11-11-2014, 01:37 PM
|
#21
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
Is this possibly a lose-lose trade for both teams? Dallas gets less experienced and weaker (or maybe not) on defense which they were already poor at already, and the piece they get back is an older, less dynamic version of players they already have in Roussel, Garbutt, Sceviour. Montreal gets more than $4 million in cap space eaten up by a 40 year old player that doesn't add anything they don't already have in Subban, Markov, Gilbert, Emelin.
Add in that you can't take Bourque's contract off their books and they spending a ton of money for very little improvement to their club, if any. Can anyone explain this?
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Cali Panthers Fan For This Useful Post:
|
|
11-11-2014, 02:01 PM
|
#22
|
Redundant Minister of Redundancy
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Montreal
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw
Why would Dallas do this trade? Cap space?
|
He's pretty old, maybe they shipped him off somewhere where he could get free healthcare.
|
|
|
11-11-2014, 02:01 PM
|
#23
|
Scoring Winger
|
Maybe Montreal needs someone to mentor their captain before the whole team turns on him. A little leadership from a guy that's been around the block won't hurt. PK is awesome but some guys may get tired of his chirpy style
|
|
|
11-11-2014, 02:08 PM
|
#24
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Flames Fan
Is this possibly a lose-lose trade for both teams? Dallas gets less experienced and weaker (or maybe not) on defense which they were already poor at already, and the piece they get back is an older, less dynamic version of players they already have in Roussel, Garbutt, Sceviour. Montreal gets more than $4 million in cap space eaten up by a 40 year old player that doesn't add anything they don't already have in Subban, Markov, Gilbert, Emelin.
Add in that you can't take Bourque's contract off their books and they spending a ton of money for very little improvement to their club, if any. Can anyone explain this?
|
Montreal gets a d which they were apparently looking for to solidify their back end. They probably saw enough of tinordi and beaulieu to see they weren't ready. They bring in a d who the coach is familiar with to play sheltered minutes and help on the pp. they move out a redundant piece in Moen who had term left after this year. Dallas frees up a spot for Klingberg who they are really high on and dump a lot of salary which gives them short term flexibility but adds to the payroll for next year. Add a bit of character as well.
So Mtl gets their d and cap flexibility for next year, Dallas gets short term cap flex and a character veteran forward.
|
|
|
11-11-2014, 02:26 PM
|
#25
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Original FFIV
Montreal gets a d which they were apparently looking for to solidify their back end. They probably saw enough of tinordi and beaulieu to see they weren't ready. They bring in a d who the coach is familiar with to play sheltered minutes and help on the pp. they move out a redundant piece in Moen who had term left after this year. Dallas frees up a spot for Klingberg who they are really high on and dump a lot of salary which gives them short term flexibility but adds to the payroll for next year. Add a bit of character as well.
So Mtl gets their d and cap flexibility for next year, Dallas gets short term cap flex and a character veteran forward.
|
Yes, I will grant you all of those points, but my question is: Is either team any better or did either team get something they didn't already have?
__________________
"You know, that's kinda why I came here, to show that I don't suck that much" ~ Devin Cooley, Professional Goaltender
|
|
|
11-11-2014, 02:29 PM
|
#26
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
|
I think this makes the habs a lot better and could actually make the stars better too. Montreal gets a pp specialist who can play sheltered minutes, he won't play much more regular time than any other bottom pairing guy but he can step in and hopefully for them make a difference on the PP. The Stars get better by being able to bring up a younger player they fell is better and they gain cap space, they also get a little more grit in the lineup.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
|
|
|
11-11-2014, 02:37 PM
|
#27
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Flames Fan
Yes, I will grant you all of those points, but my question is: Is either team any better or did either team get something they didn't already have?
|
Montreal gained an experienced NHL dman to bridge the gap until beaulieu and tinordi are ready for full time duty and stars gain cap flexibility for future moves. So yeah, each team gets something they were lacking. Montreal will show immediate return as gonchar will step in and deliver right away, Dallas may improve if Nill uses the cap space to make further improvements
|
|
|
11-11-2014, 05:18 PM
|
#28
|
Franchise Player
|
Pretty sure I remember drafting Gonchar in a hockey pool back in the 90's.
|
|
|
11-11-2014, 05:22 PM
|
#29
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
I wasn't a fan of the Stars d-core before this trade and I know Gonchar is not as good as he used to be, but their d-core now looks like.
Goligoski, Daley, Dillon, Oleksiak, Nemeth, Benn, Connauton, Klingberg.
|
|
|
11-11-2014, 05:29 PM
|
#30
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dagger
If we clear 4.6m off of their cap, Montreal has a lot of flexibility to go out and improve their roster this year either via a rental or longer term instantly. That's worth something. Montrael fans are convinced they're going to pursue an upper class RW so having that flexibility is key.
|
Why would Montreal give up assets to aquire a player and then give up more assets to get rid of that player?
|
|
|
11-11-2014, 06:24 PM
|
#31
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DOOM
I wasn't a fan of the Stars d-core before this trade and I know Gonchar is not as good as he used to be, but their d-core now looks like.
Goligoski, Daley, Dillon, Oleksiak, Nemeth, Benn, Connauton, Klingberg.
|
That list looks better without Gonchar in it.
|
|
|
11-11-2014, 06:27 PM
|
#32
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by waner
That list looks better without Gonchar in it.
|
I still think its better with him in there, but either way its not a d-core that I see bringing the Stars far.
|
|
|
11-11-2014, 06:30 PM
|
#33
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DOOM
I still think its better with him in there, but either way its not a d-core that I see bringing the Stars far.
|
I didn't see a ton of Stars games last year but when I did he looked awful and he doesn't really bring the offense to make up for his lack of a defensive game. But maybe I caught him in all his bad games.
|
|
|
11-11-2014, 06:35 PM
|
#34
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: A small painted room
|
Loved watching gonchar in his heyday. Maybe he'll find a second gear in Montreal. Worth a shot imo
|
|
|
11-11-2014, 08:25 PM
|
#35
|
Franchise Player
|
Any history with Markov and Gonchar pairing together at international events?
__________________
"OOOOOOHHHHHHH those Russians" - Boney M
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:41 PM.
|
|