Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 09-26-2018, 12:58 PM   #21
Savvy27
#1 Goaltender
 
Savvy27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VilleN View Post
Didn't Foo have the option to sign with the Greasers, but chose the Flames instead? Obviously, I understand why he chose Calgary, but you've got to think as a career move, signing in Edmonton would have been much smarter. He'd likely be on the top line looking at a 6x6 contract.
Calgary's right wing position was incredibly weak when he signed. Unfortunately for him, he was unable to make the opening line up or to establish himself as a regular on the NHL roster throughout the season. I don't think he made the wrong choice. There was a lot of opportunity on the Flames last season for right wingers and I'm sure the team would have been ecstatic if he grabbed hold of it, but he took a while to adjust to the pro game even at the AHL level.

I like him as a player and think that he still has some potential to be a regular NHLer. He is going to have to really make an impression the next opportunity he gets.
Savvy27 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 12:58 PM   #22
1qqaaz
Franchise Player
 
1qqaaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
Exp:
Default

I was expecting there to be a lot of cuts today.

I kind of disagree with sending Parsons and Foo down, but I'm not overly shocked.
1qqaaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 01:02 PM   #23
VilleN
First Line Centre
 
VilleN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Savvy27 View Post
Calgary's right wing position was incredibly weak when he signed. Unfortunately for him, he was unable to make the opening line up or to establish himself as a regular on the NHL roster throughout the season. I don't think he made the wrong choice. There was a lot of opportunity on the Flames last season for right wingers and I'm sure the team would have been ecstatic if he grabbed hold of it, but he took a while to adjust to the pro game even at the AHL level.

I like him as a player and think that he still has some potential to be a regular NHLer. He is going to have to really make an impression the next opportunity he gets.
In hindsight, it likely would have been better for him to have signed with the Oilers. If Ty Rattie is going to be the top line RW, then surely Foo would make that roster and would be making significantly more money.

With that said, as a fan I am happy he signed with the Flames, if not only for the fact that he turned down the Oilers.
VilleN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 01:10 PM   #24
NewFan
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

For me Foo is a little bit better than Hathaway and Lazar in terms of scoring and creating offence. But for the 13th or 14th spot I don't care. Hope Foo plays well and earn the first call up.
NewFan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to NewFan For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2018, 01:13 PM   #25
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz View Post
I was expecting there to be a lot of cuts today.

I kind of disagree with sending Parsons and Foo down, but I'm not overly shocked.
I don't believe there was any serious thought that Parsons would start the year on the NHL roster. He JUST turned 21-years-old, and has only played one year of professional hockey. The best thing for him and the Flames is to focus on his role in Stockton, and establish himself as an AHL starting goalie.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2018, 01:18 PM   #26
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew View Post
Foo was not really close to earning a spot. Given his age, he will really need to impress in Stockton.

That is still a ton of defensemen left in camp.
I liked Foo's game and think he's more likely to be an NHLer now than before this camp.

He didn't do enough to make the team don't get me wrong, but he showed the other parts of his game are more advanced than I thought.

Couldn't finish though, and that needs to change. I think he's a solid call up as a winger that won't hurt you though.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2018, 01:20 PM   #27
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Only real shocker for me personally is Kyllington. I felt he deserved the final try out game in SJ at the very least. Ah well. Hopefully he explodes offensively down in Stockton. He's really close to being a full time NHL player.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2018, 01:30 PM   #28
FlamesFanFromBC
First Line Centre
 
FlamesFanFromBC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BC
Exp:
Default

As of right now I would

To AHL: Gillies (G), Valimaki (D), Hogstrom (D) & Mangiapane (F)
Waive/AHL: Lazar (F), Peluso (F), Prout (D)
PTO Guys: Release all or maybe sign one to two-way deal for depth, assign to AHL
Keep on opening day roster: Dube (Starting lineup), Hathaway (13th Forward) & Andersson (6/7th Dman)

Tricky part is with Andersson is getting him into the lineup for a few games early on which I think is harder playing on right side because he would replace Stone rather than Kulak on left side.

If Andersson won't get any game action early on I would send him down and keep a depth dman like Prout.
__________________
FlamesFanFromBC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 01:31 PM   #29
heep223
Could Care Less
 
heep223's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

I’m not surprised at all by Kyllington. He had some nice flashes but he still makes terrible puck decisions and is often caught out of position. He has a lot of work to do IMO.
heep223 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to heep223 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2018, 01:39 PM   #30
Makarov
Franchise Player
 
Makarov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Moscow
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by heep223 View Post
I’m not surprised at all by Kyllington. He had some nice flashes but he still makes terrible puck decisions and is often caught out of position. He has a lot of work to do IMO.
Its interesting. He just seems to be one of those polarizing players (for whatever reason.) I watched most of the preseason games and I just didn't see this. For the most part, he looked very calm, controlled and composed (both with and without the puck) to me.

EDIT FOR FULL DISCLOSURE: I've been a bit of a Kylington fan boy since before we even drafted him. Therefore, my observations may be tainted by confirmation bias. But still...
__________________
"Life of Russian hockey veterans is very hard," said Soviet hockey star Sergei Makarov. "Most of them don't have enough to eat these days. These old players are Russian legends."
Makarov is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Makarov For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2018, 01:49 PM   #31
SeanCharles
First Line Centre
 
SeanCharles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Makarov View Post
Its interesting. He just seems to be one of those polarizing players (for whatever reason.) I watched most of the preseason games and I just didn't see this. For the most part, he looked very calm, controlled and composed (both with and without the puck) to me.

EDIT FOR FULL DISCLOSURE: I've been a bit of a Kylington fan boy since before we even drafted him. Therefore, my observations may be tainted by confirmation bias. But still...
He, much like Bennett, is an extremely polarizing player.

I think he will be fine, he just needs more time.

It's easy to forget how young he is considering he has played 3 years in the AHL.

The important thing is he has improved each year and he should be the go to guy this year with Andersson looking like he is a lock to make the big club.

Even after Valimaki gets sent down I believe they will be the top 2 guys, playing in all key situations.

It's going to be fun having a blueline with Hanifin, Andersson, Valimaki and Kylington on it for years to come. All 4 have good potential and are young up and comers.

Just because they are all at different stages of development doesn't mean I'm not still high on them. Some guys take longer than others and when you are talking about defenceman that is not necessarily a bad thing.
SeanCharles is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 01:58 PM   #32
TheIronMaiden
Franchise Player
 
TheIronMaiden's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
Exp:
Default

I like Foo's game. He was just edged out by Czarnick, Mangiapane and Dube. No shame in being sent down if he can prove that he is too good for the AHL when he gets there.
TheIronMaiden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 02:03 PM   #33
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

The message to Foo is to go down to Stockton and dominate in the AHL (like Czarnik and Mangiapane).

However much Kylington is skilled, he's still an adventure with the puck (and not in a good way).
__________________
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Reggie Dunlop For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2018, 02:16 PM   #34
fotiou22
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dammage79 View Post
Only real shocker for me personally is Kyllington. I felt he deserved the final try out game in SJ at the very least. Ah well. Hopefully he explodes offensively down in Stockton. He's really close to being a full time NHL player.
He's close, but not quite there. Wish they would have given him that last game in SJ, just to skate on the same ice against Erik Karlsson.
fotiou22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 02:16 PM   #35
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reggie Dunlop View Post
The message to Foo is to go down to Stockton and dominate in the AHL (like Czarnik and Mangiapane).

However much Kylington is skilled, he's still an adventure with the puck (and not in a good way).
I disagree with Kylington being an adventure with the puck. Even last year by all accounts he was rounding out his game quite well in Stockton. And this camp he was playing a very reserved game except for last night where he opened up a fair bit to show off his offensive skills.

His defensive liability issues are really overblown by some here. I'm not saying he's a saint but he is exponentially better than when he arrived in his first year.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2018, 02:27 PM   #36
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Kylington still needs to add man strength IMO. One of his biggest struggles at the nhl level will be trying to physically battle against NHL sized powerforwards. Liking his progression though. Time for him to dominate the AHL
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2018, 02:35 PM   #37
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Kylington still needs to add man strength IMO. One of his biggest struggles at the nhl level will be trying to physically battle against NHL sized powerforwards. Liking his progression though. Time for him to dominate the AHL
This is it for me. His decision making defensively is fine. Could use some fine tuning, but overall he's pretty strong now.

It's the ability to clear the front of the net and win puck battles in corners. He's going to need a brute of a partner because he simply lacks the size to do that, and gets pushed around at times. If he adds enough in other areas, you can live with that, but you do need to find a big strong partner for him, not unlike the line combinations you need around Gaudreau (Gaudreau obviously being MUCH smaller and needing size around him more than Kylington).
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2018, 02:40 PM   #38
Toonage
Taking a while to get to 5000
 
Toonage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan View Post
This is it for me. His decision making defensively is fine. Could use some fine tuning, but overall he's pretty strong now.

It's the ability to clear the front of the net and win puck battles in corners. He's going to need a brute of a partner because he simply lacks the size to do that, and gets pushed around at times. If he adds enough in other areas, you can live with that, but you do need to find a big strong partner for him, not unlike the line combinations you need around Gaudreau (Gaudreau obviously being MUCH smaller and needing size around him more than Kylington).
Kylington-Prout could well be that pair for Stockton
Toonage is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Toonage For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2018, 02:44 PM   #39
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames View Post
Kylington was solid. He'll be ready in a year.
I think this falls somewhere in between wishful thinking and delusion.

He was good for about one bad pinch per period and looked physically weak during in puck battles.

All of his knocks are still very visibly there after 3 years of pro. Don’t get your hopes up.
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to neo45 For This Useful Post:
Old 09-26-2018, 02:45 PM   #40
Hockey-and_stuff
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

This is by far the best camp I've seen from Kylington. It's the first time I've seen him and thought he could play in the NHL full time.

He's only 21 and right on the cusp. I think he'll be a main roster player down the road.
Hockey-and_stuff is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hockey-and_stuff For This Useful Post:
14
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:38 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy