Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-18-2015, 08:27 PM   #3921
Dion
Not a casual user
 
Dion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: A simple man leading a complicated life....
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction View Post
But of course, the black market exists in the first place because of the historical prohibition in the US for the past 80 years. You can't erase that in a short period of time and it is unrealistic to expect all the negative effects from 80 years of prohibition to just disappear over night after legalization. There are people who depend on the black market for revenue and won't give it up easily.

It will probably take a whole generation before the effectiveness can be judged fairly.
I was responding to a point that Drak had made.
__________________
Dion is offline  
Old 10-18-2015, 08:30 PM   #3922
Jets4Life
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

I'm not sure if this is common knowledge, but Trudeau mentioned that one of the reasons for his stance, is that his brother was facing possession charges in BC shortly before he died. Michel Trudeau was into snowboarding, skiing, and some extreme sports, before his untimely demise in 1998 from an avalanche.

This was at the same time that snowboarder Ross Rebagliati was nearly stripped of his Gold Medal for testing positive for marijuana use. IMO, marijuana is far less harmful on society than alcohol.
Jets4Life is offline  
Old 10-18-2015, 08:41 PM   #3923
Morozee
Scoring Winger
 
Morozee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by adc View Post
They would be taught the dangers of doing drugs and the consequences that their actions will have on their future if they continue down that path.
Consequences of smoking a plant that makes you happy, more introspective and more sensitive? Maybe even, dare I say, more creative? Yikes, don't go down that path.
Morozee is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Morozee For This Useful Post:
Old 10-18-2015, 08:47 PM   #3924
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dion View Post
I have no doubt it will be. The problem for the CRA and the police will determing who is doing it for personal use and not to sell on the black market.

Why would they have to worry about that?

The effect of legalization *should* lead to lower prices. In that case, why would somebody go through the trouble to grow marijuana to sell at a loss? Anybody going through the trouble of growing it would likely be doing it for their own enjoyment, like home brewing, not selling.
Wormius is offline  
Old 10-18-2015, 08:49 PM   #3925
Drak
First Line Centre
 
Drak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Victoria, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Morozee View Post
Consequences of smoking a plant that makes you happy, more introspective and more sensitive? Maybe even, dare I say, more creative? Yikes, don't go down that path.
Then of course, we have a boat load of legal drugs that ARE in fact dangerous - highly addictive and harmful. But hey that's OK, they are chemically produced in factories and owned/controlled by big pharma.
Drak is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Drak For This Useful Post:
Old 10-18-2015, 09:18 PM   #3926
Kavvy
Self Imposed Exile
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drak View Post
Then of course, we have a boat load of legal drugs that ARE in fact dangerous - highly addictive and harmful. But hey that's OK, they are chemically produced in factories and owned/controlled by big pharma.
I am for legalization, but this is a terrible argument to make.

Prescription drugs are prescribed by a professional. If one wants to point to the issue of doctors over-prescribing, I totally agree it should be looked at, but it has no bearing on this discussion (we don't make one bad decision for society because we're bad elsewhere).

As for non-prescription drugs - there not meant for recreational use. Yes people over do them, and even use them as recreational, but they serve a strong alternate purpose. As this discussion is not about medical weed, I would propose this has no bearing either in this discussion.

We can all think big pharma is scummy, but I truly don't think we can point to them if we want to be taken seriously while discussing legalizing weed.
Kavvy is offline  
Old 10-18-2015, 09:27 PM   #3927
Mathgod
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare View Post
The Harper Way (TM).
The Harper way (and the republican way in the US)... if someone is doing something you don't approve of, beat them into submission and ruin their life!
__________________
Mathgod is offline  
Old 10-18-2015, 09:30 PM   #3928
AcGold
Self-Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

Then document it so they'll never be employed in a legitimate company.
AcGold is offline  
Old 10-18-2015, 09:33 PM   #3929
d_phaneuf
Franchise Player
 
d_phaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Exp:
Default

Last Week Tonight did a segment on the Election tonight
d_phaneuf is offline  
Old 10-18-2015, 09:36 PM   #3930
jayswin
Celebrated Square Root Day
 
jayswin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by diane_phaneuf View Post
Last Week Tonight did a segment on the Election tonight
On Canada's election?
jayswin is offline  
Old 10-18-2015, 09:42 PM   #3931
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Crowsnest Pass
Exp:
Default

Heard tonight Harper bought a place around Priddis. Did he know end was near?
troutman is offline  
Old 10-18-2015, 09:51 PM   #3932
Roughneck
#1 Goaltender
 
Roughneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: the middle
Exp:
Default

Roughneck is offline  
Old 10-18-2015, 09:52 PM   #3933
d_phaneuf
Franchise Player
 
d_phaneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
On Canada's election?
d_phaneuf is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to d_phaneuf For This Useful Post:
Old 10-18-2015, 09:55 PM   #3934
Scrambler
One of the Nine
 
Scrambler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 福岡市
Exp:
Default

Here's a dumb question...

Say the Liberals form government tomorrow, either with a Majority or a Minority. How soon do their platform policies (specifically speaking in regards to tax policies) go in to place? Right away? After the Spring budget?

Just wondering so I know if the Income Splitting (which I fully admit that I benefit from) will still be in place for the 2015 tax season or not.

I do benefit from the Conservatives forming government again but deep down inside I don't want that to happen. I will kiss Income Splitting goodbye (after only benefiting from it one year), wi would be cool though if I can use that just one more time
Scrambler is offline  
Old 10-18-2015, 09:59 PM   #3935
MarchHare
Franchise Player
 
MarchHare's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: YSJ (1979-2002) -> YYC (2002-2022) -> YVR (2022-present)
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scrambler View Post
Here's a dumb question...

Say the Liberals form government tomorrow, either with a Majority or a Minority. How soon do their platform policies (specifically speaking in regards to tax policies) go in to place? Right away? After the Spring budget?

Just wondering so I know if the Income Splitting (which I fully admit that I benefit from) will still be in place for the 2015 tax season or not.

I do benefit from the Conservatives forming government again but deep down inside I don't want that to happen. I will kiss Income Splitting goodbye (after only benefiting from it one year), wi would be cool though if I can use that just one more time
They have to pass each of their platform policies into law before they go into effect. If they don't win a majority, then they need the support of at least one other party (most likely the NDP) to get anything done, and there's no guarantee the NDP will let them implement their platform wholesale without any modifications.

With respect to income splitting specifically, I imagine they'll probably leave it in place for this tax year and then repeal it with the budget bill for next year.
MarchHare is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to MarchHare For This Useful Post:
Old 10-18-2015, 10:01 PM   #3936
Drak
First Line Centre
 
Drak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Victoria, BC
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kavvy View Post
I am for legalization, but this is a terrible argument to make.

Prescription drugs are prescribed by a professional. If one wants to point to the issue of doctors over-prescribing, I totally agree it should be looked at, but it has no bearing on this discussion (we don't make one bad decision for society because we're bad elsewhere).

As for non-prescription drugs - there not meant for recreational use. Yes people over do them, and even use them as recreational, but they serve a strong alternate purpose. As this discussion is not about medical weed, I would propose this has no bearing either in this discussion.

We can all think big pharma is scummy, but I truly don't think we can point to them if we want to be taken seriously while discussing legalizing weed.
I don't think my point is terrible. I recognize that we live in a modern world were medicines and drugs are required. I'm merely pointing out the hypocrisy of vilifying cannabis when we have common pain killers, cough medicines, things like gravol etc. that are much more potentially harmful that cannabis, but perfectly acceptable in society.
Drak is offline  
Old 10-18-2015, 10:06 PM   #3937
Scrambler
One of the Nine
 
Scrambler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: 福岡市
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MarchHare View Post
They have to pass each of their platform policies into law before they go into effect. If they don't win a majority, then they need the support of at least one other party (most likely the NDP) to get anything done, and there's no guarantee the NDP will let them implement their platform wholesale without any modifications.

With respect to income splitting specifically, I imagine they'll probably leave it in place for this tax year and then repeal it with the budget bill for next year.
Cool that makes sense (ride out the fiscal year as is). So yay that means using the 'Family Tax Cut' for at least one more fiscal year. Who knows maybe by the 2016 or even 2017 tax season that won't be quite as beneficial to me anyway.

I figured that in a Liberal Minority that the Libs would be able to push their tax policies through anyway (both the NDP and Libs are consistent in removing Income Splitting). Not sure about other policies though.
Scrambler is offline  
Old 10-18-2015, 10:14 PM   #3938
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

If you look at what the provincial ndp did they made their tax increases retroactive to this year so right now on payroll deductions they are taxing at 4 times the increase in marginal rate to catch up.

The libs could do it with a lot less pain as its a payout rather then collection so you don't actually lose the money you just never got it. If they plan on passing a budget before year end then I suspect they would grab that money right away to pay for other spending.

Especially if is a minority where that money would directly reduce the deficit they plan to run which is politically good if their is an election in the next two years.
GGG is offline  
Old 10-19-2015, 12:06 AM   #3939
flamesfan6
First Line Centre
 
flamesfan6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

Only vid I could find on Jon oliver tonight so far:



Jon Oliver will probably post it on youtube tomorrow.
flamesfan6 is offline  
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to flamesfan6 For This Useful Post:
Old 10-19-2015, 12:23 AM   #3940
puffnstuff
Franchise Player
 
puffnstuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: wearing raccoons for boots
Exp:
Default

I watched it. He made fun of all three of them. Then took aim at the Canadian law about non residents trying to influence voters, which is where the 5000 dollar fine and/or 6 months in jail (or Ottawa lol) comes from.
puffnstuff is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:36 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy