06-20-2019, 03:35 PM
|
#381
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
I miss when Tyler Parsons was a future superstar #1.
__________________
"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 03:35 PM
|
#382
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
If the Flames take Sogaard at 26, just end me now.
|
A little over the top wouldnt you agree? Flames have done a good job drafting , good enough to not have fans start hyperventilating at the idea of them taking a player. I have my preferences as well but if they like a guy at 26 they like a guy at 26.
My bet is they find a great trade down option. This is the perfect draft to do so.
|
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 03:37 PM
|
#383
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dustygoon
Oh boy. What goalie do they like at 26? Tre said Knight would be gone by the time they pick.
|
I assume that means they would like Knight at 26th considering they doubt he will be available. No other goalie is close to being ranked around that pick.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to HighLifeMan For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 03:37 PM
|
#384
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
I miss when Tyler Parsons was a future superstar #1.
|
I think he still is that guy. His road there is a bit bumpier than others. He will get there though.
Edit: I remember pre season watching him play and ho estly I dont think I've seen that kind of explosive movement before in another goalie. Hes so fast and agile.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 03:40 PM
|
#385
|
|
First Line Centre
|
If the Flames trade down from #26 to the Hurricanes for #37 and #59 that could open an opportunity for a goaltender.
Take Samuel Poulin or John Beecher @37 and Sogaard @59
__________________
'Skank' Marden: I play hockey and I fornicate, 'cause those are the two most fun things to do in cold weather. - Mystery Alaska
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 03:47 PM
|
#386
|
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
I miss when Tyler Parsons was a future superstar #1.
|
He still has that potential. Some goalies take 6-8 years to develop. I see patience is running thin already lol
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 03:48 PM
|
#387
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Royle9
Flames smoke screen I bet , wouldn’t worry too much.
|
Ha. Could be. “Jeebus. These media are crawling all over us. Conroy....get the hell out there and starting talking about anything...even drafting a goalie”.
__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Ashasx For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 03:50 PM
|
#389
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Knight is one of the players on my list that if he somehow falls because the teams ahead of CGY load up on D men they can't get in the 2nd , they run to the podium. Knight, Lavoie, Tomasino are a couple of guys that could drop if a feeding frenzy begins on D Men.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 03:53 PM
|
#390
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
Why can’t it be Knight? He’s a goalie they like at 26 if he happens to be there. They don’t think he’ll be there but you never know. They didn’t think Parsons was still gonna be there when they drafted him.
|
You act like such a cyborg sometimes. Yes....there is the remote chance that Knight is available (he probably won’t) and there is a chance that flames want him at 26 (wouldn’t everyone), but don’t you think it’s an odd thing for conroy to say after Tre said Knight will be gone by the time we pick? Let me say it this way....there is a better chance that Conroy is taking about another goalie aside from Knight. That better?
__________________
.
"Fun must be always!" - Tomas Hertl
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 04:06 PM
|
#391
|
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dustygoon
You act like such a cyborg sometimes. Yes....there is the remote chance that Knight is available (he probably won’t) and there is a chance that flames want him at 26 (wouldn’t everyone), but don’t you think it’s an odd thing for conroy to say after Tre said Knight will be gone by the time we pick? Let me say it this way....there is a better chance that Conroy is taking about another goalie aside from Knight. That better?
|
I don’t think it’s odd for Conroy to say that knowing his personality type. There’s only 1 goalie ranked in the first by scouting services and that’s Knight. Conroy is an optimist and knows that anything can happen in the end.
I’m going to go with Occam’s razor on this one. Best goalie prospect to come around in years, only 1 goalie ranked near the first, Flames like a goalie in the 1st. It’s the simplest and most likely conclusion IMO
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 04:09 PM
|
#392
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
|
I LOL'ed - thank you. The Family Guy bag of oranges scene would have worked as well.
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 04:23 PM
|
#393
|
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Actually listening to the Button interview confirms my interpretation. He says there’s 1 goalie they would take at 26, the goalies are on a separate list. Treliving doesn’t think the goalie will be there.
https://www.sportsnet.ca/960/pinder-...mes-26th-pick/
Give it a listen, seems clear as Knight to me lol
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 04:24 PM
|
#394
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
I don’t think it’s odd for Conroy to say that knowing his personality type. There’s only 1 goalie ranked in the first by scouting services and that’s Knight. Conroy is an optimist and knows that anything can happen in the end.
I’m going to go with Occam’s razor on this one. Best goalie prospect to come around in years, only 1 goalie ranked near the first, Flames like a goalie in the 1st. It’s the simplest and most likely conclusion IMO
|
Well....Conroy is pretty positive i guess.
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 04:34 PM
|
#395
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79
I think he still is that guy. His road there is a bit bumpier than others. He will get there though.
Edit: I remember pre season watching him play and ho estly I dont think I've seen that kind of explosive movement before in another goalie. Hes so fast and agile.
|
I still love Parsons as a prospect, and we all know how hit or miss goalies are. I just doubt we'd be talking goalie at 26 if Parsons were trending better. Goalie in the 2nd l
or 3rd? Absolutely. But leaning goalie in the 1st tells me there is a high degree of uncertainty in Parsons.
__________________
"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 04:37 PM
|
#396
|
|
All I can get
|
Conroy is referring to Spencer Knight. Not likely he'll be there at #26, but if by some chance he is, the Flames drop whatever their original choice was and take the goaltender.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Reggie Dunlop For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 04:43 PM
|
#397
|
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: 0° latitude, 0° longitude
|
is it Friday?
__________________
Let the Yutes play!
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 04:44 PM
|
#398
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Demetric
is it Friday?
|
Only 28 more hours until the Flames range.
|
|
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 04:46 PM
|
#399
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV
I still love Parsons as a prospect, and we all know how hit or miss goalies are. I just doubt we'd be talking goalie at 26 if Parsons were trending better. Goalie in the 2nd l
or 3rd? Absolutely. But leaning goalie in the 1st tells me there is a high degree of uncertainty in Parsons.
|
The way Knight is touted, hed be an exception to the rule regarding the Flames. I think they still are high on Gillies and Parsons. But you take Knight all day every day I think if he is there. The other goalies? Meh. But Knight seems like this years Ilya Samsonov.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
06-20-2019, 04:48 PM
|
#400
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
Actually listening to the Button interview confirms my interpretation. He says there’s 1 goalie they would take at 26, the goalies are on a separate list. Treliving doesn’t think the goalie will be there.
https://www.sportsnet.ca/960/pinder-...mes-26th-pick/
Give it a listen, seems clear as Knight to me lol |
Where is Knight projected to go?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by LickTheEnvelope View Post
... Eakins' claims Gagne's line played Kessel's line even...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hells Bells View Post
Yeah, Gagner's line was -4 and Kessel's was +4, so it all evened out.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:37 PM.
|
|
