Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 06-27-2016, 03:24 PM   #161
FBI
Franchise Player
 
FBI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Flames fan in Seattle
Exp:
Default

Think none of us would have guessed that few lol
__________________
FBI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 03:24 PM   #162
Oling_Roachinen
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Displaced Flames fan View Post
Wotherspoon, Arnold and Agostino have ZERO chance of not being qualified.
You sure bout that?
Oling_Roachinen is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Oling_Roachinen For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2016, 03:25 PM   #163
calgaryblood
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Hmmmmmmm
Exp:
Default

What a shocker...Colborne wasn't qualified.
calgaryblood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 03:25 PM   #164
Boreal
First Line Centre
 
Boreal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Exp:
Default

Unqualified players can't sign with any other team until July 1.
Boreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 03:26 PM   #165
Red Menace
Scoring Winger
 
Red Menace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Montreal
Exp:
Default

Are they really letting Arnold, Agostino and Shore walk?
Red Menace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 03:26 PM   #166
Displaced Flames fan
Franchise Player
 
Displaced Flames fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kalispell, Montana
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen View Post
You sure bout that?
I was until I read this page of the thread!

I don't get it.
__________________
I am in love with Montana. For other states I have admiration, respect, recognition, even some affection, but with Montana it is love." - John Steinbeck
Displaced Flames fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 03:26 PM   #167
Moneyhands23
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
Exp:
Default

Arnold I thought would stay on...
Moneyhands23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 03:26 PM   #168
SuperMatt18
Franchise Player
 
SuperMatt18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Yeah I kind of get the Colborne, Ortio, and Jooris cases because of the arbitration case risk.

Don't really get the Agostino or Arnold ones - we still need farm players and those guys don't have arb. cases. Not sure why we wouldn't just qualify them.

Especially Agostino - led our AHL team each of the last two seasons. Plays a decent 200ft game, seems like a decent guy to have around as a call up.

Last edited by SuperMatt18; 06-27-2016 at 03:30 PM.
SuperMatt18 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SuperMatt18 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2016, 03:27 PM   #169
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen View Post
I can't imagine there being an unqualified former RFA who produced more than Joe Colborne's 44 points last season.

I'd be fine with moving on from Colborne, but still surprised they didn't qualify him simply to move him.
Other teams don't want to give up anything worthwhile just to get trapped into overpaying for a bottom 6 winger.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 03:27 PM   #170
MoreDrank
Crash and Bang Winger
 
MoreDrank's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Montreal
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen View Post
I can't imagine there being an unqualified former RFA who produced more than Joe Colborne's 44 points last season.

I'd be fine with moving on from Colborne, but still surprised they didn't qualify him simply to move him.
Who is going to want that arb case?
MoreDrank is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 03:30 PM   #171
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MoreDrank View Post
Who is going to want that arb case?
Yep, legitimate chance he'd get 3.5-4.0 million at arbitration.

He'll be signed for 2.75 hopefully
DJones is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 03:32 PM   #172
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJones View Post
Yep, legitimate chance he'd get 3.5-4.0 million at arbitration.

He'll be signed for 2.75 hopefully
I would rather they take that 2.75 and put it towards a legit top 6 winger. No more bottom 6ers making 2m+, we are plum full.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Fire of the Phoenix For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2016, 03:33 PM   #173
Red Menace
Scoring Winger
 
Red Menace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Montreal
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Menace View Post
Are they really letting Arnold, Agostino and Shore walk?
I mean, I didn't really think any of these guys had a shot at the NHL, but all seemed to be good AHL pros....
We will just need to replace them with similar type guys anyway....
Red Menace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 03:41 PM   #174
kehatch
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kehatch View Post
Being of the opinion that we should qualify Colborne is fair. Suggesting that not qualifying him is "stupid" isn't.

Burke has made it clear that they will not overpay for Colborne. The only way to maintain control over that is to not qualify him. The second you qualify him you are allowing him to go to arbitration and if the ruling is under 2.9 million the Flames are not able to walk away.

Not qualifying him does not mean losing him for nothing. It means you can now negotiate without the threat of arbitration and hopefully sign him to a contract you are comfortable with.

This comes down to how much the Flames value Colborne. If they think he is going to be awarded more then they are willing to pay their only option is to not qualify him. Which makes it a reasonable option.
I guess the question wasn't as stupid as some made it out to be.
kehatch is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kehatch For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2016, 03:41 PM   #175
Flames Draft Watcher
In the Sin Bin
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Menace View Post
Are they really letting Arnold, Agostino and Shore walk?
None of them looked like NHLers or even future NHLers. They would have been good depth for the farm but I'm fine having with them giving the ice time to legitimate prospects like Jankowski, Poirier, Pribyl, Mangiapane, Klimchuk, etc.
Flames Draft Watcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Flames Draft Watcher For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2016, 03:46 PM   #176
Monahan For Mayor
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by _Q_ View Post
Yes he is a second liner on every team in the NHL.

Some contenders would even have him as a first line player. I'm not sure where this notion that every player on the top two lines have to put up 70+ points comes from. Colborne would have been no worse than 5th in scoring on all the top teams in the NHL including the champion Penguins.
Wrong. He had one season at the age of 26 where he finally put up some points. He was being handed PP time like candy, and many games with Gaudreau/Mony or a Lights out Backlund. Before the past season he couldn't even put up 30 points or over 10 goals. One year that goes perfect for him doesn't make him a second liner. Never mind a first liner on a contending team!

The flames didn't even qualify him because they don't want to pay him any more then 3mill. That doesn't sound like a true top 6 to me.
Monahan For Mayor is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Monahan For Mayor For This Useful Post:
Old 06-27-2016, 04:06 PM   #177
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Bruins didn't qualify Connolly. Could he be worth a look on July 1? Just turned 24 years old, right shot, former 6th overall pick.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 04:16 PM   #178
Stay Golden
Franchise Player
 
Stay Golden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: STH since 2002
Exp:
Default

Moved.
__________________
Stay Golden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 04:23 PM   #179
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
Bruins didn't qualify Connolly. Could he be worth a look on July 1? Just turned 24 years old, right shot, former 6th overall pick.

I did a quick comparison between he and Jooris and he would be a slight upgrade.

I feel he and Chiasson would be in a similar situation where they could both be top 6 re under the right situation.

Does he have that drive though.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 04:25 PM   #180
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

It'd be interesting to know what offers BT had for Shore at the 2016 trade dead line.

I remember him saying they had significant interest at that time.

Oh well. Probably nothing major I suppose. Probably just a pick or something.
Roof-Daddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:23 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy