02-06-2015, 04:34 PM
|
#81
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FBI
kind of sick of the one track mind: MUST GET BIGGER
can't we just enjoy the way the team is playing?
|
if we make the playoffs im sure we will quickly be reminded - MUST GET BIGGER.
Which players on our team are considered big? Engelland, Bollig, Jones? We are going to need size.
|
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 04:37 PM
|
#82
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2SO4(aq)
if we make the playoffs im sure we will quickly be reminded - MUST GET BIGGER.
Which players on our team are considered big? Engelland, Bollig, Jones? We are going to need size.
|
Colborne is tall, and can get big.
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 04:42 PM
|
#83
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2SO4(aq)
if we make the playoffs im sure we will quickly be reminded - MUST GET BIGGER.
Which players on our team are considered big? Engelland, Bollig, Jones? We are going to need size.
|
Having Wolf and Hunter Smith coming up through the organization will help in that regard.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 04:53 PM
|
#84
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Salmon with Arms
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by H2SO4(aq)
if we make the playoffs im sure we will quickly be reminded - MUST GET BIGGER.
Which players on our team are considered big? Engelland, Bollig, Jones? We are going to need size.
|
Chicago is one of the smallest teams in the league. Montreal is tiny.
I'm not sure size alone is a big issue.
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 04:55 PM
|
#85
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Pharmacist
Chicago is one of the smallest teams in the league. Montreal is tiny.
I'm not sure size alone is a big issue.
|
If everything else is more or less equal, usually the bigger team will win the series. It is an advantage as you can just push players off the puck. It's not so much a big deal in terms of making the playoffs, but it makes a big difference if you want to go all the way.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 05:00 PM
|
#86
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
|
Diaz, Byron, Glencross being replaced with bigger players is the most likely plan of attack . But who knows.
Wotherspoon getting a spot next year over Diaz is a 3 inch height gain and a 13 pound gain.
Byron, well almost anyone slotting in over him in a bottom six role would massive shift the height weight average for the team over all.
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 05:05 PM
|
#87
|
|
Scoring Winger
|
I didn't know scoreface was small
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 05:20 PM
|
#88
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
|
Glencross is 6'1". These days that's not small, but it ain't big either.
Monahan is 6'2".
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 05:34 PM
|
#89
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: The Armpit of BC: Trail
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Glencross is 6'1". These days that's not small, but it ain't big either.
Monahan is 6'2".
|
Like I keep telling my wife; It's not the size that matters, it's now you use it.
__________________
Disregard any and all THANKS I give. I'm a dirty, dirty thanks-whore.
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 05:43 PM
|
#90
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trailer Fire
Like I keep telling my wife; It's not the size that matters, it's now you use it.
|
As they say in screenwriting school, ‘Show, don’t tell.’
__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 05:45 PM
|
#91
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
|
i thought i read somewhere monahan is 6'3 now
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 06:00 PM
|
#92
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robo
i thought i read somewhere monahan is 6'3 now
|
If they use the same ruler that measures Johnny Gaudreau at 5'9", Monahan is probably 6'7" now.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 06:01 PM
|
#93
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: nexus of the universe
|
I've heard reports Monahan is 6'11" and eats Kittens.
__________________
Would there even be no trade clauses if Edmonton was out of the NHL? - fotze
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 06:20 PM
|
#94
|
|
Franchise Player
|
The jets up 1-0 in the first against Blackhawks . Let's go Chicago !!!!
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 06:28 PM
|
#95
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275
The jets up 1-0 in the first against Blackhawks . Let's go Chicago !!!!
|
They aren't our concern, either of them. Our main concern is keeping ahead of the Canucks and LA. If we stay the course and those 2 continue to self implode, it won't matter what the rest of the Central Division do, because we'll be in the play offs.
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 06:44 PM
|
#96
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: PEI
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ1532
They aren't our concern, either of them. Our main concern is keeping ahead of the Canucks and LA. If we stay the course and those 2 continue to self implode, it won't matter what the rest of the Central Division do, because we'll be in the play offs.
|
While the goal is to lock up a divisional playoff spot, the Jets most certainly are a concern of ours nonetheless.
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 06:48 PM
|
#97
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
Glencross is 6'1". These days that's not small, but it ain't big either.
Monahan is 6'2".
|
Monahan looks like a legit 6'2, Glencross' height seems like someone fudging the numbers to get him over the six foot mark.
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 07:00 PM
|
#98
|
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
Monahan looks like a legit 6'2, Glencross' height seems like someone fudging the numbers to get him over the six foot mark.
|
Poor Glencross. Now the guy doesn't even get credit for being 6'1". What next, Curtis? If that is your real name...
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to FlameZilla For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 07:07 PM
|
#99
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrMastodonFarm
Monahan looks like a legit 6'2, Glencross' height seems like someone fudging the numbers to get him over the six foot mark.
|
Somedays, I can't believe what I read here.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Where ru Chris O'Sullivan For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
02-06-2015, 07:09 PM
|
#100
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlameZilla
Poor Glencross. Now the guy doesn't even get credit for being 6'1". What next, Curtis? If that is your real name...
|
Could be his hunched over skating style that fools me, really seems to have the shoulders forward when he skates.
lmao@Where ru Chris O'Sullivan
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:02 PM.
|
|
