View Poll Results: What do you think of the trade after a week of getting your head around it?
|
Love it, think Lucic is an upgrade
|
  
|
109 |
16.80% |
Like it, clears some cap space even if Lucic is no better
|
  
|
197 |
30.35% |
Indifferent, both teams getting a failed project
|
  
|
187 |
28.81% |
Dislike it, Neal needed another year to bounce back
|
  
|
107 |
16.49% |
Hate it, Neal will be better in Edmonton
|
  
|
49 |
7.55% |
07-20-2019, 01:38 PM
|
#1581
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: North of the River, South of the Bluff
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stud_McCool
Not sure how much Lucic will help this team, but to me, two of the biggest and entitled whiners last year, in Smith and Neal, are gone - to the same team, no less. That's already a win in itself.
|
I think this is something that is being missed to a degree. The Oilers have had character issues for years. Now they have traded character player for sulker. In fact two of them, and one of the handlers is GG.
They may get goals, but this is regression in the area the Oilers most need. Players who don’t fold tent and go home when the going gets tough.
I managed to talk to an ex player recently and they told me room chemistry is probably the most important factor in winning teams. Guys who you know have your back and you have theirs. He said reason most high talent teams that fail is because the players pack up and go home after the game and couldn’t care about the team.
I think Smith cares a lot, but Neal? Dude is a mercenary. So should be interesting to see what happens when things play out.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to OldDutch For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-20-2019, 01:39 PM
|
#1582
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
This trade looks to me like the Flames wanted Neal off the roster no matter what. There must have been concerns in the room.
|
Could be.
I wanted him off the roster no matter what just strictly based on his on ice play. I’m usually optimistic in general but I had zero optimism that Neal would rebound for us. Neal looked done as an nhler last season. Didn’t have nhl speed, not enough compete, not enough jam, no ability to play with the puck. He didn’t fit on any line. He had zero chemistry with anyone.
Neal was an unmitigated disaster last year. He had to be moved. He doesn’t fit in our lineup anywhere.
|
|
|
07-20-2019, 01:44 PM
|
#1583
|
#1 Goaltender
|
I still can’t believe this is real. I thought i’d wake up today and it was a bad dream. This trade is a triple kick in the nuts for me:
1) followed Neal since his days with the stars and was excited for his arrival . Scoring and snarl. But saw none of that. Was really frustrated with his terrible season but was hoping for a redemption year. Now that won’t happen here.
2). He went to the oil, for gods sakes. Now I hope he does not have a redemption year. Anywhere else I would have been ok with a bounce back.
3). Have despised lucic for years. I was angry when L.A., my distantly second favourite team, brought him on board. Now he is on my team. And not effective anymore. Terrible contract. Couldn’t we have gotten a cheaper facepuncher? I REALLY hope I am wrong and that Neal sucks and lucic adds value. But I will never say ‘Looooch’ in the Saddledome.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to 3rd liner For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-20-2019, 01:47 PM
|
#1584
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDutch
I think this is something that is being missed to a degree. The Oilers have had character issues for years. Now they have traded character player for sulker. In fact two of them, and one of the handlers is GG.
They may get goals, but this is regression in the area the Oilers most need. Players who don’t fold tent and go home when the going gets tough.
I managed to talk to an ex player recently and they told me room chemistry is probably the most important factor in winning teams. Guys who you know have your back and you have theirs. He said reason most high talent teams that fail is because the players pack up and go home after the game and couldn’t care about the team.
I think Smith cares a lot, but Neal? Dude is a mercenary. So should be interesting to see what happens when things play out.
|
Thing with Smith is that he cared so much he couldn't handle the reality of his awful play. Asked even simple, gentle questions, Smith would get out of joint. He could never just say "Yeah man, I was crap tonight, but I'll be better tomorrow." If, and I use the word intentionally, IF he was really like that, I can see it being an issue in the dressing room. A guy letting in 5, 3 of which were bad, sitting in the dressing room and saying "Well, I played good enough, must be an issue with the defense...." would not be super welcome.
|
|
|
07-20-2019, 01:52 PM
|
#1585
|
First Line Centre
|
It was said earlier and bears repaeating. The Flames are better today than they were yesterday with more cap room to maneuver. That's the Flames take on this.
Let Neal pad his stars and the Oil finish 24th instead of 25th. If you think the Flames are buying out any player with more than 2 years remaining on their contract (especially with Brouwer on the books another 3) you probably need to adjust your expectations.
__________________
Go Flames Go
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to tkflames For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-20-2019, 01:56 PM
|
#1586
|
Franchise Player
|
So basically Neal had his worst season ever after going to the SCF and realizing how hard it is on the body.
Now he wanted to go to Edmonton, where he is guaranteed a long offseason to rest his tired body.
makes sense to me.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CalgaryFan1988 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-20-2019, 02:07 PM
|
#1587
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Neal kinda reminded me of Tony Amonte as a flame. Over the hill guy brought in for scoring but just ended up skating around. Glad Looch is a Flame, he's going to bounce back next year.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Buck Murdock For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-20-2019, 02:20 PM
|
#1588
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
That's just pissy.
If you don't want to like the deal I get that. Discounting statistics that are hard to refute is a waste of bandwidth.
And it doesn't actually say that. It says he was a positive contribution player period. I wasn't quoting relative numbers.
|
You’re overreacting.
Like I said, he was on a terrible team. He was one of their better players. He got a lot of ice time. The Oilers’ third and fourth lines are atrocious.
Consider that he is going to be bottom six here barring injuries. He will get nary a sniff of top two ice time.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
|
|
|
07-20-2019, 02:21 PM
|
#1589
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
I’ve warmed up to the trade now.
I doubt getting Lucic to waive his NMC clause for the expansion draft will be a issue. Either way, he won’t be moving so it would just be a formality.
I do think Neal rebounds, but we didn’t need him last year and we don’t need him this year. We do need someone that at least hits and puts forth an effort.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
07-20-2019, 02:24 PM
|
#1590
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Personally really dislike this deal.
OTOH part of BT's job is to maximize use of the owners' money, so I guess he did that.
The "Winning the Stanley Cup" part, not so much.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to taxbuster For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-20-2019, 02:25 PM
|
#1591
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by taxbuster
Personally really dislike this deal.
OTOH part of BT's job is to maximize use of the owners' money, so I guess he did that.
The "Winning the Stanley Cup" part, not so much.
|
Would Neal have contributed to winning a Stanley cup? Because that's all we've lost here
|
|
|
07-20-2019, 02:26 PM
|
#1592
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shazam
You’re overreacting.
Like I said, he was on a terrible team. He was one of their better players. He got a lot of ice time. The Oilers’ third and fourth lines are atrocious.
Consider that he is going to be bottom six here barring injuries. He will get nary a sniff of top two ice time.
|
Neal averaged 14:57 of ice time on the Flames.
Lucic averaged 13:14 of ice time on the Oilers.
Hathaway averaged 10:32 of ice time on the Flames.
Assuming Neal's PP time as the second unit screen man goes to Lucic (probably with Hanifin/Andersson/Bennett/Backlund) and Hathaway's 5v5 minutes go to Lucic, I don't think it's too out there to expect Lucic to be around the 12-13 minute mark, about what he logged in Edmonton.
What the "advanced stats say" to use your words, is that Lucic was a positive player in almost every underlying area, while modtly playing with the likes of Ryan Nugent Hopkins, Zack Kassian, and Kyle Brodziak.
Even if he's ultimately one of our less strong possession players, there's a very low chance he's the kind of anchor that either Neal or Hathaway have been. Hathaway has only ever had decent underlyings with the Ryan/Mangiapane duo, and Neal didn't have decent underlyings with ANYONE last year, although Bennett did pull him up to respectability at times. It stands to reason that Lucic's positive impact on the likes of Brodziak and Kassian is not something Hathaway or Neal would necessarily be having
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
Last edited by GranteedEV; 07-20-2019 at 02:32 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-20-2019, 02:26 PM
|
#1593
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buck Murdock
Neal kinda reminded me of Tony Amonte as a flame. Over the hill guy brought in for scoring but just ended up skating around. Glad Looch is a Flame, he's going to bounce back next year.
|
Amonte scored 72 points as a Flame, including 42 his first season.
He got old. But he was always a pro and never a liability. Plus 3 and -4 in his two seasons. He was 35 when he got here, and time got him.
Nothing like James Neal.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-20-2019, 02:29 PM
|
#1594
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: In the studio
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shazam
You’re overreacting.
Like I said, he was on a terrible team. He was one of their better players. He got a lot of ice time. The Oilers’ third and fourth lines are atrocious.
Consider that he is going to be bottom six here barring injuries. He will get nary a sniff of top two ice time.
|
He only got 13:14 mins ATOI last year after averaging 16 to 17 mins the previous 8 seasons; they pigeon holed him as he start to fall out of favour and become snake bitten but as the numbers suggest even after being given terrible line mates he still helped drive play. I think he will fit in nice here and may even carve out some PP time.
|
|
|
07-20-2019, 02:30 PM
|
#1595
|
One of the Nine
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by taxbuster
Personally really dislike this deal.
OTOH part of BT's job is to maximize use of the owners' money, so I guess he did that.
The "Winning the Stanley Cup" part, not so much.
|
Getting rid of a disgruntled, useless anchor, and taking on a gruntled anchor that adds the physicality that this oft called "butter soft" team so desperately needs? I'm a-ok with this.
As someone said earlier, I think the biggest pill to swallow is that we all made fun of this contract for so long, now we look like fools. But that's just pride getting in the way of what is a move that makes total sense for both sides.
We just traded our blue (pouty) anchor for a red (firey) anchor. Matches better.
|
|
|
07-20-2019, 02:30 PM
|
#1596
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
Neal averaged 14:57 of ice time on the Flames.
Lucic averaged 13:14 of ice time on the Oilers.
Hathaway averaged 10:32 of ice time on the Flames.
Assuming Neal's PP time as the second unit screen man goes to Lucic (probably with Hanifin/Andersson/Bennett/Backlund) and Hathaway's 5v5 minutes go to Lucic, I don't think it's too out there to expect Lucic to be around the 12-13 minute mark, about what he logged in Edmonton.
|
Yup last year the Oilers tried to use him in more of a third line role. Which when you think about it is terrifying when you consider just how terrible the Oilers are.
Anyhow like I said before this trade is lateral at best.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
|
|
|
07-20-2019, 02:34 PM
|
#1597
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Memento Mori
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
Neal averaged 14:57 of ice time on the Flames.
Lucic averaged 13:14 of ice time on the Oilers.
Hathaway averaged 10:32 of ice time on the Flames.
Assuming Neal's PP time as the second unit screen man goes to Lucic (probably with Hanifin/Andersson/Bennett/Backlund) and Hathaway's 5v5 minutes go to Lucic, I don't think it's too out there to expect Lucic to be around the 12-13 minute mark, about what he logged in Edmonton.
What the "advanced stats say" to use your words, is that Lucic was a positive player in almost every underlying area, while modtly playing with the likes of Ryan Nugent Hopkins, Zack Kassian, and Kyle Brodziak.
Even if he's ultimately one of our less strong possession players, there's a very low chance he's the kind of anchor that either Neal or Hathaway have been. Hathaway has only ever had decent underlyings with the Ryan/Mangiapane duo, and Neal didn't have decent underlyings with ANYONE last year, although Bennett did pull him up to respectability at times. It stands to reason that Lucic's positive impact on the likes of Brodziak and Kassian is not something Hathaway or Neal would necessarily be having
|
RNH is the Oilers second best player.
The Oilers do have a coach that plays for Corsi. If you accept that Corsi is related to points then Lucic is still going to be oh so bad.
What a high bar we’re setting here BTW - he’s better than Hathaway? Phew.
__________________
If you don't pass this sig to ten of your friends, you will become an Oilers fan.
|
|
|
07-20-2019, 02:42 PM
|
#1598
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shazam
RNH is the Oilers second best player.
The Oilers do have a coach that plays for Corsi. If you accept that Corsi is related to points then Lucic is still going to be oh so bad.
What a high bar we’re setting here BTW - he’s better than Hathaway? Phew.
|
RNH is the Oilers' third best forward. There is no argument that he is on the same tier as Draisaitl or McDavid, and in fact there's a lot of reason to think he's a product of those two. I'm not convinced RNH is any better than Backlund or Bennett if you wanna talk about guys getting gifted top six minutes on a bad team he's a far better example of inflated stats. None of his underlyings whether it's passing stats or primary points or possession have been anything to write home about.
Neither McLellan nor Hitchcock "play for corsi".
The bar for Lucic is being better than the players he's replacing, yes. Which would be Neal on special teams and Hathaway at ES. And there's no reason not to think the Flames have improved in those areas. Is he overpaid? Yes, but we were never going to magically poof Neal's contract away. Playing with Mangiapane, Ryan, or Bennett there is no reason to think Lucic can't throw up 10-15 goals and ~15 assists from our bottom six. He will be playing with better players and against softer competition.
The fact that we've freed up half a million in cap space shouldn't be overlooked either. We will need all the wiggle room to retain Bennett/Rittich/Tkachuk.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
Last edited by GranteedEV; 07-20-2019 at 02:50 PM.
|
|
|
07-20-2019, 02:44 PM
|
#1599
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
|
I really hope Lucic causes havoc against his former team.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ForeverFlameFan For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-20-2019, 02:47 PM
|
#1600
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadaMatt
I wonder what we can read into Johnny (and probably other players) getting involved to make this deal happen? Is it an indictment on Neal as a dressing room guy that key players were helping get him out of the club?
|
I don't know about indictment, but this article in the Athletic by Duhatschek suggests Neal never found a fit with the team:
Quote:
If you ever wandered into the Calgary Flames’ dressing room last season, looking for James Neal, you’d find him stashed away in the far corner, the very last locker stall in the room. It’s not exactly where you’d expect to go searching for a player who was originally signed to provide a leadership voice and a winning pedigree to Calgary, based on Neal consecutive Stanley Cup final trips over the past two seasons.
For whatever reason – chemistry, a poor fit with potential first-line mates Johnny Gaudreau and Sean Monahan or simply the inability at the age of 31 to rebound from two long seasons and two short summers – Neal was never a fit in his now one-and-only season with the Flames. He was supposed to be a central piece in the emerging leadership group of the team.
Instead, he was a peripheral figure, literally and figuratively, on a team that won the Western Conference regular-season title, without any meaningful contributions from their expensive free-agent add
https://theathletic.com/1086265/2019...or-james-neal/
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:53 PM.
|
|