Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: What will Bouma get on a 1 year deal from the arbitrator (or before ruling)?
1.5 2 0.64%
1.6 2 0.64%
1.7 9 2.88%
1.8 42 13.42%
1.9 61 19.49%
2.0 75 23.96%
2.1 52 16.61%
2.2 42 13.42%
2.3 16 5.11%
2.4 5 1.60%
2.5 7 2.24%
Voters: 313. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-22-2015, 03:12 PM   #441
gvitaly
Franchise Player
 
gvitaly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mister Yamoto View Post
I really don't see what the problem is here. The 2.5 that Bouma wants is fair or even a bit low.

Sometimes the process of RFA/UFA negotiations stinks. You back up the Brinks truck for Frolik because he scored 19 goals for the Jets. Then you nickel and dime Bouma because he scored 16 goals for the Flames.

Just give him his 2.5 and be done with it.
I agree with you, but unfortunately we are in the business of maximizing assets. Obviously, lower contracts give managers more flexibility in regards to the cap. A flexibility the Flames might really need next summer, especially because it will involve locking and setting the core of this team for the next few years.

The need to resign/move Hudler, Monahan, Gaudreau, Giordano, Russelle, and the goaltending tandem will involve a lot of work and more importantly raises. The work will involve asset exchange one way or the other, be it trades or replacing some of the players internally. That is why in my opinion the Flames would actually prefer a 2 year deal, at a lower cap number, creating one more potential asset.

That said, I absolutely love Bouma, and what he brings. On the other hand, I used to love players like Glencross and Bourque the same way*; and the return for them at the time even more.

* I realize that they contributed in different ways than Bouma
gvitaly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2015, 03:12 PM   #442
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

How/why did this thread become about Backlund?
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2015, 03:14 PM   #443
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
Ferland has shown he will score more than Bouma in the long run. He's done it elsewhere. If one outlier year is an indicator, than David Clarkson is a 30 goal scorer waiting to break out. Ferland isn't likely to be top 6 and he's better offensively than Bouma.

Bouma is below replacement level offensively if you ignore last year. One year with 15 goals doesn't suddenly change that. If he does it again, we'll talk
????

I like Ferland a lot ... but based on the first 20 NHL games Baertschi should have had the #1 LW scoring spot locked up when Johnny Hockey was ready to be a Flame.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2015, 03:15 PM   #444
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
????

I like Ferland a lot ... but based on the first 20 NHL games Baertschi should have had the #1 LW scoring spot locked up when Johnny Hockey was ready to be a Flame.
Ferland has done it in juniors and AHL. Bouma has never done it.
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-2015, 03:21 PM   #445
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Ferland has shown FAR more offensively in the WHL and AHL than Bouma ever did. Bouma has last year, and that's it (as far as besting Ferland offensively at any level). We can compare Ferland to Bouma's 14/15 season after the 16/17 season as now it wouldn't be fair with Ferland being 2 years younger. I would be willing to take the bet that Ferland outscores Bouma over the next two years. He has softer hands and is much more patient than Bouma when he has the puck IMO. The discrepancy in their skill will become obvious after Ferland gets the chances Bouma has had over the last couple of years.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2015, 03:21 PM   #446
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
Who is his comparable at 2.5 with half his goals???? That's a massive overpayment
Cal Clutterbuck 25 year old RFA coming off a 10 pt season 2.75 x 4.

Clutterbuck and a 3rd round pick got the Wild the #5 pick from the 2010 draft
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2015, 03:24 PM   #447
Fire of the Phoenix
#1 Goaltender
 
Fire of the Phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Northern Crater
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Cal Clutterbuck 25 year old RFA coming off a 10 pt season 2.75 x 4.

Clutterbuck and a 3rd round pick got the Wild the #5 pick from the 2010 draft
GMs make mistakes sometimes. Neither of those moves mean anything in relation to Lance Bouma.
Fire of the Phoenix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2015, 03:25 PM   #448
Street Pharmacist
Franchise Player
 
Street Pharmacist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Cal Clutterbuck 25 year old RFA coming off a 10 pt season 2.75 x 4.

Clutterbuck and a 3rd round pick got the Wild the #5 pick from the 2010 draft
... in the lockout shortened season. Clutterbuck has scored more than 10 goals 5 times. He's also got a junior career that leads us to believe he can score
Street Pharmacist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2015, 03:32 PM   #449
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Clutterbuck for Niederreiter has to be one of the worst trades in recent memory.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to codynw For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-2015, 03:33 PM   #450
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist View Post
Ferland has done it in juniors and AHL. Bouma has never done it.
Ferland had a hot streak for about 10 AHL games... might have done better but got hurt. Last year 15 pts in 32 games.

Juniors Ferland was on a line with Mark Stone...

In 2009-10 Bouma lost the last 13 games of the season to a partially torn MCL and then played all 16 of the Giants playoff games putting up 17 pts.... third best on the team.

Hard for Bouma to put up points in the AHL as he spent so little time there.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2015, 03:36 PM   #451
T@T
Lifetime Suspension
 
T@T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Exp:
Default

Give him 3x2m and make it a day.
T@T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2015, 04:01 PM   #452
mikephoen
#1 Goaltender
 
mikephoen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw View Post
Clutterbuck for Niederreiter has to be one of the worst trades in recent memory.
I think Bruin fans might disagree with you.
mikephoen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2015, 04:07 PM   #453
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikephoen View Post
I think Bruin fans might disagree with you.
twice
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2015, 04:43 PM   #454
CaptainYooh
Franchise Player
 
CaptainYooh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Magnus Paajarvi
2014-15 salary: $1.4 million
Pre-arbitration settlement: One year, $700,000 (one-way deal)
Not sure if this had been mentioned here already. 10th overall pick in 2009, $700K... Just wow. Edmonton Oilers prospect development system keeps paying off...
__________________
"An idea is always a generalization, and generalization is a property of thinking. To generalize means to think." Georg Hegel
“To generalize is to be an idiot.” William Blake
CaptainYooh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2015, 05:08 PM   #455
Bill Bumface
My face is a bum!
 
Bill Bumface's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeteMoss View Post
Came into thread to see posters getting angry over normal negotiations.... leaving satisfied.
Came into thread looking for obligatory "came into thread" post. Leaving tired of "came into thread" posts.
Bill Bumface is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to Bill Bumface For This Useful Post:
Old 07-22-2015, 06:18 PM   #456
Anduril
Franchise Player
 
Anduril's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly View Post
I agree with you, but unfortunately we are in the business of maximizing assets. Obviously, lower contracts give managers more flexibility in regards to the cap. A flexibility the Flames might really need next summer, especially because it will involve locking and setting the core of this team for the next few years.

The need to resign/move Hudler, Monahan, Gaudreau, Giordano, Russelle, and the goaltending tandem will involve a lot of work and more importantly raises. The work will involve asset exchange one way or the other, be it trades or replacing some of the players internally. That is why in my opinion the Flames would actually prefer a 2 year deal, at a lower cap number, creating one more potential asset.

That said, I absolutely love Bouma, and what he brings. On the other hand, I used to love players like Glencross and Bourque the same way*; and the return for them at the time even more.

* I realize that they contributed in different ways than Bouma
No, the Flames are in the business of an entertainment organization that aims to win the Stanley Cup. You don't get there by constantly trying to maximize assets because the profit you could potentially make off of unloading for a better return doesn't necessarily put your team in a position to win.

Treliving will have his hands full when it comes to Monahan/Gaudreau/Gio/Bennett but thtere's a lot of other considerations that can be looked at first before considering the unlikely scenario of moving Bouma over a couple hundred K. Bouma's play and energy is more valuable to this team now and in the near future than another 2nd or 3rd round prospect that needs to be grown for another 3-4 years.
Anduril is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2015, 07:04 PM   #457
H2SO4(aq)
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

Wasn't today Bouma's hearing?
H2SO4(aq) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2015, 07:06 PM   #458
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by H2SO4(aq) View Post
Wasn't today Bouma's hearing?
Yes. It takes up to 48 hours.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2015, 07:32 PM   #459
H2SO4(aq)
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post
Yes. It takes up to 48 hours.
ahhh gotcha. keep coming into this thread and reading 4 pages of arguing just looking to find what the arbitrator ruled.
H2SO4(aq) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2015, 07:42 PM   #460
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by H2SO4(aq) View Post
ahhh gotcha. keep coming into this thread and reading 4 pages of arguing just looking to find what the arbitrator ruled.
Factor in 8 pages of arguing about Bouma until Friday, say another 12 pages of arguing about the ruling over the weekend, another 8 pages leading up to Jooris' hearing, probably 32 in between waiting for Jooris' ruling and Byron's hearing, 16 on the weekend continuing to argue about Bouma and Jooris' ruling and arguing about Byron's ruling, and then another 8 pages after Byron's ruling to wrap the whole thing up.

Last edited by Finger Cookin; 07-22-2015 at 11:44 PM.
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Finger Cookin For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:46 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy