08-28-2021, 11:47 AM
|
#4141
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kamloops
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814
Are you kidding?
A player with a $9M QO who is going to be a Blue in 12 months anyway.
Our 3rd or 4th best D.
A 1st round pick who’s never player a game for us.
A 1st next week year.
For:
A #1C, and a Cup-winning top-4 D.
It’s expensive. It wouldn’t be one of the top 10 overpays suggested in this thread, never mind in real life.
|
This grossly undervalues Tkachuk. He is a top-20 young player in the world with 2 years of team control. He had an off year last year like the whole team, but if he plays anywhere close to his potential he is worth 9m easily. Heave you seen what 9m buys you on the open market lately?
I've said it before, but again, I wouldn't add much to Tkachuk in a trade for Eichel. You are acting as if he is a throw in. Each to his own, but if you think your view of Tkachuk's value is correct there isn't much to say other than you are wrong. He is Calgary's single most valuable asset, and Calgary is not bereft of valuable assets.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to blender For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-28-2021, 12:03 PM
|
#4142
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blender
This grossly undervalues Tkachuk. He is a top-20 young player in the world with 2 years of team control. He had an off year last year like the whole team, but if he plays anywhere close to his potential he is worth 9m easily. Heave you seen what 9m buys you on the open market lately?
I've said it before, but again, I wouldn't add much to Tkachuk in a trade for Eichel. You are acting as if he is a throw in. Each to his own, but if you think your view of Tkachuk's value is correct there isn't much to say other than you are wrong. He is Calgary's single most valuable asset, and Calgary is not bereft of valuable assets.
|
He’s not a throw in, he’s the centrepiece.
And if he’s that good, it’s more than a fair offer for Buffalo, since they can still trade him or extend him.
The return is Jack Eichel. Tkachuk, good as he is, is our 2nd best left winger, and the other guy will probably extend with us if we get him a top-5 centre.
To me, it’s minimum 2 years of control for a LW Vs 5 for a centre.
That choice is clear.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”
Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-28-2021, 12:23 PM
|
#4143
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kamloops
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814
He’s not a throw in, he’s the centrepiece.
And if he’s that good, it’s more than a fair offer for Buffalo, since they can still trade him or extend him.
The return is Jack Eichel. Tkachuk, good as he is, is our 2nd best left winger, and the other guy will probably extend with us if we get him a top-5 centre.
To me, it’s minimum 2 years of control for a LW Vs 5 for a centre.
That choice is clear.
|
I like Eichel, but keep in mind he is damaged goods right now. The 5 years of control could be a major detriment if he doesn't heal properly or return to form.
In my mind the choice is not clear at all.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to blender For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-28-2021, 12:27 PM
|
#4144
|
Franchise Player
|
Tkachuk can't simply choose to be a Blue in 12 months. He's an RFA for two more seasons.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-28-2021, 12:34 PM
|
#4145
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
Tkachuk can't simply choose to be a Blue in 12 months. He's an RFA for two more seasons.
|
I think he just has to accept his QO after this up coming season and he's a UFA the following summer.
__________________

|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Sec214 For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-28-2021, 12:35 PM
|
#4146
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kamloops
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sec214
I think he just has to accept his QO after this up coming season and he's a UFA the following summer.
|
Exactly.
Two seasons til he is UFA
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to blender For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-28-2021, 01:10 PM
|
#4147
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz
Is Parayko not from Alberta? Even if he’s from Edmonton, if the Flames had the cap space, I don’t think re-signing him would be difficult or unlikely.
|
He’s from St. Albert.
|
|
|
08-28-2021, 01:23 PM
|
#4148
|
Franchise Player
|
All 31 other teams would kill to have Tkachuk on their team and here we are comfortable trading him away for a washed up Tarasenko or aging/banged up Pareyko...
Wtf am I reading here Jesus, that’s a terrible return
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Royle9 For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-28-2021, 01:44 PM
|
#4149
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9
All 31 other teams would kill to have Tkachuk on their team and here we are comfortable trading him away for a washed up Tarasenko or aging/banged up Pareyko...
Wtf am I reading here Jesus, that’s a terrible return
|
Not that - lots of us are comfortable trading him for Jack Eichel.
If it takes a 3-way trade with St Louis to make that happen, so be it.
__________________
”All you have to decide is what to do with the time that is given to you.”
Rowan Roy W-M - February 15, 2024
|
|
|
08-28-2021, 02:19 PM
|
#4150
|
First Line Centre
|
I would trade Tkachuk for Eichel and a conditional first in case Eichel doesn’t return to full health. No more add ons from the flames. If the Sabres don’t like that they can kiss my furry flames jersey lol.
|
|
|
08-28-2021, 02:59 PM
|
#4151
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Calgary
|
If the Flames are in win-now mode as they seem to be, I'd look at a different 3-way trade that was brought up before. Give up futures for Zibanejad from NYR and they can have Eichel, who probably doesn't play much of next season. Couturier's new contract shows a comparable for Zibanejad at 7.75x8. I think the salaries work if NYR retains, and they can while still fitting in Eichel.
To NYR:
Eichel
To Calgary:
Zibanejad (30% retained - 3.745/year for 1 year)
To Buffalo:
2022 1st (Calgary)
2023 2nd (Calgary) becomes 1st if CGY makes WCF in 22 or 23
2022 1st (NYR)
2023 1st (NYR)
2024 2nd (NYR) becomes 1st if NYR makes SCF in 22 or 23 or 24
At forward Calgary runs with:
Gaudreau - Zibenajed - Lindholm
Tkachuk - Monahan - Coleman
Mangiapane - Backlund - Dube
Lucic - Lewis - Pittlick
Gawdin
I don't know it's a slow Saturday afternoon lol.
|
|
|
08-28-2021, 03:18 PM
|
#4152
|
Franchise Player
|
I like Zibanejad a lot, but I think he would be asking for more than Couturier, at least $9m a season. He was on pace for almost 60 goals and 107 points over a full season in 2019-20 and will probably point to that season in contract negotiations. With only a $5.35m cap hit on his current contact, he'll be looking to get paid for sure.
Am also not sure if he would waive his NMC to leave NY and re-sign here, as he seems pretty big on his other job as a DJ and would probably want to be in a big city.
|
|
|
08-29-2021, 10:48 AM
|
#4153
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blender
Exactly.
Two seasons til he is UFA
|
Maybe 3 depending upon how it plays out
Flames could make their qualifying offer a multi year deal
Tkachuk would then have to file for arbitration
Flames could then accept the two year arbitration award
Keeps Tkachuk for three years.
__________________
'Skank' Marden: I play hockey and I fornicate, 'cause those are the two most fun things to do in cold weather. - Mystery Alaska
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to shutout For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-29-2021, 11:19 AM
|
#4154
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
The agent move leads me to think this will be resolved and it will be done before camp. I think the Flames have as good of a shot as anyone to make the deal work as long as they are all good with Eichel getting the surgery. The Sabres will want to send him west, the Flames should be desperate to make a huge move, and they should be able to get the pieces. I do think a 3 team deal is required with Tkachuk being the centerpiece from Calgary along with our 1st and perhaps another plus.
I don’t see how the Kings make the cap work, the Ducks are in full rebuild, and giving him to Vegas is likely the last thing Pegula wants.
I hope with how long this has dragged out Eichel would welcome a change anywhere and the Flames would represent a win now team with a few of his buddies on the roster.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-29-2021, 11:56 AM
|
#4155
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: Dallas
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shutout
Maybe 3 depending upon how it plays out
Flames could make their qualifying offer a multi year deal
Tkachuk would then have to file for arbitration
Flames could then accept the two year arbitration award
Keeps Tkachuk for three years.
|
9M multi years, Tkachuk would sign quick unless he has a fantastic season this year. The same season as last year, he is no where worth that much
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flamesfan05 For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-29-2021, 11:59 AM
|
#4156
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by shutout
Maybe 3 depending upon how it plays out
Flames could make their qualifying offer a multi year deal
Tkachuk would then have to file for arbitration
Flames could then accept the two year arbitration award
Keeps Tkachuk for three years.
|
It doesn’t work that way. Players who are in their final year Restricted Free Agency are only entitled to a 1 year term. Also, I’m 99% sure that the team will file for arbitration instead of extending Tkachuk a qualifying offer. The 1% is in case he has an absolute monster of a season(more than a PPG).
|
|
|
08-29-2021, 01:31 PM
|
#4157
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
split into another thread
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
08-29-2021, 02:02 PM
|
#4158
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
split into another thread
|
Is this the Gaudreau only thread now? or is this thread simply going to get locked?
|
|
|
08-29-2021, 03:52 PM
|
#4159
|
Franchise Player
|
Please lock. Two very different issues with very different points of discussion.
|
|
|
08-29-2021, 04:39 PM
|
#4160
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Groot
If the Flames are in win-now mode as they seem to be, I'd look at a different 3-way trade that was brought up before. Give up futures for Zibanejad from NYR and they can have Eichel, who probably doesn't play much of next season. Couturier's new contract shows a comparable for Zibanejad at 7.75x8. I think the salaries work if NYR retains, and they can while still fitting in Eichel.
To NYR:
Eichel
To Calgary:
Zibanejad (30% retained - 3.745/year for 1 year)
To Buffalo:
2022 1st (Calgary)
2023 2nd (Calgary) becomes 1st if CGY makes WCF in 22 or 23
2022 1st (NYR)
2023 1st (NYR)
2024 2nd (NYR) becomes 1st if NYR makes SCF in 22 or 23 or 24
At forward Calgary runs with:
Gaudreau - Zibenajed - Lindholm
Tkachuk - Monahan - Coleman
Mangiapane - Backlund - Dube
Lucic - Lewis - Pittlick
Gawdin
I don't know it's a slow Saturday afternoon lol.
|
I’d keep lindholm at center. Move monahan to the wing.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:06 AM.
|
|