Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-27-2020, 07:21 PM   #201
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CGY12 View Post
I dont necessarily disagree about the defence. Both are putrid. One line or not, I'd rather have McDavid/Draisatle over Kane/Toews right now in a best of 5. I think the Oilers win that series rather easily in 4. They are done after that though. I want that to happen, I do not want them involved in the lottery.
Experience. Hawks will wear em down with experience. Seen it too many times.to.discount the tangible of experience.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2020, 07:31 PM   #202
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Experience. Hawks will wear em down with experience. Seen it too many times.to.discount the tangible of experience.
Maybe...but usually all playoff series come down to goaltending.

Cant give either team a huge edge there based on what happened through the regular season.

With a 3 month break its even harder to ascribe an edge where players couldnt work out on ice nor in gyms...in really any series.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2020, 07:34 PM   #203
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I think that definitely favors the Hawks. They'll be on it fast while the rest of the Oilers scramble to get going. But, that's the fun of this hockey tournament if it happens, so many fine edges to every team that could get them far.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2020, 08:02 PM   #204
CGY12
#1 Goaltender
 
CGY12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Experience. Hawks will wear em down with experience. Seen it too many times.to.discount the tangible of experience.
Not even trying to defend the Oilers, as I said I hope they beat the hawks and lose in round 1 of the playoffs, because I do NOT want them in the lottery.

The experience angle is baloney, in the last 4 seasons the Hawks lost in round 1 twice and missed the playoffs the last 2 seasons, where was the experience then? Experience is all relative, this is just a case of one team being better than the other. The hawks have been on the decline for a few years now. They simply aren't what they used to be, the NHL expanded the format to 24 teams vs 22 or 20 because the Hawks and Habs were 23 and 24, 2 large viewing markets.
CGY12 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CGY12 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2020, 08:16 PM   #205
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

I'm not at all comfortable with the thought of the Oilers having a 1/8 shot at Lafreniere. When you add their lottery luck it feels like it could be a 50/50 proposition. Even the drafts they haven't finished first they have been really close.
Erick Estrada is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2020, 08:20 PM   #206
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Thinking about the Sens trading 3 and 5 for 1 and oookong at some recent drafts it makes for an interesting discussion.

2010- Hall for Gudbranson and Niederitter. Hall all day
2011- Nuge for Huberdeau and Strome. Huberdeau is the best player and the 3 picks after Strome we’re Zibenijad, Schiefele, Couturier and alll are way better than Nuge
2012- Yakupov for Galchenyuk and Rielly. No explanation needed
2013- MacKinnon for Drouin and Lindholm. Still take Nate but what if it was Jones and Lindholm/Monahan? Likely still stick with MacKinnon
2014- Ekblad for Draisaitl and Dal Colle. Draisaitl is the best player
2015- McDavid for Strome and Hanifin. No doubt McDavid
2016- Matthews for Dubois and Juolevi. Put Tkachuk in there with Dubois and I take them over Matthews
2017- Hischier for Heiskenan and Petterson easily take the duo
2018- Dahlin for Kotkaniemi and Hayton. Take Dahlin
2019- Hughes for Dach and Turcotte. Too soon to say

When there is a consensus pick that is a tier above the rest it seems like the right call to take the player but in many cases if you nail picks 3 and 5 of a draft you will end up with a better situation.
Vinny01 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2020, 01:29 AM   #207
FurnaceFace
Franchise Player
 
FurnaceFace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: 110
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I'm not at all comfortable with the thought of the Oilers having a 1/8 shot at Lafreniere. When you add their lottery luck it feels like it could be a 50/50 proposition. Even the drafts they haven't finished first they have been really close.
It is 50/50 if they are in the lottery, just like every team. Either they win it or they don't. ;-)
__________________
FurnaceFace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2020, 09:58 AM   #208
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
That vote tells me that many Flames fans don't believe this team is good enough to get very far so a win against the Jets would be about all the excitement they believe they would get out of it, where as a 1st overall talent like Lafreniere might be the nudge needed to push this team over the hump or at least give them the resources to do so.
I've disliked this team for a calendar year. There is something wrong. Missing.

I think they can and probably will beat the Jets, but I doubt they go very far. I'll be hoping I'm wrong and cheering for wins over losses.

But if they get knocked out against Winnipeg it's nice to know there is one more thing to hope for this year.

If the odds were say 1/4 I'd at least understand the thought that losing might be best because I think this team needs an off season change anyway, and getting the top pick would certainly qualify.

Would still be unlikely I'd be cheering for losses though.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2020, 10:12 AM   #209
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Yeah.

I'd argue that if the Flames were to beat Winnipeg, they'd have a less than a 1 in 8 chance to win the playoff series against their next opponent in what would be the actual 1st round.

No team ever has less than a 1 in 8 chance to win any series.

A huge underdog likely has at least a 30% chance of winning a series.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2020, 10:12 AM   #210
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
No team ever has less than a 1 in 8 chance to win any series.

A huge underdog likely has at least a 30% chance of winning a series.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
It's the Flames, math goes right out the window. Losing 1st round series is what they do.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2020, 11:07 AM   #211
Phaneuf_Phan
Scoring Winger
 
Phaneuf_Phan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Exp:
Default

Great insurance for the Flames' playoff start. Wow, Ottawa has an amazing opportunity to reshape their franchise with overall picks 3+5.
Phaneuf_Phan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2020, 11:14 AM   #212
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phaneuf_Phan View Post
Wow, Ottawa has an amazing opportunity to reshape their franchise with overall picks 3+5.
Imagine walking away from the draft with Byfield and Rossi, and then still having the Isles 1st round pick in the 15 to 20 range and FOUR 2nd round picks.

Then after picking SEVEN times in rounds 1 and 2, they will still have six more picks in the remaining rounds of the draft.

Sens fans must be dying waiting for the draft to happen. If the Sens don't trade any picks they will have 13 new prospects in their cupboards after the draft is complete.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2020, 11:23 AM   #213
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
Imagine walking away from the draft with Byfield and Rossi, and then still having the Isles 1st round pick in the 15 to 20 range and FOUR 2nd round picks.

Then after picking SEVEN times in rounds 1 and 2, they will still have six more picks in the remaining rounds of the draft.

Sens fans must be dying waiting for the draft to happen. If the Sens don't trade any picks they will have 13 new prospects in their cupboards after the draft is complete.
Have to think they'll move some.

There has to be a line where you bring too many players into your system and hurt asset value by not having the level of development or opportunity to move them all forward.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2020, 11:27 AM   #214
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Have to think they'll move some.

There has to be a line where you bring too many players into your system and hurt asset value by not having the level of development or opportunity to move them all forward.
Maybe, but they'll never move all of them forward anyways. The cream would still rise to the top, they'd just have more bullets.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2020, 12:41 PM   #215
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
Have to think they'll move some.

There has to be a line where you bring too many players into your system and hurt asset value by not having the level of development or opportunity to move them all forward.
Pretty sure Dorrian already said they would be using some of their picks to trade for NHL ready players.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-28-2020, 01:33 PM   #216
SeanCharles
First Line Centre
 
SeanCharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

I’m especially happy for Ottawa cause it hurt SJ in the process!

LA and ANA are still gonna get good players but can’t win em all.
SeanCharles is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2020, 02:54 PM   #217
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
I'm not at all comfortable with the thought of the Oilers having a 1/8 shot at Lafreniere. When you add their lottery luck it feels like it could be a 50/50 proposition. Even the drafts they haven't finished first they have been really close.
You just know it's going to happen. It's 2020 after all. If something bad can happen, it will happen.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2020, 03:09 PM   #218
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
You just know it's going to happen. It's 2020 after all. If something bad can happen, it will happen.
But thats normal bad.

2020 is the year of anomalies. Therefore the Flames, who've never picked top 3, might suddenly be a decent bet.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2020, 03:38 PM   #219
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
But thats normal bad.

2020 is the year of anomalies. Therefore the Flames, who've never picked top 3, might suddenly be a decent bet.
I don't even want to think about what the flip side of that would be for the Oilers then.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2020, 03:45 PM   #220
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
It's the Flames, math goes right out the window. Losing 1st round series is what they do.

They still haven’t lost 87.5% of first round matchups. Even with their dismal recent record.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The Cobra is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy