Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-14-2021, 01:14 PM   #481
the_only_turek_fan
Lifetime Suspension
 
the_only_turek_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
Protect Gawdin over Backlund?

OK then.
Zainullin for Savard. Enough said.
the_only_turek_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2021, 01:15 PM   #482
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I assume Button is using the exposure rules and the Flames' current contract situation and exposing Backlund because two signed veteran forwards have to be exposed.

Until they sign someone else who meets the requirements, Backlund has to be the odd man out.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 07-14-2021, 01:18 PM   #483
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Expose Taney instead. Give them a better options instead of giving up assets. Just ask them who they realistically want and see if you can make a deal. Or just expose what makes sense and play the hand you're dealt.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2021, 01:26 PM   #484
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
Again with the lazy ‘worst division in hockey’ narrative.

Winning percentage of the 7 Canadian teams in 2019-20, playing in their normal divisions: .542

Winning percentage of the 7 Canadian teams in 2020-21, playing in ‘the worst division in hockey’ so none of them ever had to play against a good team: .545

Some difference. Some worst.
Interesting. If you believe the North Division was not the worst division in the NHL in 2021 can you elaborate here and let us know what NHL division produced a worse group of four teams to make the playoffs?
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2021, 01:36 PM   #485
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

If Backlund is exposed the Kraken do not hesitate to pick him. He’d likely be their #1 C on opening night.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2021, 01:44 PM   #486
lazypucker
First Line Centre
 
lazypucker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

I am wondering who Seattle will pick from the Oilers? Of course the Oilers want them to pick Neal or Kassian or Koskinen for cap relief. But I really hope that Seattle will pick some scrub making league minimum like a Devin Shaw or Stalock just to keep the Oils in cap jail...
lazypucker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2021, 01:51 PM   #487
MacDaddy77
First Line Centre
 
MacDaddy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Exp:
Default

Kassian?? Core piece Kassian according to newly acquired Keith

Cant expose him
MacDaddy77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2021, 01:52 PM   #488
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neo45 View Post
People keep saying Tampa followed the rules but they really didn’t

Healthy players have to come off the injured reserve. Doesn’t matter if it’s on the very last day of the regular season
No, there is no such rule.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2021, 01:53 PM   #489
Lanny_McDonald
Franchise Player
 
Lanny_McDonald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
Protect Gawdin over Backlund?

OK then.
Completely explains why he never found another job in the NHL.
Lanny_McDonald is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2021, 01:54 PM   #490
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Interesting. If you believe the North Division was not the worst division in the NHL in 2021 can you elaborate here and let us know what NHL division produced a worse group of four teams to make the playoffs?
Those are two different questions. The North Division did not have a team in the top five in the NHL. It also didn't have a team in the bottom five. So the top four teams were not as good as the top four teams in the other divisions, but the bottom three teams were not as bad as the non-playoff teams in the other divisions. I believe they call this phenomenon ‘parity’.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 07-14-2021, 05:55 PM   #491
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1415459715430207501
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2021, 06:30 PM   #492
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
Those are two different questions. The North Division did not have a team in the top five in the NHL. It also didn't have a team in the bottom five. So the top four teams were not as good as the top four teams in the other divisions, but the bottom three teams were not as bad as the non-playoff teams in the other divisions. I believe they call this phenomenon ‘parity’.
I believe the phenomenon is called 'goal posts moved'.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2021, 06:38 PM   #493
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I believe the phenomenon is called 'goal posts moved'.
No. The goalposts are exactly where they always were. You just want to be playing your game in a different place.

If the North Division were really worse than the others, you would expect that to show either (a) in lower than average winning percentages by the North Division teams when they had to play against other opponents, or (b) in a significant increase in their winning percentages when they no longer had to play other opponents, or both. Neither (a) nor (b) is true. I therefore conclude that there is no evidence that the North was worse than the other divisions.

If anyone has moved the goalposts, it is you. You started by saying the division as a whole was worse, and then shifted your ground to claim that it should be judged solely by the records of the top four teams.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 07-14-2021, 07:15 PM   #494
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
No. The goalposts are exactly where they always were. You just want to be playing your game in a different place.

If the North Division were really worse than the others, you would expect that to show either (a) in lower than average winning percentages by the North Division teams when they had to play against other opponents, or (b) in a significant increase in their winning percentages when they no longer had to play other opponents, or both. Neither (a) nor (b) is true. I therefore conclude that there is no evidence that the North was worse than the other divisions.

If anyone has moved the goalposts, it is you. You started by saying the division as a whole was worse, and then shifted your ground to claim that it should be judged solely by the records of the top four teams.
It was the worst division in the NHL this season. If you disagree please tell me which one was worse. Stop playing games.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2021, 07:16 PM   #495
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
It was the worst division in the NHL this season. If you disagree please tell me which one was worse. Stop playing games.
It's a meaningless question. Show me the results of those teams playing games against each other (not just the four that happened to make the third round of the playoffs), and I'll tell you which ones were better or worse.

There are no data to justify ANY conclusion. That's why I am not drawing any conclusion. Why the hell are you?

Go ahead, show me what makes the North Division the worst. So far, all you've got is ‘Because I say so’. I call BS.
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2021, 08:15 PM   #496
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jay Random View Post
No. The goalposts are exactly where they always were. You just want to be playing your game in a different place.

If the North Division were really worse than the others, you would expect that to show either (a) in lower than average winning percentages by the North Division teams when they had to play against other opponents, or (b) in a significant increase in their winning percentages when they no longer had to play other opponents, or both. Neither (a) nor (b) is true. I therefore conclude that there is no evidence that the North was worse than the other divisions.

If anyone has moved the goalposts, it is you. You started by saying the division as a whole was worse, and then shifted your ground to claim that it should be judged solely by the records of the top four teams.
No, you're wrong here.

The average winning percentage, league wide, is about .540 (due to 3 point games). When teams play only within their own division, their average winning percentage will be about .540 (because they are always playing each other, and there is always a winner and a loser).

If you put the 8 best teams in the league in a division, and they only played each other, they would end up with an average winning percentage of about .540. If you put the 8 worst teams in the league and they only played each other, they would also have an average winning percentage of about .540.

Suggesting the division was not weak, based on the winning percentage, is just flat out wrong - the percentage proves neither good nor bad, it only proves what we already know, that, with 3 point games, the average winning percentage league-wide (or division-wide in a closed schedule) continues to be about .540
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 07-14-2021, 08:27 PM   #497
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Actually, looking at the numbers, winning percentages were a little lower than .540 this year. The divisions come out as follows:

East....: .519 (50 OT games)
Central: .530 (61 OT games)
West...: .518 (49 OT games)
North..: .508 (only 35 OT games, normalized to 40 vs 8-team divisions))
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2021, 08:28 PM   #498
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

The North had the lowest percentage because they had the fewest 3 pt games. But these stats prove nothing, positively or negatively, about the strength of the divisions,
Enoch Root is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 07-14-2021, 08:30 PM   #499
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss View Post


Said in the other thread, the Flames report the same for Gio. Bring in Dr Nick Riviera if need be to vouch for it
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2021, 09:48 PM   #500
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
No, you're wrong here.

The average winning percentage, league wide, is about .540 (due to 3 point games). When teams play only within their own division, their average winning percentage will be about .540 (because they are always playing each other, and there is always a winner and a loser).

If you put the 8 best teams in the league in a division, and they only played each other, they would end up with an average winning percentage of about .540. If you put the 8 worst teams in the league and they only played each other, they would also have an average winning percentage of about .540.

Suggesting the division was not weak, based on the winning percentage, is just flat out wrong - the percentage proves neither good nor bad, it only proves what we already know, that, with 3 point games, the average winning percentage league-wide (or division-wide in a closed schedule) continues to be about .540
That's not what I said at all.

The 7 Canadian teams had a winning percentage of .542 in 2019-20, playing in their regular divisions. In other words, collectively they were dead average in that year. They gained no extra benefit by not having to play any U.S. teams. Therefore, the North Division was close enough to average that the difference amounts to statistical noise.

Quote:
Suggesting the division was not weak, based on the winning percentage, is just flat out wrong - the percentage proves neither good nor bad, it only proves what we already know, that, with 3 point games, the average winning percentage league-wide (or division-wide in a closed schedule) continues to be about .540
I am suggesting the division was not weak based on those teams' winning percentage in their regular divisions in 2019-20.

Are we all clear now?
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.

Last edited by Jay Random; 07-14-2021 at 09:51 PM.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:35 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy