37 PM
|
#3070
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Shanghai
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bax
This thread is becoming embarrassing. There is no need to lessen Tkachuk’s impact now that he isn’t a Flame.
He is an absolute stud and his contract will be a bargain for Florida. He’s a special player.
With that being said the Flames did amazingly well given the circumstances. I still can’t believe it.
Both things can be true
|
Not lessening him because he's gone. I just never really liked him much. He had a few amazing plays scoring between his legs that were really special, but for the most part he didn't really have much impact on me as a fan.
I haven't seen enough of Huberdeau play to say if he's more or less impressive to me than Tkachuk was, but he does seem more likable. Either way, I can say with certainty that I don't feel bad about Tkachuk leaving.
__________________
"If stupidity got us into this mess, then why can't it get us out?"
|
|
|
08-05-2022, 09:39 PM
|
#3071
|
GOAT!
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
time will tell, there was no shortage of posters cringing at the thought of paying him even 9M this upcoming season though. Many posters have had concerns about Tkachuk on a superstar contract this isn't just a recent thing.
Points per season
48
49
77
61
43
104
|
Those are pretty good numbers for a guy who spent the first 4 years playing on the second line with Backlund and Frolik. He scored 35 one season playing with those guys, but people act like scoring 40 on the first line with other top line players is a one time thing he'll never do again.
Also, a power forward is a term used to describe a "player who can physically carry the puck to the front of the net." All the other things like big hits and fighting and heavy board play are nice-to-have qualities, but they predominantly belong to other roles, such as checkers, enforcers and grinders. In terms of offensive roles, there are perimeter distributors (playmakers), net drivers (power forwards) and finishers (snipers). Matthew Tkachuk is probably a 10%/70%/20% distribution of those three roles, making him a power forward by designation.
There is a lot of revisionist garbage going on in this thread. Chucky put up 35 goals and 77pts playing on the second line with Backlund and Frolik. I think he's going to be just fine playing on Florida's top line with Barkov and Reinhart.
And yeah, you guys got me. I thought he was 23, but I guess he's 24. Joke's on me there!
|
|
|
08-05-2022, 09:39 PM
|
#3072
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by USflamesfan
I totally agree...I think the loss of Huberdeau as a puck distributor significantly hampers their offense. I dont think Tkachuk approaches the season he had last year ever again without an elite passer him.
|
He's going from being an elite complimentary star who knows he owes his linemates a great deal for boosting him to a situation where he's going to have guys leeching off of him. Don't get me wrong, I think he will do well but his scoring totals are going to take a hit for sure IMO. Even if the top line came back this year, it's unlikely they would get higher than 85% of last year. A year where everything went right playing with stars to a situation where everything won't go right and he's playing with lesser complimentary types instead
|
|
|
08-05-2022, 09:41 PM
|
#3073
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bax
This thread is becoming embarrassing. There is no need to lessen Tkachuk’s impact now that he isn’t a Flame.
He is an absolute stud and his contract will be a bargain for Florida. He’s a special player.
With that being said the Flames did amazingly well given the circumstances. I still can’t believe it.
Both things can be true
|
It’s really the small group of people that are die hard Flames fans. Can’t expect them them to be reasonable. On the other hands, there are bunch of Panthers and Oilers fans that now claim Tkachuk is unicorn and franchise type
So it’s just all even out….
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flamesfan05 For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-05-2022, 09:48 PM
|
#3074
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05
It’s really the small group of people that are die hard Flames fans. Can’t expect them them to be reasonable. On the other hands, there are bunch of Panthers and Oilers fans that now claim Tkachuk is unicorn and franchise type
So it’s just all even out….
|
I have a friend who is an oilers fan who went from trashing Tkachuk as an overrated rat who was barely a step up from Kassian at one point (his words) for years until suddenly and shamelessly mocking how the flames traded the best winger in hockey. We've all said stupid things defending laundry but oilers and leafs fans are a step higher, even the reasonable ones. It's like trying to debate flat earthers basically
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to TheoFleury For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-05-2022, 09:52 PM
|
#3075
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Van Island
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheoFleury
I have a friend who is an oilers fan who went from trashing Tkachuk as an overrated rat who was barely a step up from Kassian at one point (his words) for years until suddenly and shamelessly mocking how the flames traded the best winger in hockey. We've all said stupid things defending laundry but oilers and leafs fans are a step higher, even the reasonable ones. It's like trying to debate flat earthers basically
|
It’s the same people who said we lost the trade unless they can sign Huberdeau, and then said we lost the trade because of the contract we signed him to.
I’ve just stopped listening/reading what these people say, it will always be a twist to negative some way. It’s just exhausting.
|
|
|
08-05-2022, 09:55 PM
|
#3076
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80
Those are pretty good numbers for a guy who spent the first 4 years playing on the second line with Backlund and Frolik. He scored 35 one season playing with those guys, but people act like scoring 40 on the first line with other top line players is a one time thing he'll never do again.
Also, a power forward is a term used to describe a "player who can physically carry the puck to the front of the net." All the other things like big hits and fighting and heavy board play are nice-to-have qualities, but they predominantly belong to other roles, such as checkers, enforcers and grinders. In terms of offensive roles, there are perimeter distributors (playmakers), net drivers (power forwards) and finishers (snipers). Matthew Tkachuk is probably a 10%/70%/20% distribution of those three roles, making him a power forward by designation.
There is a lot of revisionist garbage going on in this thread. Chucky put up 35 goals and 77pts playing on the second line with Backlund and Frolik. I think he's going to be just fine playing on Florida's top line with Barkov and Reinhart.
And yeah, you guys got me. I thought he was 23, but I guess he's 24. Joke's on me there!
|
I have never said he was bad or anything other than very good
its 9.5M superstar stud I'm not 100% sold on
Just pointing out this isn't the first time people have had concerns about Tkachuk's skating or said that his is over rated on CP...long before any thought of trades or not signing.
I think if you go back there were a lot of posters concerned about the 9M qualifying offer when he signed the last deal.
__________________
GFG
|
|
|
08-05-2022, 09:57 PM
|
#3077
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheoFleury
For him to be worth his contract, he probably only needs 80+ points a year with the other elements he brings. Thing is, the hype I'm seeing makes me think the expectation should be better than 'worth the contract. 80 points is not easy either. Tkachuk's only done it once, even Johnny only 3 times...
Predicting he'll get around 70+ points per year isn't insulting him, it's reasonable imo. However, I think tons of people are expecting 90+... kinda unrealistic for anyone except 4 or 5 dudes
Zito calling him generational is the kind of comment you hear in a fantasy keeper league from a buddy who has had too much to drink and he's trying to sell high or something lol. Hearing an NHL GM say that? Wow lol. Generational is a talent that appears every 15 years, Tkachuk is in the conversation for top 10 wingers for sure but it's the least valued position for a reason
|
I don't think we should read too much into Zito calling him generational. Zito kind of have to say that to hype Tkachuk up to justify what he gave up on the trade. He gave up a fantastic playmaker, a top pair D, a promising prospect and a 1st, of course he has to say something like, "look I got us a generational player, those don't come along very often."
|
|
|
08-05-2022, 09:59 PM
|
#3078
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flamesgod
I disagree, and it’s not because he’s gone. I told everyone in my circle the Flames should be selling high on him. Happy he’s gone.
|
42 goals
104 points
elite defensive metrics
draws more penalties than any other player
“Happy he’s gone”
Lol you must be hard to impress.
You can absolutely love the return and still acknowledge Tkachuk was a fantastic player for Calgary and will continue to be one for Florida
|
|
|
08-05-2022, 10:00 PM
|
#3079
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bax
42 goals
104 points
elite defensive metrics
draws more penalties than any other player
“Happy he’s gone”
Lol you must be hard to impress.
You can absolutely love the return and still acknowledge Tkachuk was a fantastic player for Calgary and will continue to be one for Florida
|
You are only using his best season if we are being fair...you say his Florida contract is a "bargain"
Happy he is gone is too strong but happy with the trade is more than fair. I 100% do this deal if Tkachuk is willing to stay, massive win. Can't even imagine Tkachuk coming back at 10.5M without Gaudreau...would have been a disaster IMO.
what point total do you expect for a 9.5M bargain?
__________________
GFG
Last edited by dino7c; 08-05-2022 at 10:03 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dino7c For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-05-2022, 10:01 PM
|
#3080
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Saskatoon
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FanIn80
Those are pretty good numbers for a guy who spent the first 4 years playing on the second line with Backlund and Frolik. He scored 35 one season playing with those guys, but people act like scoring 40 on the first line with other top line players is a one time thing he'll never do again.
Also, a power forward is a term used to describe a "player who can physically carry the puck to the front of the net." All the other things like big hits and fighting and heavy board play are nice-to-have qualities, but they predominantly belong to other roles, such as checkers, enforcers and grinders. In terms of offensive roles, there are perimeter distributors (playmakers), net drivers (power forwards) and finishers (snipers). Matthew Tkachuk is probably a 10%/70%/20% distribution of those three roles, making him a power forward by designation.
There is a lot of revisionist garbage going on in this thread. Chucky put up 35 goals and 77pts playing on the second line with Backlund and Frolik. I think he's going to be just fine playing on Florida's top line with Barkov and Reinhart.
And yeah, you guys got me. I thought he was 23, but I guess he's 24. Joke's on me there!
|
Then you should be absolutely ecstatic about having a guy that just put up 115 pts playing with Bennett and Duclair.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:20 PM.
|
|