View Poll Results: Which Legit Top 6 Forward Do You THINK The Flames Will Acquire?
|
John Tavares (UFA)
|
  
|
58 |
13.52% |
James Neal (UFA)
|
  
|
47 |
10.96% |
James Van reimsdyk (UFA)
|
  
|
31 |
7.23% |
David Perron (UFA)
|
  
|
18 |
4.20% |
Thomas Vanek (UFA)
|
  
|
8 |
1.86% |
Paul Stastny (UFA)
|
  
|
14 |
3.26% |
Tyler Bozak (UFA)
|
  
|
11 |
2.56% |
Mike Hoffman (Trade)
|
  
|
57 |
13.29% |
Max Pacioretty (Trade)
|
  
|
3 |
0.70% |
Ryan O'Reilly (Trade)
|
  
|
27 |
6.29% |
Jakub Silfverberg (Trade)
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Gustav Nyqvist (Trade)
|
  
|
3 |
0.70% |
William Nylander (Trade)
|
  
|
7 |
1.63% |
Mitchell Marner (Trade)
|
  
|
5 |
1.17% |
Nino Niederreiter (Trade)
|
  
|
20 |
4.66% |
Charlie Coyle (Trade)
|
  
|
6 |
1.40% |
Wayne Simmonds (Trade)
|
  
|
2 |
0.47% |
Mats Zuccarello (Trade)
|
  
|
4 |
0.93% |
Kevin Hayes (Trade)
|
  
|
11 |
2.56% |
Mark Stone (Trade)
|
  
|
12 |
2.80% |
Jeff Skinner (Trade)
|
  
|
10 |
2.33% |
Elias Lindholm (Trade)
|
  
|
23 |
5.36% |
Phil Kessel (Trade)
|
  
|
8 |
1.86% |
Brandon Saad (Trade)
|
  
|
3 |
0.70% |
Corey Perry (Trade)
|
  
|
4 |
0.93% |
Jordan Eberle (Trade)
|
  
|
3 |
0.70% |
Other not listed above
|
  
|
27 |
6.29% |
Fail to acquire a legit top 6 forward
|
  
|
119 |
27.74% |
06-09-2018, 05:15 PM
|
#81
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz
I definitely get where you're coming from, but I would not be surprised to see some of these guys sign a deal for 4 years or less.
|
I would be shocked if they signed four year deals (or less). This is where players at this status and age range cash in and are looking for long term security. If they would take a short deal, some of them would be good options, but I find that extremely unlikely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1qqaaz
JVR: Perhaps 6.5 million for 6 years. No assets required.
|
That's exactly the kind of scary I'm talking about. I'd want no part of that.
I get where you're coming from about signing a UFA vs. giving up assets, but I strongly disagree about the names you've listed thinking they'll take short deals.
|
|
|
06-09-2018, 05:36 PM
|
#82
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
Tavares. It's time for the Flames to catch a break. Tavares.
Tavares.
Maybe if we all think it, believe it and say it, it'll happen.
Tavares.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post:
|
AC,
bigrangy,
bubbsy,
Flashpoint,
Gaskal,
GreenLantern2814,
ignite,
jayswin,
mile,
MrButtons,
Phaneuf_Phan,
Roof-Daddy,
Snuffleupagus,
Stillman16
|
06-09-2018, 05:41 PM
|
#83
|
Not a casual user
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
|
Tre doesn't want to get into a bidding war on July 1st and will likely pass.
__________________
|
|
|
06-09-2018, 05:44 PM
|
#84
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GoJetsGo
I would be shocked if they signed four year deals (or less). This is where players at this status and age range cash in and are looking for long term security. If they would take a short deal, some of them would be good options, but I find that extremely unlikely.
That's exactly the kind of scary I'm talking about. I'd want no part of that.
I get where you're coming from about signing a UFA vs. giving up assets, but I strongly disagree about the names you've listed thinking they'll take short deals.
|
Okay, "some" may have been pushing it. But I wouldn't be surprised if one of them did go for it. Hudler was 28 years old, coming off a 50 point season, and signed a 4 year deal with the Flames. Frolik (27) and Brouwer (31) also signed 4 year deals. Last year Shattenkirk (28) signed a 4 year deal.
Sure, Perron, JVR, Neal and Bozak may have more demand than Hudler, Frolik, or Brouwer did. They're also a bit older. But Neal hasn't had more than had 45 points since the 15-16 season. He might not get as much term as people expect. Bozak may not get more than 4 years either. For some reason I don't see him getting a king's ransom.
|
|
|
06-09-2018, 06:52 PM
|
#85
|
Uncle Chester
|
I voted 'other' because there is no Kapanen option from Toronto. I think we see a deal that brings a burner to the team and Kapanen has great wheels. I'm not sure where his offensive ceiling is but he is a well rounded player. I think Treliving is telling the truth when he says that adding speed is a priority this off season.
|
|
|
06-09-2018, 06:53 PM
|
#86
|
First Line Centre
|
I'm going with Mark Stone. Brother plays with Calgary and Ferland was his linemate in Junior.
|
|
|
06-09-2018, 06:58 PM
|
#87
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SportsJunky
I voted 'other' because there is no Kapanen option from Toronto. I think we see a deal that brings a burner to the team and Kapanen has great wheels. I'm not sure where his offensive ceiling is but he is a well rounded player. I think Treliving is telling the truth when he says that adding speed is a priority this off season.
|
Yeah I didn't put guys like that as options because they aren't proven top 6 NHL forwards yet, but yeah he could be a good option.
Speaking of burners, I wonder if Ottawa would ever entertain flipping Duchene? I'd be interested in that if Treliving could swing it with an extension.
|
|
|
06-09-2018, 06:59 PM
|
#88
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: SW Ontario
|
I find it a bit mind boggling that currently 18 people legitimately believe the Flames will sign John Tavares. Kudos for the optimism though.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to dissentowner For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2018, 07:08 PM
|
#89
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
I find it a bit mind boggling that currently 18 people legitimately believe the Flames will sign John Tavares. Kudos for the optimism though.
|
I find it just as surprising, if not more, that 33 people so far think we won't acquire any top 6 forwards this off season.
Actually leads all the poll options by a fair margin. Although I realize it's only 1/4 of the total votes.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2018, 07:13 PM
|
#90
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nachodamus.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
I find it just as surprising, if not more, that 33 people so far think we won't acquire any top 6 forwards this off season.
Actually leads all the poll options by a fair margin. Although I realize it's only 1/4 of the total votes.
|
It's been too many post seasons (Dougie being the notable exception) that the Flames have gone big game hunting (or supposedly did), and came away with an also ran. I have no expectations or hopes. I'm in a wait and see groove right now.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Lanny'sDaMan For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2018, 07:34 PM
|
#91
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
|
I chose none of the above.
I don't know if there will be a fit anywhere in terms of price of acquisition and desire to come here/bring them in.
The Flames desperately need 2 top 6 forwards.
If Backlund and Frolik are in your top 6, you're not a playoff team. They are elite 3rd line players, but if you don't have the depth to have them in their proper roles, your team is not very good.
The Flames could always use a center and a RW. It is possible to shift Janko over to the wing if a C is acquired.
Anything less than this
Gaudreau-Monahan-New guy
Tkachuk-New guy/Janko-New guy
Bennett-Backlund-Frolik
Miscellaneous guys that earn the 4th line spots.
probably means the team misses again. Ferland should not be counted on as a top 6 forward. He is basically this team's version of Glencross. A guy who can pot 20, but is still a 3rd/4th line forward.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
|
|
|
06-09-2018, 08:08 PM
|
#92
|
tromboner
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion
Tre doesn't want to get into a bidding war on July 1st and will likely pass.
|
Tre might've realized that we don't need more middle. We need more high-end. Why get it through a trade with a high acquisition cost if you can get it from a UFA with no acquisition cost?
|
|
|
06-09-2018, 08:11 PM
|
#93
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
I find it a bit mind boggling that currently 18 people legitimately believe the Flames will sign John Tavares. Kudos for the optimism though.
|
Adjust for the typical percentage that didn’t read the OP or the question completely before voting.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to topfiverecords For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2018, 08:19 PM
|
#95
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great
I chose none of the above.
I don't know if there will be a fit anywhere in terms of price of acquisition and desire to come here/bring them in.
The Flames desperately need 2 top 6 forwards.
If Backlund and Frolik are in your top 6, you're not a playoff team. They are elite 3rd line players, but if you don't have the depth to have them in their proper roles, your team is not very good.
The Flames could always use a center and a RW. It is possible to shift Janko over to the wing if a C is acquired.
Anything less than this
Gaudreau-Monahan-New guy
Tkachuk-New guy/Janko-New guy
Bennett-Backlund-Frolik
Miscellaneous guys that earn the 4th line spots.
probably means the team misses again. Ferland should not be counted on as a top 6 forward. He is basically this team's version of Glencross. A guy who can pot 20, but is still a 3rd/4th line forward.
|
I've half convinced myself that Brandon Saad won't cost as much as some would think to get. I feel the Blackhawks need a D man. Any D man. and they need to cut some cap. IMO, Stone for Saad is in the ballaprk of what I figure they'd do. Probably off base but closer to the mark than further away.
I think Lindholm can be had as well. RFA and the Canes are going to be weird for a couple of years with their owner running the ship. He might be a little costlier than I think he is worth but I think the Flames could get him.
But why get him? 23 year old RFA who puts up 40 points a year?
Well he is right handed, is a natural center and if we're talking about adding one RW and one C....Why not Lindholm? He can slot in anywhere from the 1-3 RW, the 2-3 C. Just multi tooled assset to have when the argument is GOOD solid forward depth. Just feel he may be a good target to move something for.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
|
|
|
06-09-2018, 08:21 PM
|
#96
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dissentowner
I find it a bit mind boggling that currently 18 people legitimately believe the Flames will sign John Tavares. Kudos for the optimism though.
|
You're just sweating because if one of them is a wizard and makes it happen, you're gonna have a Treliving buddy jesus tapestry zapped into your back.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
|
|
|
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2018, 08:23 PM
|
#97
|
Farm Team Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp: 
|
I don't understand why so many people think the Flames will land Tavares. If the Islanders don't feel they will sign him, they will trade him before the deadline so a team has exclusive rights to try and sign him. And some team will give a 1st round pick. The Flames of course do not have a 1st and the Isles won't let Tavares walk without getting anything for him. I wish I was more positive, but I just don't see it happening.
|
|
|
06-09-2018, 08:45 PM
|
#98
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WilliPlett
I don't understand why so many people think the Flames will land Tavares. If the Islanders don't feel they will sign him, they will trade him before the deadline so a team has exclusive rights to try and sign him. And some team will give a 1st round pick. The Flames of course do not have a 1st and the Isles won't let Tavares walk without getting anything for him. I wish I was more positive, but I just don't see it happening.
|
No team is going to give up a first unless they are confident they can sign him. With the courting period now, the only advantage to trading for his rights is getting to talk to him and sign him before that.
But if he is intent on testing the waters, you've just thrown away a 1st for nothing.
I don't think most people are predicting the Flames sign him - just hoping for it. It's a fun "what if" to think about.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jiri Hrdina For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2018, 08:52 PM
|
#99
|
First Line Centre
|
Dear Mr. Brad Treliving,
Please don't sign anyone on July 1st. I don't want to see any huge overpays. Ask someone to take away all your methods of communication if necessary.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Nelson For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2018, 09:57 PM
|
#100
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jiri Hrdina
I don't think most people are predicting the Flames sign him - just hoping for it. It's a fun "what if" to think about.
|
So they didn't read the OP?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:57 PM.
|
|