Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-30-2021, 10:03 AM   #861
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
Is there are possible way to fit Eichel plus new contracts for Gaudreau, Tkachuk and Mangiapane under the cap next year? We're looking at adding about $17 to $20 million in cap hits.
No
Flamesfan05 is online now  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:08 AM   #862
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers View Post
1. This is just made up nonsense.
2. They could easily recoup assets for him if needed. He’s an RFA. The timeline for resolving the Eichel situation is now. The timeline for resolving Tkachuk is next year.
1. Made up nonsense? Seems like a plausible scenario to me. The question isn’t would Buffalo want Tkachuk, it is why would Tkachuk want to sign long term in Buffalo? Aside from maybe Arizona, is there a team with a more grim outlook than Buffalo?

2. Why would Buffalo want to inherit that situation? Seems like made up nonsense to me.
TOfan is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:10 AM   #863
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Unless Johnny and Tkachuk were willing to sign for $9M or less, Mangiapane at $6M or less and they dump Monahan, Lucic, and Backlunds contracts they could make it work but I don’t see all of that falling into place.

I think Tkachuk would be traded at the draft to a team he was willing to sign with long term
Vinny01 is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:12 AM   #864
tkflames
First Line Centre
 
tkflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TOfan View Post
1. Made up nonsense? Seems like a plausible scenario to me. The question isn’t would Buffalo want Tkachuk, it is why would Tkachuk want to sign long term in Buffalo? Aside from maybe Arizona, is there a team with a more grim outlook than Buffalo?

2. Why would Buffalo want to inherit that situation? Seems like made up nonsense to me.
Why would we trade tkachuck or any other player not involved in the Eichel deal to Buffalo. There is a whole league that would be interested in tkachucks services. Most would likely pay way more than Buffalo.

If you are suggesting trading chucky for eichel now...they makes no sense from the perspective of flames management. They are not risking playoffs this season...especially in light of what Montreal did last year. Not saying it's right...its just not happening.
__________________
Go Flames Go
tkflames is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:14 AM   #865
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Unless Johnny and Tkachuk were willing to sign for $9M or less, Mangiapane at $6M or less and they dump Monahan, Lucic, and Backlunds contracts they could make it work but I don’t see all of that falling into place.

I think Tkachuk would be traded at the draft to a team he was willing to sign with long term
Even that leaves you $2 million or so over your cap hit this year, plus you're short two forwards. Maybe the cap goes up next year but I don't see how it's possible.

The team would have to say goodbye to Tkachuk or Gaudreau.
Strange Brew is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:16 AM   #866
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tkflames View Post
Why would we trade tkachuck or any other player not involved in the Eichel deal to Buffalo. There is a whole league that would be interested in tkachucks services. Most would likely pay way more than Buffalo.

If you are suggesting trading chucky for eichel now...they makes no sense from the perspective of flames management. They are not risking playoffs this season...especially in light of what Montreal did last year. Not saying it's right...its just not happening.
I’m suggesting the opposite, it makes no sense for the Flames to include Tkachuk, nor do I think Buffalo would want him due to his contract situation and the likelihood of him leaving Buffalo, one way or another, within a year/year and a half

Last edited by TOfan; 10-30-2021 at 11:05 AM.
TOfan is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:17 AM   #867
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dustygoon View Post
If the price is too high for us and vegas gets him, then so be it.

But if we miss out because Tre ran our numbers up to the cap and the salary going back to buffalo isn't to their liking, then i'm washing my rage pillow for heavy use.
I think the only way I would be mad that a deal fell through is if it came to light that Buffalo would take Tkachuk in deal and Tre said no. I personally don’t think Buffalo wants the headache of trying to sign Tkachuk . I also think it’s going to be a very hard contract negotiation for Calgary to pull off .
kyuss275 is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:19 AM   #868
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
Even that leaves you $2 million or so over your cap hit this year, plus you're short two forwards. Maybe the cap goes up next year but I don't see how it's possible.

The team would have to say goodbye to Tkachuk or Gaudreau.
The poster on HF who claims to be the insider seems to think Buffalo is really pushing for one of Mangiapane or Dube and if that is the case does it make sense to sell high on Mangiapane considering Dube is cost controlled until some of these big cap hits are off the books so it takes one huge negotiation for this summer off the table.
Vinny01 is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:22 AM   #869
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Oh my gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooddddddddddddd dddddd how is this saga still going??????

Trade him already you pieces of crap. Trade him, trade him, trade him!
Roof-Daddy is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 10-30-2021, 10:25 AM   #870
Flamesfan05
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
Even that leaves you $2 million or so over your cap hit this year, plus you're short two forwards. Maybe the cap goes up next year but I don't see how it's possible.

The team would have to say goodbye to Tkachuk or Gaudreau.
Good bye to Monahan and zadorov would cover Eichel.

Still need to find money for Johnny, Tkachuk and Mangi
Flamesfan05 is online now  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:25 AM   #871
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
Even that leaves you $2 million or so over your cap hit this year, plus you're short two forwards. Maybe the cap goes up next year but I don't see how it's possible.

The team would have to say goodbye to Tkachuk or Gaudreau.
Matthew!
Jiri Hrdina is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:25 AM   #872
stemit14
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
Is there are possible way to fit Eichel plus new contracts for Gaudreau, Tkachuk and Mangiapane under the cap next year? We're looking at adding about $17 to $20 million in cap hits.

Very difficult. Would need to trade Monahan without bringing back any salary (covers mangiapane’s raise and some of Eichel’s salary). Also need Lucic to retire or have to trade another player near his salary such as backlund without taking any salary back (should cover gaudreau’s raise and tkachuck’s raise). Even then I don’t see it being enough.

Currently (just focusing on players that could potentially be moved or need new contracts):

Tkachuk: $7,000,000
Gaudreau: $6,750,000
Monahan: $6,375,000
Backlund: $5,350,000
Lucic: $5,250,000
Mangiapane: $2,425,000
Zadorov: $3,750,000

TOTAL: $36,900,000

Next year:
Eichel: $10,000,000
Tkachuk: $9,000,000
Gaudreau: $9,000,000
Monahan: Traded
Backlund: $5,350,000
Lucic: Retired
Mangiapane: $6,000,000
Zadorov: gone

TOTAL: $39,350,000

I know there are other players to consider such as gudbranson and stone being UFAs that could leave but the team has to fill their spots with other players and they have to re-sign Kylington this year… and if he keeps playing like he is he will be due a good raise.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
stemit14 is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:36 AM   #873
mile
Franchise Player
 
mile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
The poster on HF who claims to be the insider seems to think Buffalo is really pushing for one of Mangiapane or Dube and if that is the case does it make sense to sell high on Mangiapane considering Dube is cost controlled until some of these big cap hits are off the books so it takes one huge negotiation for this summer off the table.
Just tell Adams that we’re competing this year and can’t subtract another roster player in addition to Monahan. Trade Mangiapane and we’d lose one of our best players. Trade Dube and we’d lose two of our top four centers in the deal

Assuming the rest of the package is the 2022 1st, Monahan, Zary, and 2022 2nd that was discussed - Treliving is probably pushing to offer one of Pelletier, Valimaki, or maybe another 1st as the final piece. If Buffalo still says no to all of these, I’d begrudgingly give up Dube. Hoping that Treliving is waiting for Vegas to make their best offer before he makes his final one that would beat it
mile is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:36 AM   #874
joejoe3
First Line Centre
 
joejoe3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

This is everyone assuming mony would waive his NTC?
__________________
GO FLAMES GO!
joejoe3 is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:38 AM   #875
mile
Franchise Player
 
mile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by joejoe3 View Post
This is everyone assuming mony would waive his NTC?
I think he would to get out of 4th line duty and get a fresh start.

Sutter has really emphasized how much he likes having speed down the middle and I don’t see him playing higher then any of Lindholm, Backlund, Dube. Love the guy but it almost feels like he doesn’t belong here anymore.

Last edited by mile; 10-30-2021 at 10:41 AM.
mile is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:40 AM   #876
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
1. Because he’s under contract for four more seasons after this one.

2. Because acquiring him is the best way to convince Gaudreau (and Tkachuk) to stay.
Just ignore this guy, he clearly is not a Flames fan and is trying to stir the pot with his negative bs.
dissentowner is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:41 AM   #877
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Coffee View Post
“Talks have cooled”

“Talks are heating up”

Eyeroll. There’s only so many asset permutations you can negotiate around, to have it take this long is straight up bizarre. If I was Eichel I would 1,000% be filing a grievance.

Hey Buffalo- if you’re not getting what you think he’s worth, maybe he just isn’t worth what you think he’s worth? Like newsflash, he’s worth what the market will pay and it isn’t getting better for you. So dumb.
Indeed. Looking for a kings ransom where there isn't any. And holding out 3 months evidently doesn't make it appear out of thin air. This is what happens when you walk yourself into a corner because of your own doing. When you operate that way and lose the player you also lose your leverage. Bite the bullet and do the kid a solid - the return only gets worse from here.
djsFlames is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:45 AM   #878
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

I still think Monahan would be flipped to a third team likely with some salary retained by Buffalo to get more picks and prospects.

Valimaki, Zary, 1st, 2nd, and whatever they get for Monahan hopefully is enough to get it done.
Vinny01 is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:46 AM   #879
joejoe3
First Line Centre
 
joejoe3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mile View Post
I think he would to get out of 4th line duty and get a fresh start.

Sutter has really emphasized how much he likes having speed down the middle and I don’t see him playing higher then any of Lindholm, Backlund, Dube. Love the guy but it almost feels like he doesn’t belong here anymore.
That or Buffalo is not on his 10 team no trade list…
__________________
GO FLAMES GO!
joejoe3 is offline  
Old 10-30-2021, 10:52 AM   #880
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Vegas talks have cooled? Valimaki scratched tonight?
Vinny01 is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:20 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy