Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 08-01-2014, 08:58 AM   #21
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
My guess is Subban gets the $ but not the term. 8m x 3-5 years.
The arbitrator cannot hand out anything longer than a two-year contract. And since I think even that is the team's choice, and Montreal has asked for a one-year deal (so he's still RFA when it expires), that is what it will be.

A one-year, $8 million deal is a big win for Subban, as it starts next year's negotiation right in the range he wants.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2014, 08:58 AM   #22
Parallex
I believe in the Jays.
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
My guess is Subban gets the $ but not the term. 8m x 3-5 years.
Not in arbitration... team elected arbitration awards are for one or two years (and the Habs elected for one year).
Parallex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2014, 09:04 AM   #23
ForeverFlameFan
Franchise Player
 
ForeverFlameFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NC
Exp:
Default

Forgot about that. Thanks guys.

Yes, 8m for one year wouldn't be a bad deal. Anything under that the Habs win.
ForeverFlameFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2014, 09:12 AM   #24
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ForeverFlameFan View Post
Forgot about that. Thanks guys.

Yes, 8m for one year wouldn't be a bad deal. Anything under that the Habs win.
May win the battle, but not the war.
Yoho is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Yoho For This Useful Post:
Old 08-01-2014, 09:33 AM   #25
Finger Cookin
Franchise Player
 
Finger Cookin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Exp:
Default

Nice story on The Score's website about 3 past arbitration hearings.

http://www.thescore.com/nhl/news/547156
Finger Cookin is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Finger Cookin For This Useful Post:
Old 08-01-2014, 09:34 AM   #26
Tron_fdc
In Your MCP
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Watching Hot Dog Hans
Exp:
Default

Is he open to offer sheets if he signs a 1 or 2 year deal and then goes to RFA?
Tron_fdc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2014, 09:36 AM   #27
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

^
The Canadiens should not have to endure criticism for their instance on a bridge deal. Subban had simply not accomplished enough at the time for justifying the inherent risk; it was the responsible thing to do.

Of course this looks bad in hindsight, and I think the Canadiens have erred in trying to get him at such a bargain. But there is a sea of very good top-four defensemen who looked like Subban did in 2011–12, but never managed to take the next step.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Old 08-01-2014, 09:40 AM   #28
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
The 16 defencemen chosen before PK in the 2007 draft:

Thomas Hickey
Karl Alzner
Keaton Ellerby
Ryan McDonagh
Kevin Shattenkirk
Alex Plante
Ian Cole
Jonathon Blum
Brendan Smith
Nick Petrecki
Nick Ross
T.J. Brennan
Taylor Ellington
Josh Godfrey
Tommy Cross
Kevin Marshall

Every single one of them is taller than PK except Shattenkirk (the next best defencemen) and Hickey (who is the same height). Big = Good
That's your conclusion? Good lord. Your anti-obsession with size is pretty silly. Here are the defensemen drafted before Shea Weber:

Suter
Coburn
Phaneuf
Seabrook
Burns
Stuart
Belle
Richmond
Egener
Klein
Ramholt
Smaby
Carle

10 of the 13 are smaller than Weber. If teams were in fact blindly drafting size over talent, wouldn't that apply here too? Why did they draft smaller defensemen before Weber?

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
Ya, I couldn't remember where he was drafted, then was shocked to see so many defencemen drafted before him. Wonder what it was that so many teams missed. Not sure if it was the eternal quest to find another Chris Pronger. But it is weird that the best defencemen out to the top 16 were the two shortest guys.
They didn't 'miss' anything. Some guys develop more (and less) than expected. The draft is not an exact science, and defensemen are even more unpredictable. Subban was the 17th Dman taken. Weber was the 14th. Duncan Keith as 16th. And there are other examples.

The more sensible conclusion here, IMO, is that there is an element of uncertainty in drafting defensemen - a very large one.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 08-01-2014, 09:47 AM   #29
FlamesAddiction
Franchise Player
 
FlamesAddiction's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
Exp:
Default

Correct me if I am wrong, but for some reason I recall Subban was player that fell in the draft, but he was in fact ranked quite high by a lot of sources. There were questions over his attitude and dedication at the time (but I think it is fair to say that he matured quite nicely as a professional).
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
FlamesAddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2014, 09:48 AM   #30
Major Major
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

criticism for the bridge deal, no. But a realization that if you set the precedent for paying a player what he's worth, then you need to pay the player what he's worth. The fact this is going to arb is a huge botch. under the current cap climate, subban is worth 9m/8. Why you'd risk losing this guy for nothing is beyond me.
Major Major is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Major Major For This Useful Post:
Old 08-01-2014, 09:50 AM   #31
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
...10 of the 13 are smaller than Weber. If teams were in fact blindly drafting size over talent, wouldn't that apply here too? Why did they draft smaller defensemen before Weber?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to recall that Weber was MUCH smaller in his draft year, and that this was the reason why he did not go until the second round. Didn't he have a huge growth spurt the year or two after he was drafted?
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2014, 09:57 AM   #32
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to recall that Weber was MUCH smaller in his draft year, and that this was the reason why he did not go until the second round. Didn't he have a huge growth spurt the year or two after he was drafted?
Don't know when he 'grew' but I do remember he was very big at the WJCs
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2014, 09:57 AM   #33
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nehkara View Post
But Montreal is still going to go into that room and tell PK all of the reasons that they think he's awful.

Arbitration destroys player/team relationships.

I think PK is a free agent in 2016.
Not necessarily. The Predators did not attempt to cut Shea Weber down in their arbitration hearing specifically because they did want to keep him long term. Of course, the result was an NHL record award, so YMMV.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2014, 10:07 AM   #34
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Don't know when he 'grew' but I do remember he was very big at the WJCs
Yes, it turns out that I am wrong. It serves me right for foolishly trusting the internet.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2014, 10:14 AM   #35
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Major View Post
criticism for the bridge deal, no. But a realization that if you set the precedent for paying a player what he's worth, then you need to pay the player what he's worth. The fact this is going to arb is a huge botch. under the current cap climate, subban is worth 9m/8. Why you'd risk losing this guy for nothing is beyond me.
They're not really risking anything.

After the arbitrator rules, they'll have him under contract for next season. After next season, if they don't get him re-signed long-term, he'll still be an RFA. He can accept an offer sheet, but the Habs will likely match any offer sheet, so it's not really a huge concern for them.

The only potential concern is if Subban decides he has been mistreated by the Habs and elects to sign a one-year deal next year and go to UFA in 2016. Even if that happens, they have him for two more seasons and will be able to move him for a big return at the deadline in 2016.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2014, 10:15 AM   #36
AcGold
Self-Suspension
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Exp:
Default

You might something something???
AcGold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2014, 10:24 AM   #37
codynw
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
Oh please, I was just pointing something I noticed out for this particular draft. Wondering aloud if that was one possible reason.
Obsession, WTF are you talking about? If there are two players with equal skill of differing size, you take the bigger one 10 times out of 10.

Just wondering if the natural tendency of the eye to be drawn to the bigger opposing person has an impact, not making any conclusions. I do it, at the prospect camp I couldn't take my eyes off of Hunter Smith and Keegan Kanzig, people who are 6' blend in.

Was just looking for a trend.

Just interesting that exactly 6 foot. Giant top notch defence are almost as rare as 5'10".

Ray Bourque 6'00
Paul Coffey 6'00
Phil Housley 5'10
Denis Potvin 6'00
Bobby Orr 6'00
Scott Stevens 6'00
Brad Park 6'00
Gary Suter 6'00
Steve Duchesne 5'11
Mathieu Schneider 5'11
Mark Howe 5'11
Scott Niedermayer 6'00
Drew Doughty 6'00
Erik Karlsson 6'00
Mark Giordano 6'00

Sure there is Weber and Chara and Pronger

I'm not saying take the shorter guy, that would be ######ed.
jerk
Cool, you named a bunch of good defenceman that were/are average sized but only named a couple big ones. That should help get your point across.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by CroFlames View Post
Before you call me a pessimist or a downer, the Flames made me this way. Blame them.
codynw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2014, 10:26 AM   #38
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

what a gongshow this will be if they only do a 1 year deal out of this arbitration and then subban walks next summer.

habs better be careful on how they're handling their best player outside of carey price.
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2014, 10:28 AM   #39
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bubbsy View Post
what a gongshow this will be if they only do a 1 year deal out of this arbitration and then subban walks next summer.

habs better be careful on how they're handling their best player outside of carey price.
He can't walk next summer. He can either re-sign with the Habs or sign an offer sheet that the Habs will match.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2014, 10:36 AM   #40
bubbsy
Franchise Player
 
bubbsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by getbak View Post
He can't walk next summer. He can either re-sign with the Habs or sign an offer sheet that the Habs will match.
right sorry, 2 years from now when he's a UFA, forgot about that. gongshow regardles should all this push subban to want to test free agency when he qualifies..
bubbsy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:25 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy