Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-22-2019, 09:10 AM   #781
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
My biggest surprise during the coverage was CBC saying TMX was already approved by the government so it doesn't need a revote once it passes the courts even if the Liberals were in a spot where they needed an NDP coalition.

Which leads me to question why everyone was up in arms over this. Are you thinking the Liberals are going to junk it now just to be dicks about it?
Its fear-mongering, plain and simple. Voters in Alberta and Saskatchewan ate that up though, and it worked out perfectly here.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Slava For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2019, 09:11 AM   #782
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
Its fear-mongering, plain and simple. Voters in Alberta and Saskatchewan ate that up though, and it worked out perfectly here.
I mean it could also just be looking at their record to this point and seeing a fat 0/2 with the third and final hanging in the balance.

But no, you're right, just fear-mongering.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 09:12 AM   #783
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
I mean it could also just be looking at their record to this point and seeing a fat 0/2 with the third and final hanging in the balance.

But no, you're right, just fear-mongering.
Can you clarify this point? I don't get it.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 09:13 AM   #784
Hot_Flatus
#1 Goaltender
 
Hot_Flatus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Uranus
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
The US doesn't need Canadian oil any more. And their producers would object big time to the addition of competition.
Not really. The U.S. loves buying Canadian oil at a discount and has for decades. I don't see that changing, especially considering 95% of our oil still goes to the states to begin with. They definitely need our oil in a big way and look no further than the ongoing battles to get US pipelines built (Keystone, energy east). Whether they are dead or not means little, the demand is certainly there.
__________________
I hate to tell you this, but I’ve just launched an air biscuit

Last edited by Hot_Flatus; 10-22-2019 at 09:16 AM.
Hot_Flatus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 09:13 AM   #785
FireFly
Franchise Player
 
FireFly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

When do we get our $2000 camping cheques?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimbl420 View Post
I can wash my penis without taking my pants off.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23 View Post
If edmonton wins the cup in the next decade I will buy everyone on CP a bottle of vodka.
FireFly is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to FireFly For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2019, 09:15 AM   #786
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Can you clarify this point? I don't get it.
There's been literally zero progress made on our ability to transport our product. It's actually gone in reverse. And now it's just fear-mongering to not believe they're going to get anything done in their next term?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 09:16 AM   #787
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
I mean it could also just be looking at their record to this point and seeing a fat 0/2 with the third and final hanging in the balance.

But no, you're right, just fear-mongering.
Well it's fear-mongering because there are no more votes on that topic. So unless you think there is something coming that would alter that, and that the Liberals would completely change their tune now, there's not much that can be undone there.

There are going to be legal challenges, and hopefully we win those. But the truth is, if we're not happy with how that proceeds, the Liberals are in a much weaker position than before to be pushed into proceeding in a more forthright manner.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 09:16 AM   #788
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hot_Flatus View Post
Not really. The U.S. loves buying Canadian oil at a discount and has for decades. I don't see that changing, especially considering 95% of our oil still goes to the states to begin with.
If Alberta is absorbed by the US it's US oil.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 09:19 AM   #789
The Big Chill
I believe in the Jays.
 
The Big Chill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

I don't really get why so many people are directing their anger at Canadian voters and not the Conservative Party itself. The vote 4 years ago was an incredibly clear message that they had fallen so far behind the majority of voters' opinions on social issues that they simply weren't a viable option for many people. At the time I actually thought it would be a positive situation, to let the Libs have 4 years and the Conservatives tuck their tails and come back with much more progressive ideas on social issues.

But here we are 4 years later, the Conservatives haven't changed a bit, and voters are unwilling to move on those same social issues. All the anger should be directed at the Conservative Party for not getting their #### together and making even a half-assed effort at trying to represent the majority of Canada's beliefs on social issues.
The Big Chill is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 09:20 AM   #790
Blaster86
UnModerator
 
Blaster86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
There's been literally zero progress made on our ability to transport our product. It's actually gone in reverse. And now it's just fear-mongering to not believe they're going to get anything done in their next term?
There was no "fear mongering" about bureaucratic incompetence though. There was, however, fear mongering about an NDP-Liberal coalition cancelling the pipe line.
__________________

THANK MR DEMKO
CPHL Ottawa Vancouver
Blaster86 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Blaster86 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2019, 09:20 AM   #791
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
Well it's fear-mongering because there are no more votes on that topic. So unless you think there is something coming that would alter that, and that the Liberals would completely change their tune now, there's not much that can be undone there.

There are going to be legal challenges, and hopefully we win those. But the truth is, if we're not happy with how that proceeds, the Liberals are in a much weaker position than before to be pushed into proceeding in a more forthright manner.
I mean sure, no more votes. Nothing has been built and they have a record of not getting anything built and have also implemented a law to basically hamstring the future ability for anything to get built.

Sorry, it's not irrational to check the "doubt" box when it comes to your party.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterJoji View Post
Johnny eats garbage and isn’t 100% committed.
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nik- For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2019, 09:21 AM   #792
Joborule
Franchise Player
 
Joborule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N-E-B View Post
The separatism mentality is flooding my Facebook feed right now. I’m sure a lot of it is reactionary BS but it’s still quite amazing how many seemingly rational people can lose their minds so quickly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
Yeah, a lot of people seem to forget that Quebec had leverage. It has access to Hudson's Bay and the St. Lawrence.


Alberta can maybe roll barrels of oil down the Bow River or N. Saskatchewan and hope for the best.
I get the frustration and sentiment though. Alberta is not respected in parliament since no party except for one is aligned with the province's best interest. They feel Alberta is Canada's bitch, and there's nothing they can do about it. If they feel they don't have a voice in government, leaders of other parties actively attacking the primary resource/economy through their rhetoric and actions rather than defending it and promoting enhancements, and not giving interest in attempting to benefit Albertans to gain votes, then they feel alienated, and question what they are getting from being part of Canada.

And it's not like Alberta isn't willing to give other parties a shot in this province. Liberals had 4 seats in the province in forever! It was a sign that the province was ready to start moving on from the grudge held from the past, and had faith that by voting liberals, that they would do what they can do accommodate Alberta. But with only 4 seats, it's insignificant in parliament, and with how the pipeline debacle has gone down, liberals chose to keep the pipeline in limbo, rather than seriously try to get construction started. Lots of people are skeptical the liberals actually want to build the pipeline, and will only believe it if construction actually starts. With that, any goodwill the liberals had in the province is now gone once again.

It's unfortunate that the only party the province can vote for isn't palatable for a lot outside of the prairies due to their desire to cling onto to outdated social views. If they would catch up with the times and understand that the party needs to be more moderate, they honestly should be waking up with a majority government this morning. Why they want to be stuck in the past is beyond me. It's not working, and it's never going to work.

Separation is never gonna work, but Alberta is handicapped by the current structure of government. Either way, have to find a way to make the best out of it since there's no alternative.
Joborule is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Joborule For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2019, 09:22 AM   #793
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
There's been literally zero progress made on our ability to transport our product. It's actually gone in reverse. And now it's just fear-mongering to not believe they're going to get anything done in their next term?
Fair enough, but how is that on the Liberals and not the people who are actively opposing the project - BC, First Nations. What would the Conservatives have done differently to have more progress?
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 09:24 AM   #794
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
I mean sure, no more votes. Nothing has been built and they have a record of not getting anything built and have also implemented a law to basically hamstring the future ability for anything to get built.

Sorry, it's not irrational to check the "doubt" box when it comes to your party.
Haha, my party. I have a feeling that you and I voted for the same party yesterday.

I realise that it's not actually built yet, but it's going ahead at this point. Of course there are more legal challenges, and hopefully they get quashed. But to suggest that the NDP or BQ would just crush this because they have a potential balance of power in parliament doesn't seem possible as surely the CPC and Liberals would crush any attempt at this point.
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 09:28 AM   #795
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slava View Post
Haha, my party. I have a feeling that you and I voted for the same party yesterday.

I realise that it's not actually built yet, but it's going ahead at this point. Of course there are more legal challenges, and hopefully they get quashed. But to suggest that the NDP or BQ would just crush this because they have a potential balance of power in parliament doesn't seem possible as surely the CPC and Liberals would crush any attempt at this point.
I think the BQ would also support it as long as it gets something. But unless there's some sort of legislation bypassing the courts, they are past that point anyway.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 09:30 AM   #796
llwhiteoutll
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM View Post
Fair enough, but how is that on the Liberals and not the people who are actively opposing the project - BC, First Nations. What would the Conservatives have done differently to have more progress?
The Liberal government literally didn't show up for a TMX court date where they probably would have been able to kill all the objections that cropped up after the last approval. Alberta sent lawyers to the hearing and the court agreed with them on each point and killed every objection that Alberta could speak to. The Liberals decided not to show up and because of that, the court had to accept the claims and send them on. The judge even said in his decision that the government probably had strong evidence to counter the claims of inadequate consultation, but chose to withhold evidence and submissions. If they were serious about getting it built, they probably would have made the time in a few of their lawyers schedules to show up and pretend to care.

Last edited by llwhiteoutll; 10-22-2019 at 09:33 AM.
llwhiteoutll is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to llwhiteoutll For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2019, 09:32 AM   #797
DuffMan
Franchise Player
 
DuffMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Big Chill View Post
I don't really get why so many people are directing their anger at Canadian voters and not the Conservative Party itself. The vote 4 years ago was an incredibly clear message that they had fallen so far behind the majority of voters' opinions on social issues that they simply weren't a viable option for many people. At the time I actually thought it would be a positive situation, to let the Libs have 4 years and the Conservatives tuck their tails and come back with much more progressive ideas on social issues.

But here we are 4 years later, the Conservatives haven't changed a bit, and voters are unwilling to move on those same social issues. All the anger should be directed at the Conservative Party for not getting their #### together and making even a half-assed effort at trying to represent the majority of Canada's beliefs on social issues.
or go even harder right, socially regressive and anti-intellectual, it worked down south.
__________________
Pass the bacon.
DuffMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 09:36 AM   #798
AltaGuy
AltaGuy has a magnetic personality and exudes positive energy, which is infectious to those around him. He has an unparalleled ability to communicate with people, whether he is speaking to a room of three or an arena of 30,000.
 
AltaGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: At le pub...
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by llwhiteoutll View Post
The Liberal government literally didn't show up for a TMX court date where they probably would have been able to kill all the objections that cropped up after the last approval. Alberta sent lawyers to the hearing and the court agreed with them on each point and killed every objection that Alberta could speak to. The Liberals decided not to show up and because of that, the court had to accept the claims and send them on. The judge even said in his decision that the government probably had strong evidence to counter the claims of inadequate consultation, but chose to withhold evidence and submissions. If they were serious about getting it built, they probably would have made the time in a few of their lawyers schedules to show up and pretend to care.
Could you source this one for me?
AltaGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-22-2019, 09:36 AM   #799
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

Really frustrating to see a lot of this sentiment from the media today

https://twitter.com/user/status/1186504190585163781

The idea that Alberta voted against their best interests by overwhelmingly voting Conservative, rather than the party that introduced bills C-69 and C-48.

That we're just angry because the world is passing us by.

People wonder why Albertans are frustrated. Just take a loot at the replies to that tweet to get an idea of what the rest of the country thinks of us.

Last edited by Ashasx; 10-22-2019 at 09:57 AM.
Ashasx is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
Old 10-22-2019, 09:41 AM   #800
DiracSpike
First Line Centre
 
DiracSpike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: BELTLINE
Exp:
Default

The worst part is the world is most certainly not passing us by, oil and gas are important commodities and will continue to be for decades. This isn't steel mills or auto plants despite how desperately Toronto and Montreal writers want it to be.
DiracSpike is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DiracSpike For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:34 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy