Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-22-2021, 10:05 AM   #101
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Dougie Hamilton is not signing in Edmonton lol.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-2021, 10:10 AM   #102
Plett25
Scoring Winger
 
Plett25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: 780
Exp:
Default

LTIR confuses me.

Doesn't Klefbom have to be on the opening day 20 man cap complaint roster?

Then, I thought they could exceed the cap by some amount up to Klefbom's salary.
Plett25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2021, 10:10 AM   #103
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stang View Post
I wouldn’t get too hung up on Ryan just wanted a RS 3C.
Yamamoto is getting 2-2.5 IMO and I have him there
Put Hamilton at 8 and there’s still 2.2 in cap.

And I didn’t worry about who is playing with who.
Well, you should. If all your goals come from one line anyway, signing a utility man at $5.5M to play on it is not money well spent.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2021, 10:11 AM   #104
stang
CP's Fraser Crane
 
stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Dougie Hamilton is not signing in Edmonton lol.
I’d agree with you, but that’s what Frank Serevalli is speculating today.
stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2021, 10:11 AM   #105
Bring_Back_Shantz
Franchise Player
 
Bring_Back_Shantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mull View Post
Ty Why can only TO sign him for 8 years?
Free agents can only sign 8 year deals with the team that holds/previously held their rights.
Any other team is 7 years max.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
<-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
Bring_Back_Shantz is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bring_Back_Shantz For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-2021, 10:13 AM   #106
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I'm glad Hyman isn't coming to CGY on that type of contract.
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2021, 10:15 AM   #107
Weitz
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Plett25 View Post
LTIR confuses me.

Doesn't Klefbom have to be on the opening day 20 man cap complaint roster?

Then, I thought they could exceed the cap by some amount up to Klefbom's salary.
Its very complicated and there are all sorts of ways to do things. If you want to confuse yourself take a look here.

https://www.capfriendly.com/ltir-faq
Weitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2021, 10:16 AM   #108
Mull
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bring_Back_Shantz View Post
Free agents can only sign 8 year deals with the team that holds/previously held their rights.
Any other team is 7 years max.
ahh thank you so even if it was a month in the future only TO could sign for 8 years.

Any idea why that was included in the CBA? Seems like an odd thing for the teams to fight for. Its only a one year difference,
Mull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2021, 10:19 AM   #109
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bring_Back_Shantz View Post
Free agents can only sign 8 year deals with the team that holds/previously held their rights.
Any other team is 7 years max.
Nearing semantics, but with the exception of Seattle during the expansion draft, it's actually what team held their rights at the time of the trade deadline and prior to them becoming UFA. So the Oiler's could not trade for his rights and then sign him to an 8 year deal, he must sign with Toronto and before July 28 to get an 8 year term.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mull View Post
ahh thank you so even if it was a month in the future only TO could sign for 8 years.

Any idea why that was included in the CBA? Seems like an odd thing for the teams to fight for. Its only a one year difference,
Not even Toronto will be able to sign him for 8 years in a month. And I think it's 100% to encourage players to sign with the teams who have their rights and provide the ability for teams who do have their rights to potentially make sign-and-trades like this.
Oling_Roachinen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Oling_Roachinen For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-2021, 10:21 AM   #110
Mull
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2020
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen View Post
. And I think it's 100% to encourage players to sign with the teams who have their rights and provide the ability for teams who do have their rights to potentially make sign-and-trades like this.
The difference between 7 and 8 years seems just so minor to make it worthwhile to include in the CBA to have an effect of really many occasions

Maybe that's why it was included ha, one NHL negotiator wanted it and everyone just "ok'd" it as it didn't' matter to anyone else
Mull is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2021, 10:21 AM   #111
Plett25
Scoring Winger
 
Plett25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: 780
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz View Post
Its very complicated and there are all sorts of ways to do things. If you want to confuse yourself take a look here.

https://www.capfriendly.com/ltir-faq
Thanks, I think I've looked at that before. I still can't wrap my head around it.

It just seems like everybody just ignores Klefbom's contract like it doesn't exist or affect anything. I'm not sure that's correct.
Plett25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2021, 10:23 AM   #112
VilleN
First Line Centre
 
VilleN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mull View Post
The difference between 7 and 8 years seems just so minor to make it worthwhile to include in the CBA to have an effect of really many occasions

Maybe that's why it was included ha, one NHL negotiator wanted it and everyone just "ok'd" it as it didn't' matter to anyone else
It seems to be a factor in these types of scenarios. For Hyman, it means an extra ~5mil guaranteed... doesn't seem like nothing.

Edit: With salary vs. term it equates to around 2.8M... still not nothing. And it becomes more valuable in higher salary scenarios, like Tavares for example.
__________________
Quote:
Can I offer you a nice egg in these trying times?

Last edited by VilleN; 07-22-2021 at 10:27 AM.
VilleN is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to VilleN For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-2021, 10:25 AM   #113
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

I think Hyman is a very good player and he might be exactly what the oilers need.

I think he can bring more to the Oilers than he can to the Flames. Flames need something that changes the top six not just supplement it, like a Eichel or Laine.

Flames already have guys like Hyman in Lindholm, Mangiapane and Dube. They need the thoroughbreds.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2021, 10:27 AM   #114
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

5.125 x 8: the new 6 x 6
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2021, 10:28 AM   #115
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Oilers D is worse, goaltending likely worse...slight upgrade at forward and no cap space for years.

Shrewd
__________________
GFG
dino7c is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2021, 10:31 AM   #116
GhostCookie
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
Dougie Hamilton is not signing in Edmonton lol.
Wasn't one of the reason's Dougie wanted out due to his love of high culture and the lack of it in Calgary? It's not exactly like Edmonton has the Louvre there so I would have to agree with you.

Then again, money makes people look past things pretty easily, possible he figures it will be fine and then just checks out. 8x8 for a player that soon regrets being there sounds like the standard E=NG contract.
GhostCookie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2021, 10:35 AM   #117
Tron_fdc
In Your MCP
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Watching Hot Dog Hans
Exp:
Default

I doubt Hamilton is signing with any Canadian team to be honest. After what happened here the guy is probably happy counting fat stacks in relative anonymity in Florida. Can't say I blame him either.
Tron_fdc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2021, 10:36 AM   #118
Aarongavey
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
If the Oilers are mortgaging the future then put pieces like Holloway, Broberg, 1st rounders etc for players who can help with good cap hits. I guess my problem is I don’t view Hyman as a $5M player on a short or long term deal. I would say he is a 4.5M player for 3-4 years. That is my opinion I know others view him far more highly but to me this is a role player being grossly overpaid in both dollars and term
Holland's hybrid approach is fine by me. Save a little money now, build a team that still cannot really compete for the Cup but hurt yourself down the line. I am good with them buying out Neal and Koskinen in that sense as well.
Aarongavey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2021, 10:37 AM   #119
stang
CP's Fraser Crane
 
stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Exp:
Default

Carolina does owe Oilers “future considerations”
stang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2021, 10:39 AM   #120
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aarongavey View Post
Holland's hybrid approach is fine by me. Save a little money now, build a team that still cannot really compete for the Cup but hurt yourself down the line. I am good with them buying out Neal and Koskinen in that sense as well.
As an Oiler hater I absolutely love the moves he has made. Honestly I think he is worse than Chiarelli so far.

Ken’s best moves were the Barrie deal? What else? I guess Smith last year was a nice signing.

I think Connor is waiting until his NMC kicks in before he requests a trade but I do think it will come. I am not sure which of the Hyman or Nuge deal will look worse sooner.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:23 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy