01-29-2020, 09:13 AM
|
#141
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
Amazing how one rough game can undo everything Talbot was doing before hand around here. Impressive.
|
I wouldn't say that's the sentiment in this thread. It was just an awful night by him.
|
|
|
01-29-2020, 09:14 AM
|
#142
|
In the Sin Bin
|
I think it does show the calls for Talbot to take the starter's role or play 50/50 with Rittich were waaay premature.
I feel much more confident with BSD in net. I think he's clearly the starter and has been all year.
|
|
|
01-29-2020, 09:34 AM
|
#143
|
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
|
Where have you gone Jusso Valimaki? Flames Nation turns its lonely eyes to you.
|
|
|
01-29-2020, 09:39 AM
|
#144
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: England
|
I think Talbots critics are being a bit hard. If you look the goals at least two of them are due to blown coverage by the D, leaving a many wide open on the back door both times. Then you have the fact that on both of those goals the puck went through multiple players to get there.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to UKflames For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-29-2020, 09:44 AM
|
#145
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
I think it does show the calls for Talbot to take the starter's role or play 50/50 with Rittich were waaay premature.
I feel much more confident with BSD in net. I think he's clearly the starter and has been all year.
|
It seems to me that this reprimand is essentially guilty of the same thing. Yes, calls for Talbot to play the starter’s role have definitively been premature, but this was ONE game, and I don’t see evidence in this performance of anything but a rusty goalie who hasn’t played in two weeks. I continue to believe that the workload between Talbot and Rittich will be close to a 2:1 split down the stretch, with Rittich drawing around twenty of the remaining starts. The Flames still need Talbot to play regularly, and to play well.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-29-2020, 09:45 AM
|
#146
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
|
I'd caution reading too much into goaltending performances after almost 2 weeks off. Even Binnington looked like garbage last night.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to burn_this_city For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-29-2020, 09:47 AM
|
#147
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UKflames
I think Talbots critics are being a bit hard. If you look the goals at least two of them are due to blown coverage by the D, leaving a many wide open on the back door both times. Then you have the fact that on both of those goals the puck went through multiple players to get there.
|
I don’t think Talbot played well at all, but I also believe a big part of that was the fourteen days he sat between starts. Talbot should have played the Ottawa game.
|
|
|
01-29-2020, 09:49 AM
|
#148
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
Monahan played 1 minute of OT.
11seconds of the two full minute pp.
Lucic had 28 seconds of OT pp time
Why.
|
What!? If this is true it's an epic fail. Potentially the most clutch (in terms of GWG) player in flames history, who's already potted two on the evening, not playing in sudden death?
That is a severe lapse in judgement.
|
|
|
01-29-2020, 10:18 AM
|
#149
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer
What!? If this is true it's an epic fail. Potentially the most clutch (in terms of GWG) player in flames history, who's already potted two on the evening, not playing in sudden death?
That is a severe lapse in judgement.
|
The power play was 3/3 heading into OT, Lucic hadn't gotten a single second of PP icetime up to that point.
3 defenders played 1 minute + on a 4-3 power play.
Players on that power play by most to least icetime
Gaudreau
Tkachuk
Lindholm
Giordano
Brodie
Anderson
Lucic
Monahan
That's some Galaxy brain strategizing.
|
|
|
01-29-2020, 11:19 AM
|
#150
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red
Sit Bennett. Does little and likes to take needless penalties. Oilers have a great PP.
|
I thought Bennett was very good last night.
There are certainly more than enough games on his log this year that suggest a healthy scratch, but last night wasn't one of them.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-29-2020, 11:23 AM
|
#151
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho
Didn’t the Flames have more high danger chances in the Ottawa game as well?
Save the dramatics.
|
Ottawa games was 12-10 Calgary
Blues game was 12-3 Calgary
Pretty much matches the eye test in both cases. Lots of shots and possession in Ottawa but not a big advantage in scoring chances.
Vs outplaying St. Louis but losing out on the goalie battle.
|
|
|
01-29-2020, 11:34 AM
|
#152
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
The power play was 3/3 heading into OT, Lucic hadn't gotten a single second of PP icetime up to that point.
3 defenders played 1 minute + on a 4-3 power play.
Players on that power play by most to least icetime
Gaudreau
Tkachuk
Lindholm
Giordano
Brodie
Anderson
Lucic
Monahan
That's some Galaxy brain strategizing.
|
Well, Lucic would have been on the second unit on the previous PPs, but they scored quickly.
I agree Monahan should have been on unless there was some reason we don't know about - slight injury (that didn't hamper the shootout where he looked normal). I suppose maybe someone overstayed their shift after the first OT PP unit changed off.
|
|
|
01-29-2020, 11:37 AM
|
#153
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by UKflames
I think Talbots critics are being a bit hard. If you look the goals at least two of them are due to blown coverage by the D, leaving a many wide open on the back door both times. Then you have the fact that on both of those goals the puck went through multiple players to get there.
|
I think everyone agrees the 2 backdoor goals were not on him. The one open shot where he left way too much net and the one where he didn't cover the puck were his fault, and also the one that got called back was soft. Plus he looked shaky on a bunch of shots that didn't go in.
No, he wasn't good at all. But I'm also not going to condemn him for the season over it. Rittich has had a couple bum outings as well.
|
|
|
01-29-2020, 11:39 AM
|
#154
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
I thought Bennett was very good last night.
There are certainly more than enough games on his log this year that suggest a healthy scratch, but last night wasn't one of them.
|
My thought wasn't based on one game. I'm looking at Bennett the player this season and past. He takes penalties a lot and the Oilers are deadly on a PP.
Limits t their opportunities this way without missing any real offence. His grit is replaced by Buddy.
|
|
|
01-29-2020, 11:41 AM
|
#155
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Well, Lucic would have been on the second unit on the previous PPs, but they scored quickly.
I agree Monahan should have been on unless there was some reason we don't know about - slight injury (that didn't hamper the shootout where he looked normal). I suppose maybe someone overstayed their shift after the first OT PP unit changed off.
|
Ward clearly wanted Tkachuk as the net front presence, and Lindholm in the faceoff circle on his strong side (he won both draws). Regardless, You have to find a way to get Monahan out there for more than 10 seconds..
|
|
|
01-29-2020, 11:45 AM
|
#156
|
Franchise Player
|
Playing Talbot was the right decision from Ward, because Rittich is the right call for tonight's game. It isn't Ward's fault that Talbot played poorly, it's Talbot's. Unless you consider the Ottawa game, in which Talbot should have played. That's Ward's fault. Him having 17 days off (or whatever), that';s Ward's fault. But the call last night was the right one.
Where Ward effed up, was not having Monahan out there for the PP - I was starting at my TV in dis-belief? WTF? Was he injured? He better have been, because otherwise, that was the worst piece of coaching I have seen in a while. (and Ward has already lost me - he's in over his head).
Bennett had a great game. So did Johnny.
Robinson deserves another start after his effort last night. Leave him with Johnny for another game.
I predicted, before that game, that the Flames would come out flat. I was completely wrong - it was a great effort. And they would have gotten 2 points with decent goaltending.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-29-2020, 11:46 AM
|
#157
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighLifeMan
Ward clearly wanted Tkachuk as the net front presence, and Lindholm in the faceoff circle on his strong side (he won both draws). Regardless, You have to find a way to get Monahan out there for more than 10 seconds..
|
It's OT. Nothing to lose. Go with:
Johnny
Monahan
Lindholm, and
Tkachuk
|
|
|
01-29-2020, 11:47 AM
|
#158
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by HighLifeMan
Ward clearly wanted Tkachuk as the net front presence, and Lindholm in the faceoff circle on his strong side (he won both draws). Regardless, You have to find a way to get Monahan out there for more than 10 seconds..
|
I'm still wondering if someone didn't come off when they should have.
This seems like a question someone would have asked him post-game.
|
|
|
01-29-2020, 11:47 AM
|
#159
|
Franchise Player
|
Johnny and Lindholm up high/on the sides, Tkachuk down low, Monahan looking for open ice in the slot.
|
|
|
01-29-2020, 11:49 AM
|
#160
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
I'm still wondering if someone didn't come off when they should have.
This seems like a question someone would have asked him post-game.
|
Again, it's OT. Call a fricking timeout if Monahan is tired. But he has to be out there for that PP.
Worst player management I have seen in a long time.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:21 PM.
|
|