Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 04-09-2018, 11:22 AM   #9681
Red
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jg13 View Post
Bennett has potential to be a #1C and Fox is just tooooo good!
Bennett is playing himself in to an energy player territory. He has no finish. I am not ready to give up on him, but #1 C is a pipe dream.
Red is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 11:23 AM   #9682
jg13
Franchise Player
 
jg13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red View Post
Bennett is playing himself in to an energy player territory. He has no finish. I am not ready to give up on him, but #1 C is a pipe dream.
Sorry I should've used green text.
jg13 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to jg13 For This Useful Post:
Red
Old 04-09-2018, 11:26 AM   #9683
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoJetsGo View Post
Yea it's pretty typical an underwhelming proposition that wouldn't be enough for Buffalo to consider moving RoR gets tossed out and a few people think they wouldn't do it on our end.

I think you must be undervaluing Fox, significantly. Moving Bennett is a mistake in the making, as I think the moment he gets away from Gully's lines he's going to start to contribute offensively in a meaningful way.

The team could try and take another shortcut by sending out young assets, I'd just caution them against it.

I view Fox as having more value than our 2019 1st, and would sooner move that pick than Fox.
ComixZone is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 11:31 AM   #9684
GoJetsGo
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
I think you must be undervaluing Fox, significantly. Moving Bennett is a mistake in the making, as I think the moment he gets away from Gully's lines he's going to start to contribute offensively in a meaningful way.

The team could try and take another shortcut by sending out young assets, I'd just caution them against it.

I view Fox as having more value than our 2019 1st, and would sooner move that pick than Fox.

There's no certainty Fox ever plays a game for Calgary. The thing I like most about our 2019 first is there isn't a good chance it leaves us for free agency.

And the chances of Bennett becoming a sixty point elite 2-way Centre like Ryan O'Reilly is now are very small.

If that offer was on the table (which it wouldn't be, because I think Buffalo would scoff at it), you take it every day and twice on Sunday.

O'Reilly would be exatly the kind of player we'd be looking to add. If we aren't willing to just over half the value it would take to land such a player, maybe we can send a fax out saying we're willing to move Brouwer and that we'll throw in Hanowski.
GoJetsGo is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to GoJetsGo For This Useful Post:
Old 04-09-2018, 12:05 PM   #9685
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoJetsGo View Post
There's no certainty Fox ever plays a game for Calgary. The thing I like most about our 2019 first is there isn't a good chance it leaves us for free agency.

And the chances of Bennett becoming a sixty point elite 2-way Centre like Ryan O'Reilly is now are very small.

If that offer was on the table (which it wouldn't be, because I think Buffalo would scoff at it), you take it every day and twice on Sunday.

O'Reilly would be exatly the kind of player we'd be looking to add. If we aren't willing to just over half the value it would take to land such a player, maybe we can send a fax out saying we're willing to move Brouwer and that we'll throw in Hanowski.
Then we don't do it. I'm saying as a Flames fan I wouldn't offer that, I'm not saying whether or not Buffalo would accept it.

Simply adding in RoR would do nothing to fix the culture issues that face this team - unless, in that proposed deal, you believe Fox and Bennett are the cancers eating away at this team's core. Adding players without addressing the problems that exist won't help this team take a step forward.
ComixZone is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 12:11 PM   #9686
GoJetsGo
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
Then we don't do it. I'm saying as a Flames fan I wouldn't offer that, I'm not saying whether or not Buffalo would accept it.

Simply adding in RoR would do nothing to fix the culture issues that face this team - unless, in that proposed deal, you believe Fox and Bennett are the cancers eating away at this team's core. Adding players without addressing the problems that exist won't help this team take a step forward.

Couldn't disagree more with you on this.

Getting a top line NHL centre who's a heart and soul player for a prospect that may never play for us and a player who may never be more than a 3rd liner would be highway robbery.

2nd, you have no idea what the culture issues are and by all accounts RoR is a character player and leader. He's exactly the kind of player in terms of both skill and temperament we'd be looking for.
GoJetsGo is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 12:15 PM   #9687
Harry Lime
Franchise Player
 
Harry Lime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Exp:
Default

I understand why many posters are keen on moving out young assets like Bennett, Fox and Janko. We are building something special, and our window is now.

On the other hand, I think that if management is serious about a shakeup, we are going to see some vets on the way out. That group that sits in the 27 to 30 age bracket.

It wouldn't surprise me at all if one or two of Backlund, Frolik, Brodie, or Stone find themselves in different threads for next year. I'm thinking that it is likely that Tre holds onto anyone that has not yet reached their potential (whether they achieve that potential or not). That leaves the known commodities.

The one young guy I could see moving is Ferland. He had a dream scenario of playing on the first line for most of the year. His value will never be higher than right now.

I like the direction that posters have in targeting players like ROR. I just disagree with the type of player that we would see going back in such a trade.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
Harry Lime is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 12:20 PM   #9688
GoJetsGo
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime View Post
I like the direction that posters have in targeting players like ROR. I just disagree with the type of player that we would see going back in such a trade.
Just out of curiosity, what is the kind of package you think it would take and that you'd be willing to put forth for a player like RoR?

I don't have a affinity for him in particular, but I do think he'd be a great fit.

The problem is, he's a fantastic player, and he would take a lot to land. As would any player of that ilk.

The difficulty with this thread in particular is the penchant for so many people to say "I'd love to land ______.... but only if we don't have to give up [anything of comparable value]". That's not limited to this forum or fanbase, but it's one of the most futile parts of discussing trades in general. No one wants to give up what it would likely take to get.

Just curious what you think would be a reasonable offer in this random proposal?
GoJetsGo is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 12:31 PM   #9689
Harry Lime
Franchise Player
 
Harry Lime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoJetsGo View Post
Just out of curiosity, what is the kind of package you think it would take and that you'd be willing to put forth for a player like RoR?

I don't have a affinity for him in particular, but I do think he'd be a great fit.

The problem is, he's a fantastic player, and he would take a lot to land. As would any player of that ilk.

The difficulty with this thread in particular is the penchant for so many people to say "I'd love to land ______.... but only if we don't have to give up [anything of comparable value]". That's not limited to this forum or fanbase, but it's one of the most futile parts of discussing trades in general. No one wants to give up what it would likely take to get.

Just curious what you think would be a reasonable offer in this random proposal?
Any proposal for ROR, in my opinion, starts with the guy we would least like to give up. That's Backlund. ROR is a better player, and Buffalo knows that, but the drop off between the two is not that great.

I would then do what many fans would consider an overpay, and add Brodie. We can ask for a sweetener to balance the contracts, but Buffalo would still come away feeling good about the trade.

From a Calgary perspective, I would feel very comfortable going into next season with centre depth of :

ROR
Monahan
Jankowksi
Shore
with Bennett as an emergency stand in.

Spend the summer figuring out the 4th defenceman.

Edit : I would add, that I think that slotting Backlund is a bit of a problem for this team. He is cemented in the second line because of his overall ability, but to have a player like that you need a truly elite first line centre to make Backlund's defense really shine. With someone like Crosby, Tavares or .... Eichel ahead in the depth chart, Backlund is a potential shutdown monster. The way Calgary is built, they need more offense from the second line, and that won't happen with Backlund, and they are not going to start rebuilding around him, or have the opportunity at landing a top 5 centre in the league. He has more value to Buffalo than he does to Calgary, and ROR has more value to Calgary than to Buffalo, due to the makeup of their respective cores. It's a potentially good 'hockey trade'.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."

Last edited by Harry Lime; 04-09-2018 at 12:43 PM.
Harry Lime is offline  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Harry Lime For This Useful Post:
Old 04-09-2018, 03:06 PM   #9690
TOfan
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
I think you must be undervaluing Fox, significantly. Moving Bennett is a mistake in the making, as I think the moment he gets away from Gully's lines he's going to start to contribute offensively in a meaningful way.

The team could try and take another shortcut by sending out young assets, I'd just caution them against it.

I view Fox as having more value than our 2019 1st, and would sooner move that pick than Fox.
Dude, that monkey that's Sam is reaching for in your avatar is now King Kong. And he's not on Sam's back, he's standing in Sam's chest.

The fantasy that Sam Bennett is a coaching change away from 'breaking through' is about as thin of a hope as it gets. But then again, there's still hope for Yakupov, right?
TOfan is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 03:42 PM   #9691
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
Then we don't do it. I'm saying as a Flames fan I wouldn't offer that, I'm not saying whether or not Buffalo would accept it.
If it were left up to voting by fans, not a single deal would ever be made in the NHL. That's how much fans overvalue their own players and prospects.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
CliffFletcher is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 04:12 PM   #9692
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime View Post
Any proposal for ROR, in my opinion, starts with the guy we would least like to give up. That's Backlund. ROR is a better player, and Buffalo knows that, but the drop off between the two is not that great.

I would then do what many fans would consider an overpay, and add Brodie. We can ask for a sweetener to balance the contracts, but Buffalo would still come away feeling good about the trade.

From a Calgary perspective, I would feel very comfortable going into next season with centre depth of :

ROR
Monahan
Jankowksi
Shore
with Bennett as an emergency stand in.

Spend the summer figuring out the 4th defenceman.

Edit : I would add, that I think that slotting Backlund is a bit of a problem for this team. He is cemented in the second line because of his overall ability, but to have a player like that you need a truly elite first line centre to make Backlund's defense really shine. With someone like Crosby, Tavares or .... Eichel ahead in the depth chart, Backlund is a potential shutdown monster. The way Calgary is built, they need more offense from the second line, and that won't happen with Backlund, and they are not going to start rebuilding around him, or have the opportunity at landing a top 5 centre in the league. He has more value to Buffalo than he does to Calgary, and ROR has more value to Calgary than to Buffalo, due to the makeup of their respective cores. It's a potentially good 'hockey trade'.
ROR's salary is going to be tough for Buffalo in a couple years. Reinhart looks to have rebounded some, and Mittlestadt looks like he will be good. So that, plus his comments, might make him tradeable. That's pretty much the trade I was thinking: Backlund/Brodie for ROR+. What the plus is makes the trade a win, loss or tie.
GioforPM is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 04:19 PM   #9693
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

I think ROR is someone Brad should target HARD. He's a guy that is capable of being a number one centre which normally go for the moon. But has a lack of "shine" that makes every GM in the league jump in. He has a bit of a shady past in the NHL which lowers value (but doesn't mean much now, imo), he's played on a terribad team this season which lowers value, and the Sabres will likely have trouble with his salary, where as we could fit it in on the Flames.

I truly think if a good team gets ROR in a trade it'll take about a year for it to turn into one of those "I can't believe the (insert team) were able to get a top line centre for that package, unbelievable more GM's didn't go after him" trades.
jayswin is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 04:19 PM   #9694
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

I'd be wanting to keep Backlund as the 3C if we traded for ROR personally.

Monahan
O'Reilly
Backlund

That's a pretty solid group of top 3 centers for the next 5 seasons.
Roof-Daddy is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 04-09-2018, 04:23 PM   #9695
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

If I'm Brad I try to woo them with a great package out of the hop. I know most don't seem to think there's any reason to worry about Fox, I'm not of them, I think this was the year he'd either sign with us or he's going to finish Harvard and test FA.

Buffalo is in the east and Fox doesn't have the "he's definitely going 4 years" label in the media circles YET. I think you dangle him as part of a huge return trade before he most likely turns to literally nothing next April.

To Buffalo: Fox, Brodie, Bennett

To CGY: ROR
jayswin is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 04:27 PM   #9696
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GoJetsGo View Post
by all accounts RoR is a character player and leader.
Just don’t follow him through a Timmies drive thru.
Scroopy Noopers is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
Old 04-09-2018, 04:28 PM   #9697
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Listening to the Fan...Dougie Hamilton skipped talking to the media today? That strikes me as odd.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers View Post
Just don’t follow him through a Timmies drive thru.
or get into a contract negotiation with him, because he just takes his ball and goes home.
ComixZone is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 04:28 PM   #9698
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers View Post
Just don’t follow him through a Timmies drive thru.
You mean if he's following you get the hell out of the timmies drive through!
jayswin is offline  
Old 04-09-2018, 04:38 PM   #9699
oldschoolcalgary
Franchise Player
 
oldschoolcalgary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
If I'm Brad I try to woo them with a great package out of the hop. I know most don't seem to think there's any reason to worry about Fox, I'm not of them, I think this was the year he'd either sign with us or he's going to finish Harvard and test FA.

Buffalo is in the east and Fox doesn't have the "he's definitely going 4 years" label in the media circles YET. I think you dangle him as part of a huge return trade before he most likely turns to literally nothing next April.

To Buffalo: Fox, Brodie, Bennett

To CGY: ROR
i like ROR, but that seems to be a bit of an over payment imo... 2 pieces out of those 3, plus a 3rd rounder maybe depending on the mix...
oldschoolcalgary is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to oldschoolcalgary For This Useful Post:
Old 04-09-2018, 04:44 PM   #9700
Dan403
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher View Post
If it were left up to voting by fans, not a single deal would ever be made in the NHL. That's how much fans overvalue their own players and prospects.
Except right after missing the playoffs when the Knee-Jerk reaction is to undervalue your players and prospects.
Dan403 is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:53 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy