Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-29-2022, 10:41 AM   #2801
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
Was the Kawhi Leonard trade a win for the Raptors?
The only way that would have a comparison here is if the Flames win the Stanley Cup this year. So ask that question again when that happens.
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Parallex For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2022, 10:44 AM   #2802
the-rasta-masta
First Line Centre
 
the-rasta-masta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Turner Valley
Exp:
Default

Apologies if it's been posted somewhere in all the trade threads, but was there ever confirmation of what any of the other offers were, particularly the St Louis one? I've seen a few posts where it sounds like the Blues offer was public?
the-rasta-masta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 10:47 AM   #2803
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the-rasta-masta View Post
Apologies if it's been posted somewhere in all the trade threads, but was there ever confirmation of what any of the other offers were, particularly the St Louis one? I've seen a few posts where it sounds like the Blues offer was public?
Rutherford on the Athletic speculated the Blues offer was Tarasenko, Scandella and a high pick

The Hurricanes were rumored to have a deal around Necas but no other info. I could have seen the Canes being more aggressive prior to their acquisition of Pacioretty which limited their cap space
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2022, 10:48 AM   #2804
the-rasta-masta
First Line Centre
 
the-rasta-masta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Turner Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Rutherford on the Athletic speculated the Blues offer was Tarasenko, Scandella and a high pick

The Hurricanes were rumored to have a deal around Necas but no other info. I could have seen the Canes being more aggressive prior to their acquisition of Pacioretty which limited their cap space
Wow, start the car indeed. Great work Tre.
the-rasta-masta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 10:49 AM   #2805
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the-rasta-masta View Post
Apologies if it's been posted somewhere in all the trade threads, but was there ever confirmation of what any of the other offers were, particularly the St Louis one? I've seen a few posts where it sounds like the Blues offer was public?
Several sources say the Blues’ offer was Tarasenko + Scandella + 1st

Sources also say the Canes offer included Necas.

They also say those two plus the Panthers were the only offers made. And the list of teams Tkachuk submitted was said to consist of those 3 plus Tampa, Nashville, and Dallas.

Trades for players with $9+ mil cap hits are extremely difficult to make in a flat cap environment, especially with a limited number of suitors.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.

Last edited by CliffFletcher; 07-29-2022 at 10:52 AM.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 10:49 AM   #2806
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Huberdeau > Tarasenko
Weegar > Scandella

FLA Pick + prospect > STL Pick
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2022, 10:52 AM   #2807
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
Several sources say the Blues’ offer was Tarasenko + Scandella + 1st

Sources also say the Canes offer included Necas.

They also say those two plus the Panthers were the only offers made.

Trades for players with $9+ mil cap hits are extremely difficult to make in a flat cap environment.
Indeed even though Tkachuk provided a list of 5 teams he would consider, 2 of them were not possibilities, so it came down to those 3.
Jiri Hrdina is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 10:53 AM   #2808
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by UnitedFlames View Post
Tkachuk had zero to do with our haul. The Flames were just super lucky that Florida values him the way they do and decided to go this route now. If not for that, we might all be debating where Tarasenko fits into the line up. If that had happened, no one would be calling Tkachuk a hero.

As someone on here said, he's in it for himself - always has been, always will be.
Call it whatever you will, but this trade is going to shake out as a colossal failure if Huberdeau and Weegar are not extended long term. For me, if this isn't done by training camp, it is almost a guarantee that we are going to be in the same situation as we just were next summer wondering what happened as these 2 players walk off into the sunset for greener pastures.

BT has done half the job but playing the slow game again would be a major miscalculation. We all know this team won't be in sell mode come the trade deadline so something needs to give. I am completely unwilling to call this trade a "haul" or massive win until there is at least one of the parties locked up. Florida only moved these guys because they knew they would be challenging to sign given their own perceived value and cap situation.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 10:57 AM   #2809
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Flames win the cup next year it is a win no matter what
Exactly. If this is Darryl’s last year of coaching do you roll the dice and fall head first into a rebuild the year following?
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 11:06 AM   #2810
flamesgod
Powerplay Quarterback
 
flamesgod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Saskatoon
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Huberdeau > Tarasenko
Weegar > Scandella

FLA Pick + prospect > STL Pick
Treliving must of done a hell of a job leveraging what St.Louis was offering against Florida. Forced them to upgrade on St.Louis' offer, at forward and the blueline. Both have a first in the deal, then get the prospect added for good measure.
flamesgod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 11:08 AM   #2811
PeteMoss
Franchise Player
 
PeteMoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I have only one Raiders player jersey and it's a Bo Jackson one. Being a big football fan I'm used to players moving around all the time and due to guaranteed contracts it doesn't happen as much in the NHL but it doesn't change the fact that players are hired mercenaries so it's a matter of cheering for the jersey and not getting overly attached to players. When Iginla left I turned the page quickly just as I have with these two players. It's just business at the end of the day and nothing personal as players should do what's in their own best interests. Tkachuk's actions have spoken for him so he doesn't owe me an explanation, and the last thing I want is BS from him about how it was a tough decisions or how much he liked playing in Calgary. The events this summer involving him have been in the works for a long time. He's turned the page on the Calgary part of his career and I have turned the page on cheering for him as I'm focused on the players wearing the jersey that want to be here.
Agree with this and you can see why players shouldn't be vilified by acting this by seeing what happened with Huberdeau. By all accounts he wanted to sign back in Florida long term but they traded him when they thought they could improve.

The Flames would and should do the same thing to the players as well if they can improve the team. As long as both sides are giving it their all during the contractually agreement - that's really all you can ask for.
PeteMoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 11:14 AM   #2812
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
While I think that's true my estimation is that the Flames will be a very good team this upcoming season... following from that I don't think they would be traded so the theoretical return you could get for them doesn't matter.
It matters to me as I plan on remaining a Flames fan past this upcoming season.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 11:15 AM   #2813
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
I disagree It's only a massive win if both extend. It's a slight win if only Huberdeau extends, a slight loss if only Weegar extends, and a big loss if neither do.
If neither want to sign and then ...

Huberdeau is dealt for a 1st, 2nd and a prospect
Weegar is dealt for a 1st and a 4th

it's still a loss?

That's Tkachuk and a 4th for 3 1sts, a 2nd, a 3rd, Schwindt, and a prospect.

The only way they lose this deal is if both players walk in a year, but even then it's a 1st, Schwindt, and the value of both players playing in Calgary for a year as rentals.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 11:16 AM   #2814
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
I think your ok scenario really depends on which one signs. If it is Hubredeau it is definitely ok, maybe even slightly better than ok and the Flames did very well in the trade. If Weeger signs and we lose Hubredeau for nothing it is probably slightly worse than ok and it is questionable whether the Flames did well in the trade. Other than that I agree with the breakdown.
I think both are wins.

protected 1st
Schwindt
Weegar (1st pairing D signed)
one year rental of Huberdeau.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 11:21 AM   #2815
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
I think both are wins.

protected 1st
Schwindt
Weegar (1st pairing D signed)
one year rental of Huberdeau.
If you believe if it’s a one year of Tkachuk then it’s a win

If you believe it’s a trade of a signed Tkachuk then it’s a meh deal. Average I guess.
Flamesfan05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 11:23 AM   #2816
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
It matters to me as I plan on remaining a Flames fan past this upcoming season.
Of course... I'm saying it doesn't matter because it's not going to happen. The Flames will not be trading them (unless something goes seriously sideways) so what you could hypothetically get for them in trade doesn't matter. I mean I suppose you could imagine what they team could get for their negotiating rights after the playoffs (but that won't be much at all).
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 11:24 AM   #2817
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus View Post
Call it whatever you will, but this trade is going to shake out as a colossal failure if Huberdeau and Weegar are not extended long term. For me, if this isn't done by training camp, it is almost a guarantee that we are going to be in the same situation as we just were next summer wondering what happened as these 2 players walk off into the sunset for greener pastures.

BT has done half the job but playing the slow game again would be a major miscalculation. We all know this team won't be in sell mode come the trade deadline so something needs to give. I am completely unwilling to call this trade a "haul" or massive win until there is at least one of the parties locked up. Florida only moved these guys because they knew they would be challenging to sign given their own perceived value and cap situation.
Tarasenko is also a guy with one year left to UFA. In NJ, Bratt is an unsigned RFA and any D that they'd care to include would be a pending UFA. Same with Dallas and Robertson being an existing RFA. So out of his options, Treliving clearly did the best deal possible.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 11:25 AM   #2818
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Even in the “loss” scenario, it is a mitigated loss as we know we have a good prospect and a first rounder, plus whatever run we have this year with Huberdeau and Weegar. To me that is still better than the Blues offer. Not ideal, but better. The Canes offer is harder to decipher since we don’t know what it was. Necas is fine, but if he comes with a bunch of cap dumps and nothing better than a late first, I don’t see that as much better, if at all.

The problem I think is that posters are comparing the “loss” against a mythical return of unprotected firsts and NJ’s 2nd overall, when now it seems clear that wasn’t an option. NJ wasn’t on the list. It was Floridas very credible offer and a bunch of pu-pu platters. Flames win this deal. Be happy.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Fighting Banana Slug is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fighting Banana Slug For This Useful Post:
Old 07-29-2022, 11:26 AM   #2819
Fighting Banana Slug
#1 Goaltender
 
Fighting Banana Slug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Double post
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
Fighting Banana Slug is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2022, 11:31 AM   #2820
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fighting Banana Slug View Post
Even in the “loss” scenario, it is a mitigated loss as we know we have a good prospect and a first rounder, plus whatever run we have this year with Huberdeau and Weegar. To me that is still better than the Blues offer. Not ideal, but better. The Canes offer is harder to decipher since we don’t know what it was. Necas is fine, but if he comes with a bunch of cap dumps and nothing better than a late first, I don’t see that as much better, if at all.

The problem I think is that posters are comparing the “loss” against a mythical return of unprotected firsts and NJ’s 2nd overall, when now it seems clear that wasn’t an option. NJ wasn’t on the list. It was Floridas very credible offer and a bunch of pu-pu platters. Flames win this deal. Be happy.
But it's not a win unless the Flames get every possible contingency covered by a deal invented in every critic's mind.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:26 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy