03-03-2015, 12:26 PM
|
#181
|
Franchise Player
|
Giving Schlemko #3 seems to indicate that they feel that he is going to be a contributor on this team. Giving him a high available number would have sent a different message.
I'm hoping that between Treliving knowing the player, and Russell being familiar with his play, we will see a player that has yet to reach his potential, given the chance to do so. I think that we see Russell/Schlemko pairing soon.
__________________
"By Grabthar's hammer ... what a savings."
|
|
|
03-03-2015, 12:27 PM
|
#182
|
Acerbic Cyberbully
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon In Flames
I understand defensemen take longer to develop, that's not the issue.
The issue is having called up Wotherspoon 4 times this season and missing AHL games, only to be benched in place of Diaz, Engelland and/or Potter.
Wotherspoon played last year and looked NHL ready. It's been almost a year and he hasn't got another NHL game in.
I get that Treliving likes to over-rippen his prospects, but at what point does Wotherspoon start taking exception to this?
|
I guess that is a question only Tyler Wotherspoon can answer, but I think it is grossly premature to start to think that it is one that he should be entertaining.
|
|
|
03-03-2015, 12:30 PM
|
#183
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon In Flames
I understand defensemen take longer to develop, that's not the issue.
The issue is having called up Wotherspoon 4 times this season and missing AHL games, only to be benched in place of Diaz, Engelland and/or Potter.
Wotherspoon played last year and looked NHL ready. It's been almost a year and he hasn't got another NHL game in.
I get that Treliving likes to over-rippen his prospects, but at what point does Wotherspoon start taking exception to this?
|
Wotherspoon did NOT look nhl ready last year
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Street Pharmacist For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-03-2015, 12:37 PM
|
#184
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon In Flames
I understand defensemen take longer to develop, that's not the issue.
The issue is having called up Wotherspoon 4 times this season and missing AHL games, only to be benched in place of Diaz, Engelland and/or Potter.
Wotherspoon played last year and looked NHL ready. It's been almost a year and he hasn't got another NHL game in.
I get that Treliving likes to over-rippen his prospects, but at what point does Wotherspoon start taking exception to this?
|
I was underwhelmed by Wotherspoon last year, but I figured it was to be expected. As for being called up and not played? Welcome to the bubble. It's a nod to good play in the AHL. Plus, I don't think he missed that many games in the AHL - their schedule is weird. Anyway, Hartley sees them in practice and if he thought Wotherspoon was better, he'd play him over one of those guys.
|
|
|
03-03-2015, 01:29 PM
|
#185
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
I was underwhelmed by Wotherspoon last year, but I figured it was to be expected. As for being called up and not played? Welcome to the bubble. It's a nod to good play in the AHL. Plus, I don't think he missed that many games in the AHL - their schedule is weird. Anyway, Hartley sees them in practice and if he thought Wotherspoon was better, he'd play him over one of those guys.
|
I don't think we'll ever be overwhelmed by Wotherspoon but if you watch him, he efficiently does his job with few mistakes. He ain't going to be a Bobby Orr or a Brodie but he'll do his job very well.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Vulcan For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-03-2015, 02:05 PM
|
#186
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
|
The general consensus last year was that Wotherspoon was NHL ready. He didn't look out of place and was quiet every game. That's exactly what you want from a defensive defenseman who's holding down the bottom pairing.
I don't think he would of got into 14 games last year if he wasn't NHL ready..
|
|
|
03-03-2015, 02:10 PM
|
#187
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon In Flames
The general consensus last year was that Wotherspoon was NHL ready. He didn't look out of place and was quiet every game. That's exactly what you want from a defensive defenseman who's holding down the bottom pairing.
I don't think he would of got into 14 games last year if he wasn't NHL ready..
|
I don't recall that but maybe I'm mistaken. He was good for a raw 20 year old, but let's not pretend he got those Ganges because he was ready. Hanowski got games at the end of the season, was he ready? Candari did, etc. He was there because there was a spot open and the flames were out of the race. By almost every metric he was one of the worst defensemen out there despite very soft minutes.
I think he'll be a good bottom 4 guy, but let's not pretend he's there already based on last year because it's factually inaccurate
|
|
|
03-03-2015, 02:14 PM
|
#188
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon In Flames
I understand defensemen take longer to develop, that's not the issue.
The issue is having called up Wotherspoon 4 times this season and missing AHL games, only to be benched in place of Diaz, Engelland and/or Potter.
Wotherspoon played last year and looked NHL ready. It's been almost a year and he hasn't got another NHL game in.
I get that Treliving likes to over-rippen his prospects, but at what point does Wotherspoon start taking exception to this?
|
I don't think this is another Barts situation waiting to happen...
Also, didn't Wotherspoon just come back from re constructive shoulder surgery in late 2014? Perhaps could be a factor in that? Or maybe the set up is not yet tweaked to include a stay at home D in the system?
http://www.calgarysun.com/2014/09/24...rn-from-injury
But then again, so did Poirier with shoulder surgery and I think Poirier has played more NHL games than Wotherspoon this season, no? So perhaps, not the reason.
|
|
|
03-03-2015, 02:17 PM
|
#189
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
I don't recall that but maybe I'm mistaken. He was good for a raw 20 year old, but let's not pretend he got those Ganges because he was ready. Hanowski got games at the end of the season, was he ready? Candari did, etc. He was there because there was a spot open and the flames were out of the race. By almost every metric he was one of the worst defensemen out there despite very soft minutes.
I think he'll be a good bottom 4 guy, but let's not pretend he's there already based on last year because it's factually inaccurate
|
Hanowski and Cundari were there in an attempt to make the Iginla and Bou trades look decent. Also to see what area's of the game needed the most improvement.
Nobody expected those two to make the team. Many fans thought Wotherspoon earned bottom pairing minutes. I haven't heard a single negative thing about the guy until you piped in just now.
|
|
|
03-03-2015, 02:19 PM
|
#190
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vancouver
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon In Flames
I understand defensemen take longer to develop, that's not the issue.
The issue is having called up Wotherspoon 4 times this season and missing AHL games, only to be benched in place of Diaz, Engelland and/or Potter.
Wotherspoon played last year and looked NHL ready. It's been almost a year and he hasn't got another NHL game in.
I get that Treliving likes to over-rippen his prospects, but at what point does Wotherspoon start taking exception to this?
|
Always earned, never given. Has Wotherspoon blown the roof off the AHL? No. He's making steady progress, and If I was him, I wouldn't be complaining about getting called up when 6 other D-prospects haven't even gotten to practice with the big club or collect an NHL salary.
__________________
Death by 4th round picks.
|
|
|
03-03-2015, 02:25 PM
|
#191
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon In Flames
Hanowski and Cundari were there in an attempt to make the Iginla and Bou trades look decent. Also to see what area's of the game needed the most improvement.
Nobody expected those two to make the team. Many fans thought Wotherspoon earned bottom pairing minutes. I haven't heard a single negative thing about the guy until you piped in just now.
|
It's not that negative, it's just that he was what you would expect a young 20 year old player to be. He could be a bottom pairing guy now, I don't know and won't comment there as I haven't watched him much this year. Last year though, he had a couple good games that maybe tinted peoples view because he had 4 points in those 14 games. Despite the soft minutes, the opposition had almost twice as many scoring chances the flames did when he was out there. In fairness to him, he was paired with Smid
|
|
|
03-03-2015, 02:29 PM
|
#192
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thymebalm
Always earned, never given. Has Wotherspoon blown the roof off the AHL? No. He's making steady progress, and If I was him, I wouldn't be complaining about getting called up when 6 other D-prospects haven't even gotten to practice with the big club or collect an NHL salary.
|
That's the issue.. Wotherspoon will never be flashy or blow the roof off anywhere. It's not his game.
And the majority of posters also thought he earned an NHL spot this season:
http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthr...erspoon&page=1
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bandwagon In Flames For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-03-2015, 02:36 PM
|
#193
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sunshine Coast
|
I don't know about his Corsi or his level of competition but he had pretty good stats and when I watched him he didn't look overwhelmed at all. He was for sure better than O'Brian, Billins and Smith, also IMO better than Butler. I thought that except for his shoulder injury he had a good chance to make the team this season.
His stats were okay and even his plus minus fell into about team average for the games he played. I figure the reason he's staying in the AHL is too build up his offensive game, so that he can be more than just a third pairing guy but right now I'd have more faith in him than some of the guys on our third pairing.
NHL 14 0 4 4 4 -3
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Vulcan For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-03-2015, 02:37 PM
|
#194
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harry Lime
Giving Schlemko #3 seems to indicate that they feel that he is going to be a contributor on this team. Giving him a high available number would have sent a different message.
|
Other than kids starting on the farm, did we ever give established players numbers outside of the low numbers? I don't recall Diaz or Raymond ever using a high number for instance.
Not questioning your comment. Sounds like a reasonable assumption and belief. Just wanted to clarify.
|
|
|
03-03-2015, 02:39 PM
|
#196
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon In Flames
|
I'm not suggesting he was going to be some offensive force. I just thought he was not quite an NHler last year (but OK with the progress).
That thread is hard to read but it looked to me like a lot of the posters had Wotherspoon as a 7th defenceman. Of course, there was no Engelland or Diaz, and lots of people had add-ins like Mike Green.
Is there a thread of the views of Wotherspoon from this years camp?
|
|
|
03-03-2015, 02:41 PM
|
#197
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
I'm not suggesting he was going to be some offensive force. I just thought he was not quite an NHler last year (but OK with the progress).
That thread is hard to read but it looked to me like a lot of the posters had Wotherspoon as a 7th defenceman. Of course, there was no Engelland or Diaz, and lots of people had add-ins like Mike Green.
Is there a thread of the views of Wotherspoon from this years camp?
|
If you want to find counter evidence than find it yourself..
This is based off his play from last season, so the linked thread is relevant.
And yes he was the 6-7 d-man for most line-ups (I actually had him in the 2nd pairing due to Wideman's terrible play last year). That means he has a permanent spot after the first injury. There has been injuries throughout the year and Wotherspoon has no ice time to show for it. There's currently 2 injuries nearing the end of the season and he's still not in the line-up.
Last edited by Bandwagon In Flames; 03-03-2015 at 02:45 PM.
|
|
|
03-03-2015, 02:44 PM
|
#198
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon In Flames
If you want to find counter evidence than find it yourself..
This is based off his play from last season, so the linked thread is relevant.
|
Thanks for your help. I am not trying to counter you, but I would suggest that his performance at this years camp is more relevant than a thread speculating on this years lineup which includes guys like Mike Green or Aaron Ekblad on defence.
I imagine Wotherspoon could outplay Engelland on a lot of nights. That doesn't mean that I want him to have those minutes as opposed to a better role in Adirondack. And I do trust Hartley and his decisions on lineups. He could have put Wotherspoon in and he didn't. I would, in fact, have an issue if Treliving started dictating to Hartley what his lineup is going to be.
|
|
|
03-03-2015, 02:47 PM
|
#199
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Flame Country
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Thanks for your help. I am not trying to counter you, but I would suggest that his performance at this years camp is more relevant than a thread speculating on this years lineup which includes guys like Mike Green or Aaron Ekblad on defence.
I imagine Wotherspoon could outplay Engelland on a lot of nights. That doesn't mean that I want him to have those minutes as opposed to a better role in Adirondack. And I do trust Hartley and his decisions on lineups. He could have put Wotherspoon in and he didn't. I would, in fact, have an issue if Treliving started dictating to Hartley what his lineup is going to be.
|
There's nothing wrong with a prospect playing bottom pairing minutes. He was still getting 12-15 minutes of ice time per night. It's not the same as a forward like Poirier on the 4th line getting 5-7 minutes of ice time (which nobody seems to even have exception with).
|
|
|
03-03-2015, 02:47 PM
|
#200
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The C-spot
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bandwagon In Flames
I understand defensemen take longer to develop, that's not the issue.
The issue is having called up Wotherspoon 4 times this season and missing AHL games, only to be benched in place of Diaz, Engelland and/or Potter.
Wotherspoon played last year and looked NHL ready. It's been almost a year and he hasn't got another NHL game in.
I get that Treliving likes to over-rippen his prospects, but at what point does Wotherspoon start taking exception to this?
|
If he's taking exception to making an NHL salary and practicing and travelling with NHL players, instead of riding the bus for an AHL salary but playing AHL games, then ... well, I'd be surprised.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Five-hole For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:26 PM.
|
|