Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-21-2015, 10:46 AM   #61
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bob-loblaw View Post
If someone wants to pick him up on waivers, can they ask the Flames to retain some salary? Or does it have to become a trade at that point.
No. that only applies in a trade.
dammage79 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-21-2015, 10:50 AM   #62
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
I highly doubt it. Who wants him? No one. He's not an up and comer, he's not been good in the NHL ever and he's even worse this year. What team would he help???
I'm not saying a trade is likely (at this point, I'd be surprised if a trade happens), but for the same reasons you've stated, why would anyone claim him off waivers and pay his full salary?

I think the only way he goes to another NHL team is if the Flames retain a significant amount of salary, and probably take a bad contract back in return.


I wonder if Europe is an option for him at this point? If the Flames were to lend him to a team in Finland (or somewhere over there), what would be the cap implications?
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 10-21-2015, 10:50 AM   #63
topfiverecords
Franchise Player
 
topfiverecords's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Park Hyatt Tokyo
Exp:
Default

No one wanted him when he was UFA in the summer. No one will take him now that he's signed to $3.8. Even at $1.9 50% retained, it's still too high.
topfiverecords is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 10:52 AM   #64
DoubleF
Franchise Player
 
DoubleF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords View Post
No one wanted him when he was UFA in the summer. No one will take him now that he's signed to $3.8. Even at $1.9 50% retained, it's still too high.
IIRC, he never made it to FA.

I could see waived + trade after cleared. Wasn't Russell acquired in a similar manner?
DoubleF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 10:54 AM   #65
Huntingwhale
Franchise Player
 
Huntingwhale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by topfiverecords View Post
Should have never signed him this summer anyway. Especially for that $ amount, knowing there's a chance it would come to this.
Yeah it was such a weird signing. I know the contract itself wasn't an issue being only 1 year and we had cap space. And I'm sure Treliving wanted to build some internal competition hence the signing. But it's been nothing short of a disaster and the standings prove it.

I'm willing to bet that once Ortio gets the net, the team suddenly plays better. I just have a gut feeling things will finally start to get better. It will make me both upset and happy. Upset because it shouldn't take something like this to make a team better. But happy because I honestly think we will be better now.
Huntingwhale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 10:54 AM   #66
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleF View Post
IIRC, he never made it to FA.

I could see waived + trade after cleared. Wasn't Russell acquired in a similar manner?
Yeah but that was because of the looming arbitration I believe. Completely different situation and since only 900k or so of Ramos contract would be buried in the AHL, I doubt that a team will all of a sudden bite after he clears.
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 10:57 AM   #67
CMPunk
aka Spike
 
CMPunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Darkest Corners of My Mind
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
I'm not saying a trade is likely (at this point, I'd be surprised if a trade happens), but for the same reasons you've stated, why would anyone claim him off waivers and pay his full salary?

I think the only way he goes to another NHL team is if the Flames retain a significant amount of salary, and probably take a bad contract back in return.


I wonder if Europe is an option for him at this point? If the Flames were to lend him to a team in Finland (or somewhere over there), what would be the cap implications?
His cap would still count, minus the $900 000 the Flames can bury in the minors. The European team might help pay for his salary, but that would be about it.
CMPunk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 10:59 AM   #68
N-E-B
Franchise Player
 
N-E-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I think they made the right move. I know Hiller isn't the most popular guy around here, but in my mind he's slightly better than Ramo. Hiller is either really good or really bad. Ramo is more consistent but lets in his signature terrible goal every game.
N-E-B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 11:00 AM   #69
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

Maybe Buffalo makes a claim otherwise he is in Stockton playing as Gillies backup.

Glad they cut bait with one of them.
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 11:06 AM   #70
Bandwagon In Flames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
Exp:
Default

I'm glad Treliving wasn't too stubborn to put a player on waivers whom he just signed to a 3.8 mil contract.
Bandwagon In Flames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 11:06 AM   #71
Split98
Franchise Player
 
Split98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Don't we still pay half his salary if he's claimed?
Split98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 11:07 AM   #72
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Being put on waivers does not necessarily mean he's gone but in this case, I think it does. Goes unclaimed and backs up Gillies in Stockton. Or maybe traded with 50% retained salary.

There is one fact that is beyond debate IMO. Signing a guy to a $3.8 million dollar contract and waiving him 6 games into the season is a black mark against the GM.
Strange Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Strange Brew For This Useful Post:
Old 10-21-2015, 11:07 AM   #73
CMPunk
aka Spike
 
CMPunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: The Darkest Corners of My Mind
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Split98 View Post
Don't we still pay half his salary if he's claimed?
No, that was removed from the current CBA
CMPunk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 11:10 AM   #74
Split98
Franchise Player
 
Split98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CMPunk View Post
No, that was removed from the current CBA
Thanks! Wasn't sure if it was an old thing... or something I always assumed incorrectly.
Split98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 11:17 AM   #75
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

this signing was a weird decision right from the start. i wonder if we'll ever find out the rationale for it.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 11:17 AM   #76
DuffMan
Franchise Player
 
DuffMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: 127.0.0.1
Exp:
Default

should've just put them both on waivers.
__________________
Pass the bacon.
DuffMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 11:21 AM   #77
Racki
First Line Centre
 
Racki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DuffMan View Post
should've just put them both on waivers.
It wouldn't shock me to see Hiller waived as well at some point. Play well in the NHL or play in Stockton. I have no reason to believe that Ramo wouldn't be recalled and Hiller sent down at some point.
__________________
Racki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 11:21 AM   #78
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

I bet there is a trade on the table that requires the Flames to take back a deadbeat contract, and this is the last ditch effort to move Ramo without taking back a contract.

I still think he is a serviceable goalie, but a bad start to the season and fairly high salary makes him hard to move.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 11:22 AM   #79
Harry Lime
Franchise Player
 
Harry Lime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Exp:
Default

Ramo passing successfully through waivers may make him more attractive to a team that is headed to the playoffs, and isn't comfortable with their goaltending depth. Wouldn't it then be possible for him to be assigned directly to the AHL by the team that he is sent to?

The team that I see most likely to want a proven goalie in this position are the NY Islanders. They currently have Thomas Griess as their backup, and lost Poulin on waivers to the Lightning. Although they will have the opportunity to reacquire Poulin when he is sent back down in a few weeks, they may feel more comfortable having a proven NHL goalie taking regular reps down in the AHL. If anything happens to Halak, would you rather have Griess as your number 1, or Ramo?

In terms of return, I wouldn't expect much more than JS Berube (a goalie for AHL Stockton) and perhaps one of NYs buried defensive prospects. Calgary eats whatever is left to balance the salaries (maybe a million), and NY gains an open contract spot.

I would put the possibility of a trade at about 50/50.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
Harry Lime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2015, 11:23 AM   #80
HartAttack
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

After thinking about this some more, maybe they figured Ramo is the least likely to get claimed out of the 3 goalies, and that could be why the Flames chose to put him on waivers as opposed to Hiller.
HartAttack is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to HartAttack For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:08 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy