Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
Exp:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Texas Flames Fan
This is exactly what they do. Please fact check if you are unsure.
Care to address anything else they do, and your apparent stance that you actually want the abortion rate in the US to to up?
Because if you actually know what they do, you know that getting rid of them will remove access to contraception from millions of women who will then need abortions.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN. <-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
Washington Post calling for Nunes to be investigated.
Quote:
We’ve said before that it was doubtful that an investigation headed by Mr. Nunes into Russia’s interference in the election could be adequate or credible. The chairman’s contradictory and clownish grandstanding makes that a certainty. His committee’s investigation should be halted immediately — and Mr. Nunes deserves to be subject to the same leaking probe he demanded for the previous disclosures.
Ah, but we're not talking about the same thing. If you're taking about direct medicaid reimbursement for medical services such as cervical cancer screening, mammograms and perinatal care, then I will agree with you. How does that support abortions?
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
Exp:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
Ah, but we're not talking about the same thing. If you're taking about direct medicaid reimbursement for medical services such as cervical cancer screening, mammograms and perinatal care, then I will agree with you. How does that support abortions?
He feels it's a sick organization.
Facts are for you stupid Lib-tards!
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN. <-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
The Following User Says Thank You to Bring_Back_Shantz For This Useful Post:
Ah, but we're not talking about the same thing. If you're taking about direct medicaid reimbursement for medical services such as cervical cancer screening, mammograms and perinatal care, then I will agree with you. How does that support abortions?
Any minute now he'll come back with a well sourced logical argument.
You don't even read your own links. That report states that from 2010-2012 combined, Planned Parenthood Federation of America received $342 million, and that the number went down each year (126 to 112 to 105). That's not $500 million a year.
Which is unfortunate, because if you had read the report, you'd have come across this table which would have answered the earlier question about "what Planned Parenthood actually does".
The quote in your post, which is unattributed, seems to come from an article on teaparty.org. I, for one, am shocked.
__________________ "The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
The Following 17 Users Say Thank You to CorsiHockeyLeague For This Useful Post:
That's not what the report you linked said. It says:
Quote:
From fiscal year 2010 through 2012, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) reported obligating about $236 million to six organizations and their affiliates and member associations: Advocates for Youth, Guttmacher Institute, International Planned Parenthood Federation, Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Population Council, and the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States. While HHS obligated funding to each of these six organizations, USAID obligated funding to two of the six organizations. In addition, the six organizations reported expending funding they received directly and indirectly from federal agencies, including HHS and USAID, as well as the Departments of Agriculture, Defense, Housing and Urban Development, and Justice. The six organizations reported expending over $482 million of federal funding during the same time frame.
So that means that over a 2 year fiscal period nearly $500 million was expended across SIX organizations. Not Planned Parenthood in a single year.
Why are you misrepresenting your own provided information?
__________________
Who is in charge of this product and why haven't they been fired yet?
As a rule, misinformed people do not change their minds once they have been presented with facts that challenge their beliefs. But, beyond simply not changing their minds when they should, research shows that they are likely to become more attached to their mistaken beliefs. The factual information “backfires.” When people don’t agree with you, research suggests that bringing in facts to support your case might actually make them believe you less. In other words, fighting the ill-informed with facts is like fighting a grease fire with water. It seems like it should work, but it’s actually going to make things worse.
So that means that over a 2 year fiscal period nearly $500 million was expended across SIX organizations. Not Planned Parenthood in a single year.
Three year fiscal period, not two. And those are federal funds.
__________________ "The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
<-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
