04-13-2021, 02:51 PM
|
#521
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
So we're saying Florida's 16th ranked prospect is our 5th best? That's embarrassing and if so, hopefully only because whoever ranked their prospects knew nothing about him.
|
Shiny new toy syndrome.
|
|
|
04-13-2021, 02:51 PM
|
#522
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
That list definitely needs to be revamped with the arrival of Sutter and the three year contract. That move has to be death for Phillips, Pettersen, Francis, and Zavgorodniy, then a huge lift for Ruzicka, Pospisil, Kuznetsov, and Solovyov. I'd put Heineman in the #6 slot on the list and then elevate Ruzicka, Kuznetsov, and add Solovyov to the ranks, probably dropping Francis from the top 20.
|
Hey man, with Benny gone I was wondering what you’d be doing with all your newfound time
Write a novel, take up piano at a late age, paint a masterpiece?
|
|
|
04-13-2021, 02:53 PM
|
#523
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
|
So does #9 not mean what it used to anymore?
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Strange Brew For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-13-2021, 02:54 PM
|
#524
|
All I can get
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
That list definitely needs to be revamped with the arrival of Sutter and the three year contract. That move has to be death for Phillips, Pettersen, Francis, and Zavgorodniy, then a huge lift for Ruzicka, Pospisil, Kuznetsov, and Solovyov. I'd put Heineman in the #6 slot on the list and then elevate Ruzicka, Kuznetsov, and add Solovyov to the ranks, probably dropping Francis from the top 20.
|
Yeah, 5 or 6 .... about there. This is a second rounder in the Dillon Dube range as far as potential (and a bit more size). A lot of upside with "the Panthers got robbed" vibe.
Of course with prospects, nothing's guaranteed. But a nice asset at this point.
|
|
|
04-13-2021, 02:59 PM
|
#525
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Not Beltline
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamesfan05
Only guys clearly over him are Zary and Peletier
It’s a joke that Poireir and Francis jumped him in a few months
And no, the midget goalie is not a better prospect
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to BeltlineFan For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-13-2021, 03:05 PM
|
#526
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
|
That is the most hallowed number in the game...big expectations with it.
Howe, Richard, Hull, McDonald, Duff, Kariya, Bucyk, Nicholls, Anderson (shudder), Modano, Bathgate....others that may still get there.
|
|
|
04-13-2021, 03:19 PM
|
#527
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
That is the most hallowed number in the game...big expectations with it.
Howe, Richard, Hull, McDonald, Duff, Kariya, Bucyk, Nicholls, Anderson (shudder), Modano, Bathgate....others that may still get there.
|
Don't forget Sergei Zholtok and Harri Pesonen.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to powderjunkie For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-13-2021, 03:24 PM
|
#528
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
So we're saying Florida's 16th ranked prospect is our 5th best? That's embarrassing and if so, hopefully only because whoever ranked their prospects knew nothing about him.
|
Well, that and Calgary's prospects are pretty ####e.
Last edited by Lanny_McDonald; 04-13-2021 at 03:28 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Lanny_McDonald For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-13-2021, 03:28 PM
|
#529
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
|
There better be a Lanny stache come playoff time
|
|
|
04-13-2021, 03:30 PM
|
#530
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Calgary
|
I would put Heinie(?) somewhere between 5-10. Just my opinion-I think there's alot of numbers that show we have something here, and he passes the eye test with flying colors. Sutter will love him too methinks.
|
|
|
04-13-2021, 03:32 PM
|
#531
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache
Hey man, with Benny gone I was wondering what you’d be doing with all your newfound time
Write a novel, take up piano at a late age, paint a masterpiece?
|
Nah, I'll just float blissfully in the pool of your warm salty tears.
|
|
|
04-13-2021, 03:33 PM
|
#532
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Still very happy with the return.
FLA definitely paid specifically for playoff Benny as they have post season aspirations.
|
|
|
04-13-2021, 03:39 PM
|
#533
|
Franchise Player
|
I haven't looked at the Panthers roster. Do they have to make any hard decisions around the expansion draft with Bennett now on the team? The failed miserably last go with Vegas.
|
|
|
04-13-2021, 03:44 PM
|
#534
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
Nah, I'll just float blissfully in the pool of your warm salty tears.

|
Quenneville and Zito clearly think Bennett is worth a lot more than you, so I wouldn't be taking a victory lap just yet.
|
|
|
04-13-2021, 04:18 PM
|
#535
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob
I haven't looked at the Panthers roster. Do they have to make any hard decisions around the expansion draft with Bennett now on the team? The failed miserably last go with Vegas.
|
Well, they do have Barkov, Huberdeau, Hornqvist, Vatrano, Duclair, Verhaeghe, and Wallmark up front that they may consider protecting. Then on the blueline they have Ekblad, Yandle, Stralman, Weegar, Nutivaara, Forsling, and Gudas. I don't see a clear protection list there. Based on the investment they just made I suspect they qualify and protect Bennett, but then try and sign him to a two year prove it contract at less than the qualification.
|
|
|
04-13-2021, 04:22 PM
|
#536
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ
Hunter Smith was passed by all teams for 7 rounds in 2013. Sucks that we picked him with a 2nd rounder in 2014. At least that was the Berra pick (I think?) so it wasn't too bad. But would've loved to have a serviceable NHLer picked in the 2nd round
.
|
The fact he was passed over doesn't bother me at all. There have been a lot of good players that have not been drafted in there first year of eligibility. The issue was more the type of player being picked: big and not skilled.
My approach to the draft would be home run swings in every round. Those are the franchise changing picks. So take your swings. I would be asking my scouts to describe if they could see their player playing in the top of our line-up, or being an impact on the roster. In the later rounds the chances of that would be far slimmer but I'll still take a guy who has a 10% chance of being an impact player over a guy that has a 50% chance of being a 4th liner.
Draft for upside. Each pick. Every round.
|
|
|
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
1qqaaz,
Aarongavey,
CliffFletcher,
D as in David,
ForeverFlameFan,
Geeoff,
JT45,
Mightyfire89,
powderjunkie,
Rick M.,
rogermexico,
shutout,
tknez16,
VilleN
|
04-13-2021, 04:34 PM
|
#537
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
The fact he was passed over doesn't bother me at all. There have been a lot of good players that have not been drafted in there first year of eligibility. The issue was more the type of player being picked: big and not skilled.
My approach to the draft would be home run swings in every round. Those are the franchise changing picks. So take your swings. I would be asking my scouts to describe if they could see their player playing in the top of our line-up, or being an impact on the roster. In the later rounds the chances of that would be far slimmer but I'll still take a guy who has a 10% chance of being an impact player over a guy that has a 50% chance of being a 4th liner.
Draft for upside. Each pick. Every round.
|
100%. Easier to fill the bottom 6 with UFA vets rather than trying to “home grow” one. Always pick for huge upside.
|
|
|
04-13-2021, 04:39 PM
|
#538
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99
That is the most hallowed number in the game...big expectations with it.
Howe, Richard, Hull, McDonald, Duff, Kariya, Bucyk, Nicholls, Anderson (shudder), Modano, Bathgate....others that may still get there.
|
Yeah, give Bennett 99 and watch Edmonton erupt.
|
|
|
04-13-2021, 04:51 PM
|
#539
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick M.
Yeah, give Bennett 99 and watch Edmonton erupt.
|
That would, in fact, be hilarious but cant happen.
99 is retired league wide.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-13-2021, 04:54 PM
|
#540
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
The fact he was passed over doesn't bother me at all. There have been a lot of good players that have not been drafted in there first year of eligibility. The issue was more the type of player being picked: big and not skilled.
My approach to the draft would be home run swings in every round. Those are the franchise changing picks. So take your swings. I would be asking my scouts to describe if they could see their player playing in the top of our line-up, or being an impact on the roster. In the later rounds the chances of that would be far slimmer but I'll still take a guy who has a 10% chance of being an impact player over a guy that has a 50% chance of being a 4th liner.
Draft for upside. Each pick. Every round.
|
I mostly agree with this sentiment as well - draft for value, make trades later to balance it out.
The only issue is that it becomes expensive to acquire grit that can play. Look at what Goodrow went for last year, for instance.
Also, the Flames were interested in Smith since his first draft eligibility. They invited him after the draft, but I think he was nursing an injury, or something or other. That next season saw him shoot up in points and he was playing both PK and PP on his team, and looking good actually with skilled players. He wasn't picked as a goon, or even as a 4th liner. Him (and Kanzig) were both identified as being large players who had been improving their skill level.
Hitting it out of the park is getting a big, fast, tough and skilled player too. I still don't hate that the Flames tried to go for it. Just sucked that it didn't work out.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:23 AM.
|
|