Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 03-20-2021, 10:06 PM   #121
memphusk
Franchise Player
 
memphusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigrangy View Post
I checked briefly on natural stat trick. The flames aren’t appreciably better or worse than most teams with their amount of shots for at shooting wide.

Just looked at FF minus SF and that counts misses.

Also, I think the top 6 Ritchie experiment can be wrapped up, that’s not working. Get Lindholm back into the gato gang and get the top 6 rolling again.
So what it says is that they're mediocre right now. I thought they would've been bottom 10.
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
memphusk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2021, 10:34 PM   #122
simonarea
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1_Flames_Fan View Post
#freematthewphillips
I like him but we can’t go any smaller than this current line up. Unless we get rid of Ryan (I know there are Ryan lovers here but he is overpaid, old, too small... good speed but we need a great speedster , or mangiapane(his playing style is aggressive however his hardware can’t match his style ... he gets knocked off the puck too many times)
simonarea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2021, 10:38 PM   #123
CSharp
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by simonarea View Post
I like him but we can’t go any smaller than this current line up. Unless we get rid of Ryan (I know there are Ryan lovers here but he is overpaid, old, too small... good speed but we need a great speedster , or mangiapane(his playing style is aggressive however his hardware can’t match his style ... he gets knocked off the puck too many times)
That’s like most of the team!
CSharp is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CSharp For This Useful Post:
Old 03-20-2021, 10:46 PM   #124
taxbuster
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Well that sucked. Flames looked gassed from the opening puck drop. Not going to win many games if that's true. Makes me question their conditioning. Also makes me question the GAF meter on the top two lines. Way too many lazy plays still. And the bottom two lines just aren't going to win you games.

It seems that twice now Flames have come up big for a game....and fallen totally flat the next one. This is good info for DS. What he's going to do about it? Beats me.
taxbuster is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to taxbuster For This Useful Post:
Old 03-20-2021, 10:48 PM   #125
bigpete
Crash and Bang Winger
 
bigpete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

An Iginla in his prime would look good on this team right now. That's what we need. Are there any of those lying around?
bigpete is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to bigpete For This Useful Post:
Old 03-20-2021, 11:01 PM   #126
memphusk
Franchise Player
 
memphusk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigpete View Post
An Iginla in his prime would look good on this team right now. That's what we need. Are there any of those lying around?
32 teams are looking for an Iginla.
__________________
I hate just about everyone and just about everything.
memphusk is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to memphusk For This Useful Post:
Old 03-20-2021, 11:04 PM   #127
blender
First Line Centre
 
blender's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kamloops
Exp:
Default

I was more disappointed in the lack of entertainment value than the loss.

Best take Ottawa seriously and get the 4 points.
blender is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2021, 11:13 PM   #128
sa226
#1 Goaltender
 
sa226's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Back in Calgary!!
Exp:
Default

I honestly think that there have been more tweaks and adjustments to system and style than they immediately let on.

My optimistic side thinks they're in an adjustment period, taking a bit too much time to make sure they're in the right spot and doing the right thing. Once that becomes second nature, I think we'll see some good things happen. Problem is that Sutter mentioned the maturity of this group needs some work. That's a problem in a shortened season.

The positives for me is that the structurel ooks way better. Just plain old positioning has cleaned up at of the glaring issues. But the execution is way off where it needs to be. Sure, they are playing way better positionally, but if your 5v5 offense is as effective as a pop gun, and your powerplay is abysmal, you're not going to win too many games.

I do actually see some progress, but if they have any aspirations for this season, they're running out of time.

Sent from my SM-G973W using Tapatalk
sa226 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2021, 11:21 PM   #129
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Frustrating game to watch, but also shows you how important it is for the team to buy in to the system and structure play. The Leafs have more high end talent and skill but it wasn't the skill that beat the Flames, it was the structure and system. While the Leafs are struggling right now, you can tell they are still playing to their structure. That's where the Flames need to get to and as Darryl says, that's going to be a work in progress.

Flames had trouble gaining the zone and moving through the neutral zone, that's not all on a lack of talent, that's the Leafs. The Leafs shut down McDavid and Draisatl so stopping the Flames should have been a walk in the park.

A few bounces the other way and the Flames could have got an extra point or stolen 2. While they were outplayed both games, it wasn't as bad as the last time they were in Toronto and Rittich stole them 3 points.

If you consider the Leafs and Oilers as the class of the division, well the Flames split these 4 games with them and they aren't near where Darryl wants them to be yet. So that's an optimistic view of things.

How the Flames fare against the Sens in the upcoming two games will tell us if they have righted the ship at least in the proper direction. They have to win both games and convincingly and they have to win the series against the Jets.

Can't really lose out on any points against the Sens, Habs and Canucks from here on out, especially since it looks like they will have a hard time sweeping any series against the top 3 teams.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2021, 11:24 PM   #130
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

More upset that they couldn't even score one than the fact that they lost
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
Old 03-20-2021, 11:26 PM   #131
868904
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sa226 View Post
The positives for me is that the structurel ooks way better. Just plain old positioning has cleaned up at of the glaring issues. But the execution is way off where it needs to be. Sure, they are playing way better positionally, but if your 5v5 offense is as effective as a pop gun, and your powerplay is abysmal, you're not going to win too many games.

I do actually see some progress, but if they have any aspirations for this season, they're running out of time.

Sent from my SM-G973W using Tapatalk
These are on the skill guys and its' clear to me that Darryl is trying his best to manage the confidence of Gaudreau, Monahan, Lindholm, Tkachuk, etc. He knows they need a firm hand but also can't just rip them too harshly because confidence is the big thing with these guys.

It's really a shame that our young stars have been subjected to terrible coaching through the most important years of the career and only now are receiving the proper coach and mentor. You hope it's not too late for Johnny and Mony.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
868904 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to 868904 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-20-2021, 11:34 PM   #132
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Do any of us believe that this team can actually win with Monahan and Gaudreau playing the roles they do/accounting for as much of the cap as they do?

I just...don’t. I don’t think they can elevate beyond what they’ve shown thus far in their careers, and I even say that while liking both players a good deal. I just don’t think they can get it done.

(I have similar thoughts towards Backlund and Giordano)
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 03-20-2021, 11:35 PM   #133
shadowlord
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Vancouver, BC
Exp:
Default

With the Johnny-Mony-Ritchie line essentially MIA, how are we feeling about the Tkachuk-Lindholm-Dube line?

Although it's become our de-facto top line, but I'm not sure it's a great top-line for a playoff team. There might be better options that involve breaking up Lindholm and Tkachuk. That line seems to provide some sustained offensive pressure at times, but I don't feel like they are a dangerous scoring threat in recent games.

The Lucic-Backlund-Mangiapane line is seems quite effective at cycling the puck leading to a scoring chance as was last year's Tkachuk-Backlund-Mangiapane line. In fact, I'd propose that last year's Tkachuk-Backlund-Mangiapane line is a much more deadly top-line than Tkachuk-Lindholm-Dube, although they were playing as a second line last year.
shadowlord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2021, 11:37 PM   #134
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
Do any of us believe that this team can actually win with Monahan and Gaudreau playing the roles they do/accounting for as much of the cap as they do?

I just...don’t. I don’t think they can elevate beyond what they’ve shown thus far in their careers, and I even say that while liking both players a good deal. I just don’t think they can get it done.

(I have similar thoughts towards Backlund and Giordano)
The cap hit isn't the problem, they're paid fairly for what they bring.

Problem is neither of them are the elite guy that we need them to be. Both are fantastic secondary pieces. Trouble is, that's all we have, is fantastic secondary pieces.

And I have no answer to this question. The only proven way to get the piece we need is via lottery balls.

If I'm Treliving I go hard after Eichel
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2021, 11:39 PM   #135
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by btimbit View Post
The cap hit isn't the problem, they're paid fairly for what they bring.

Problem is neither of them are the elite guy that we need them to be. Both are fantastic secondary pieces. Trouble is, that's all we have, is fantastic secondary pieces.

And I have no answer to this question. The only proven way to get the piece we need is via lottery balls.

If I'm Treliving I go hard after Eichel
I don’t believe Monahan is even a fantastic secondary piece at this stage. He has been an outright bad even strength player for over two full calendar years.

Yeah, Eichel needs to be the target if this team wants to actually win.

Last edited by ComixZone; 03-21-2021 at 12:53 AM.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 03-21-2021, 12:32 AM   #136
Manhattanboy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

The decline of Monahan and Gaudreau has been nothing short of spectacular.

During the 2015 playoffs, and even after the loss to Anaheim I remember thinking we could win a cup with these guys.

JG was amazing. Remember the home game against Anaheim where he tied it with the goalie pulled and Backlund scored in OT?

That was almost five years ago. Look where we are now.
Manhattanboy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Manhattanboy For This Useful Post:
Old 03-21-2021, 12:39 AM   #137
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
True but their opponent tonight plays 2 games in 11 days

Why does the number of off days the Leafs have after playing Calgary matter?

True Toronto had 4 off days before playing Calgary in back to back games. You make it sound like they had 9 off days.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2021, 12:59 AM   #138
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Manhattanboy View Post
The decline of Monahan and Gaudreau has been nothing short of spectacular.

During the 2015 playoffs, and even after the loss to Anaheim I remember thinking we could win a cup with these guys.

JG was amazing. Remember the home game against Anaheim where he tied it with the goalie pulled and Backlund scored in OT?

That was almost five years ago. Look where we are now.

I was at that game. The dome was ####ing going ape#### when Johnny tied it. Went shelf too. I couldn’t hear myself think I’m surprised the building didn’t collapse it was actually shaking. What a great memory.
heep223 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to heep223 For This Useful Post:
Old 03-21-2021, 01:04 AM   #139
camm13
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

^ I was at that game too. And I've never felt that level of excitement in my life, mix that with 19,000 + other screaming fans. I remember every one leaving that game, still chanting GFG. Still gives me chills to think about.
camm13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-21-2021, 01:04 AM   #140
Psytic
First Line Centre
 
Psytic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by taxbuster View Post
Well that sucked. Flames looked gassed from the opening puck drop. Not going to win many games if that's true. Makes me question their conditioning. Also makes me question the GAF meter on the top two lines. Way too many lazy plays still. And the bottom two lines just aren't going to win you games.

It seems that twice now Flames have come up big for a game....and fallen totally flat the next one. This is good info for DS. What he's going to do about it? Beats me.
Probably compile a list of whos off the boat and traded. I dont suspect this team will really hit its stride until next season assuming teams are willing to make some deals with us.
Psytic is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:58 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy