08-11-2021, 11:16 AM
|
#1822
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
|
Time to offer sheet Pettersson. Make Vancouver sweat
|
|
|
|
08-11-2021, 11:19 AM
|
#1823
|
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
Can Seattle still do that? They should.
|
|
|
|
|
08-11-2021, 11:22 AM
|
#1824
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
If Seattle offer sheets him, I think it'll work out better for Vancouver. Seattle doesn't look like a good team, their first will be a high one and in this draft that could be dangerous. Imagine Seattle offer sheets him and the nucks get their first and it wins the lottery.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
|
|
08-11-2021, 11:24 AM
|
#1825
|
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
Fair point
|
|
|
|
|
08-11-2021, 11:33 AM
|
#1826
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Petterson for Tkachuk?
|
|
|
|
|
08-11-2021, 11:38 AM
|
#1827
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Petterson for Tkachuk?
|
I personally think the value is fair, but putting myself in the Canucks’ shoes, wouldn’t they have the same problem of re-signing him? Pretty sure Tkachuk wants to play for an American team.
|
|
|
|
|
08-11-2021, 11:40 AM
|
#1828
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan
I personally think the value is fair, but putting myself in the Canucks’ shoes, wouldn’t they have the same problem of re-signing him? Pretty sure Tkachuk wants to play for an American team.
|
Be easier for CGY to sign Petey in little Stockholm. Half his buddies that he trains with already here.
And I can't think of a better way to cut bait if Tkachuk is as unhappy about being in CGY as rumored.
Let Dim Jim handle the Tkachuk contract issue.
Plus we would be addressing Center ice from a position of strength.
|
|
|
|
|
08-11-2021, 11:40 AM
|
#1829
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan
I personally think the value is fair, but putting myself in the Canucks’ shoes, wouldn’t they have the same problem of re-signing him? Pretty sure Tkachuk wants to play for an American team.
|
And Petterson wants to play with a winning team and he may not think Calgary is it. Of course, he's an ELC and has no arb rights on the next contract.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-11-2021, 11:43 AM
|
#1830
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: CALGARY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Be easier for CGY to sign Petey in little Stockholm. Half his buddies that he trains with already here.
And I can't think of a better way to cut bait if Tkachuk is as unhappy about being in CGY as rumored.
Let Dim Jim handle the Tkachuk contract issue.
Plus we would be addressing Center ice from a position of strength.
|
Buddies or not... he said he wants to go somewhere with a chance of winning so flames would be out.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
08-11-2021, 11:44 AM
|
#1831
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan
Time to offer sheet Pettersson. Make Vancouver sweat
|
He said he wants to play for a winning team...
|
|
|
|
|
08-11-2021, 11:45 AM
|
#1832
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Flames are closer than Vancouver is. Anyone want to argue otherwise?
|
|
|
|
|
08-11-2021, 11:47 AM
|
#1833
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan
Time to offer sheet Pettersson. Make Vancouver sweat
|
Calgary likely not considered much better than Vancouver for winning.
Last edited by The Cobra; 08-11-2021 at 11:52 AM.
Reason: Dumb typo.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-11-2021, 11:48 AM
|
#1834
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Flames are closer than Vancouver is. Anyone want to argue otherwise?
|
Maybe, but neither is likely close.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Cobra For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-11-2021, 11:48 AM
|
#1835
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra
Calgary likely not considered much better than Calgary for winning.
|
I would say they were exactly the same.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Fighting Banana Slug For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-11-2021, 11:48 AM
|
#1836
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Flames are closer than Vancouver is. Anyone want to argue otherwise?
|
Does closer matter? Neither team is close at this point.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Ped For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
08-11-2021, 11:49 AM
|
#1837
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
And Petterson wants to play with a winning team and he may not think Calgary is it. Of course, he's an ELC and has no arb rights on the next contract.
|
The way I interpret it is Petersson wanting some consistency. He’s probably disappointed with going from a team in the second round to a team that barely has playoff hope.
I think there would absolutely be consistency when we’ve finally obtained a 1A center. I think Petersson can be that. He and Lindholm down the middle would be nice
|
|
|
|
|
08-11-2021, 11:50 AM
|
#1838
|
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Calgary
|
Petterson would provide incredible centre depth. Lindholm could handle the heavier lifting leaving Petterson as the scoring option. Not sure about the winger situation though. Would need to move Monahan for a RW.
__________________
From HFBoard oiler fan, in analyzing MacT's management:
O.K. there has been a lot of talk on whether or not MacTavish has actually done a good job for us, most fans on this board are very basic in their analysis and I feel would change their opinion entirely if the team was successful.
|
|
|
|
|
08-11-2021, 11:51 AM
|
#1839
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
If Seattle offer sheets him, I think it'll work out better for Vancouver. Seattle doesn't look like a good team, their first will be a high one and in this draft that could be dangerous. Imagine Seattle offer sheets him and the nucks get their first and it wins the lottery.
|
Seattle has excellent goaltending and good defence.
Their forwards are looking better and they still have lots of cap left. And you would be adding Pettersson to the mix.
That team looks quite bit better than lots of others, including a Pettersson less Canuck team.
|
|
|
|
|
08-11-2021, 11:52 AM
|
#1840
|
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Red Deer
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra
Calgary likely not considered much better than Calgary for winning.
|
I’d say there’s a good chance that Calgary will be better than Calgary
__________________
It was in.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ---Hatrick--- For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:59 PM.
|
|
