06-27-2016, 03:24 PM
|
#161
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
|
Think none of us would have guessed that few lol
__________________
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 03:24 PM
|
#162
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Displaced Flames fan
Wotherspoon, Arnold and Agostino have ZERO chance of not being qualified.
|
You sure bout that?
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Oling_Roachinen For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2016, 03:25 PM
|
#163
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
|
What a shocker...Colborne wasn't qualified.
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 03:25 PM
|
#164
|
First Line Centre
|
Unqualified players can't sign with any other team until July 1.
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 03:26 PM
|
#165
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Montreal
|
Are they really letting Arnold, Agostino and Shore walk?
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 03:26 PM
|
#166
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kalispell, Montana
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
You sure bout that?
|
I was until I read this page of the thread!
I don't get it.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 03:26 PM
|
#167
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
|
Arnold I thought would stay on...
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 03:26 PM
|
#168
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Yeah I kind of get the Colborne, Ortio, and Jooris cases because of the arbitration case risk.
Don't really get the Agostino or Arnold ones - we still need farm players and those guys don't have arb. cases. Not sure why we wouldn't just qualify them.
Especially Agostino - led our AHL team each of the last two seasons. Plays a decent 200ft game, seems like a decent guy to have around as a call up.
Last edited by SuperMatt18; 06-27-2016 at 03:30 PM.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2016, 03:27 PM
|
#169
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
I can't imagine there being an unqualified former RFA who produced more than Joe Colborne's 44 points last season.
I'd be fine with moving on from Colborne, but still surprised they didn't qualify him simply to move him.
|
Other teams don't want to give up anything worthwhile just to get trapped into overpaying for a bottom 6 winger.
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 03:27 PM
|
#170
|
Crash and Bang Winger
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Montreal
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
I can't imagine there being an unqualified former RFA who produced more than Joe Colborne's 44 points last season.
I'd be fine with moving on from Colborne, but still surprised they didn't qualify him simply to move him.
|
Who is going to want that arb case?
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 03:30 PM
|
#171
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoreDrank
Who is going to want that arb case?
|
Yep, legitimate chance he'd get 3.5-4.0 million at arbitration.
He'll be signed for 2.75 hopefully
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 03:32 PM
|
#172
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJones
Yep, legitimate chance he'd get 3.5-4.0 million at arbitration.
He'll be signed for 2.75 hopefully
|
I would rather they take that 2.75 and put it towards a legit top 6 winger. No more bottom 6ers making 2m+, we are plum full.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Fire of the Phoenix For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2016, 03:33 PM
|
#173
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Montreal
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Menace
Are they really letting Arnold, Agostino and Shore walk?
|
I mean, I didn't really think any of these guys had a shot at the NHL, but all seemed to be good AHL pros....
We will just need to replace them with similar type guys anyway....
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 03:41 PM
|
#174
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kehatch
Being of the opinion that we should qualify Colborne is fair. Suggesting that not qualifying him is "stupid" isn't.
Burke has made it clear that they will not overpay for Colborne. The only way to maintain control over that is to not qualify him. The second you qualify him you are allowing him to go to arbitration and if the ruling is under 2.9 million the Flames are not able to walk away.
Not qualifying him does not mean losing him for nothing. It means you can now negotiate without the threat of arbitration and hopefully sign him to a contract you are comfortable with.
This comes down to how much the Flames value Colborne. If they think he is going to be awarded more then they are willing to pay their only option is to not qualify him. Which makes it a reasonable option.
|
I guess the question wasn't as stupid as some made it out to be.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to kehatch For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2016, 03:41 PM
|
#175
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Menace
Are they really letting Arnold, Agostino and Shore walk?
|
None of them looked like NHLers or even future NHLers. They would have been good depth for the farm but I'm fine having with them giving the ice time to legitimate prospects like Jankowski, Poirier, Pribyl, Mangiapane, Klimchuk, etc.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2016, 03:46 PM
|
#176
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Q_
Yes he is a second liner on every team in the NHL.
Some contenders would even have him as a first line player. I'm not sure where this notion that every player on the top two lines have to put up 70+ points comes from. Colborne would have been no worse than 5th in scoring on all the top teams in the NHL including the champion Penguins.
|
Wrong. He had one season at the age of 26 where he finally put up some points. He was being handed PP time like candy, and many games with Gaudreau/Mony or a Lights out Backlund. Before the past season he couldn't even put up 30 points or over 10 goals. One year that goes perfect for him doesn't make him a second liner. Never mind a first liner on a contending team!
The flames didn't even qualify him because they don't want to pay him any more then 3mill. That doesn't sound like a true top 6 to me.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Monahan For Mayor For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-27-2016, 04:06 PM
|
#177
|
Franchise Player
|
Bruins didn't qualify Connolly. Could he be worth a look on July 1? Just turned 24 years old, right shot, former 6th overall pick.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
|
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 04:16 PM
|
#178
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
|
Moved.
__________________
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 04:23 PM
|
#179
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw
Bruins didn't qualify Connolly. Could he be worth a look on July 1? Just turned 24 years old, right shot, former 6th overall pick.
|
I did a quick comparison between he and Jooris and he would be a slight upgrade.
I feel he and Chiasson would be in a similar situation where they could both be top 6 re under the right situation.
Does he have that drive though.
|
|
|
06-27-2016, 04:25 PM
|
#180
|
Franchise Player
|
It'd be interesting to know what offers BT had for Shore at the 2016 trade dead line.
I remember him saying they had significant interest at that time.
Oh well. Probably nothing major I suppose. Probably just a pick or something.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:23 PM.
|
|