Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-23-2019, 07:04 PM   #61
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86 View Post
Hasn't it been reported that he's looking for 5 years? Seems like a team doing an offer sheet might give that to him...

If I was the GM of another team, 8.1MM for 5 years plus a 1st 2nd and 3rd would look pretty attractive. If those picks are bottom half that would be way less than he's worth.

I think that also means that 8.1MMx5 might be the best possible outcome Tre can get...
2 - 1st's
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 07:19 PM   #62
FlamesFanTrev
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86 View Post
Hasn't it been reported that he's looking for 5 years? Seems like a team doing an offer sheet might give that to him...

If I was the GM of another team, 8.1MM for 5 years plus a 1st 2nd and 3rd would look pretty attractive. If those picks are bottom half that would be way less than he's worth.

I think that also means that 8.1MMx5 might be the best possible outcome Tre can get...
Okay but what's the price point that the flames don't match at? If they are looking at this core as the group they could win with, and Matt is a expected to be a key cog to that success, surely 2 firsts a second and a third as compensation isn't all that interesting to them, as those picks are unlikely to help during that window. That means another GM could push Treiving "all in" at 10 mil. That final tier, regardless how much you like Tkachuk, 4 first would be hard to walk away from. So the better question is, would the flames still match at 10 million?

Also, if Ottawa came and offered Treliving 2 firsts, a second and a third as a trade offer for a signed Tkachuck today, would Treliving take it?
FlamesFanTrev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 07:34 PM   #63
bettercallbettman
Scoring Winger
 
bettercallbettman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Exp:
Default

Shortest term that’ll take him to UFA and 8.5
bettercallbettman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 07:34 PM   #64
Beatle17
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Exp:
Default

If he signed an offer sheet of $7.5M x 7 years the compensation would be 4 - 1st round picks. Makes quite a bit of difference in the the offering teams calculations.

From Cap Friendly:
The AAV for an offer sheet, which determines the compensation required, is derived by dividing the total contract value amount by the lesser of:
-number of years offered, or
-five (5) years
Beatle17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 07:37 PM   #65
ricosuave
Threadkiller
 
ricosuave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 51.0544° N, 114.0669° W
Exp:
Default

https://www.nhl.com/news/signing-mat...es/c-306974344
__________________
https://www.reddit.com/r/CalgaryFlames/
I’m always amazed these sportscasters and announcers can call the game with McDavid’s **** in their mouths all the time.
ricosuave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 07:37 PM   #66
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
The teams also need their picks. A lot of the teams at the top have traded their picks or have conditions on picks.

Out of the playoff teams you have the following teams that have their picks for this year:
COL, LV, CAR, PIT, NAS, TB, NYI, WAS, and BOS.

Looking at that list maybe Carolina, NYI, or Colorado could make a push, but the others are up against the cap or have their own RFA issues.
This years picks are irrelevant. Tkachuk is a free agent after the draft so all future picks. There could be a few teams impacted but I don’t think too many.

Walk away for me is the 4 1sts.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 07:42 PM   #67
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
2 - 1st's
Not unless cap friendly has the compensation table wrong. https://www.capfriendly.com/offer-sheet-calculator

8.1 MM is less than 8.118 MM
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 07:43 PM   #68
wired
Powerplay Quarterback
 
wired's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Strathmore
Exp:
Default

Bridge deal, 2x5 mil.
His play down the stretch and in the playoffs hurt his value.
wired is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 07:49 PM   #69
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

First off, jeers to Chiarelli and Dubas. These dumbasses have signed RFAs like they are UFAs, breaking the market.

Tre will do better than that though.

I am looking to see 5 years at about 6.5

Tkachuk is a good player, often acts mature in interviews, is credited with having leadership

But he did himself very few favours on the ice in 2019 to improve his negotiating position.

If Tkachuk wants the negotiations to get ugly, they will. I am sure Treliving will bring up a couple of things.

He piled up points early and when the games got tougher to play, he often struggled
Something like 1 G 3 A and -4 in 13 games in February. (Or in 15 games if you count Jan 22 and Mar 2).
1 point in his last 6.
In the playoffs, a nice game 1, but invisible and not an impact player afterwards. 1A and -5 in the last 4

Seems he has to explain how he is a consistent player and not streaky, and how he should be paid like a big game player that shows up when it matters.

Tkachuk takes advice from his dad, and many expect he will look for top dollar. Tre is absolutely going to make the point that one player going for top dollar affects what they have available to ice a team that just fell flat. He already has said there are 23 other mouths to feed.

And yes, I think Tre would be just fine to remind him how many cups his dad got. You can’t be bigger than the team in the cap era.
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 07:57 PM   #70
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
First off, jeers to Chiarelli and Dubas. These dumbasses have signed RFAs like they are UFAs, breaking the market.

Tre will do better than that though.

I am looking to see 5 years at about 6.5

Tkachuk is a good player, often acts mature in interviews, is credited with having leadership

But he did himself very few favours on the ice in 2019 to improve his negotiating position.

If Tkachuk wants the negotiations to get ugly, they will. I am sure Treliving will bring up a couple of things.

He piled up points early and when the games got tougher to play, he often struggled
Something like 1 G 3 A and -4 in 13 games in February. (Or in 15 games if you count Jan 22 and Mar 2).
1 point in his last 6.
In the playoffs, a nice game 1, but invisible and not an impact player afterwards. 1A and -5 in the last 4

Seems he has to explain how he is a consistent player and not streaky, and how he should be paid like a big game player that shows up when it matters.

Tkachuk takes advice from his dad, and many expect he will look for top dollar. Tre is absolutely going to make the point that one player going for top dollar affects what they have available to ice a team that just fell flat. He already has said there are 23 other mouths to feed.

And yes, I think Tre would be just fine to remind him how many cups his dad got. You can’t be bigger than the team in the cap era.


What?

Career high goals, assists, points, +/-.

Playing a major role on the 2nd place team in the entire league.

Did himself no favors?
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-23-2019, 08:00 PM   #71
Captaincanada80
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Captaincanada80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

I still think he’ll get same contract I thought mid-season

7yr/50M

7.14 per
__________________
Originally Posted by oilboy2
This deal is DONE, im not sure what the worry is. Heatly is an Oiler, just some paperwork to get done. This isnt another Nylander incident
Captaincanada80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 08:10 PM   #72
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captaincanada80 View Post
I still think he’ll get same contract I thought mid-season

7yr/50M

7.14 per
That would be a great deal. I don’t think they can get 7 years without going over $8M and could be $9M for the full 8.

I think $7.75Mx6
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 08:10 PM   #73
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by transplant99 View Post
What?

Career high goals, assists, points, +/-.

Playing a major role on the 2nd place team in the entire league.

Did himself no favors?
He did a lot of that in the 2018 portion of the season. Remember earlier in the season when he was on pace for over 90 points?

Was it really that unclear that I was referring to the stretch?
DeluxeMoustache is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 08:41 PM   #74
Corral
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Stampede Grounds
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01 View Post
You can’t believe the Flames are going to dig in on the internal cap do you?

Gio signed his deal 4 years ago that number has gone up. Tkachuk signs an offer sheet before accepting the Giordano/Gaudreau cap imo.
I do. The flames won’t alter the salary hierarchy in the room on the basis of potential for tkachuk.
Corral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 08:56 PM   #75
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Guentzel is a good comp. I think that and lackluster clutch play when it counts keeps him to ~7x5. You had your chance to make Matthews money in the playoffs this year and weren't able to convert. Earn it for the next contract, when you'll only be 25
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 08:59 PM   #76
dino7c
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
Guentzel is a good comp. I think that and lackluster clutch play when it counts keeps him to ~7x5. You had your chance to make Matthews money in the playoffs this year and weren't able to convert. Earn it for the next contract, when you'll only be 25
Yeah look at all the winning Matthews has done
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 09:06 PM   #77
Monahammer
Franchise Player
 
Monahammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c View Post
Yeah look at all the winning Matthews has done
Did you even watch any of the games? Fault to a lot of leaf players but certainly not matthews this year. I'm a huge tkachuk fan but one has clearly been more impressive.
Monahammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 09:09 PM   #78
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monahammer View Post
Did you even watch any of the games? Fault to a lot of leaf players but certainly not matthews this year. I'm a huge tkachuk fan but one has clearly been more impressive.
Yup....Matthews is the better player, no question.

5 million dollars a year better though?

No.
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to transplant99 For This Useful Post:
Old 04-23-2019, 09:23 PM   #79
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beatle17 View Post
If he signed an offer sheet of $7.5M x 7 years the compensation would be 4 - 1st round picks. Makes quite a bit of difference in the the offering teams calculations.

From Cap Friendly:
The AAV for an offer sheet, which determines the compensation required, is derived by dividing the total contract value amount by the lesser of:
-number of years offered, or
-five (5) years
does it work that way though?

I thought the tiers were pretty set based on the AAV... an offer sheet with an AAV of 7.5 shows as 1st a 2nd and a 3rd.

edit... nvm... i see its divided by contract years, or 5 years, which ever is the lesser number...

Last edited by oldschoolcalgary; 04-23-2019 at 09:26 PM.
oldschoolcalgary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2019, 09:37 PM   #80
Jordan!
Jordan!
 
Jordan!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
Exp:
Default

Keller for Tkachuk?
Jordan! is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:10 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy