Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-08-2016, 10:26 AM   #41
Madman
Franchise Player
 
Madman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Madman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2016, 10:27 AM   #42
TheoFleury
Powerplay Quarterback
 
TheoFleury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

This was always clearly a LTIR move, I'm not sure what the big deal is/was. They probably had to give him a few games to actually get him to sign the contract in the first place. As well, the NHL probably looks at these things to to ensure teams aren't trying to circumvent the cap. Probably had to play him a little bit so the move wasn't too transparent.
TheoFleury is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to TheoFleury For This Useful Post:
Old 11-08-2016, 10:28 AM   #43
Wiggum_PI
Scoring Winger
 
Wiggum_PI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Da_Chief View Post
Finally...now that Grossman is gone, PP will be amazing, PK will stop teams, Bennett will stop taking dumb penalties, Brodie will start making smart plays, Gaudreau will start to pass the puck, Monahan will get his scoring ability back, Elliott/Johnson will make timely saves, Giordano will hit the net with his shot...lets all rejoice!
... McDavid won't get 4+ breakaways vs the Flames.
Wiggum_PI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2016, 10:28 AM   #44
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
if (lol) he clears, how much does his salary affect the team's cap?
nothing at all
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2016, 10:29 AM   #45
Frank MetaMusil
RANDOM USER TITLE CHANGE
 
Frank MetaMusil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: South Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
I'm clueless because I didn't think Grossman deserved even the league min? Guess what? The GM agrees with me because he just waived him.

I'm arguing that the GM made a mistake signing him in the first place. The GM has now realized his mistake and cut him.
I'm with you. It was a useless PTO and signing. If he wasn't available for Gulutzan to use, problem solved. It's not really a chicken/egg scenario, he didn't belong on the opening day roster and somehow ended up there.
Frank MetaMusil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2016, 10:29 AM   #46
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheoFleury View Post
This was always clearly a LTIR move, I'm not sure what the big deal is/was. They probably had to give him a few games to actually get him to sign the contract in the first place. As well, the NHL probably looks at these things to to ensure teams aren't trying to circumvent the cap. Probably had to play him a little bit so the move wasn't too transparent.
I could see them having a handshake agreement to get some games in like they did with Backstrom.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2016, 10:31 AM   #47
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank MetaMusil View Post
I'm with you. It was a useless PTO and signing. If he wasn't available for Gulutzan to use, problem solved. It's not really a chicken/egg scenario, he didn't belong on the opening day roster and somehow ended up there.
The signing was very specific and had to do with maximizing LTIR room from Smid.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Robbob For This Useful Post:
Old 11-08-2016, 10:31 AM   #48
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
I'm clueless because I didn't think Grossman deserved even the league min? Guess what? The GM agrees with me because he just waived him.

I'm arguing that the GM made a mistake signing him in the first place. The GM has now realized his mistake and cut him.

It's your "black mark" comment that people are disputing. Every team has contracts like Grossman that eventually go through waivers . There would be no waivers if there wasn't. If this is a black mark on Flames gm, then every other GM in the league has the same black mark.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2016, 10:32 AM   #49
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
if (lol) he clears, how much does his salary affect the team's cap?
It goes down $575,000. It will still be over the cap, so Smid's LTIR space will still be available.

It will also open another spot on the 23 man roster (which is currently at 22 with Bouma and Versteeg on IR). We'll almost certainly see one forward recalled tomorrow. I suspect we'll see two.

If I were to guess, I'd say we'll see Hathaway and Vey recalled, but I also wouldn't be surprised if Klimchuk or Jankowski get the call.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2016, 10:33 AM   #50
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
I'm clueless because I didn't think Grossman deserved even the league min? Guess what? The GM agrees with me because he just waived him.

I'm arguing that the GM made a mistake signing him in the first place. The GM has now realized his mistake and cut him.


Did you read my post? Your comment makes you appear clueless and guess what? You still are. Grossmann wasn't even a hockey signing. It was a technicality to get the max cap relief from LTIR. He was nothing but a pawn the entire time. If we didn't have the Smid situation Treliving never would have signed him.

It's on Gulutzan for actually giving him icetime.
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2016, 10:36 AM   #51
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
nothing at all
what does that mean? Will his NHL salary still be counted against the team's cap, or will it be at some reduced rate?

If i recall the rule changes made, despite being waived and sent down, his full salary will be counted against the cap.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2016, 10:37 AM   #52
Super-Rye
First Line Centre
 
Super-Rye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I get why they signed him. If you look at defensemen in Stockton who could see NHL time this year you have 5 players your looking at. Wotherspoon, Kylington, Andersson, Morrison and Culkin. It's good depth but none of those guys is a true physical defensive defender. Wotherspoon has potential but hasn't shown it at the NHL level yet, so BT signs Grossman, who fills a depth role and checks some boxes that are missing organizationally.

Where the disconnect for me comes in is having him make the team out of camp. He clearly showed he wouldn't be able to handle regular minutes at the NHL level during the preseason. And to have him play over Jokipakka and Kulak at any point this season is just outrageous. Not that either of those 2 has set the NHL on fire, but they are clearly miles ahead of Grossman.
Super-Rye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2016, 10:37 AM   #53
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I still don't understand why he was signed to a one-way.
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2016, 10:38 AM   #54
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
what does that mean? Will his NHL salary still be counted against the team's cap, or will it be at some reduced rate?

If i recall the rule changes made, despite being waived and sent down, his full salary will be counted against the cap.
His contract is fully buriable in Stockton. None of his salary will count against the cap should he be assigned.
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Finger Cookin For This Useful Post:
Old 11-08-2016, 10:39 AM   #55
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
It goes down $575,000. It will still be over the cap, so Smid's LTIR space will still be available.

It will also open another spot on the 23 man roster (which is currently at 22 with Bouma and Versteeg on IR). We'll almost certainly see one forward recalled tomorrow. I suspect we'll see two.

If I were to guess, I'd say we'll see Hathaway and Vey recalled, but I also wouldn't be surprised if Klimchuk or Jankowski get the call.
You can bury up to 950k. His contract is less than that so sending will not result in a cap hit going forward.
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Robbob For This Useful Post:
Old 11-08-2016, 10:39 AM   #56
bax
#1 Goaltender
 
bax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GranteedEV View Post
I still don't understand why he was signed to a one-way.


To get the max cap relief from Smid being on LTIR
bax is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to bax For This Useful Post:
Old 11-08-2016, 10:39 AM   #57
Cali Panthers Fan
Franchise Player
 
Cali Panthers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Exp:
Default

I get the logistics of signing Grossmann for maximizing cap purposes, but why the hell did we let him play? Perhaps Treliving should have told Gulutzan to staple his ass into the press box. I can't even fathom how he got another game after the Edmonton one. Keegan Kanzig would have done better, and he's in the ECHL.
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
Cali Panthers Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Cali Panthers Fan For This Useful Post:
Old 11-08-2016, 10:40 AM   #58
GranteedEV
Franchise Player
 
GranteedEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bax View Post
To get the max cap relief from Smid being on LTIR
How is that different from signing him to a two-way?
__________________

"May those who accept their fate find happiness. May those who defy it find glory."
GranteedEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2016, 10:40 AM   #59
Cactus Jack
First Line Centre
 
Cactus Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Iīd get signing Grossman if we ran into some injuries on the backend, but not at camp. And itīs not even because he had a mediocre camp. Why not let one of the kids prove they can/canīt hack it before signing a guy like this. Would Wotherspoon really have been much worse or given up the puck more?
__________________
Resident beer snob
Cactus Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2016, 10:40 AM   #60
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
what does that mean? Will his NHL salary still be counted against the team's cap, or will it be at some reduced rate?

If i recall the rule changes made, despite being waived and sent down, his full salary will be counted against the cap.
http://www.colliganhockey.com/nhl-cb...ontracts-work/
Robbob is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:29 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy