Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-23-2019, 08:42 PM   #101
flames_fan_down_under
I believe in the Jays.
 
flames_fan_down_under's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kitsilano
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barca View Post
Isn't that true for most teams not named Tampa though?

the only other team stacked with offensive talent is the Maple Leafs and maybe the Jets.

oh and Edler is signed for 2 years.
Thanks, oversight on my part.

To your first point I don't think it's true for most teams.

I think having depth and balance is really important (hot take) and the Canucks have basically zero depth. The key word in my post was "disparity" in talent. When your fourth best forward in terms of points is Antoine Roussel you are not going to be winning very many games. And then you're crossing your fingers for guys like Virtanen and Gaunce to magically turn into top 6 forwards I think you have real recipe for failure.
flames_fan_down_under is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2019, 08:55 PM   #102
Barca
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flames_fan_down_under View Post
Thanks, oversight on my part.

To your first point I don't think it's true for most teams.

I think having depth and balance is really important (hot take) and the Canucks have basically zero depth. The key word in my post was "disparity" in talent. When your fourth best forward in terms of points is Antoine Roussel you are not going to be winning very many games. And then you're crossing your fingers for guys like Virtanen and Gaunce to magically turn into top 6 forwards I think you have real recipe for failure.

The Canucks have also been hit with some really bad luck with injuries.

Beartschi only played 26 games, Sutter (26 games), Roussel (65 games) Leivo was a mid season acquisition and Pearson was a TDL pick up.

I agree with the rest though, Eriksson sucks ass, Schaller spent most of the year in the press box, Jake and Markus were ok but not enough production.

Gaunce played 3 games for the Canucks last season and is not part of the future (he's a UFA now)

some really promising signs though.

Pearson 12 points in 19 games
Leivo 25 points in 45 games
Virtanen hit the 15 goal mark for the first time lol

Sven was actually having a good year before the injuries hit, 14 points in 26 games.

the key staying healthy for at least 60+ games...
Barca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2019, 09:04 PM   #103
SportsJunky
Uncle Chester
 
SportsJunky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Exp:
Default

I thought Pearson looked pretty good once he got to Van.
SportsJunky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2019, 09:42 PM   #104
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

The funny part is Vancouver could have just signed a winger with just money rather than picks/players. Really disappointing that they did the Lightning a solid and helping them save cap space.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2019, 10:04 PM   #105
Blaster86
UnModerator
 
Blaster86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
The funny part is Vancouver could have just signed a winger with just money rather than picks/players. Really disappointing that they did the Lightning a solid and helping them save cap space.



Anyone we signed would cost over $7 million for longer term.
__________________

THANK MR DEMKO
CPHL Ottawa Vancouver
Blaster86 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2019, 10:04 PM   #106
Calgary4LIfe
Franchise Player
 
Calgary4LIfe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barca View Post
Core Pieces: Demko, Hughes, Boeser, Horvat, Pettersson
Support cast: Virtanen, MacEwen, Gaudette, Goldobin
Prospects: Podkolzin, Hoglander, Juolevi, Madden, Rathbone, DiPietro, Karlsson.

the biggest area of weakness is obviously defence which is a work in progress, but the Canucks signed a couple college free agents late last season (Teves, Rafferty and Eliot).

this trade for Miller is to surround the young guys with some veterans that fits the teams age range going forward.

guys like Beartschi (26) Miller (26) Pearson (26) Granlund (25) Spooner (26)

Imo, the Canucks are doing a good rebuild and like JB said, this trade accelerates the process and help develop the core pieces get better.

You cant continue to draft young kids and plug them in the lineup like EDM has done with Puljuarvi and expect to get better. Thats where the Canucks and Oilers differ imo we have a better support cast in place.

if only we could get out of the Eriksson and Sutter contracts

Exactly. Vancouver didn't go out and proclaim their young players as the leaders and just put them in position to fail. They - quite like the Flames actually, and every other team in the NHL that has successfully went through a rebuild process - surrounded their young players with capable veterans that could shoulder that load.


Edmonton is the poster child for poor drafting and development. Vancouver - IMO - took a bit too long to get their act together, but it does seem more likely than not that they are coming out of a rebuild with a sustainably good team. Unless something goes wrong with their defensive development, I don't even think that is THAT glaring of a weakness at the moment. A couple of depth defencemen should be able to help patch up some leaks until those defencemen mature. It isn't like the Oilers' level bad there. It will be interesting to see how these pieces mature over the next couple of seasons, but I would be surprised if the Canucks were bottom 3 in the west this season.
Calgary4LIfe is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Calgary4LIfe For This Useful Post:
Old 06-23-2019, 10:37 PM   #107
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaster86 View Post
Anyone we signed would cost over $7 million for longer term.
Better hope that you guys are good in 2021 then! Ottawa 2.0 would be funny.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-23-2019, 10:56 PM   #108
opendoor
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaster86 View Post
Anyone we signed would cost over $7 million for longer term.
What's an extra $2M when you're spending nearly $20M on Eriksson, Sutter, Spooner, Schaller, and Beagle? If that amount of cap space is worth giving up a 1st rounder, perhaps Benning should've been more judicious in handing out huge money to bottom of the roster junk.
opendoor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2019, 07:02 AM   #109
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaster86 View Post
Anyone we signed would cost over $7 million for longer term.
I doubt Ferland costs that much money. Not as good as Miller but you keep the top 10 pick
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2019, 07:05 AM   #110
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
Better hope that you guys are good in 2021 then! Ottawa 2.0 would be funny.
The downside of course is that a blow up of that magnitude would probably cost Benning his job, which means there's a chance the Canucks could hire someone competent
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2019, 07:06 AM   #111
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff View Post
The downside of course is that a blow up of that magnitude would probably cost Benning his job, which means there's a chance the Canucks could hire someone competent
Good thing Chiarelli is potentially joining the organization
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vinny01 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2019, 07:16 AM   #112
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
Good thing Chiarelli is potentially joining the organization
I'd like to think Vancouver is smart enough to keep Chiarelli far away from hockey ops.


Benning just trying to get his homie a paycheck.



He'll probably be a cheerleader like Jay Feaster in Tampa
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2019, 07:54 AM   #113
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff View Post
I'd like to think Vancouver is smart enough to keep Chiarelli far away from hockey ops.


Benning just trying to get his homie a paycheck.



He'll probably be a cheerleader like Jay Feaster in Tampa
Well they weren't smart enough to keep Weisbrod away from hockey ops.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2019, 08:18 AM   #114
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Chiarelli, Weisbrod and Benning are all basically a group package

They've been trying to put the band back together since Boston.

I feel better watching them undercut their rebuild the way Weisbrod/Feaster undercut Calgary's.

Excited for them to move more 1st and 2nd round picks for 'win now' middle of the roster players.
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2019, 08:30 AM   #115
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
Chiarelli, Weisbrod and Benning are all basically a group package

They've been trying to put the band back together since Boston.

I feel better watching them undercut their rebuild the way Weisbrod/Feaster undercut Calgary's.

Excited for them to move more 1st and 2nd round picks for 'win now' middle of the roster players.
Yeah I was a little worried they were on the right path to building a good team so this weekend has been great as a Flames fan. I hope they blow huge $$$ on Myers and maybe even Ferland in the next week.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Erick Estrada For This Useful Post:
Old 06-24-2019, 08:59 AM   #116
Geeoff
Franchise Player
 
Geeoff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken View Post
Chiarelli, Weisbrod and Benning are all basically a group package

They've been trying to put the band back together since Boston.

I feel better watching them undercut their rebuild the way Weisbrod/Feaster undercut Calgary's.

Excited for them to move more 1st and 2nd round picks for 'win now' middle of the roster players.
I have this theory that Benning and Weisbrod are desperately trying to prove they are more than amateur scouts, so they take any opportunity they can to give away draft picks
Geeoff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2019, 09:10 AM   #117
Flash Walken
Lifetime Suspension
 
Flash Walken's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geeoff View Post
I have this theory that Benning and Weisbrod are desperately trying to prove they are more than amateur scouts, so they take any opportunity they can to give away draft picks
I think they want to keep their jobs and showing an inpatient owner what they can do in the short term with draft picks helps because the owner has no concept of what that long term impact is.
Flash Walken is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2019, 11:09 AM   #118
Blaster86
UnModerator
 
Blaster86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
Better hope that you guys are good in 2021 then! Ottawa 2.0 would be funny.

Again, if the Canucks some how regress that badly in two years, we have much bigger problems than this trade.


A more accurate comparison is we become the Flames 2.0 after the Hamonic deal. Only difference is, we got some lottery protection just in case.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
I doubt Ferland costs that much money. Not as good as Miller but you keep the top 10 pick

Ferland's contract would look absolutely awful in a season or two. His play style is not one that ages well and he's already showing the wear and tear, similar to Lucic at that age. Ferland is a guy I'd want no part in for that kind of dollar amount.
__________________

THANK MR DEMKO
CPHL Ottawa Vancouver

Last edited by Blaster86; 06-24-2019 at 11:12 AM.
Blaster86 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2019, 11:13 AM   #119
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blaster86 View Post
Again, if the Canucks some how regress that badly in two years, we have much bigger problems than this trade.


A more accurate comparison is we become the Flames 2.0 after the Hamonic deal. Only difference is, we got some lottery protection just in case.
Not a lot of accuracy there by you seeing the Flames weren't a 23rd place club that had missed the playoffs four straight seasons when they made that trade. They had made the playoffs the season before the trade and were trying to go further in the playoffs not just hang in the race. Of course Glen Gulutzan had something to say about that but there's really not a lot of similarities.

Last edited by Erick Estrada; 06-24-2019 at 11:15 AM.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2019, 11:15 AM   #120
Blaster86
UnModerator
 
Blaster86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Vancouver, British Columbia.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
Wouldn't the Canucks have had to make the playoffs this year to make it a Flames 2.0 after the Hamonic deal? Flames weren't a 23rd place club that had missed the playoffs four straight seasons when they made that trade.

Nope. The Flames made the play-offs on pure luck the year before, with underlying numbers worse than most non-play-off teams. A smart GM realizes they were playing with house money and treats the roster like a non-play-off team. The Hamonic deal was made to try and shore up that problem, and it didn't work and not one was really shocked by it (except Flames fans...).
__________________

THANK MR DEMKO
CPHL Ottawa Vancouver
Blaster86 is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:04 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy