Bose isn't bad, but it really doesn't make sense to buy them unless at least a good 20-30%+ is lopped off the price. Think 30-40% overpayment for beats. Even then, there are things in that price range that will be way better. Bose and Beats have reasonably good performance. However, both are horrible in the "best bang for buck" department. I disagree with people saying Bose = crap. But I agree they're often bad value.
If you have no idea, for items sold in (let's say Futureshop) Sennheisers are usually a good bet value wise. Sony isn't bad either for bang vs buck. JVC and Koss, hit or miss, do research first.
Skull Candy... Same argument as Bose and Beats. Monster = Beats.
That's probably the best I can do for a generic suggestion. Many headphones are actually ranked on an individual basis and deeper audiophile circles put loyalty on certain headphones and not specifically brands itself even though certain brands put many popular high end headphones that audiophiles enjoy.
EDIT:
If you want to foray further, I would suggest researching the following headphones:
ATH M50 (Audio technica) Absolutely amazing bang for buck value headphones.
DT 770/880 pro (Beyerdynamic) <- EDIT again. Holy Crap, the prices have spiked in the last few years. The DT770 used to be similar price to the ATH M50. I prefer these to the M50s
HD 280 pro/380/598 (Sennheiser) Generally safe choices. But depends on the sound "style" individual may like.
SRH 440 (Shure) Heard good things. Not sure if I would go for this over M50, but depends on how much you want to spend.
None are noise canceling, some are noise isolating and some are open concept.
I unfortunately don't know much about ear buds... because I don't prefer them. I have a set of dual driver JVC ear buds and used to own CX200 (Sennheiser) but after good cans... I don't like going back. Check out the long and McQuade website.
Again, nothing wrong with Bose. You are just paying a premium for no reason.
Last edited by DoubleF; 12-05-2014 at 01:12 AM.
|