Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-27-2020, 04:52 PM   #181
Hackey
#1 Goaltender
 
Hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
If it was a 100% chance of Lafrenierre, then maybe it wouldn't be the worst thing in the world to lose? a 1/8 chance though is not enough to say so. It would be nice if we did get him, but it would be better to beat the Jets and then go on.
Maybe? Id take Lafrenierre over a beating from the Blues without thinking twice.

This long layoff does make things a bit more interesting though. At the start of every season certain teams start really hot and others really cold. These playoffs could be very similar so its really hard to know how things will play out. Normally the best teams are heavily favored but this time who knows.
Hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hackey For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2020, 04:53 PM   #182
OutOfTheCube
Franchise Player
 
OutOfTheCube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

If you would trade winning for a 1-in-8 chance at the first overall pick, well, let me tell you a thing or two about the luck of the Calgary Flames franchise...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great View Post
If it was a 100% chance of Lafrenierre, then maybe it wouldn't be the worst thing in the world to lose? a 1/8 chance though is not enough to say so. It would be nice if we did get him, but it would be better to beat the Jets and then go on.
If it was a 100% chance, you throw the series, shamelessly.
OutOfTheCube is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OutOfTheCube For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2020, 05:05 PM   #183
agulati
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

There is no way I’d ever be comfortable cheering for losses to get the 1st overall pick. If it ends up being the situation, so be it, but I’d rather Flames beat the Jets on their way to deeper in the playoffs
agulati is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2020, 05:26 PM   #184
AustinL_NHL
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Exp:
Default

If you were 100% guaranteed to get Lafreniere if you lose to the Jets, you throw the series. It's hilarious to think otherwise.

Trying to beat out 23 other NHL teams (less than 5% chance of winning without even accounting for the skill level variance) just because you don't want to have a "loser mentality" is just dumb and idiotic when you could easily have a franchise-altering player as a result of losing 3 non-Playoff games.
AustinL_NHL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2020, 05:29 PM   #185
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

I really don’t want Vancouver, Edmonton, Arizona getting that pick.

I don’t want the Flames to lose to the Jets but if the team were able to get that pick and use the disappointing season to retool the team I can see it paying off huge down the road.

I would see how interested the Sabres would be in a deal around Lafreniere and Eichel. Other pieces need to be added to balance it out but that is an extremely strong base for an offer.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2020, 05:30 PM   #186
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinL_NHL View Post
If you were 100% guaranteed to get Lafreniere if you lose to the Jets, you throw the series. It's hilarious to think otherwise.

Trying to beat out 23 other NHL teams (less than 5% chance of winning without even accounting for the skill level variance) just because you don't want to have a "loser mentality" is just dumb and idiotic when you could easily have a franchise-altering player as a result of losing 3 non-Playoff games.
Its hilarious to me that anyone actually believes that professional athletes and coaches would have anything to do with throwing any game any where in order to get an 18 year old kid they may or may not ever even play with.

Its just so absurd.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2020, 05:35 PM   #187
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

Come on, these are the Flames. They'll lose to the jets, not win the draft, either draft an average player or trade the pick for an average player. And even if the won the draft lottery, the player would turn out to be a bust. This is an average at best franchise, they'll never be bad enough to draft a good player and never be good enough to actually go on a run in the playoffs and win the cup.

Now if you want the team to do anything other than what they've been doing in order to not just be average, you're a looser!
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2020, 05:42 PM   #188
CGY12
#1 Goaltender
 
CGY12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default

The Flames don't have a shot at winning the cup in my opinion. Do I want to see them beat the jets? Of course, nobody cheers for loses, but they are in tough. They have the toughest matchup of all of the western conference match-ups.

I wouldn't expect the Flames to win the lottery if they happen to lose but wow if they were to win it and sign Hall, this team could be on the cusp of greatness, with what they already have upfront and what is brewing on the back end. They would just need to solve the goaltending issue.

Both the Oilers and Canucks aren't losing their qualifying match-ups. Chicago is too weak defensively and Minny isn't a threat. They will both bow out in round 1 of the playoffs though.
CGY12 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CGY12 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2020, 05:44 PM   #189
SeanCharles
First Line Centre
 
SeanCharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

I now officially want hockey to come back for the first time since it got cancelled.

A chance to win the cup or get 1st overall vs no hockey and picking 16th.
SeanCharles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2020, 05:46 PM   #190
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CGY12 View Post
...Both the Oilers and Canucks aren't losing their qualifying match-ups. Chicago is too weak defensively and Minny isn't a threat. They will both bow out in round 1 of the playoffs though.
Have you looked at Edmonton's blue line? Add to that the fact that they have only one top-line player playing on their first line and I would say the Oilers are not an especially good bet to move past the unspectacular Chicago Blackhawks.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2020, 05:46 PM   #191
dissentowner
Franchise Player
 
dissentowner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969 View Post
Come on, these are the Flames. They'll lose to the jets, not win the draft, either draft an average player or trade the pick for an average player. And even if the won the draft lottery, the player would turn out to be a bust. This is an average at best franchise, they'll never be bad enough to draft a good player and never be good enough to actually go on a run in the playoffs and win the cup.

Now if you want the team to do anything other than what they've been doing in order to not just be average, you're a looser!
If you truly think this way then why on Earth do you follow the team? Serious question. I could find a million better things to do with my time than follow a team I think will suck no matter what.
dissentowner is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2020, 06:04 PM   #192
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

I hope I did this right. Here are the Flames draft position scenarios...
If the Flames lose their play-in round and ...
... win the second lottery: 1st Overall Pick

... lose the second lottery: 13th Overall Pick at worst. Their pick will move up one spot if the second lottery is won by one of MTL/CHI/ARI/MIN, and will move up one spot for every one of MTL/CHI/ARI/MIN that wins their play-in round. The Flames' best possible draft position in this scenario is 9th overall.

If the Flames win their play-in round ...
... 16th Overall Pick at best. Their pick will drop down one spot for every one of MTL/CHI/ARI/MIN that wins their play-in round (but doesn't reach the Conference Finals). The Flames' worst possible draft position in this scenario is 20th overall.

... and loses the Western Conference Final: 28th Overall Pick, unless Montreal also loses the Eastern Conference Final, in which case, the Flames would get the 29th Overall Pick.

... and loses the Stanley Cup Final: 30th Overall Pick.

... and wins the Stanley Cup: 31st Overall Pick and all the Oilers' tears you can drink!
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2020, 06:14 PM   #193
AustinL_NHL
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
Its hilarious to me that anyone actually believes that professional athletes and coaches would have anything to do with throwing any game any where in order to get an 18 year old kid they may or may not ever even play with.

Its just so absurd.
I'm not talking from the athletes or coaches POV. I'm talking from the logical outside point of view.

It's called the "lottery" for a reason.

If you know you're guaranteed to win the lottery that could set you up for the next 10+ years just for losing 3 games, you'd say "No, I'd rather win the 3 games and take the 4% chance of winning it all"?

I wonder what you'd be hoping if you were told you'd win the lotto max if the Flames lost the play-in series.
AustinL_NHL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2020, 06:17 PM   #194
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AustinL_NHL View Post
I'm not talking from the athletes or coaches POV. I'm talking from the logical outside point of view.

It's called the "lottery" for a reason.

If you know you're guaranteed to win the lottery that could set you up for the next 10+ years just for losing 3 games, you'd say "No, I'd rather win the 3 games and take the 4% chance of winning it all"?

I wonder what you'd be hoping if you were told you'd win the lotto max if the Flames lost the play-in series.
Yeah that’s the same.
Scroopy Noopers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2020, 06:20 PM   #195
AustinL_NHL
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers View Post
Yeah that’s the same.
It's an exaggerated point.

But in the NHL, it really is a game changer.

I can guarantee you every fanbase minus the top 4-5 in 2015 would've accepted missing the Playoffs in exchange for being guaranteed to get Connor McDavid
AustinL_NHL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2020, 06:32 PM   #196
CGY12
#1 Goaltender
 
CGY12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Toronto
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
Have you looked at Edmonton's blue line? Add to that the fact that they have only one top-line player playing on their first line and I would say the Oilers are not an especially good bet to move past the unspectacular Chicago Blackhawks.
I dont necessarily disagree about the defence. Both are putrid. One line or not, I'd rather have McDavid/Draisatle over Kane/Toews right now in a best of 5. I think the Oilers win that series rather easily in 4. They are done after that though. I want that to happen, I do not want them involved in the lottery.
CGY12 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CGY12 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2020, 06:41 PM   #197
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
I hope I did this right. Here are the Flames draft position scenarios...
If the Flames lose their play-in round and ...
... win the second lottery: 1st Overall Pick

... lose the second lottery: 13th Overall Pick at worst. Their pick will move up one spot if the second lottery is won by one of MTL/CHI/ARI/MIN, and will move up one spot for every one of MTL/CHI/ARI/MIN that wins their play-in round. The Flames' best possible draft position in this scenario is 9th overall.

If the Flames win their play-in round ...
... 16th Overall Pick at best. Their pick will drop down one spot for every one of MTL/CHI/ARI/MIN that wins their play-in round (but doesn't reach the Conference Finals). The Flames' worst possible draft position in this scenario is 20th overall.

... and loses the Western Conference Final: 28th Overall Pick, unless Montreal also loses the Eastern Conference Final, in which case, the Flames would get the 29th Overall Pick.

... and loses the Stanley Cup Final: 30th Overall Pick.

... and wins the Stanley Cup: 31st Overall Pick and all the Oilers' tears you can drink!
The first and last options or nothing!
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2020, 06:47 PM   #198
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

There's no way an NHL team would ever throw a series but the Flames fans now have a safety blanket knowing that another of a long line of failed opening series will come with a silver lining of a 12.5% chance of drafting a franchise player.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2020, 06:59 PM   #199
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
873 (at time of recording) people who either are or should be Oiler fans.

Losers cheer for losses.
Yes, but up until game day, based on recent performances, I can’t logically predict a scenario where the Flames go deep in the playoffs. Could happen, but less likely than not. So I’d rather hedge with a hope at the first overall pick to strengthen our chances of going deep in subsequent seasons. Once game day hits though it’s vote for winning games and multiple series 100%.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2020, 07:15 PM   #200
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

I think my ranking of where I’d want to be after all games are over.

8. Lose play-in. Lose lottery. Oilers win lottery.
7. Lose play-in. Lose lottery. East team wins.
6. Win play-in. Jets won lottery.
5. Lose first round.
4. Lose second round.
3. Lose conference finals.
2. Lose Play-in. Win 1st Overall in lottery.
1. Stanley Cup Champion
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:24 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy