View Poll Results: Best prospect from the following list?
|
Andersson
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Bruce
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Carroll
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Culkin
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Dube
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Falkovsky
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Fox
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Gillies
|
  
|
17 |
3.81% |
Hamilton
|
  
|
1 |
0.22% |
Harrison
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Hathaway
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Hickey
|
  
|
15 |
3.36% |
Jankowski
|
  
|
28 |
6.28% |
Kanzig
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Karnaukhov
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Klimchuck
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Kulak
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Kylington
|
  
|
8 |
1.79% |
Lindstrom
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Mangiapane
|
  
|
1 |
0.22% |
Mattson
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
McDonald
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Morrison
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Ollas Mattsson
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Parsons
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Phillips
|
  
|
1 |
0.22% |
Poirier
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Pollock
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Pribyl
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Rafikov
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Rittich
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Schneider
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Shinkaruk
|
  
|
6 |
1.35% |
Smith
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
Tkachuk
|
  
|
367 |
82.29% |
Tuulola
|
  
|
2 |
0.45% |
Wotherspoon
|
  
|
0 |
0% |
07-08-2016, 04:32 PM
|
#121
|
Owner
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FBI
Definitely Klimchuk will be moving down..
|
I look forward to big seasons from Poirier and Klimchuk. Nothing about developing players is a ruler on a page, they go up they go down, there's an ebb and flow to it.
Look at Jankowski ... 5th ... 11th ... 6th ... this year what? 3rd?
have to give these kids time to find their bearings.
|
|
|
07-08-2016, 04:36 PM
|
#122
|
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Cleveland, OH (Grew up in Calgary)
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
|
Who would've thought that the 9th ranked Brodie would go on to be the best player on that list?
__________________
Just trying to do my best
|
|
|
07-08-2016, 04:37 PM
|
#123
|
Our Jessica Fletcher
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Nothing about developing players is a ruler on a page, they go up they go down, there's an ebb and flow to it.
|
|
|
|
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to The Fonz For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-08-2016, 04:40 PM
|
#124
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
IIRC Jankowski didn't have to come to this camp, he's attended enough. It's to his credit that he came and wants to continually improve his game.
|
He probably came just so he could finally keep all the swag from the camp and not have to worry about any sanctions by the NCAA
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Robbob For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-08-2016, 04:48 PM
|
#125
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eric Vail
I just don't understand the love for Jankowski. Drafted four years ago, still does not sound ready for the NHL.
|
Did they say "he will be ready in four years" four years ago?
Or four years ago did they say(paraphrasing here) "We think he'll probably play a 3-4 years in college, another year or two in the AHL, but in ten years we think he has the capability to be the best forward in this draft"?
Look at Radek Faksa. This was another guy from the 2012 draft, although about eight months older.
Year 1, he was a sketchy pick.
Year 2, he was a very poor pick who couldn't even break a PPG in JUNIOR.
Year 3, he was the biggest bust in the draft class who put up the same kind of numbers Klimchuk did last year in the AHL.
Year 4, Suddenly he's playing in the NHL playoffs and he's their best forward not named Benn, Sharp or Spezza.
Teams that draft well, draft with a long term vision in mind. There was no gain to be had from Nail Yakupov turning rookie right away from that draft. The Stars, and the Flames are teams that follow the Detroit Red Wings model of drafting what they perceive as talent, and developing it. Development is not gauged solely by statistical progression devoid of context nor is upside measured by a sprint. Give me Faksa over Yakupov any day. And I see even more upside in our Jankowski than I see in Faksa.
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to GranteedEV For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-08-2016, 05:15 PM
|
#126
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberta_Beef
Which he really shouldn't. He wasn't given an opportunity to produce offensively and excelled defensively.
|
I admittedly have seen very little of his play last year, but what does it mean he wasn't given an opportunity to produce offensively? I understand he may have been slotted in a defensive role but was he told not to cross center ice?
|
|
|
07-08-2016, 06:11 PM
|
#127
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FBI
Definitely Klimchuk will be moving down..
|
Was he even at development camp? He may be a fine prospect but he's a ninja - never se or hear about him
|
|
|
07-08-2016, 07:01 PM
|
#128
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by edslunch
Was he even at development camp? He may be a fine prospect but he's a ninja - never se or hear about him
|
No. He has already attended 3.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
07-08-2016, 07:09 PM
|
#129
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords
Wotherspoon has never lived up to his potential and has had plenty of opportunity to claim a regular spot. I'd say he's one more shot away from it being his last. They can't continue to wait and hope he finally gets there with the amount of depth behind him.
Kulak in my opinion had a great camp and was very steady and reliable in his call-up last year and was surprised he was sent back down, although I was happy with Nakladal's play so wasn't depressed about it. Just seems to be a better option to me and I feel he'll be the first in line for the next open roster spot.
Shinkaruk has to have shown enough at the end of last year that if he doesn't have a rough camp he'll get more NHL time.
But the better question is what have you seen out of Wotherspoon that you think he's likely to hold down a spot?
|
For me, what I saw out of both Kulak and Shinkaruk were two players that could take the NHL pace in spurts, but saw they both lacked consistency in their showings. They were call up material, but not roster ready. What I saw with Wotherspoon during his final call up was a player able to play good minutes relatively mistake free. He isn't a flashy prospect, but I didn't see him looking out of place once last season.
I saw Wotherspoon / Nakladal as a completely acceptable 5/6 pairing. I didn't see a 200ft game from Shinkaruk that would make me want to play him 82 games this year, and Kulak just looked a little raw and lost.
I expected Wotherspoon to make the team out of camp last year, but Kulak exploded past him before fading back to where he was. they are close, but from where I'm sitting, Wotherspoon is ahead.
Shinkaruk vs Wotherspoon is obviously not an apples to apples comparison, but when a rookie comes in hungry to score and winds up a minus player, it makes me question their NHL maturity.
__________________
Death by 4th round picks.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to thymebalm For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-08-2016, 07:14 PM
|
#130
|
Franchise Player
|
^^
I think both Hamilton and Hathaway looked pretty much NHL ready, and it's probably easier to make the NHL as a 4th line winger than a bottom pairing Dman.
So, IMO it is debatable as to who is the most NHL ready guy from Stockton.
That's a good thing though.
|
|
|
07-08-2016, 07:21 PM
|
#131
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
^^
I think both Hamilton and Hathaway looked pretty much NHL ready, and it's probably easier to make the NHL as a 4th line winger than a bottom pairing Dman.
So, IMO it is debatable as to who is the most NHL ready guy from Stockton.
That's a good thing though.
|
I'd say Hathaway most easily takes Jooris' spot up front. Wotherspoon still seems like he's an easy first promotion on the backend. Nothing flashy but well seasoned and has the most NHL games behind him.
__________________
Death by 4th round picks.
|
|
|
07-08-2016, 07:23 PM
|
#132
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: St. George's, Grenada
|
Tkachuk. Upside is terrific.
2-5 should be really interesting polls. I expect a good Jankowski v Gillies thread for #2
Last edited by btimbit; 07-08-2016 at 07:34 PM.
|
|
|
07-08-2016, 07:32 PM
|
#133
|
Franchise Player
|
The 6 2 205 lb Hickey has a lot of upside , perhaps a top pairing D.
Exceptional edges and acceleration with an IQ to match.
Next to Tkachuk, I believe he is the surest bet to be a core player.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to timbit For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-08-2016, 07:39 PM
|
#134
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by timbit
The 6 2 205 lb Hickey has a lot of upside , perhaps a top pairing D.
Exceptional edges and acceleration with an IQ to match.
Next to Tkachuk, I believe he is the surest bet to be a core player.
|
Yeah, TJ Brodie like skating but an inch taller and will probably play 20-25 lbs heavier.
He'll have to develop more of an offensive game to be top pairing IMO, but with his IQ, skating, size and apparent defensive ability he looks like a decent bet to make it as a top 4 shut down D.
|
|
|
07-08-2016, 07:52 PM
|
#135
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: The Void between Darkness and Light
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by timbit
The 6 2 205 lb Hickey has a lot of upside , perhaps a top pairing D.
Exceptional edges and acceleration with an IQ to match.
Next to Tkachuk, I believe he is the surest bet to be a core player.
|
Who would you compare his play style to in the NHL?
|
|
|
07-08-2016, 07:54 PM
|
#136
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
Who would you compare his play style to in the NHL?
|
Karl Alzner?
|
|
|
07-08-2016, 08:01 PM
|
#137
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
Who would you compare his play style to in the NHL?
|
Maybe Noah Hanifin, which would be nice.
|
|
|
07-08-2016, 08:03 PM
|
#138
|
Fearmongerer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by timbit
The 6 2 205 lb Hickey has a lot of upside , perhaps a top pairing D.
Exceptional edges and acceleration with an IQ to match.
Next to Tkachuk, I believe he is the surest bet to be a core player.
|
Yup...his development has been brilliant and shows little sign of regressing. Play one more year of NCAA and then turn pro is my guess.
Looking like a steal of a pick.
|
|
|
07-08-2016, 08:20 PM
|
#139
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by edslunch
Was he even at development camp? He may be a fine prospect but he's a ninja - never se or hear about him
|
He actually was, although not in the main portion. Each day he was on the ice with Shinkaruk working with the power skating coach.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
|
|
|
07-08-2016, 08:48 PM
|
#140
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockey_Ninja
Who would've thought that the 9th ranked Brodie would go on to be the best player on that list?
|
That's the thing about developing defensive prospects, you have to have a large stable to get a dark horse. Who would have thought Giordano would be the best out of Richie Regher, Matt Pelech or Tim Ramholt or that Brodie would be the best out of Erixon, Aulie, Negrin. I wonder who will be on the blue line of the future out of Hickey, Kylington, Andersson, Matson and Fox?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:02 AM.
|
|