01-22-2019, 10:33 PM
|
#141
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Internet cliche, but,
What a time to be alive!
|
|
|
01-22-2019, 10:37 PM
|
#142
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger
69 plus two in the...
|
Sitting on that one for awhile?
|
|
|
01-22-2019, 10:38 PM
|
#143
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Just checked and it looks like there's no ATL on the Oiler board. I can't begin to guess why.
|
They are just continuing on in the one started after their last loss. No new loss PGT for them.
|
|
|
01-22-2019, 10:40 PM
|
#144
|
Taking a while to get to 5000
|
Agree with most here. Weird game. Flames weren't the better of the two teams yet should have won 6-2 but still got the win regardless. None the less good to get the break with a win and doing it in OT adds some punch. Enjoy the break, you've earned it!
|
|
|
01-22-2019, 10:40 PM
|
#145
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteTiger
They are just continuing on in the one started after their last loss. No new loss PGT for them. 
|
That's their PGT. Not an ATL.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-22-2019, 10:41 PM
|
#146
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Back in Calgary
|
Feel bad for Ferland, hope he didn't rush back for this game and prolong the injury.
While he might be too much for a trade deadline acquisition, I wonder if he would take a discount (3.0ish?) to come back to Calgary as a UFA. Good Friends, team helped him get sober, likes the city...
|
|
|
01-22-2019, 10:41 PM
|
#147
|
Closet Jedi
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
Carolina really is the "eye test" for some of the advanced stats narratives.
They shot from everywhere and anywhere, but their 1st goal was an own deflection and Hanifin had another close call, but they generated almost nothing else of actual danger.
The Flames had almost no shots through 40, yet could have easily been up 4-1.
|
Huh? Everybody agrees that the Flames did not play that well this game. You're saying we should've been up 4-1?? Canes dominated possession for the first 2 periods. Flames did manage a lot of good rush chances, but the first produces more consistent results.
__________________
Gaudreau > Huberdeau AINEC
|
|
|
01-22-2019, 10:41 PM
|
#148
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Game Takes:
Flames 3 Canes 2 OT
- not a good effort from the Flames until late
- Backlund and Neal click
- Rittich solid
- point streaks come to an end
|
|
|
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-22-2019, 10:42 PM
|
#149
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AC
Carolina really is the "eye test" for some of the advanced stats narratives.
They shot from everywhere and anywhere, but their 1st goal was an own deflection and Hanifin had another close call, but they generated almost nothing else of actual danger.
The Flames had almost no shots through 40, yet could have easily been up 4-1.
|
I didn’t really see it that way.
In all situations, Hurricanes had 29 scoring chances and 11 high danger chances. At least 2 posts I can think of.
Flames had 20 scoring chances and 10 high danger chances.
5 on 5 was less flattering to the Flames.
Hurricanes had been playing well and I’m not surprised they gave Flames all they could handle. Flames have better finish though and they won the goalie battle. And when game was on the line, Flames were excellent even though they lost the 3rd period.
|
|
|
01-22-2019, 10:42 PM
|
#150
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
That's their PGT. Not an ATL.
|
Oh, derp. That's my reading comprehension for you. Yeah, their current ATL is standing at 6 pages, with no updates. Looks like they are all talking about firing Chia.
|
|
|
01-22-2019, 10:45 PM
|
#151
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: 403
|
|
|
|
The Following 76 Users Say Thank You to TheRealPepman For This Useful Post:
|
---Hatrick---,
-TC-,
1Nite,
3thirty,
442scotty,
ASP#26525,
Barnet Flame,
BeltlineFan,
BigBrodieFan,
bigrangy,
BlAcKNoVa,
Blixa,
bob-loblaw,
Bonecrushing Hits,
btimbit,
bucksmasher,
Bunk,
chummer,
ClubFlames,
Cole436,
crapshoot,
CrazyCaper,
CRXguy,
Demaeon,
djsFlames,
Domoic,
DownInFlames,
dying4acup,
FFR,
Fire,
FlamesAreOne,
Flamesfan2010,
FlamesFanTrev,
FlamesNation23,
flame^thrower,
foshizzle11,
Frank MetaMusil,
Gaskal,
getbak,
GoFlamesGo,
IGGYFORMVP,
Insufficient Funds,
jaikorven,
jayswin,
Jetfire,
jg13,
jkflames,
JohnnyBeGood,
kkaleR,
Lanny'sDaMan,
LeftWing,
midniteowl,
Monahammer,
MrButtons,
Phaneuf,
Poe969,
PugnaciousIntern,
Puppet Guy,
Rhettzky,
rogermexico,
Rubicant,
Samonadreau,
SaskUke,
sempuki,
Slacker,
SOMBRI2,
ssjshmo,
taxbuster,
TBone290,
Textcritic,
TheIronMaiden,
Titan,
topfiverecords,
tripin_billie,
tvp2003,
UKflames
|
01-22-2019, 10:45 PM
|
#152
|
Resident Videologist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philly06Cup
Huh? Everybody agrees that the Flames did not play that well this game. You're saying we should've been up 4-1?? Canes dominated possession for the first 2 periods. Flames did manage a lot of good rush chances, but the first produces more consistent results.
|
Yes, the Flames didn't play well.
But I don't think all the Carolina shots amounted to much through 40. The Flames had some Grade A chances that didn't go in (Neal and Gio) and could have been up 4-1 after 40.
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-22-2019, 10:46 PM
|
#153
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: SW Ontario
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
I didn’t really see it that way.
In all situations, Hurricanes had 29 scoring chances and 11 high danger chances. At least 2 posts I can think of.
Flames had 20 scoring chances and 10 high danger chances.
5 on 5 was less flattering to the Flames.
Hurricanes had been playing well and I’m not surprised they gave Flames all they could handle. Flames have better finish though and they won the goalie battle. And when game was on the line, Flames were excellent even though they lost the 3rd period.
|
High danger scoring chances are still just shots from a certain area. It's not like Rittich was making huge saves left and right.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to PeteMoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-22-2019, 10:46 PM
|
#154
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
Oh and why is the top of page 1 dominated by Oiler threads after a Flames win?
|
When you win, act like you’ve been there before. When your rival loses, give it to them from all angles.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-22-2019, 10:48 PM
|
#155
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheRealPepman
|
Does Reg know he is an internet sensation?
__________________
Trust the snake.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bunk For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-22-2019, 10:49 PM
|
#156
|
First Line Centre
|
I missed the first period and a bit. Were Ferland/Hamilton cheered hard? I heard there was a video for them?
|
|
|
01-22-2019, 10:49 PM
|
#157
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Regina
|
Huge win late !
|
|
|
01-22-2019, 10:52 PM
|
#158
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss
High danger scoring chances are still just shots from a certain area. It's not like Rittich was making huge saves left and right.
|
I thought he was pretty good. High danger are more than just shots from a certain area, but an area defined as where most goals come from.
I do see what you’re saying, but I thought Carolina carried the play for like no stretches and had good chances. How many posts?
Flames with great chances too resulting from less pressure but nice plays. Until the last half of the third.
|
|
|
01-22-2019, 10:52 PM
|
#159
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunk
Does Reg know he is an internet sensation?
|
Is Reg his anointed name like Bev or does someone actually know him?
Edit: or did someone lip read from his first spotlight of fame with the 'shove it'?
__________________
ech·o cham·ber
/ˈekō ˌCHāmbər/
noun
An environment in which a person encounters only beliefs or opinions that coincide with their own, so that their existing views are reinforced and alternative ideas are not considered.
|
|
|
01-22-2019, 10:55 PM
|
#160
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Pas, MB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheSutterDynasty
Edit: or did someone lip read from his first spotlight of fame with the 'shove it'?
|
Yes
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Inferno For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:13 PM.
|
|