Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-23-2020, 08:12 AM   #1961
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

On this episode of black mirror: Two Cobras go at it.
dammage79 is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-23-2020, 08:48 AM   #1962
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
He has a specific ongoing habit of miss-representing the opinions on the board and over-stating how many people on this board feel a certain way.
That type of hyperbole doesn't make for good debate or discussion.
I think this is a great community and when people make comments that look down upon it - I find that irritating.

And no - I don't think a lot of fans would feel that way. He's a player that's been a fan favorite in every stop, including in junior.
So why on earth would a lot of Flames fans feel that way? And furthermore why say it?
How is saying a large number of the board will make an oncoming player a whipping boy degrading the community? It has happened time and time again. You have a list of members you disagree with that you attack on here time and time again because they have differing opinions. That is fine for a regular poster but makes the site look pretty bad coming from a moderator. Whenever anyone has a differing opinion about the physicality of the game which is a touchy subject for you or other things you make baseless accusations and go on a tangent. That is also irritating. Again, if you don't like my opinion there is the ignore button. Now I am through with this. Now TOfan or someone else will break board rules and personally attack me and you will look the other way. Rinse and repeat.
dissentowner is offline  
Old 07-23-2020, 08:48 AM   #1963
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
On this episode of black mirror: Two Cobras go at it.

But then it turns out the whole thing was an app
Geeoff is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Geeoff For This Useful Post:
Old 07-23-2020, 09:05 AM   #1964
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
Every one of your comments is negative and either completely untrue or highly exaggerated.

I'm not sure why anyone ever responds to your posts.

It's a useless exercise.
I totally.thought you were arguing with yourself.
Bonded is offline  
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Bonded For This Useful Post:
Old 07-23-2020, 09:17 AM   #1965
PepsiFree
Participant
Participant
 
PepsiFree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
How is saying a large number of the board will make an oncoming player a whipping boy degrading the community? It has happened time and time again. You have a list of members you disagree with that you attack on here time and time again because they have differing opinions. That is fine for a regular poster but makes the site look pretty bad coming from a moderator. Whenever anyone has a differing opinion about the physicality of the game which is a touchy subject for you or other things you make baseless accusations and go on a tangent. That is also irritating. Again, if you don't like my opinion there is the ignore button. Now I am through with this. Now TOfan or someone else will break board rules and personally attack me and you will look the other way. Rinse and repeat.
Your interactions with many people on the board aren’t exactly all peaches, so perhaps the victim complex thing would be better played out in front of a more naive audience.

The “the board is a monolith that thinks this dumb way or that dumb way” thing is just silly, really. There are examples of players coming in and being universally loved (or universally hated) so not only is the opinion that “half the board will think like X” dismissive, it’s also just wrong.

And hey, as for the moderator thing, you should probably get over it. I’m pretty sure this is a free board that you get to participate in as a treat, and they’re just a bunch of random dudes with the thankless task of having to moderate the bull#### of some childish men (for free!). It’s ok when moderators disagree with you bud. Don’t take it so hard.
PepsiFree is offline  
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to PepsiFree For This Useful Post:
Old 07-23-2020, 03:16 PM   #1966
BlackRedGold25
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
How is saying a large number of the board will make an oncoming player a whipping boy degrading the community? It has happened time and time again. You have a list of members you disagree with that you attack on here time and time again because they have differing opinions. That is fine for a regular poster but makes the site look pretty bad coming from a moderator. Whenever anyone has a differing opinion about the physicality of the game which is a touchy subject for you or other things you make baseless accusations and go on a tangent. That is also irritating. Again, if you don't like my opinion there is the ignore button. Now I am through with this. Now TOfan or someone else will break board rules and personally attack me and you will look the other way. Rinse and repeat.
Get off the cross. We need the wood, you hypocrite.
BlackRedGold25 is offline  
Old 07-23-2020, 03:44 PM   #1967
schteve_d
First Line Centre
 
schteve_d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Fort McMurray, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner View Post
How is saying a large number of the board will make an oncoming player a whipping boy degrading the community? It has happened time and time again. You have a list of members you disagree with that you attack on here time and time again because they have differing opinions. That is fine for a regular poster but makes the site look pretty bad coming from a moderator. Whenever anyone has a differing opinion about the physicality of the game which is a touchy subject for you or other things you make baseless accusations and go on a tangent. That is also irritating. Again, if you don't like my opinion there is the ignore button. Now I am through with this. Now TOfan or someone else will break board rules and personally attack me and you will look the other way. Rinse and repeat.


Not really offering an opinion on the subject at hand, but to your comment about the ignore button: I can't help but think it would be terribly difficult for a moderator to moderate with posters on ignore. Seems like a silly suggestion for a mod.
schteve_d is offline  
Old 07-23-2020, 04:22 PM   #1968
Jiri Hrdina
Franchise Player
 
Jiri Hrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schteve_d View Post
Not really offering an opinion on the subject at hand, but to your comment about the ignore button: I can't help but think it would be terribly difficult for a moderator to moderate with posters on ignore. Seems like a silly suggestion for a mod.
There's a valid point that I should probably let go some of the things that irritate me about some posters. It doesn't add anything of value to the board. I was cranky yesterday largely due to COVID reasons and the mask debate. It's easy to simply look past a poster even if you can't put them on ignore. So "take your own advice" is a fair point to make to me here.
Jiri Hrdina is offline  
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
Old 07-23-2020, 07:31 PM   #1969
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina View Post
There's a valid point that I should probably let go some of the things that irritate me about some posters. It doesn't add anything of value to the board. I was cranky yesterday largely due to COVID reasons and the mask debate. It's easy to simply look past a poster even if you can't put them on ignore. So "take your own advice" is a fair point to make to me here.
I think we are all cranky due to the virus Jiri. Myself included. I apologize for jumping down your throat. Too much stress.
dissentowner is offline  
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 07-23-2020, 11:21 PM   #1970
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

To piggyback on the Arizona / Hall negotiation reports, Friedman said on 31 Thoughts he thinks Arizona has offered around $7.5M per.

Marek asked what Hall might be asking for when it comes to term. Friedman says he thinks Hall wants a stable environment and a team that can win.
AC is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
Old 07-23-2020, 11:58 PM   #1971
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

I think Hall could probably get more than that on the open market. But ultimately I think he signs here for around $8.
__________________
Need a great deal on a new or pre-owned car? Come see me at Platinum Mitsubishi — 2720 Barlow Trail NE

TheScorpion is offline  
Old 07-24-2020, 12:03 AM   #1972
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Well that's a good number. I too think if he signs in CGY it'll be for $8m AAV. If it's any less thatd be fantastic.
Roof-Daddy is offline  
Old 07-24-2020, 12:05 AM   #1973
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

If the Flames lose the play in, hopefully they trade for Hall's rights. Gotta get that 1st OA haha
Roof-Daddy is offline  
Old 07-24-2020, 06:45 AM   #1974
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
If the Flames lose the play in, hopefully they trade for Hall's rights. Gotta get that 1st OA haha
I was thinking about that 1OA and a possible trade down scenario. If the Flames get that pick I could see a scenario where they trade that pick and Lucic to the Kings for the 2nd pick and maybe a couple of their 2nds?

The Kings have a fairly set roster with plenty of cap space so they could pull it off and with Turcotte and Valiardi they have some solid C prospects and can use that dynamic winger.

Flames pick Stutzle or Byfield while clearing Lucic off the books. Could be an opportunity to run with both Hall and Gaudreau for a season? They could also look at still trading Gaudreau and then adding more futures and having some money to potentially add Lehner in addition to Hall?
Vinny01 is offline  
Old 07-24-2020, 07:27 AM   #1975
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
I was thinking about that 1OA and a possible trade down scenario. If the Flames get that pick I could see a scenario where they trade that pick and Lucic to the Kings for the 2nd pick and maybe a couple of their 2nds?

The Kings have a fairly set roster with plenty of cap space so they could pull it off and with Turcotte and Valiardi they have some solid C prospects and can use that dynamic winger.

Flames pick Stutzle or Byfield while clearing Lucic off the books. Could be an opportunity to run with both Hall and Gaudreau for a season? They could also look at still trading Gaudreau and then adding more futures and having some money to potentially add Lehner in addition to Hall?
Those cap dump trades are hard to gauge the value on, but I wouldn't mind that. Flames need a potential future #1C more than future #LW and the cupboard is pretty barren overall, plus they're still trying to win now and Lucic eating up $5.25 million in the bottom six is a real drag.

Dropping down even 1 spot and giving up Lafreniere is a risk, but clearing some dead weight, adding a very high end C prospect, plus another 2nd rounder or two would all be good things, and worth the risk IMO.
Roof-Daddy is offline  
Old 07-24-2020, 07:42 AM   #1976
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
I was thinking about that 1OA and a possible trade down scenario. If the Flames get that pick I could see a scenario where they trade that pick and Lucic to the Kings for the 2nd pick and maybe a couple of their 2nds?

The Kings have a fairly set roster with plenty of cap space so they could pull it off and with Turcotte and Valiardi they have some solid C prospects and can use that dynamic winger.

Flames pick Stutzle or Byfield while clearing Lucic off the books. Could be an opportunity to run with both Hall and Gaudreau for a season? They could also look at still trading Gaudreau and then adding more futures and having some money to potentially add Lehner in addition to Hall?
Id argue that they wouldn’t need to move Lucic, as Lafrieniere will be a $1mil top 6 winger for 3 seasons.
Scroopy Noopers is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
Old 07-24-2020, 08:04 AM   #1977
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers View Post
Id argue that they wouldn’t need to move Lucic, as Lafrieniere will be a $1mil top 6 winger for 3 seasons.
Thats a good point
Roof-Daddy is offline  
Old 07-24-2020, 08:08 AM   #1978
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers View Post
Id argue that they wouldn’t need to move Lucic, as Lafrieniere will be a $1mil top 6 winger for 3 seasons.
Presumably he'd hit a number of the bonus clauses, so he won't be quite that cheap.
The Cobra is offline  
Old 07-24-2020, 08:27 AM   #1979
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason14h View Post
If you’re always worried about your cap situation 5-6 years in the future you are never winning a cup

How many of the “Cap He’ll” situations have ever actually came back to bite a team in the rear ?

So much changes in 5 years. When you have a chance to get Elite talent you go for it . Now the issue is paying guys who are average for 5 years big money ! And that seems to be the Flames MO.
That's easy to answer. The Kings and Hawks are perfect examples of teams that went all-in and paid a steep price. The Sharks are now a mess and the Wild are going to be stuck in perpetual mediocrity. In the case of the Hawks and Kings it was probably worth it to win multiple cups but you have to make an honest assessment of your overall roster and its ability to grind out 16 playoff wins in a single season. Is there enough depth in the blueline to overcome injuries (Flames maybe have enough)? Is the goaltending Stanley Cup caliber (firm no IMO)? Do you have enough skill, tenacity and will to win to beat multiple teams that may have as much or more talent on their rosters (not that I have seen from this group)? If you don't then you better make sure you don't have a lot of other albatross contracts on the roster or you will be following the lead of those teams mentioned above and with no Stanley Cups to make it worthwhile.

I'm personally not against signing Hall to an albatross contract but I am not under any illusion that he's going to be the guy to take this franchise over the top as he hasn't done that at any stop in his NHL career. The reason I would be okay with it is because this franchise has no elite forwards in the pipeline and once Gaudreau is gone things will be dire so Hall at least for the first half of the deal will be able to fill that void and after that I would hope the GM has structured team contracts in a manner that it's one of the few bad contracts.

Last edited by Erick Estrada; 07-24-2020 at 08:31 AM.
Erick Estrada is offline  
Old 07-24-2020, 08:28 AM   #1980
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
Presumably he'd hit a number of the bonus clauses, so he won't be quite that cheap.
True. So he’d max out at $3.8. Still a hell of a bargain if he’s producing in the top 6 as anticipated.
Scroopy Noopers is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:17 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy