10-06-2014, 10:01 AM
|
#21
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
Same scenario as Subban. When is he going to be a UFA again?
|
As Diane put it, this gives RJ a great amount of leverage in his next deal.
Sign him long term to big value, or he walks in a year.
|
|
|
10-06-2014, 10:24 AM
|
#22
|
Franchise Player
|
If Johansen is as good as he thinks he is, the Jackets will be happy to sign him for $6+ in 3 years.
If he turns out to be a one-hit wonder, they let him go UFA.
Meanwhile, they have him for 3 years at a bridge-type price.
I fail to see how it's a bad move for the Jackets. Seems like everyone got kind of what they wanted here.
|
|
|
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-06-2014, 10:27 AM
|
#23
|
In the Sin Bin
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx
As Diane put it, this gives RJ a great amount of leverage in his next deal.
Sign him long term to big value, or he walks in a year.
|
If he's worth it then, he'll get it. If not, he'll be traded. The risk to the Jackets simply isn't that high.
|
|
|
10-06-2014, 10:35 AM
|
#24
|
I believe in the Jays.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by codynw
Which side caved?
|
They both did.
The CBJ get the price point they wanted on the first two years and Johansen got the big money final year to set the high minimum value on his next contract that he wanted.
|
|
|
10-06-2014, 10:44 AM
|
#25
|
Franchise Player
|
Funny how fans have slung a lot of mud at Johansen and his agent, but Doughty pulled the same tactic and people don't seem to regard him as an entitled jerk.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
|
|
|
10-06-2014, 10:49 AM
|
#26
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher
Funny how fans have slung a lot of mud at Johansen and his agent, but Doughty pulled the same tactic and people don't seem to regard him as an entitled jerk.
|
Doughty had more than one good season.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
|
|
|
|
10-06-2014, 10:56 AM
|
#27
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA/Scottsdale, AZ
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher
Funny how fans have slung a lot of mud at Johansen and his agent, but Doughty pulled the same tactic and people don't seem to regard him as an entitled jerk.
|
Doughty is #1 D-man on 27/30 NHL teams.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to DoubleK For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-06-2014, 11:09 AM
|
#28
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BACKCHECK!!!
This means his minimum qualifying offer is 6-point-something if the Jackets want to retain his rights after this contract, correct?
So he either gets a $6+m follow-on contract, or becomes a UFA when this deal expires?
(Edited: I see we were all thinking the same thing)
|
QO is at $6M. Not $6M+. They got rid of the 10% raise in the 2005 CBA above a certain threshold. Johanson will be well above that threshold.
|
|
|
10-06-2014, 11:23 AM
|
#29
|
Franchise Player
|
I think the point was that any contract forthcoming at that time will be greater than $6m
|
|
|
10-06-2014, 11:50 AM
|
#30
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
A solid win for the Johansen camp.
|
|
|
10-06-2014, 12:46 PM
|
#31
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
If Johansen is as good as he thinks he is, the Jackets will be happy to sign him for $6+ in 3 years.
If he turns out to be a one-hit wonder, they let him go UFA.
Meanwhile, they have him for 3 years at a bridge-type price.
I fail to see how it's a bad move for the Jackets. Seems like everyone got kind of what they wanted here.
|
Unless, he is really bad, I can't see them not qualifying him after three years.
They can also take him to arbitration and potentially get a 15% paycut ($5.1M)
|
|
|
10-06-2014, 01:35 PM
|
#32
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK
Doughty is #1 D-man on 27/30 NHL teams.
|
Was he three years ago?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.
|
|
|
|
10-06-2014, 01:39 PM
|
#33
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
For everyone at the hockey draft:
Ffffffffuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu................
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|
|
|
10-06-2014, 01:39 PM
|
#34
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher
Was he three years ago?
|
Yes. He was on TC’s Olympic Team in 2010 and was the best defenseman there outside of maybe Keith.
__________________
"If the oceans was whiskey and I was a duck, I'd swim to the bottom and never come up, but the oceans ain't whiskey, and I ain't no duck, so I'll play the Jack of Diamonds and toast to my luck..."
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Jables16 For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-06-2014, 02:03 PM
|
#35
|
Our Jessica Fletcher
|
Doughty was, IMO, Canada's top dman on the 2010 Olympic Gold Medal winning team.
Last edited by The Fonz; 10-06-2014 at 02:05 PM.
|
|
|
10-06-2014, 02:04 PM
|
#36
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher
Was he three years ago?
|
Absolutely. Doughty was a Norris finalist in his 2nd NHL season.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
|
|
|
|
10-06-2014, 02:20 PM
|
#37
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CliffFletcher
Was he three years ago?
|
When he was a rookie, I remember thinking - and saying a lot - that he was the best 18 year old defenseman I had seen since Bobby Orr
|
|
|
10-06-2014, 06:39 PM
|
#38
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
If Johansen is as good as he thinks he is, the Jackets will be happy to sign him for $6+ in 3 years.
If he turns out to be a one-hit wonder, they let him go UFA.
Meanwhile, they have him for 3 years at a bridge-type price.
I fail to see how it's a bad move for the Jackets. Seems like everyone got kind of what they wanted here.
|
if Johansen wants he can get a 1 year deal at that point and be a UFA at 25, there would be nothing the Jackets could do about it
they lost any type of leverage they had, unless he's a one hit wonder, which they obviously aren't hoping for
my guess is he gets traded before he signs another deal with columbus
|
|
|
10-06-2014, 07:05 PM
|
#39
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by diane_phaneuf
if Johansen wants he can get a 1 year deal at that point and be a UFA at 25, there would be nothing the Jackets could do about it
they lost any type of leverage they had, unless he's a one hit wonder, which they obviously aren't hoping for
my guess is he gets traded before he signs another deal with columbus
|
every player can go UFA after 7 years if they so choose. All he has done is not give up any UFA years yet, which is just another way of saying bridge contract.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:03 AM.
|
|