|
View Poll Results: Will Richards get claimed today?
|
|
Yes
|
   
|
213 |
42.26% |
|
No
|
  
|
291 |
57.74% |
01-27-2015, 02:29 PM
|
#501
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hack&Lube
Instead of sending out Richards and another good player for nothing (or garbage) in return, it makes more sense for LA to just bury him in the minors unless there is some reason for the owners to be greedy and not want to pay him.
|
Putting a guy on the minors only takes care of $925K on the cap. They have a $4.8M hit in terms of dead space with him in the AHL
|
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:30 PM
|
#502
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Edmonton,AB
|
has richards been assigned to his ahl team yet?
Last edited by Robo; 01-27-2015 at 02:36 PM.
|
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:31 PM
|
#503
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoggyFlamesFan
This seems like the most realistic offer/trade so far.
|
Glencross is expiring but I'm sure would re-up with LA (of any team), and Raymond is half as expensive as Richards, so cap-wise it makes sense. Sven could still be seen as a valuable asset to some teams given the offensive success he showed at the NHL level up until his demotion last fall.
You have to keep in mind what it would cost to take Toffoli off the Kings (even with the Richards dump), it'll cost a Glencross at least. Raymond would be the filler going the other way, though he could find a groove with LA, but the Kings could see value what Glencross brings, and get a young piece on the fringe of breaking in with Sven.
I don't think LA cares for our bottom pairing d-men, so I don't think that'll fly if we want to pry Toffoli from them.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:32 PM
|
#504
|
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trailer Fire
I'm annoyed at the fact that a simple explanation can't be left at a simple explanation. You just had to try to belittle me and I can't quite tell why. It's not some great offence to my delicate nature, but it is an uncalled for annoyance. Maybe that's just me.
|
Saying 'good deal' does not belittle you - it refers to the proposal. If you don't want your trade proposals to be criticized, don't propose them.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:32 PM
|
#505
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Glencross is highly unlikely to waive for a team below the Flames in the standings.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:34 PM
|
#506
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
I like how the no votes spiked after it was announced that he cleared, oddly enough though, a couple of late yes votes came in. 
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FlamesAddiction For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:35 PM
|
#507
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
They still would have most of his cap counted against them with the new(ish) rule changes.
|
Which is why it would be more beneficial to dump him on another team. I don't believe LA wants to pay someone over 4 million to play in the minors. This is a temporary solution, while they work out a deal.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:35 PM
|
#508
|
 Posted the 6 millionth post! |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
Glencross is highly unlikely to waive for a team below the Flames in the standings.
|
Uhh, what? You don't think he would waive to go play in LA with Darryl Sutter again? That's crazy. Wow. LA is ONE point behind us. Plus they have have the ability to turn it on in the playoff push.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Ozy_Flame For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:37 PM
|
#509
|
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
Glencross is highly unlikely to waive for a team below the Flames in the standings.
|
Thanks for the chuckle.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:41 PM
|
#510
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
Is there a point though that the NHL just says no and doesn't approve a deal if it is so obviously one sided? I know that several years they banned trades directly for money because it is seen as detrimental to the league. If the Kings are obviously trading hockey assets for what is essentially money, would the league ever step in?
|
I dont think they can do that unless theres some sort of CBA circumvention going on.
I mean, if they did things like that it might explain why the Oilers can never get a trade done.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:44 PM
|
#511
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame
Uhh, what? You don't think he would waive to go play in LA with Darryl Sutter again? That's crazy. Wow. LA is ONE point behind us. Plus they have have the ability to turn it on in the playoff push.
|
It is reported that Glencross is not wanting to leave Alberta. He signed when Darryl was the GM but never played for him as a coach. In addition he is what a 3rd liner in LA? Why would he agree to a trade there?
If the Flames want to move Glencross to California look at Anaheim. I don't see Glencross accepting a trade from the Flames unless he is going to a far superior team.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:45 PM
|
#512
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
It is reported that Glencross is not wanting to leave Alberta. He signed when Darryl was the GM but never played for him as a coach. In addition he is what a 3rd liner in LA? Why would he agree to a trade there?
If the Flames want to move Glencross to California look at Anaheim. I don't see Glencross accepting a trade from the Flames unless he is going to a far superior team.
|
Does Glencross even have a NTC?
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:49 PM
|
#513
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames
Thanks for the chuckle.
|
Yeah well I get a good chuckle when people toss Glencross in proposals thinking he is going to waive for anybody. Why would he leave a top line position on a team he has been with for nearly 7 years and took a big discount to stay, in his home province? A team he has missed the playoffs with for 5 years but is finally turning a corner? I just don't see hi waiving unless it is for a top team. Why leave now? If the Flames don't want to meet his contract demands he leaves in the summer. He holds all the power
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:49 PM
|
#514
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SmoggyFlamesFan
Does Glencross even have a NTC?
|
He has a full No Move Clause
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:50 PM
|
#515
|
|
Could Care Less
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dino7c
I don't think some of you realize how big of a problem this contract is, especially for the Kings...Kings will need to make a "bad deal" to move him
|
In addition to the contract itself, and it's been mentioned a few times, with the extremely weak (and weakening) CAD due to the collapse in oil and subsequent BOC rate cut, it's going to really affect the cap which further adds to the Kings woes with the Richards contract. They really, really need that cap space. Some of the trades offered in this thread don't look so ludicrous when you take this into account. This shouldn't be overlooked - and CAD looks to be under even more pressure for the foreseeable future.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:52 PM
|
#516
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
There was also a rumour that he (Glencross) is expecting a child in April. Has that ever been confirmed?
If so, I don't think he waives his cause easily.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:53 PM
|
#517
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Bay Area
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Red John
|
I am always serious. Teams can never have too many Hanowski's.
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:54 PM
|
#518
|
|
Powerplay Quarterback
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Calgary, AB
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dustygoon
I am always serious. Teams can never have too many Hanowski's.
|
If he's part of this package, apparently we can!
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:55 PM
|
#519
|
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: YYC
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vinny01
Glencross is highly unlikely to waive for a team below the Flames in the standings.
|
Im pretty sure the Flames were supposed to be lower in the standings than we are right now, than at the start of the year. If its not the Oilers, Glencross should feel blessed
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2015, 02:56 PM
|
#520
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dustygoon
I am always serious. Teams can never have too many Hanowski's.
|
What? We have too many Hanowskis.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:05 PM.
|
|
