Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
If they put Mangiapane with them ... maybe even Dube than they'd be a second line.
The way things are built though there isn't a 2nd line.
Coleman and Backlund are certainly not scoring like second liners but they're only a few points away from doing so.
Based on production / 60 the Flames break down as follows
1st Line
Gaudreau
Tkachuk
2nd Line
Lindholm (1 point short of top line)
Mangiapane (1 point short of top line)
Lucic
Dube
3rd Line
Coleman (1 point short of 2nd line)
Backlund (3 points short of 2nd line)
Then a huge drop off.
|
The team is missing a 2nd line center and a serviceable 4th line. That's really the issue.
Tkachuk-Lindholm-Gaudreau has been an elite top line this year.
The problem though is that I'm not sure we've used Mangiapane, Backlund, Coleman, Dube, and Lucic in a way that makes sense.
One thing they really should be doing is giving Mangiapane-Backlund-Coleman more of a look.
In 120 minutes together they are 66% expected goals for, have 2 goals for, 0 goals against, but are shooting 3.0% when on the ice together.
They've been dominant though in terms of possession and chance creation (70% high danger corsi for).
Then the other thing in the interim is not playing Monahan with Lewis on the 4th line.
Monahan is 54.5% xGF when playing without Lewis, and 38.8% xGF when playing with Lewis. Monahan hasn't had the bounce back season we hoped, but that was never going to happen being saddled with Lewis and Richardson.
Ideally they bring in a forward at the deadline, and I'd like them to call up one of the prospects, but with the pieces they have on the roster right now the lines really should be:
Gaudreau - Lindholm - Tkachuk: 60.8% xGF in 387 minutes
Mangiapane - Backlund - Coleman: 66.3% xGF in 120 minutes
Lucic - Monahan - Dube: 64.2 xGF in 30 minutes
That's actually putting our best 9 forwards into our top 9.
Then between Lewis, Ritchie, Pitlick, Ruzicka, and Richardson (who shouldn't play) put together a 4th line.